Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lcgwf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T01:39:58.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Community attitudes and preferences towards woody species: implications for conservation in Nawaikoke, Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2009

John R.S. Tabuti*
Affiliation:
Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7298 Kampala.
T. Ticktin
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.
M.Z. Arinaitwe
Affiliation:
Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7298 Kampala.
V.B. Muwanika
Affiliation:
Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7298 Kampala.
*
Institute of Environment and Natural Resources, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7298 Kampala. E-mail jtabuti@muienr.mak.ac.ug
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Worldwide many important tree resources, and the livelihoods of local community members who depend on them, are threatened. Effective management of tree resources requires, among other things, knowledge of which species are preferred locally and can therefore be successfully adopted into conservation plans, as well as an understanding of local attitudes towards tree conservation. We conducted a study in Nawaikoke Sub-county of eastern Uganda to address three questions: (1) Which woody species are considered most valuable to rural communities and how do priorities vary across different sectors of the communities? (2) What are local perceptions of the status of woody species and of the main threats to their conservation? (3) What attitudes do local people hold towards conservation and what challenges do conservation initiatives face? We carried out focus group discussions with different specialist groups, key informant interviews, and semi-structured interviews with 62 households. Our results illustrate that local communities value 26 woody species highly, 15 of which are indigenous. However, priorities vary greatly across different specialist user groups. According to respondents most of the prioritized species are threatened, with the greatest threats being charcoal burning, overexploitation and expanding agriculture. Community members are actively managing and/or interested in managing those tree resources with economic value but largely ignore the greater diversity of woody species, especially shrubs. Administrative, political and traditional leadership institutions do not currently assist in the conservation of woody species. We provide suggestions for a conservation action plan that involves multiple strategies.

Information

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Nawaikoke Sub-county, with the location of the two villages in which interviews were carried out. The inset shows the location of the main map in eastern Uganda.

Figure 1

Table 1 The 26 woody species prioritized during focus group discussions with traditional medicine practitioners, homestead members, builders, carpenters and craft-makers of Kyalizwa-nyuma village, and with key informants. Local perceptions of some attributes of the species and major uses are also shown.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 The 17 species prioritized by specialist plant user groups. Scores were obtained using the list-scoring method (Sheil et al., 2003; see text for details) during focus group discussions. TMPs, traditional medicine practitioners. The species Acacia macrothyrsa Harms (Muhologoma) was mentioned by TMPs only and does not appear in Table 1.

Figure 3

Table 2 Local practices, attitudes and ecological factors that threaten woody species, as reported by residents of Nawaikoke Sub-county. Ranks are based on averages from the household interviews (1 represents the highest threat).

Figure 4

Fig. 3 The most destructive practices threatening woody plant survival as reported by specialist plant users in focus group discussions. Scores were obtained using the list-scoring method (Sheil et al., 2003; see text for details). TMPs, traditional medicine practitioners; CB, charcoal burning; LC, land clearance for agriculture; F, furniture construction; Fw, fuelwood collection; Cr, craft making; HM, harvest of herbal medicines; Pot, pot making; Hs, house construction; Fc, construction of fishing craft (e.g. oars).

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Percentage of respondents retaining, planting or interested in planting the most highly valued tree species (Table 1) in Nawaikoke Sub-county, ordered by decreasing percentage wishing to plant.

Figure 6

Table 3 The percentage of respondents planting, retaining, or wishing to plant the most highly valued tree species in Nawaikoke Sub-county according to their nativeness, perceived status and perceived abundance. Values represent means ± 1 SE. Values in bold indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 7

Fig. 5 Percentage of respondents requesting various types of assistance to establish and manage trees. A = seedlings; B = knowledge of how to propagate and care for trees; C = pesticides; D = equipment; E = money to purchase equipment and other farm material; F = land; G = fertilisers; H = labour.

Figure 8

Table 4 Constraints to conservation of trees in Nawaikoke Sub-county. Rankings were averaged from the household interviews (1 represents highest constraint).