Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T01:36:08.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilateral Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and Tullio Phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Jonghun John Lee ,
Pavlo Ohorodnyk ,
Manas Sharma  and
Sachin Kishore Pandey
Jonghun John Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Pavlo Ohorodnyk
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Manas Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sachin Kishore Pandey*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
*
Correspondence to: Sachin Kishore Pandey, London Health Sciences Centre – University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada. N6G 2V4 Email: Sachin.Pandey@lhsc.on.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Semicircular canalSSCDsuperior semicircular canal dehiscenceTullio syndrome

Information

Type
Neuroimaging Highlights
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 319 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc. 2016 

A 44-year-old female presented to a neurology clinic with changes to her hearing and balance for the past 3 years. She endorsed hearing her own voice, heartbeat, and footsteps. Notably, loud noises initiated rotatory nystagmus and vertigo. The echolalia was present in the left ear. Patient denied any subjective hearing loss but described longstanding nonpulsatile tinnitus that had not changed over the past 3 years.

On examination, tympanic membranes appeared normal bilaterally. Full cranial nerve examination, including extraocular movements, was normal. Pneumatic otoscopy and palpation of the tragus to perform a fistula test demonstrated a subtle reproducible rotatory nystagmus synchronous with pulsations. This also elicited visual symptoms that the patient had been experiencing previously. Audiogram demonstrated a left 20-dB conductive hearing at 2000 Hz and a symmetric 25-dB loss in the high frequencies. Her acoustic reflexes were all intact, in the setting of a conductive hearing loss, making it suspicious for a possible “third-window” type pathology.

Computed tomography (CT) scan of the temporal bone was obtained demonstrating intact tympanic membranes and ossicles bilaterally. The facial nerve followed a normal course and the internal auditory canal was also normal. However, dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal was noted bilaterally (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1

Coronal reformats of the left (A-C) and right temporal bone (D, E) of unenhanced computed tomography demonstrating dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal (white arrow).

Figure 2

Poschl view of the left (A, B) and right temporal bone (C, D) of unenhanced computed tomography, demonstrating dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. The size of the maximal dehiscence on the Poschl view was 3.9 mm on the left and 1.6 mm on the right superior semicircular canal.

Discussion

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) is a radiological diagnosis and is associated with Tullio phenomenon, which refers to sound-induced hearing loss, vertigo, nystagmus, and oscillopsia.Reference Minor, Solomon, Zinreich and Zee 1 In one study, the prevalence of SSCD was 0.7%, and 1.3% had a bony layer of less than 0.1 mm covering the canal in normal subjects.Reference Carey, Minor and Nager 2 Though pathogenesis is uncertain, prior studies have implicated possible genetic, embryologic, metabolic and traumatic etiologies.Reference Hirvonen, Weg, Zinreich and Minor 3 - Reference Takahashi, Tsunoda, Shirakura and Kitamura 5

In SSCD, an additional conduction from bone to fluid through the dehiscence is present, acting as a “third window” of conduction. The transmitted oscillations from high-intensity acoustic stimuli and increased pressure in the canal cause direct stimulation of the cochlear hair cells. This mechanism results in tinnitus and autophony, including vertigo, nystagmus, and oscillopsia.Reference Minor, Solomon, Zinreich and Zee 1 , Reference Takahashi, Tsunoda, Shirakura and Kitamura 5

Diagnosis is made initially on clinical grounds and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials causing vestibular response to stimuli of lower intensity than expected. The diagnosis is confirmed with CT scan of the temporal bone.Reference Branstetter, Harrigal, Escott and Hirsch 6 A 1-mm CT scan of the temporal bone has a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 77%, respectively, for SSCD.Reference Lip and Nichols 7 In addition, there seems to be no association between the size of temporal bone dehiscence and symptoms.Reference Lip and Nichols 7 However in our case, the dehiscence was larger on the left ear (3.9 mm on left vs 1.6 mm on right), which correlated with the clinical findings of echolalia on the left ear.

Additional reformations in the planes of Stenver (perpendicular to canal) and Poschl (parallel to the canal) do not seem to change the diagnostic interpretation for SSCD.Reference Branstetter, Harrigal, Escott and Hirsch 8 In addition, cone beam CT has emerged as a low-dose technique in visualizing high-contrast structures in the head and neck. However, there is insufficient evidence at present to conclude that cone beam CT is superior to the conventional CT.Reference Miracle and Mukherji 9

Surgical repair of the canal defect is offered to individuals with debilitating symptoms.Reference Fiorino, Barbieri, Pizzini and Beltramello 10 Surgical techniques include canal plugging and resurfacing of the canal. Improvement in 94% of the patients who underwent surgery has been previously demonstrated; however, most patients with SSCD opt for conservative management.Reference Walgampola, Myrie, Minor and Carey 11

Disclosures

Jonghun John Lee, Pavlo Ohorodnyk, Manas Sharma, and Sachin Kishore Pandey do not have anything to disclose.

References

1 Minor, LB, Solomon, D, Zinreich, JS, Zee, DS. Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:249-258.Google Scholar
2. Carey, JP, Minor, LB, Nager, GT.. Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.. 2000;126:137-147.Google Scholar
3. Hirvonen, TP, Weg, N, Zinreich, SJ, Minor, LB. High-resolution CT findings suggest a developmental abnormality underlying superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123:477-481.Google Scholar
4. Zehender, AF, Kristiansen, AG, Adams, JC, Kujawa, SG, Merchant, SN, McKenna, MJ. Osteoprotegrin knockout mice demonstrate abnormal remodelling of the otic capsule and progressive hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:201-206.Google Scholar
5. Takahashi, N, Tsunoda, A, Shirakura, S, Kitamura, K. Anatomical feature of the middle cranial fossa in fetal periods: possible etiology of superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013;132:385-390.Google Scholar
6. Branstetter, BF 4th, Harrigal, C, Escott, EJ, Hirsch, BE. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal as a cause of sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo. Radiology. 2003;226(2):337-343.Google Scholar
7. Lip, G, Nichols, Dm. Measurement of defect angle in superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:1210-1233.Google Scholar
8. Branstetter, BF 4th, Harrigal, C, Escott, EJ, Hirsch, BE. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: oblique reformatted CT images for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;238:938-942.Google Scholar
9. Miracle, AC, Mukherji, SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1285-1292.Google Scholar
10. Fiorino, F, Barbieri, F, Pizzini, FB, Beltramello, A. A dehiscent superior semicircular canal may be plugged and resurfaced via the transmastoid route. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:136-139.Google Scholar
11. Walgampola, MS, Myrie, OA, Minor, LB, Carey, JP. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potential thresholds normalize on plugging superior canal dehiscence. Neurology. 2008;70:464-472.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Coronal reformats of the left (A-C) and right temporal bone (D, E) of unenhanced computed tomography demonstrating dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal (white arrow).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Poschl view of the left (A, B) and right temporal bone (C, D) of unenhanced computed tomography, demonstrating dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. The size of the maximal dehiscence on the Poschl view was 3.9 mm on the left and 1.6 mm on the right superior semicircular canal.