Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-jhrpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T14:33:45.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 Archaeological fieldwork and research in Roman Macedonia: 2014–2024

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2025

Abstract

Over the past decade, archaeological research in Roman-period Macedonia has seen significant advances, driven by the emergence of Roman archaeology as a distinct discipline focused on spatial organization, identity, and provincial dynamics within the Mediterranean context. Large-scale infrastructure projects, such as Thessaloniki’s Metro and the Trans Adriatic Pipeline, have provided unprecedented opportunities to investigate both urban and rural landscapes, revealing dense settlement patterns, economic networks, and cultural continuity from the Hellenistic to the Late Antiquity periods.

Urban excavations in key Macedonian sites such as Thessaloniki, Dion, Philippi, Edessa, and Amphipolis have refined our understanding of urban development, architectural sophistication, and resilience amid political and natural challenges. The Thessaloniki Metro project stands out for uncovering well-preserved urban grids, monumental public architecture, and diverse burial grounds, highlighting the city’s evolution and enduring cultural vitality. Similarly, discoveries of elite residences, public buildings, and monumental statues across Macedonia reveal the complexity and transformation of provincial urban centres. In parallel, public work-facilitated archaeological investigations have exposed a vibrant countryside marked by small cemeteries, artisanal workshops, agricultural estates, and infrastructure such as roads and bridges. These findings challenge traditional villa-centric models, emphasizing continuous rural habitation, intensified agricultural activity, and sophisticated land management strategies. Interdisciplinary approaches, including geoarchaeology and bioarchaeology, further illuminate the socio-economic networks and daily lives of rural communities. Despite challenges such as economic constraints and publication delays, recent archaeological efforts have fostered a holistic understanding of Macedonian antiquity, integrating technological innovation and collaborative methodologies. The cumulative research underscores the resilience and adaptability of both urban and rural populations, revealing a complex, interconnected landscape that reshaped our perceptions of ancient life in this key Roman province.

Information

Type
Archaeology in Greece 2024–2025
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies and The British School at Athens
Figure 0

Map 5.1. 1. Kleitos; 2. Theodosia; 3. Isoma; 4. Nea Mesimvria; 5. Drymos; 6. Lipochori; 7. Peristerias; 8. Vasileiada; 9. Platamonas Goritsa; 10. Philippi (vicus); 11. Kalamonas; 12. Koronouda, Kilkis; 13. Nea Zichni; 14. Karteres; 15. Symvoli, Serres; 16. Assiros; 17. Thassos; 18. Petres; 19. Longos, Edessa; 20. Morrylos; 21. Europos; 22. Nea Santa; 23. Vergina (Aigai); 24. Dion; 25. Philippi (city); 26. Thessaloniki; 27. Amphipolis; 28. Terpni; 29. Villa Alexandros, Amyntaion; 30. Argos Orestikon; 31. Paralimni; 32. Antigonos; 33. Philotas; 34. Pyrgoi Omaloi; 35. Ilarion dam; 36. Velventos; 37. Agios Georgios; 38. Pontokomi-Vrysi; 39. Nea Kerdylia Strovolos.

Figure 1

Fig. 5.1. The Late Roman house of Zosas at Dion. © Pingiatoglou et al.2016: 164.

Figure 2

Fig. 5.2. The Ereipionas sector at Dion.©

Figure 3

Fig. 5.3. The reassembled statue of Hercules at Philippi. © University Excavation of Philippi / Hellenic Ministry of Culture.

Figure 4

Fig. 5.4. Venizelou Station. Ground plan of the archaeological site. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Thessaloniki City.

Figure 5

Fig. 5.5. Syntrivani Station. Eastern cemetery. Acheilara 2015. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Thessaloniki City.

Figure 6

Fig. 5.6. Cuirassed statue Amphipolis. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Serres.

Figure 7

Fig. 5.7. The EC basilica at Terpni, Serres. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Serres.

Figure 8

Fig. 5.8. Mosaic detail from Villa Alexandros, Amyntaion. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Florina.

Figure 9

Fig. 5.9. Ballon photo of the building – assembly hall at Argos Orestikon. © Dimitris Damaskos, University of Patras.

Figure 10

Fig. 5.10. Photo of the Roman cemetery at Theodosia Kilkis. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Kilkis.

Figure 11

Fig. 5.11. Coin hoard from the same cemetery. Bronze coins hoard. The horn cap of the leather pouch has survived, in Skartsis 2021: 153, fig. 10–11. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Kilkis.

Figure 12

Fig. 5.12. Silver spoon, pendants, and ring from the Roman cemetery at Isoma, Kilkis, © Ephorate of Antiquities of Kilkis.

Figure 13

Fig. 5.13. Triple burial in the cemetery of Nea Mesimvria. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Thessaloniki region.

Figure 14

Fig. 5.14. Grave finds from the LR cemetery at Drymos. Thessaloniki. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Thessaloniki Region.

Figure 15

Fig. 5.15. Aerial view of rural building I at Philippi. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Kavala.

Figure 16

Fig. 5.16. Kalamonas, Hellenistic workshop. Stone bench. © Ephorate of Antiquities of Drama.

Figure 17

Fig. 5.17. Paralimni GIannitsa. Late Roman road. Layer of fallen blocks from the Late Roman bridge. © The credits on the depicted monument belongs to the Ministry of Culture (Ν. 4858/2021). Ephorate of Antiquities of Pella-Hellenic Ministry of Culture | Hellenic Organization of Cultural Resources Development.