The impact of white-tailed deer browsing on crop yields, specifically soybean yield, has been a problem within agriculture for several decades. In an effort to reduce the losses incurred by deer browsing, several wildlife repellents have been commercialized and marketed for use on soybean. Despite their availability, limited research has been conducted on the ability of these repellents to deter feeding or the effects of these products on weed control when applied in combination with common herbicides. In 2023 and 2024, a field experiment was conducted in four soybean fields to evaluate five commercial deer repellent products (Bobbex, Hinder, Liquid Fence, Plantskydd+, and Penergetic bWV) for their ability to reduce deer browsing on soybean. Each product was applied either once, twice, or three times in conjunction with the preplant burndown, early postemergence, and late postemergence pesticide applications, respectively. Regular assessments of deer browsing were conducted at weekly intervals following applications. Across all locations in 2023 and 2024, all applications of repellent products, even three sequential applications of these products, failed to provide any consistent suppression in deer browsing throughout the growing season. An additional field experiment was conducted during both seasons to evaluate the potential impacts of combinations of common herbicides and deer repellents on weed control and soybean injury. Results from these trials indicate that very few differences in foxtail species, waterhemp, and common cocklebur control and crop injury were observed with any repellent and herbicide combination compared to treatments of post-emergent herbicides alone. Overall, the results from these experiments indicate that combinations of these deer repellent products with herbicides in tank mixtures do not increase or decrease weed control when compared to stand-alone herbicide treatments. There is also no evidence that these repellent products effectively deter deer browsing during the time frame when the soybean plant may be most vulnerable.