Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T13:39:57.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Historical and prehistorical water levels of Mormon Lake, Arizona as a measure of climate change on the southwest Colorado Plateau, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2020

Richard Hereford*
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA
Lee Amoroso
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA
*
*Corresponding author at: U.S. Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001, USA. E-mail address: rhereford@usgs.gov (R. Hereford).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mormon Lake, elevation 2166 m with maximum historic surface area of 31.4 km2, lies in a forested endorheic basin covering 103 km2. It is the largest unaltered freshwater body on the 337,000 km2 Colorado Plateau. Prehistorical (before AD 1878) highstands were ca. 9 and 24 m relative to depocenter datum. These levels likely occurred during four multidecadal episodes of cool, wet conditions between ca. 3.55 and 0.20 ka BP. Maximum historical levels (early 1900s) were up to 7.9 m, whereas modern (post-1941) levels were frequently zero or relatively low. Historical climate records indicate reconstructed lake levels correlate directly with annual precipitation and inversely with temperature. Early highstands were associated with above average precipitation and the lowest temperatures of the 116 yr record. The lake receded after 1941; thereafter, frequent drying and low-water levels resulted from recurrent drought and steadily increasing temperatures. Consequently, a wet episode from the 1970s to the 1990s had precipitation like the early 1900s, but highstands were only ca. 3.8 m. The historical lake-level chronology is consistent with changes of hydrologic balance predicted by climate models, that is, reduced effective precipitation (precipitation minus evaporation). These changes, particularly aridification, apparently began in the 1970s or earlier. Global oceanic and atmospheric climate modulate lake levels and regional hydroclimate.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Shaded relief maps of the Mormon Lake study region. (A) The study region on the southwestern Colorado Plateau of the American Southwest. Previously studied lakes are circled. Weather stations in cities and towns are labeled: NWS, National Weather Service; COOP, Cooperative weather station. (B) Mormon Lake drainage basin in the Mormon Mountain volcanic field (Holm, 1994); I (NW of MLL), MLL, LV, and RS are island, Mormon Lake Lodge, Lakeview subdivision, and ranger station, respectively. Elevation of selected mountainous volcanic features are labeled. Stars show occurrences of high-level prehistoric lake sediment. The solid triangle is the lowest surveyed point and zero-depth reference elevation of 2165.60 m. Mudflat is the dry unvegetated lake floor as exposed in June 2007 (Hevly, 1965; Anderson, 1993; Hasbargen, 1994; Fawcett et al., 2018; Supplementary Data 1).

Figure 1

Table 1. Radiocarbon ages at two localities from near the base (Fig. 1B; Bass Point) and top (Double Springs) of prehistorical lacustrine sediment.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Photograph of the island, probably 1920. (A) South side of the island viewed from a small boat; (B) similar scene in August 2016. Pastureland presently surrounds the former island. Courtesy of Hoover Collection-Arizona Memory Project and Arizona Historical Society.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Grass Tank berm, 1920. (A) North-facing photograph of flooded milking barn and two outbuildings (constructed on the berm) when the lake was at its historic high level, inferred water level is 7.9 m; (B) similar scene in 2018, other buildings have collapsed. Courtesy of Cline Library Special Collections, Northern Arizona University.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Bass Point shoreline, 1925. (A) South-facing view across an inundated bouldery shoreline and wave-swept lake; (B) approximately same view in 2019 showing abandoned shoreline overgrown by downslope encroachment of nearshore blackjack pine forest. Courtesy of Cline Library Special Collections, Northern Arizona University.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Germination age, date, elevation, and water level of nearshore Pinus ponderosa.

Figure 6

Figure 6. West-to-east shoreline transect below east end of Bass Point showing elevation and corresponding levels of two waterline groups (pattern) that formed after 1920 to before 1947 and 1972 to shortly after 1992 as indicated by age-diagnostic debris at the top of the lower level. Waterlines are solid circles crossed with a horizontal line. The Ribes shoreline lies between 2169.1 and 2169.4 m elevation or equivalent level of 3.5–3.8 m.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Elevation of reconstructed water levels and associated surface area and volume, 1885–2016. Pattern shows historical, Ribes highstand, and dry to low-water levels after ca. 1941. Dashed line connects points across years with unknown depth.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Scatter plots showing the relation between lake level and three climate variables over the period 1913–2016. (A) Cool-season precipitation; (B) snowfall; (C) warm-season temperature anomaly.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Terminology of precipitation episodes (top) and time series of precipitation, and temperature of five southwestern Colorado Plateau weather stations. Symbols are the average value of all reporting weather stations in a given year or season. (A) Combined cool- and warm-season precipitation; (B) cool-season precipitation; (C) average October to May snowfall; (D) warm-season rainfall; (E) average annual temperature anomaly; (F) average cool-season temperature anomaly; (G) average warm-season temperature anomaly.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Box plots of combined cool- and warm-season average annual precipitation of four precipitation episodes of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Median and quartile range (pattern) of climate variables grouped by hydrologic episode as in Fig. 10. (A) Cool-season precipitation; (B) snowfall; (C) warm-season precipitation; (D and E) cool- and warm-season temperature anomaly, respectively. E20CP, early twentieth-century pluvial; M20CD, mid-twentieth-century drought; Wet, wet episode; E21CD, early twenty-first-century drought.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Box plots comparing precipitation and temperature changes between the early twentieth-century pluvial (E20CP) and the wet episode (left and right sides of the box plot columns, respectively). (A) Cool- and (B) warm-season precipitation; (C) snowfall; (D and E) cool- and warm-season average annual temperature anomaly, respectively.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Time series of modeled lake level compared with three global climate indices and regional hydroclimate, 1947–2016. (A) Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) sea-surface temperature (SST) anomaly; (B) Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) index; (C) average monthly Niño 3.4 SST anomaly; purple, green, and gray symbols are El Niño, La Niña, and neutral events; (D) Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) of northeastern Arizona, positive values indicate increased moisture, negative values indicate drought or drought-like conditions; (E) modeled lake level. Dashed vertical lines highlight combinations of positive and negative regimes of the AMO and PDO and corresponding drought frequency expressed as percent of years with drought in each regime, after McCabe et al. (2004). Note the wet episode has persistently high lake levels and the lowest drought frequency of the entire period.

Supplementary material: Image

Hereford and Amoroso supplementary material

Hereford and Amoroso supplementary material 1

Download Hereford and Amoroso supplementary material(Image)
Image 3.3 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Hereford and Amoroso supplementary material

Hereford and Amoroso supplementary material 2

Download Hereford and Amoroso supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 75.5 KB