Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T12:43:52.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cyclic patterns in the central European tick-borne encephalitis incidence series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2016

P. ZEMAN*
Affiliation:
Medical Laboratories, Prague, Czech Republic
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is peculiar due to its unstable dynamics with profound inter-annual fluctuations in case numbers – a phenomenon not well understood to date. Possible reasons – apart from variable human contact with TBE foci – include external factors, e.g. climatic forcing, autonomous oscillations of the disease system itself, or a combined action of both. Spectral analysis of TBE data from six regions of central Europe (CE) revealed that the ostensibly chaotic dynamics can be explained in terms of four superposed (quasi-)periodical oscillations: a quasi-biennial, triennial, pentennial, and a decadal cycle. These oscillations exhibit a high degree of regularity and synchrony across CE. Nevertheless, some amplitude and phase variations are responsible for regional differences in incidence patterns. In addition, periodic changes occur in the degree of synchrony in the regions: marked in-phase periods alternate with rather off-phase periods. Such a feature in the disease dynamics implies that it arises as basically diverging self-oscillations of local disease systems which, at intervals, receive synchronizing impulses, such as periodic variations in food availability for key hosts driven by external factors. This makes the disease dynamics synchronized over a large area during peaks in the synchronization signal, shifting to asynchrony in the time in between.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Tick-borne encephalitis dynamics in the Czech Republic: (a) raw incidence series with the trend superimposed; (b) de-trended and standardized series; (c) continuous wavelet (CW) spectrum showing the time evolution of different periodicities whose amplitude is grey-tone coded [see the top right scale bar; note that the amplitudes within a year ‘sum’ to (b)], the white dashed line delimits the ‘cone of influence’ – a sector within which the spectrogram is free of edge effects; (d) power spectrum of the de-trended series with the respective (left to right) 80%, 90%, and 95% confidence limits (based on 1000 Monte Carlo simulations of H0). Note that the diagram shows four dominant periodicities – of ~2·5, 3, 5, and 10 years – with at least 80% confidence levels; to focus the eye, they are traced across the CW spectrum by horizontal lines.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Tick-borne encephalitis dynamics in Austria. Details as in Figure 1 legend.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Tick-borne encephalitis dynamics in Slovenia. Details as in Figure 1 legend.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Tick-borne encephalitis dynamics in Bavaria. Details as in Figure 1 legend.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Tick-borne encephalitis dynamics in Baden-Württemberg. Details as in Figure 1 legend.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Tick-borne encephalitis dynamics in Switzerland. Details as in Figure 1 legend.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Autocorrelation of the six de-trended tick-borne encephalitis incidence series; 95% confidence limits of randomness are shown in grey. Note that maxima and minima of the disease incidence alternate about every 5 years (range ~4–7 years). CZ, Czech Republic; A, Austria; SL, Slovenia; BA, Bavaria: BW, Baden-Württemberg; SW, Switzerland.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Time-frequency (multivariate synchrosqueezing method) localization of the oscillations which the six regional tick-borne encephalitis incidence series exhibit in common; grey tones correspond to the degree to which the oscillations are synchronized, and the concentric lines indicate the respective (from outer to inner) 80%, 90%, and 95% levels at which randomness can be excluded (based on 100 (×6) Monte Carlo simulations of the series under H0). Note four bands – common oscillations of the wavelengths varying around 2·5, 3·2, 5·3, and 10·5 years, respectively.

Supplementary material: File

Zeman supplementary material

Figures S1-S2

Download Zeman supplementary material(File)
File 3 MB