Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T01:18:05.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stylistic variation among mobile speakers: Using old and new regional variables to construct complex place identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

Jennifer Nycz
Jennifer Nycz*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines stylistic variation in the (oh), (o), (aw), and (ay) classes among native speakers of Canadian English living in or just outside either New York City or Washington, DC. Speakers show evidence of change toward US norms for all four vowels, though only (aw) shows consistent style shifting: prevoiceless (aw) is realized with higher nuclei when speakers express ambivalence about or distance from the United States, and lower nuclei when closeness to or positive affect about the United States is being conveyed. Canadians in New York also show topic- and stance-based shift in (oh): (oh)s are higher when expressing positive affect or closeness to New York City and lower when expressing negative affect or distance. These results suggest that mobile speakers continue to exploit the socioindexical links in their native dialect while learning and using new links in their adopted dialect—but only if those links are socially salient.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , July 2018 , pp. 175 - 202
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this work were presented at Dartmouth College (October 27, 2016) and at the Georgetown University Roundtable in Linguistics (March 11, 2017). I am grateful for encouraging and helpful feedback from both audiences and for the comments of two anonymous reviewers.

References

REFERENCES

Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, & Walker, Steve. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara. (2009). /r/ and the construction of place identity on New York City's Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:634–658.Google Scholar
Becker, Kara. (2014). The social motivations of reversal: Raised bought in New York City English. Language in Society 43(4):395–420.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.Google Scholar
Blom, Jan-Petter, & Gumperz, John J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. (2008). Regional phonetic differentiation in Standard Canadian English. Journal of English Linguistics 36:129–154.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.36. Available at: http://www.praat.org. Accessed November 11, 2017.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. (2015). Exploring linguistic malleability across the life span: Age-specific patterns in quotative use. Language in Society 44:457–496.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. (1980). Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9:1–12.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2004). Variation and a sense of place. In Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 107–118.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–476.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87–100.Google Scholar
ELAN. (2017). ELAN [Computer software]. Version 4.94. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Available at: https://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/. Accessed December 19, 2017.Google Scholar
Evans, Bronwen G., & Iverson, Paul. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121:3814–3826.Google Scholar
Hagiwara, Robert. (2006). Vowel production in Winnepeg. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51:127–141.Google Scholar
Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, SallyAnne, & Watson, Catherine. (2000). Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30:63–78.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. (2001). An introductory investigation into bidialectalism. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7(3):85–100.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Nolan, Aaron, & Drager, Katie. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. Linguistic Review 23(3):351–379.Google Scholar
Hindle, Donald M. (1979). The social and situational conditioning of phonetic variation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. New York: Penguin. 269–293.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34:485–499.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. (2004). Place, globalization, and linguistic variation. In Fought, C. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 65–83.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, & Kiesling, Scott F. (2008). Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/ monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:5–33.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin. (1942). A phonological dilemma in Canadian English. Language 18:141–144.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. (1998). Men's identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case of fraternity men. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2:69–99.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. (2011). Stance in context: Affect, alignment, and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Paper presented at the iMean 2 conference, The University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, April.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F., Onuffer, Spencer, & Hardware, Alexander. (2012). Operationalizing stance as an independent variable. Poster presented at NWAV 41, Indiana University, Bloomington, October 25–28.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273–309.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change: A multimedia reference tool. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lawson, Robert. (2011). Patterns of linguistic variation among Glaswegian adolescent males. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15:226–255.Google Scholar
Lee, Sinae. (2016). Phonetic variation in Washington, D.C.: Race, neighborhood, and gender. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. (2006). “Where are you from?”: Identifying place. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:320–343.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi. (2001). “Live free or die” as a linguistic principle. American Speech 76(1):30–41.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer. (2011). Second dialect acquisition: Implications for theories of phonological representation. Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer. (2013). Changing words or changing rules? Second dialect acquisition and phonological representation. Journal of Pragmatics 52:49–62.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer. (2016). Awareness and acquisition of new dialect features. In Babel, A. (ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 62–79.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer, & Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2014). Best practices in measuring vowel merger. Proceedings of the Meetings on Acoustics 20(1):060008.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2006). Phonetic detail in sociolinguistic variation: Its linguistic significance and role in the construction of social meaning. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2011). The California vowel shift and gay identity. American Speech 86(1):32–51.Google Scholar
Rickford, John R., & McNair-Knox, Faye. (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 235–276.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid. (2011). A short introduction to transcribing with ELAN. Available at: http://fave.ling.upenn.edu. Accessed December 2017.Google Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Josef, Evanini, Keelan, & Yuan, Jiahong. (2011). FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction). Available at: http://fave.ling.upenn.edu. Accessed December 2017.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian, & Blondeau, Helene. (2007). Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83:560–588.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (2004). Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8:163–195.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1972). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–196.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, Janneke. (2017). The systematicity of style: Investigating the full range of variation everyday speech. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans. (2012). Age grading in sociolinguistic theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 6:371–382.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic, Llamas, Carmen, Docherty, Gerard J., Hall, Damien, & Nycz, Jennifer. (2014). Language and identity on the Scottish/English border. In Watt, D. & Llamas, C. (eds.), Language, borders and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 8–26.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing. (2008). Rhotacization and the “Beijing smooth operator”: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:201–222.Google Scholar