Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T11:09:58.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sympatric speciation driving evolution of Late Ordovician brachiopod Zygospira in eastern North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2023

Colin D. Sproat*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. ,
Jessica S.A. McLeod
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. ,
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

The morphology of Zygospira, an early atrypide brachiopod, was analyzed using a multivariate approach. Principal component analysis and discriminant analysis clearly differentiated species as they are currently defined primarily based on differences in shell size and ornamentation but not in terms of overall shell shape. The older Zygospira modesta was able to persist into the late Katian (Richmondian) while smaller early species in other brachiopod lineages mostly went extinct. This may have been possible through niche partitioning because the smaller shells have been found attached to other filter feeders and no larger species have been found in these associations so far. This could represent a rare example of sympatric speciation preserved in the fossil record. In the future, detailed study of the spiralia and their associated structures may provide clues as to the ultimate evolutionary affinities of this group in relation to the other atrypide brachiopods evolving at this time.

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. (1) Stratigraphic range of Zygospira and closely related genera Anazyga and Zygatrypa (left). (2) Maps showing the range of Zygospira in eastern North America in the middle (top) to late Katian (bottom). Note that this does not include the numerous species now classified under other atrypide genera or suspected to belong to Anazyga (see Systematic Paleontology). Colors: black = Z. modesta; green = Z. kentuckiensis; blue = Z. cincinnatiensis; red = Z. resupinata and subspecies.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Measurements of Zygospira species in this study. L = length (equivalent to length of ventral valve); Ld = length of dorsal valve; W = width; T = thickness (depth) of specimens; Td = thickness of dorsal valve; Tv = thickness of ventral valve; Ts = depth of the sulcus at the anterior commissure; Aa = apical angle (angle formed by the ventral umbo as it projects across the hinge line). Number of ribs on the ventral valve also was counted.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Zygospira modesta attached to bryozoans from Tanner's Creek Formation in Indiana. (1) PE 16630, dense cluster of Zygospira modesta from near Brookville; (2, 3) FM PE16583 Zygospira modesta preserved attached to bryozoan; (4–6) FM PE16631 Zygospira modesta attached to Spatiopora corticans (Nicholson, 1874) from near Clifton; (5) and (6) magnified views of (4) in blue and green, respectively. Scale bars for (1–4) = 1 cm; (5, 6) = 1 mm.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (1–10) Zygospira modesta types from the Hudson River Group (Katian) near Cincinnati, Ohio. (1–5) Lectotype AMNH 29835, dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, and posterior views; (6–10) paratype AMNH 29836, dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, and posterior views. Scale bars = 5 mm. This is part of Hall's type collection at the AMNH along with several unfigured paratypes in the collection (labeled AMNH 1356d–o).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Tracings of serial sections of a Zygospira modesta shell from the Grant Lake Formation near Sharonville in the region around Cincinnati, Ohio (CMC IP96903). Numbers represent distance from posterior of ventral umbo in mm at which the section was ground. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Bivariate plots of length vs. width and thickness vs. width for measured Zygospira modesta specimens. Black = middle Katian (Maysvillian) specimens (n = 92); blue = late Katian (Richmondian) specimens (n = 50); circles indicate length vs. width; plus signs represent thickness vs. width. The r2 values shown (red lines) represent values for combined ages; r2 values for individual datasets are as follows: length/width Maysvillian = 0.85759; thickness/width Maysvillian = 0.70637; length/width Richmondian = 0.82215; thickness/ width Richmondian = 0.75109.

Figure 6

Table 1. Summary statistics for Zygospira modesta specimens measured for this study (n = 92). L = length; W = width; T = thickness (depth); Ad = deflection at anterior of the commissure (all in mm); Aa = apical angle in degrees; R = number of ribs counted on the ventral valve; L/W = length/width ratio; T/W = thickness/width ratio.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Zygospira cincinnatiensis types from the Fairmount Beds (Cincinnatian = Katian) near Cincinnati, Ohio. (1–5) Lectoype FM UC16-a: dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views; (6–10) figured paratype FM UC164-b: dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views. Zygospira cincinnatiensis from the Hudson River Group near Cincinnati, Ohio (from Hall's type collection for Atrypa modesta). (11–15) AMNH 29837, dorsal, ventral, anterior, posterior, and lateral views. Scale bars = 5 mm.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Bivariate plots of length vs. width and thickness vs. width for measured Zygospira cincinnatiensis specimens. Circles indicate length vs. width; plus signs represent thickness vs. width.

Figure 9

Table 2. Summary statistics for Zygospira cincinnatiensis specimens measured for this study (n = 32). L = length; W = width; T = thickness (depth); Ad = deflection at anterior of the commissure (all in mm); Aa = apical angle in degrees; R = number of ribs counted on the ventral valve; L/W = length/ width ratio; T/W = thickness/width ratio.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Zygospira kentuckiensis. (1–10) Types from Cincinnatian (= Katian) of Jefferson County, 18 miles east of Louisville, Kentucky; (1–5) neotype FM UC96-a dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views; (6–10) figured paratype FM UC96-b, dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views; (11–15) illustrated plesiotype FM UC 12390 in Hall and Clarke (1894) from Cincinnatian (=Katian) of Oldham County, Kentucky, dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views. Scale bars = 5 mm.

Figure 11

Figure 10. (1–10) Zygospira kentuckiensis from the Queenston Shale (late Katian) at Big Bay near Owen Sound, Ontario. (1–5) ROMIP 66852 dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views; (6–10) ROMIP 66853 dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views. (11–15) Zygospira kentuckiensis meafordensis from the Queenston Shale near Meaford, Ontario (GSC 8514); (11) small slab with several shells on surface; (12) dorsal valve attached to piece of rock; (13) exterior of isolated dorsal valve attached to slab in (11); (14) interior of dorsal valve attached to slab in (11); (15) magnified view of (14). Scale bars = 5 mm (1–14); = 1 mm (15).

Figure 12

Figure 11. Tracings of serial sections of Zygospira kentuckiensis from the Queenston Formation at Big Bay near Owen Sound, Ontario (ROMIP 66854). Numbers represent distance from posterior of ventral umbo in mm at which the section was ground. Figure represents two sectioned shells to show the complete internal morphology of species (above and below line). Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 13

Table 3. Summary statistics for Zygospira kentuckiensis specimens measured for this study (n = 110). L = length; W = width; T = thickness (depth); Ad = deflection at anterior of the commissure (all in mm); Aa = apical angle in degrees; R = number of ribs counted on the ventral valve; L/W = length/ width ratio; T/W = thickness/width ratio.

Figure 14

Figure 12. Bivariate plots of length vs. width and thickness vs. width for measure Zygospira kentuckiensis specimens. Circles indicate length vs. width; plus signs represent thickness vs. width.

Figure 15

Figure 13. (1–10) Zygospira resupinata types from Brainard Shale, Maquoketa Formation in Jackson County, Iowa. (1–5) Holotype SUI 1874, dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views; (6–10) paratype SUI 1873, dorsal, ventral, lateral, anterior, posterior views. Scale bars = 5 mm.

Figure 16

Table 4. Measurements of Zygospira resupinata types. L = length; W = width; T = thickness (depth); Ad = deflection at anterior of the commissure (all in mm); Aa = apical angle in degrees; R = number of ribs counted on the ventral valve; L/W = length/ width ratio; T/W = thickness/width ratio.

Figure 17

Figure 14. Principal component analysis (PCA) scattergram showing PC1 plotted against PC2. Loadings for PC1 (bottom left) and PC2 (bottom center) shown along with scree plot (bottom right). Blue = Z. modesta from localities near Cincinnati, Ohio (dots = specimens from the middle Katian, plus signs = specimens from upper Katian); green = Z. kentuckiensis (dots = specimens from the Cincinnati region, plus signs = specimens from Ontario); black = Z. cincinnatiensis from area near Cincinnati; red = Z. resupinata types from upper Katian of Iowa; gray = Z. concentrica from area near Cincinnati.

Figure 18

Figure 15. Principal component analysis (PCA) scattergram showing PC2 plotted against PC3. Loadings for PC2 (bottom left) and PC3 (bottom center) shown along with scree plot (bottom right). Blue = Z. modesta from localities near Cincinnati, Ohio (dots = specimens from the middle Katian, plus signs = specimens from upper Katian); green = Z. kentuckiensis (dots = specimens from the Cincinnati region, plus signs = specimens from Ontario); black = Z. cincinnatiensis from area near Cincinnati; red = Z. resupinata types from upper Katian of Iowa; gray = Z. concentrica from area near Cincinnati.

Figure 19

Figure 16. Discriminant analysis (DA) scattergram showing the morphological difference between all species (top) and all species excluding Z. concentrica (bottom). Blue = Z. modesta from localities near Cincinnati, Ohio (dots = specimens from the middle Katian, plus signs = specimens from upper Katian); green = Z. kentuckiensis (dots = specimens from the Cincinnati region, plus signs = specimens from Ontario); black = Z. cincinnatiensis from area near Cincinnati; red = Z. resupinata types from upper Katian of Iowa; gray = Z. concentrica from area near Cincinnati.

Figure 20

Table 5. Confusion matrix for Zygospira species in Figure 15 (top). Rows are given groups while columns are predicted groups. Note that 93.4% of specimens were correctly identified.

Figure 21

Table 6. Confusion matrix for Zygospira species in Figure 15 without Z. concentrica (bottom). Rows are given groups while columns are predicted groups. Note that 93.31% of specimens were correctly identified.

Figure 22

Figure 17. Allopatric and sympatric speciation. Species represented by different background colors (gray = Z. modesta; blue = Z. cincinnatiensis; green = Z. kentuckiensis). The late Katian species of Zygospira in eastern North America likely arose through sympatric speciation, although it isn't yet clear from which lineage Z. resupinata in the interior of North America arose.