Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-mgxrv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T05:00:21.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of the tegument of Fasciola hepatica to infection and immunization sera in vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2025

Clive E. Bennett
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Adam P.S. Bennett
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Robert E.B. Hanna
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Agrifood and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, UK
Mark W. Robinson*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
*
Corresponding author: Mark Robinson; Email: mark.robinson@qub.ac.uk

Abstract

The migratory phase is a critical time for Fasciola hepatica as it must locate, penetrate and migrate through the alimentary tract to the liver parenchyma whilst under attack from the host immune response. Here, scanning and transmission electron microscopy were used to monitor the in vitro effects of sera (with, and without, complement depletion) on F. hepatica newly excysted juveniles (NEJs) and flukes recovered at 7, 35, 70 and 98 days post infection (dpi) from the liver and bile ducts of rats. Test sera were from these F. hepatica-infected rats. A F. hepatica NEJ-specific rabbit antiserum was also used. All fluke stages demonstrated release of the tegumental glycocalyx and microvesicles and intense activity within the tegumental syncytium characterized by eccrine secretion of T-0/T-1/T-2 secretory bodies with subsequent microvillar formation and shedding of microvesicles from the apical plasma membrane. Exposure of both NEJs and 35 dpi flukes to 35 and 70 dpi rat sera produced significant amounts of eccrine-derived secretory material and putative attached immunocomplex. Rabbit anti-F. hepatica NEJ-specific antiserum produced similar responses at the NEJ tegument, including binding of putative immunocomplex to the surface, but with additional blistering of some regions of the apical plasma membrane. Our data suggest that immune sera stimulates multiple interrelated secretory mechanisms to maintain the integrity of the tegumental barrier in response to immune attack. Concurrent release of microvesicles may also serve to both divert the immune response away from the fluke itself and permit delivery of immunomodulatory cargo to immune effector cells.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of F. hepatica NEJs after treatment with (A) uninfected control rat serum and (B) F. hepatica-infected (35 dpi) rat serum for 1 h in vitro at 37°C. Os, oral sucker; Vs, ventral sucker; Ep, excretory pore; Ic, putative immunocomplex.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Transmission electron micrographs of F. hepatica NEJs exposed to (A) normal rat serum, (B) F. hepatica-infected 7 dpi rat serum, (C) heat-inactivated 7 dpi rat serum, (D and E) 35 dpi rat serum and (F) heat-inactivated 35 dpi rat serum for 1 h in vitro at 37°C. Ec, eccrine-derived material; Ic, putative immunocomplex; mi, microvillous eccrine secretion, Mu, muscle; Sp, spine; T-0, type 0 secretory granule; Ts, tegumental syncytium.

Figure 2

Table 1. Mean score of putative immunocomplex fixed in association with the tegument as viewed by SEM after exposure to medium alone or 30% serum in NCTC medium for 1 h (7 and 35 dpi rat serum compared with uninfected control rat serum)

Figure 3

Table 2. Mean score (expressed as a percentage) of tegument response and putative immunocomplexes recorded by TEM after exposure to 30% serum in NCTC medium for 1 h (7, 35, 70 and 98 dpi rat sera compared with medium alone and uninfected control rat serum)

Figure 4

Table 3. Mean score of amount of putative immunocomplex fixed in association with the tegument after exposure to 30% serum in NCTC medium for 1 h for rabbit anti-F. hepatica NEJ-specific antiserum compared with preimmune rabbit serum

Figure 5

Table 4. Mean score (expressed as a percentage) of tegument response and putative immunocomplex recorded by TEM after exposure to 30% serum in NCTC medium for 1 h (rabbit anti-F. hepatica NEJ-specific serum compared with medium alone and preimmune rabbit serum)

Figure 6

Figure 3. Transmission electron micrographs of juvenile F. hepatica recovered from rat liver and exposed to serum for 1 h in vitro at 37°C. (A) 7 dpi fluke exposed to F. hepatica-infected (35 dpi) rat serum, (B) 35 dpi fluke exposed to 35 dpi rat serum, (C) 35 dpi fluke exposed to heat-inactivated 35 dpi rat serum, (D) 35 dpi fluke exposed to 70 dpi rat serum, (E) 35 dpi fluke exposed to 98 dpi rat serum and (F) 35 dpi fluke exposed to heat-inactivated 98 dpi rat serum. Ec, eccrine-derived material; ic, putative immunocomplex; Mi, microvillar structures; Mu, muscle; Sp, spine; T-1, type 1 secretory granule; T-2, type 2 secretory granule; Ts, tegumental syncytium.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Electron micrographs of F. hepatica NEJs incubated with serum for 1 h in vitro at 37°C (A) scanning electron micrograph showing exposure to heat-inactivated F. hepatica NEJ-specific antisera. (B–D) transmission electron micrographs showing incubation with (B) normal rabbit serum, (C) F. hepatica NEJ-specific antiserum and (D) heat-inactivated F. hepatica NEJ-specific antiserum showing eccrine-derived microvesicle secretion (ec). Ic, putative immunocomplex; Mu, muscle; Sp, spine; Ts, tegumental syncytium; T-0, type 0 tegumental granule; Va, vacuolation.