Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T19:22:20.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Having a voice in your group: Increasing productivity through group participation – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2022

Sherry Jueyu Wu Open the ORCID record for Sherry Jueyu Wu [Opens in a new window]  and
Elizabeth Levy Paluck
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

group dynamicsbehavioral changeproductivityvoicefield experiment

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 2025 , pp. 482 - 483
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re- use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Cambridge apologises for a publisher-introduced error during the production process of the above article (Wu and Paluck, Reference Wu and Paluck2022).

Table 1 was incorrectly typeset. The corrected Table 1 is reproduced below.

Table 1.

Productivity Change During the Six-Week Experiment Period and Sustained Productivity Change After the Experiment.

Note: The comparison condition to the participatory meetings is the control-observer condition. Models include full-time sewing workers paid by piece-rates. Supervisors (N = 65) and staff members (N = 76) whose productivity cannot be determined by gross salary were excluded in the productivity data analysis. For workers who did not show up on any given day, their productivity was counted as zero for that day. See Table S8 for substantively and statistically consistent results using missing data imputation to account for those who did not provide demographic information or who left their positions. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

References

Wu, S. J. and Paluck, E. L. (2022), ‘Having a voice in your group: Increasing productivity through group participation’, Behavioural Public Policy, https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Productivity Change During the Six-Week Experiment Period and Sustained Productivity Change After the Experiment.