Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-xnzfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-01T12:33:03.639Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on biomarkers of bone health in pre- and post-menopausal females: a randomized control crossover trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2012

D. Fitzmaurice  and
L. Doyle
D. Fitzmaurice
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Science, School of Health Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology, Republic of Ireland
L. Doyle
Affiliation:
Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Science, School of Health Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an Australian study of 1200 subjects 17% had tried or intended to try a low-carbohydrate diet, and 70% believed they should cut back on carbohydrates to lose weight(Reference Crowe and Cameron-Smith1). With increasing levels of obesity, the low-carbohydrate diet has become popular as a weight loss method. While weight loss through consumption of a low carbohydrate diet has been proven (Reference Gardner, Kiazand and Alhassan2) there is contradictory evidence regarding its effect on bone health (Reference Carter, Vasey and Valeriano3, Reference Reddy, Wanh and Sakhaee4). Furthermore the effect of this diet on bone health for greater than 12 weeks is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a low-carbohydrate diet consumed over 24 weeks on biomarkers of bone health in pre- and postmenopausal females.

Following ethical approval and informed consent subjects were screened. 24 females (13 pre-menopausal; 11 postmenopausal) were randomly assigned to a control (AB) or low-carbohydrate diet (BA) group for 24 weeks. Subjects were then crossed over to the alternative dietary regimen for 24 weeks. Blood and urine samples taken at week 24 and 48 were analysed for biomarkers of bone resorption and formation using ELIZA. Urine pH was measured and a 3 day food diary analysed using CompEat™. Data was analysed for treatment and carryover effects using unpaired t-tests. Non-parametric tests were used where data was not normally distributed.

Table 1.

Dietary and bone biomarker differences between groups at end of control and dietary periods

* Presence of carryover effects, data from AB group only, was analysed.

Although carbohydrate intake and protein/carbohydrate ratio significantly (P<0.05) changed between control and dietary periods, there was no evidence of an effect on calcium intake, urine pH or biomarkers of bone formation (serum osteocalcin and BALP) and resorption (serum CTx and urinary NTx).

This work was supported by Strand III funding under the Technological Sector Research grant.

References

1.Crowe, T & Cameron-Smith, D (2005) Med J Australia 182, 594–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gardner, C, Kiazand, A, Alhassan, S et al. (2007) JAMA 298, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Carter, J, Vasey, F & Valeriano, (2006) Osteoporosis Int 17, 1398–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Reddy, S, Wanh, C, Sakhaee, K et al. (2002) J Kidney Dis 40, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Dietary and bone biomarker differences between groups at end of control and dietary periods