¹ Ruiz, Hiram A., Afghanistan: Conflict and Displacement 1978 to 2001, 13 Forced Migration Rev. 8, 9 (2002)Google Scholar. See generally Ghufran, Nasreen, The Role of UNHCR and Afghan Refugees in Pakistan, 35 Strategic Analysis 945 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

² See generally Guglielmo Verdirame & Barbara Harrell-Bond, Rights in Exile: Janus-Faced Humanitarianism 68–70 (2005) (describing methods by which the UNHCR tried to distinguish “recyclers” from refugees first seeking assistance on the Kenyan-Sudanese border during the 1990s).

³ Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, UNHCR News Stories (Oct. 3, 2002), at http://www.unhcr.org/3d9c57708.html. On deployment elsewhere, see, e.g., Justin Lee, WFP, UNHCR Using Iris Recognition for Syrian Refugee Food Program in Zaatari, Biometric Update (Oct. 17, 2016), at http://www.biometricupdate.com/201610/wfp-unhcr-using-iris-recognition-for-syrian-refugee-food-program-in-zaatari. Two of the four iris verification centers set up near the Afghan-Pakistan border in 2002 were closed in 2004 after a decline in the number of refugees returning to Afghanistan. UNHCR Closes Two Iris Verification Centres in Pakistan, IRIN (Sept. 20, 2004), at http://www.irinnews.org/news/2004/09/20/unhcr-closes-two-iris-verification-centres-pakistan.

⁴ Jurisdiction, n., Oxford English Dictionary Online, at http://www.oed.com (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

⁵ Zieck, Marjoleine, The Legal Status of Afghan Refugees in Pakistan, a Story of Eight Agreements and Two Suppressed Premises, 20 Int'l J. Refugee L. 253 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁶ Sensory, adj.; sense, n.; and sensation, n., Oxford English Dictionary Online, at http://www.oed.com (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

⁷ This article's account of sense thus departs from a claim made in some legal theory scholarship that the law privileges the visual. See, e.g., Alison Dundes Renteln, Sensational Jurisprudence: Visual Culture and Human Rights. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource 1–15 (2015).

⁸ Indeed, drawing upon feminist scholarship, the account of sense presented here rejects conventional oppositions between abstract, principled reasoning, and embodied, material practice. See, e.g., Jane Gallop, Thinking Through the Body (1988) (exploring how literature and philosophy have cast the body as that which must be transcended or dominated, and arguing instead for thinking of the body as a site of (philosophical) knowledge).

⁹ Economy, n., Oxford English Dictionary Online, at http://www.oed.com (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

¹⁰ Johns, Fleur, The Temporal Rivalries of Human Rights, 23 Ind. J. Glob. Legal Stud. 39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹¹ Paul Bowman & Richard Stamp, Introduction: A Critical Dissensus, in Reading Rancière, Critical Dissensus xi, xii (2011).

¹² Rancière, Jacques, The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics, in Reading Rancière, Critical Dissensus , supra note 11, at 1, 7 (Bowman, Paul & Stamp, Richard eds., 2011)Google Scholar.

¹³ This idea may be related to the ideals of humanism, but that is not a relationship that will be developed here.

¹⁴ Jacques Rancière, The Politics of Aesthetics 12 (Rockhill, Gabriel trans., 2004)Google Scholar.

¹⁵ See, e.g., Root, Elihu, The Need of Popular Understanding of International Law, 1 AJIL 1, 2 (1907)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (arguing for the importance of improving public knowledge of international law, and “promot[ing] a popular habit of reading and thinking about international affairs,” in light of growing nonstate (popular) control over national conduct); Eagleton, Clyde, Organization of the Community of Nations, 36 AJIL 229 (1942)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (writing of the need for the international lawyer to speak “[f]rom his [sic] post of expert knowledge” as the “authoritative voice” of a community, to “reveal to statesmen and to peoples what is necessary to make his law effective”[sic]).

¹⁶ See, e.g., Bodansky, Daniel, The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?, 93 AJIL 596 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (highlighting the perception that international environmental institutions and processes are insufficiently democratic and surveying means by which this could be addressed); Sarfaty, Galit A., Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: The Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank, 103 AJIL 647 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (analyzing the organizational culture of one powerful international institution—the World Bank—to understand why international institutions behave as they do and exploring the marginality of human rights principles within this organizational culture).

¹⁷ See, e.g., The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes: Advisors, Decision Makers or Irrelevant Actors? (Monika Ambrus, Karin Arts, Ellen Hey & Helena Raulus eds., 2014). The proliferation and circulation of experts charged with various types of international legal responsibility has been a topic of burgeoning scholarly interest over the past decade, but there is also a literature on this theme that dates from, or looks back to, the Cold War era. See, e.g., Moon, Donna C. Mehos & Suzanne M., The Uses of Portability: Circulating Experts in the Technopolitics of Cold War and Decolonization, in Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Cold War 43–74 (Hecht, Gabrielle ed., 2011)Google Scholar; Shen, Zhihua, A Historical Examination of the Issue of Soviet Experts in China: Basic Situation and Policy Changes, 29 Russ. Hist. 377 (2002)Google Scholar; Gillian White, The Use of Experts by International Tribunals (1965).

¹⁸ David Kennedy, A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy (2016). The focus on the technical shaping of modes of “public reason” as such is Sheila Jasanoff's contribution. See Sheila Jasanoff, Science and Public Reason 5 (2012).

¹⁹ Kennedy, supra note 18, at 32.

²⁰ Samuel Moyn voices comparable skepticism: Moyn, Samuel, Knowledge and Politics in International Law, 129 Harv. L. Rev. 2164, 2167 (2016)Google Scholar (reviewing Kennedy, supra note 18).

²¹ Kennedy, supra note 18, at 78–82.

²² Id. at 165–66.

²³ Id. at 93.

²⁴ Id. at 164–67 (describing the professional experience of “yielding” as one of relative freedom, or untethered expert discretion, that emerges when “an expert abandons his position in the face of another”).

²⁵ The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and the Rule of Law (Sally Engle Merry, Kevin E. Davis & Benedict Kingsbury eds., 2015) (a book featuring chapters by social scientists, such as Sally Engle Merry and Smoki Musaraj, and lawyers, including Benedict Kingsbury, Kevin Davis, and René Urueña).

²⁶ Id. at 2.

²⁷ Compare Kevin E. Davis, Sally Engle Merry, Benedict Kingsbury, Introduction: The Local-Global Life of Indicators: Law, Power, and Resistance, in The Quiet Power of Indicators, supra note 25, at 4 (2015).

²⁸ Galton, Francis, Biometry, 1 Biometrika 7 (1901)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (discussing the application to biology of the methods of statistics). Galton is noteworthy for his elaboration of the correlation coefficient and his observation of the phenomenon of regression to the mean. See Nicholas Wright Gillham, A Life of Sir Francis Galton: from African Exploration to the Birth of Eugenics (2001). See also Porter, Theodore, Making Things Quantitative, 7 Sci. in Context 389 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁹ McFarland, Daniel A. & McFarland, H. Richard, Big Data and the Danger of Being Precisely Inaccurate, 2 Big Data & Soc'y (2015)Google Scholar, at http://bds.sagepub.com/content/2/2/2053951715602495 (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

³⁰ See, e.g., The Quiet Power of Indicators, supra note 25, at 2.

³¹ Kitchin, Rob, Big Data, New Epistemologies, and Paradigm Shifts, 1 Big Data & Soc'y 1 (2014)Google Scholar.

³² Power, Michael, Counting, Control and Calculation: Reflections on Measuring and Management, 57 Hum. Rel. 765, 769 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See, e.g., Smoki Musaraj, Indicators, Global Expertise, and a Local Political Drama: Producing and Deploying Corruption Perception Data in Post-Socialist Albania, in The Quiet Power of Indicators, supra note 25, at 222, 224 (citing the work of Michael Power, among others).

³³ Theodore M. Porter, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life ix (1996); Porter, Theodore, Measurement, Objectivity, and Trust, 1 Measurement: Interdisc. Res. & Persp. 241, 242 (2003)Google Scholar. See, e.g., The Quiet Power of Indicators, supra note 25, at 2 (citing the work of Theodore Porter, among others).

³⁴ Cf. Orford, Anne, In Praise of Description, 25 Leiden J. Int'l L. 609 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (arguing for the productiveness of a turn to description, as a method of writing about law, in lieu of explanation and critique, or at least an alternative to those modes of critique most prevalent in international legal scholarship). Of course, philosophy often also entails description, phenomenological description being the obvious example. However, unlike most works of phenomenological description, this article is not a study of the structure or nature of consciousness as experienced in the first person by an individual human subject. See Dermot Moran, Introduction to Phenomenology (2000) (introducing the principal writings of the classical phenomenologists and those of some related thinkers).

³⁵ Cf. Kennedy, David, When Renewal Repeats: Thinking Against the Box, 32 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 335, 476–500 (2000)Google Scholar (describing Kennedy's “efforts to launch and sustain an extravernacular project in the field [of international law]”—that is, a project that departs from argumentative routines and concerns typical of international legal scholarship). This description is meso-level in the sense that it is neither a deep empirical dive into the details of any one or more case study or studies, nor an all-encompassing, all-explaining account of global legal order.

³⁶ Samuel A. Chambers, The Lessons of Rancière 38–64, 122–56 (2013) (explaining Rancière's reinvention of politics premised on the prevalence of orders of inequality and domination, and insistence that the “disordering logic” of democracy must operate on this terrain). In referring to the embedded inequality of the international legal field, I am saying something more than that international law is implicated in, and helps to reproduce “real world” inequalities understood as external to the field. Rather, the claim is that the purported commonality of the international legal field is made of inequality; that inequality in the distribution of sense-making capacity is fundamental to its operation in ways not well captured by critiques of international law for gender bias, racial bias, or other modes of external critique.

³⁷ See, e.g., Plato, Republic, Book VII 107–17 (Emlyn-Jones, Chris & Preddy, William ed. & trans., Harvard Univ. Press 2014)Google Scholar (c. 380–360 B.C.E.) (the allegory of the cave, a famous exposition of Plato's conviction that reality may only be apprehended intellectually, through an appreciation of abstract “forms,” not by the senses); David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding 23–29 (Millican, Peter ed., Oxford Univ. Press 2007)Google Scholar (1748) (arguing that knowledge arises not from reason but from experience); Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception (Landes, Donald A. trans., Routledge 2012)Google Scholar (1945) (emphasizing the role of bodily experience in consciousness); Nancy, Jean-Luc & Syrotinski, Michael, Extraordinary Sense, 8 The Senses & Soc'y 10 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (on the sensory or sensible foundations of philosophic thought and their resistance to rational ordering).

³⁸ These statements are not made out of any circumspection about Rancière's project, or doubt about the importance or politics of his work. What I am seeking to avoid here is any suggestion that the dilemmas by which international law is plagued and by which international lawyers should be concerned—as represented in this article—might be cured or transcended by recourse to another discipline. All too often in legal writing, appeal is made to some deus ex machina drawn from another scholarly field, presumed to be free of the difficulties attributed to the legal discipline in question and capable of leading hapless lawyers out of those difficulties with benign grace. My engagement with Rancière's work in this article is brief and contained only to avoid any such representation of his power (a representation of which Rancière's work itself counsels wariness).

³⁹ Yasuaki, Onuma, International Law in and with International Politics: The Functions of International Law in International Society, 14 Eur. J. Int'l L. 105, 108 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On the role played by functionalism in international legal thought, see Johnston, Douglas M., Functionalism in the Theory of International Law, 26 Can. Y.B. Int'l L. 3 (1988)Google Scholar.

⁴⁰ UN Charter pmbl.; Art. 1, para.1.

⁴¹ See, e.g., Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument 515 (rev. ed. 2005) (“Juristic discussion appeared to remain in a constant flux. It could find no position in which to remain permanently.”).

⁴² Rancière, Jacques, Panagia, Davide & Bowlby, Rachel, Ten Theses on Politics, 5(3) Theory & Event (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v005/5.3ranciere.html.

⁴³ Id.

⁴⁴ Alvarez-Verdugo, Milagros, Comparing U.S. and E.U. Strategies Against Weapons of Mass Destruction: Some Legal Consequences, 11 Ann. Surv. Int'l & Comp. L. 119 (2005)Google Scholar (“Weapon(s) of mass destruction (WMD) is not a legal concept. Nonetheless the social sciences regularly use this term to encompass nuclear, chemical and biological weapons to distinguish them from conventional weapons … .”). See generally Daniel Joyner, International Law and the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (2009); Joyner, Daniel, The Security Council as a Legal Hegemon, 43 Geo. J. Int'l L. 225 (2012)Google Scholar (discussing UN Security Council Resolution 1540 and related resolutions, concerning the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction).

⁴⁵ Jensen, Eric Talbot, The International Law of Environmental Warfare: Active and Passive Damage During Armed Conflict, 38 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 145 (2005)Google Scholar; Burch, Thomas, Non-state Actors in the Nuclear Black Market: Proposing an International Legal Framework for Preventing Nuclear Expertise Proliferation & Nuclear Smuggling by Non-state Actors, 2 Santa Clara. J. Int'l L. 84 (2004)Google Scholar.

⁴⁶ Weapons Under International Human Rights Law (Stuart Casey-Maslin ed., 2014).

⁴⁷ Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, opened for signature July 1, 1968, 21 UST 483, 729 UNTS 161 (entered into force March 5, 1970), available at http://www.un.org/disarmament/WMD/Nuclear/NPTtext.shtml [hereinafter Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty].

⁴⁸ Stephen J. Whitfield, The Culture of the Cold War 1–25, 203–31 (2d ed. 1996).

⁴⁹ Mohamed Shaker, The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty: Origin and Implementation 1959–1979, Vol. 1, at 5 (1980). See also Joyner, supra note 44, at 3–11.

⁵⁰ Shaker, supra note 49

⁵¹ Joyner, supra note 44, at 7.

⁵² Id. at 9.

⁵³ Id. at 8. See Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, supra note 47, Art. IX, para. 3.

⁵⁴ UNODA, Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Status of the Treaty, at http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/npt (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

⁵⁵ UNRCPD, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, at http://unrcpd.org/wmd/the-nuclear-non-proliferation-treaty (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

⁵⁶ Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, supra note 47, Art. I.

⁵⁷ Joyner, supra note 44, at 11.

⁵⁸ Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, supra note 47, Art. II.

⁵⁹ Id. Art. III. For wider-angle insights into the work of the IAEA, see David Fischer, History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: The First Forty Years (1997) (narrating the history of the IAEA from 1957 to 1997); Hecht, Gabrielle, The Power of Nuclear Things, 51 Tech. & Culture 1, 8 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (arguing that the IAEA's “distinctions about nuclearity” serve in part to constitute “a technopolitical frame for global trade”).

⁶⁰ Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, supra note 47, Arts. IV–V.

⁶¹ Id. Art. VI.

⁶² IAEA, The Structure and Content of Agreements Between the Agency and States Required in Connection with the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (June 1, 1972), at https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1972/infcirc153.pdf [hereinafter INFCIRC/153]. See Joyner, supra note 44, at 20.

⁶³ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, paras. 7–9, 31–32, 51–90.

⁶⁴ Rancière, supra note 14, at 19.

⁶⁵ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, para. 87 (emphasis in original).

⁶⁶ IAEA, Biography of Hans Blix, at https:// www.iaea.org/about/dg/blix/biography (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

⁶⁷ Helena Smith, Blix: I Was Smeared by the Pentagon, Guardian (June 11, 2003), at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jun/11/iraq.usa. See generally Hans Blix, Disarming Iraq (2004).

⁶⁸ Sydney Peace Found., Hans Blix, 2007, at http://sydneypeacefoundation.org.au/peace-prize-recipients/2007-hans-blix (last visited Mar. 28, 2017); Fulbright Ass'n, Past Laureates of the Fulbright Prize, 2014 – Hans Blix, at http://fulbright.org/fulbright-prize/past-prize-laureates (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

⁶⁹ Nobel Prize, Mohamed ElBaradei – Biographical, at http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2005/elbaradei-bio.html (last visited Mar. 28, 2017). The latter was the title of ElBaradei's 2011 memoir: Mohamed ElBaradei, The Age of Deception: Nuclear Diplomacy in Treacherous Times (2011).

⁷⁰ Scott Ritter, We Ain't Found Shit, 37 London Rev. Books 35 (July 7, 2015).

⁷¹ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, para. 85.

⁷² But see The Role of ‘Experts’ in International and European Decision-Making Processes, supra note 17 (analyzing experts’ role at the international and European levels in the policy areas of environment, trade, human rights, migration, and financial regulation).

⁷³ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, paras. 9, 49–69.

⁷⁴ This seems in tension with Michael Power's widely read account of the “drift from an inspection style to an audit style of oversight” with audit style treating “the management system as its primary object” whereas inspection style “focuses more on the substantive conduct of the inspectee” (although it is “difficult to distinguish definitively between them”). See Michael Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification 130–31 (1997).

⁷⁵ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, paras. 51–69, 74–75.

⁷⁶ Id., paras. 8–9, 88.

⁷⁷ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62; IAEA, Model Protocol Additional to the Agreement(s) Between State(s) and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards (Sept. 1, 1997), at https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/infcirc540.pdf [hereinafter INFCIRC/540].

⁷⁸ Hirsch, Theodore, The IAEA Additional Protocol: What It Is and Why It Matters, 2004 Non-proliferation Rev. 140, 143 (2004)Google Scholar.

⁷⁹ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, para. 6.

⁸⁰ INFCIRC/540, supra note 77, Arts. 5(c), 6, 9, 18(f), 18(g).

⁸¹ Latour, Bruno, Circulating Reference. Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest, in Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies 24, 36 (1999)Google Scholar.

⁸² On the notion of “circulating reference” being drawn upon here, see id.

⁸³ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, para. 1; Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, supra note 47, Art. III, para. 1.

⁸⁴ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, paras. 43(b)–(c), 49(a), 58(c), and, for the definition of a “facility” to be so described, para. 106; INFCIRC/540, supra note 77, Art. 2.

⁸⁵ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, paras. 74–75, 91–97; INFCIRC/540, supra note 77, Art. 6(a).

⁸⁶ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, paras. 76–82; INFCIRC/540, supra note 77, Arts. 4–9 (emphasis in original).

⁸⁷ INFCIRC/540, supra note 77, Art. 15.

⁸⁸ Id. Art. 14(b).

⁸⁹ Hirsch, supra note 78, at 143.

⁹⁰ Pilat, Joseph F., The Future of the NPT, in Routledge Handbook of Nuclear Proliferation and Policy 131, 139 (Pilat, Joseph F. & Busch, Nathan E. eds., 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹¹ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, paras. 74–75; INFCIRC/540, supra note 77, Arts. 6, 14. For background on the controversies and sensitivities surrounding the IAEA gaining access to, and relying on, intelligence data gleaned from satellites under individual nations’ control, see Fischer, supra note 59, at 283.

⁹² Guy S. Goodwin-Gill & Jane McAdam, The Refugee in International Law 1 (2d ed. 2007).

⁹³ Id.; see also Johns, Fleur, The Madness of Migration: Disquiet in the International Law Relating to Refugees, 27 Int'l J. L. & Psych. 587, 588 (2004)Google ScholarPubMed (discussing the tendency of “international refugee law … to foster a sense that multivalent allegiance and migratory diffusion are deviant, unnatural impulses”).

⁹⁴ UNHCR, Registration: A Practical Guide for Field Staff (Jan. 1, 1994), available at http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/AD0FDA8A15FAB9EEC1256D360037732C-hcr-register.pdf [hereinafter 1994 UNHCR Guide].

⁹⁵ Id.

⁹⁶ UNHCR, Commodity Distribution: A Practical Guide for Field Staff (June 1997), at http://www.unhcr.org/3c4d44554.html [hereinafter 1997 UNHCR Guide]. For insight into practices of refugee registration, identification, and counting beyond the scope of these manuals, and ways in which these play into the global politics of refugee protection and aid distribution, see Harrell-Bond, Barbara, Voutira, Eftihia & Leopold, Mark, Counting the Refugees: Gifts, Givers, Patrons and Clients, 5 J. Refugee Stud. 205 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Edwards, Alice, A Numbers Game: Counting Refugees and International Burden-Sharing, 32 U. Tasmania L. Rev. 1 (2013)Google Scholar; Zetter, Roger, Labelling Refugees: Forming and Transforming a Bureaucratic Identity, 4 J. Refugee Stud. 39 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹⁷ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94; 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96.

⁹⁸ See Handl, Gunther F., Reisman, W. Michael, Simma, Bruno, Dupuy, Pierre Marie & Chinkin, Christine, A Hard Look at Soft Law, 82 ASIL Proc. 371 (1988)Google Scholar; Robilant, Anna di, Genealogies of Soft Law, 54 Am. J. Comp. L. 499 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹⁹ Contra Harrell-Bond, Voutira & Leopold, supra note 96, at 211 (arguing that “the attitudes of assistance agencies themselves lead to disbelief of any self-generated estimates of refugee numbers … ”).

¹⁰⁰ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 2, para. 7.3.

¹⁰¹ Id., pt. 2, para. 7.3; pt. 3, para. 1.2.

¹⁰² Id., pt. 2, para. 7.11.

¹⁰³ Id.

¹⁰⁴ Id., pt. 4, para. 6.2(e).

¹⁰⁵ 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, Key Points.

¹⁰⁶ Id., sec. 1.4.5.

¹⁰⁷ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 2, para. 7.10; pt. 3, para. 2.2; pt. 4, paras. 1.7, 6.1, 6.3.

¹⁰⁸ Id., pt. 4, para. 10.6.

¹⁰⁹ Id., pt. 4, para. 10.8.

¹¹⁰ Id., pt. 2, para. 7.12.

¹¹¹ Id., pt. 2, paras. 1.3–1.4.

¹¹² Id., pt. 2, para. 9.5.

¹¹³ 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, secs. 1.2, 3.1.

¹¹⁴ Id., sec. 1.1.

¹¹⁵ Id., sec. 3.5.

¹¹⁶ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 2, paras. 8.1–8.4.

¹¹⁷ Id., pt. 2, paras. 5.1, 7.8, 8.4.

¹¹⁸ Id., pt. 2, para. 8.3.

¹¹⁹ 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, sec. 1.4.1.

¹²⁰ Id., secs. 1.2, 5.2.

¹²¹ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 2, paras. 1.6, 10.1.

¹²² Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, supra note 47, Art. III.

¹²³ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, para. 2.

¹²⁴ 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, sec. 1.4.2.

¹²⁵ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 4, para. 10.5(c).

¹²⁶ 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, sec. 1.4.2.

¹²⁷ Id.

¹²⁸ Id., sec. 1.4.3.

¹²⁹ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 2, para. 9.10.

¹³⁰ Id.

¹³¹ 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, sec. 2.1.

¹³² 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 4, para. 10.11.

¹³³ Id., pt. 4, paras. 10.11(a), (g).

¹³⁴ Id., pt. 4, para. 9.2; 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, secs. 3.5–3.6.

¹³⁵ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 3, para. 2.3(b); 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, secs. 2.3, 3.5.

¹³⁶ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 4, para. 9.2.

¹³⁷ Martti Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, at 406 (2004).

¹³⁸ 1994 UNHCR Guide, supra note 94, pt. 2, para. 9.1.

¹³⁹ Id., pt. 5, para. 4.1.

¹⁴⁰ 1997 UNHCR Guide, supra note 96, sec. 2.2.

¹⁴¹ Id.

¹⁴² Id., sec. 6.2.

¹⁴³ Id., sec. 2.2.

¹⁴⁴ Contra Friedrich A. Hayek, 2 Law, Legislation, and Liberty: The Mirage of Social Justice 107, 109 (1978).

¹⁴⁵ Contra Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas, Atmospheres of Law: Senses, Affects, Lawscapes, 7 Emotion, Space & Soc'y 35 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (emphasizing law's regulation and control of the sensing body, although Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos does not, admittedly, posit a prelegal, authentic mode of bodily existence as such).

¹⁴⁶ Contra Danilo Mandic, Caterina Nirta, Andrea Pavoni & Andreas Philoppopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Introduction: Law and Taste 5 (The Westminster Online Working Papers Series, Law and the Senses Series: The Taste Issue, 2013), available at https://nonliquetlaw.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/law-and-the-senses_taste.pdf (“[S]ince [it is] deemed much too close to the animal, the elemental, the corporeal … taste has to be controlled, disciplined and moderated, to avoid it turning into a capital vice (gluttony).”).

¹⁴⁷ The reference to law and policy having “weight” makes use of a phrase in Pilat, supra note 90, at 139 (discussing the “normative and legal weight of the [NPT] regime”). Regarding the “pull” to/of law and lawfulness, there are many scholarly accounts of this phenomenon and how it may be sustained. One of my favorites, albeit not one directly transposable here, is Duncan Kennedy's account of an encounter with a rule that “just applies itself” in the course of adjudication. See Kennedy, Duncan, Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology, 36 J. Leg. Educ. 518, 520 (1986)Google Scholar.

¹⁴⁸ Gary Milhollin, The Iraqi Bomb, New Yorker, Feb. 1, 1993, at 47; ElBaradei, supra note 69, at 9–28.

¹⁴⁹ Philip Towle, The Disarmament of Iraq: Precedents and Prospects, 12 Defense Analysis 53, 57 (1996); Iraq: A Deadly Game of Chicken, Time (Oct. 7, 1991), at http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,973980,00.html.

¹⁵⁰ Adam Gorlick, Stanford's North Korea Team of Siegfried Hecker and John Lewis Keeps the World Informed of Pyongyang Nuclear March, Stanford News (Nov. 30, 2010), at http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/november/hecker-lewis-cisac-113010.html.

¹⁵¹ IAEA, Strengthening the Effectiveness and Improving the Efficiency of Agency Safeguards, General Conference, GC (58)/16, 3 (Aug. 5, 2014), at https://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC58/GC58Documents/English/gc58-16_en.pdf; James Doyle, Nuclear Safeguards, Security and Nonproliferation: Achieving Security with Technology and Policy 74 (2011); Eugene P. Bertin, Principles and Practice of X-Ray Spectrometric Analysis 6–12, 89–92 (2012); Hem Raj Verma, Atomic and Nuclear Analytical Methods: XRF, Mössbauer, XPS, NAA and Ion-Beam Spectroscopic Techniques 1–2, 19 (2007).

¹⁵² IAEA Symposium on International Safeguards: Linking Strategy, Implementation and People, Oct. 20–24, 2014, Book of Abstracts Presentations and Papers, Doc. No. IAEA-CN-220 (Mar. 23, 2015), at https://www.iaea.org/safeguards/symposium/2014/home/eproceedings/sg2014_eproceedings_online.pdf [hereinafter IAEA Safeguards Symposium Proceedings].

¹⁵³ Monitoring Nuclear Weapons: The Nuke Detectives, Economist (Sept. 5, 2015), at http://www.economist.com/topics/nuclear-weapons.

¹⁵⁴ Id. (quoting Dr. Lassina Zerbo, head of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization).

¹⁵⁵ Timothy Oleson, Beyond the Bomb: The World's Nuclear Watchdog Expands its Science, Earth Mag. (Apr. 27, 2015), at http://www.earthmagazine.org/article/beyond-bomb-worlds-nuclear-watchdog-expands-its-science.

¹⁵⁶ Cf. Martin Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays 3–35 (William Lovitt trans., 1977) (on technology as revealing). Not all, however, subscribe to this expectation, and those who do voice it do so in varying degrees. Former director general of the IAEA Hans Blix, for example, has emphasized that “international civil servants” charged with on-site inspection and qualitative, as well as quantitative, analysis may reach “conclusions … closer to reality” than conclusions yielded by remotely or indirectly sourced intelligence data. For this reason, Blix has argued strongly for the maintenance of both modes of verification practice—inspection and intelligence data-gathering—and for “keep[ing] them apart.” Pomper, Miles A., Getting it Right the Next Time: An Interview with Hans Blix, 34 Arms Control Today 14, 16 (2004)Google Scholar.

¹⁵⁷ Oleson, supra note 155.

¹⁵⁸ Alisa L. Carrigan, Can the IAEA Verify the Iran Deal?, Bull. Atomic Scientists (May 5, 2015), at http://thebulletin.org/can-iaea-verify-iran-deal8302.

¹⁵⁹ Yukiya Amano, Statement at IAEA Symposium on International Safeguards: Linking Strategy, Implementation and People (Oct. 20, 2014), at https://www.iaea.org/safeguards/symposium/2014/images/pdfs/Speech_DG.pdf.

¹⁶⁰ Yukiya Amano, Challenges in Nuclear Verification: The IAEA's Role on the Iranian Nuclear Issue (Oct. 31, 2014), at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/challenges-nuclear-verification-iaea's-role-iranian-nuclear-issue.

¹⁶¹ Denise Bleakly, Karl Horak, & Michael McDaniel, Sandia National Laboratories, Enhancing Safeguards Analysts’ Geospatial Usage 15 (2012). See Bhupendra Jasani, Bernd Richter, Gotthard Stein, Maurice D. Ward & Mark Killinger, Enhancing IAEA Safeguards Using Commercial Satellite Imagery: A Pilot Study (1996).

¹⁶² Niemeyer, Irmgard, Listner, Clemens & Nussbaum, Sven, Object-Based Image Analysis Using Very High-Resolution Satellite Data, 40 J. Inst. Nuclear Materials Mgmt. 100, 100 (2012)Google Scholar; IAEA, IAEA Safeguards: Staying Ahead of the Game 21 (2007); IAEA, New and Emerging Trends in Satellite Imagery, Presentation at 2014 Safeguards Symposium (Oct. 21, 2014), at https://www.iaea.org/safeguards/symposium/2014/home/eproceedings/sg2014-slides/000042.pdf.

¹⁶³ IAEA, IAEA Safeguards, supra note 162, at 21. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists (a U.S.-based nongovernmental organization), there were 1,419 operating satellites orbiting the earth as of June 2016. See UCS Satellite Database, at http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/space-weapons/satellite-database.html#.VoveHbZ97IX (last visited Mar. 28, 2017). About 40 percent of those orbiting in 2014 were used primarily for commercial purposes. See David Yanofsky & Tim Fernholz, This is Every Active Satellite Orbiting Earth (Dec. 21, 2015), at http://qz.com/296941/interactive-graphic-every-active-satellite-orbiting-earth (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

¹⁶⁴ Bleakly, Horak & McDaniel, supra note 161, at 15–16; open source, adj., Oxford English Dictionary Online, at http://www.oed.com (last visited Mar. 28, 2017) (“designating software for which the original program files used to compile the applications are available to users to be modified and redistributed as they wish”).

¹⁶⁵ Bleakly, Horak & McDaniel, supra note 161, at 16 (endnote omitted).

¹⁶⁶ Laura Rockwood, The IAEA and International Safeguards, in Routledge Handbook of Nuclear Proliferation and Policy, supra note 90, at 142, 151–52.

¹⁶⁷ Id. at 150–54.

¹⁶⁸ Laura Rockwood, The IAEA's State-Level Concept and the Law of Unintended Consequences, Arms Control Today, at https://www.armscontrol.org/print/6413.

¹⁶⁹ E.g., Julian Ryall, Satellite Imagery Reveals North Korea Is Refurbishing Nuclear Facility, Telegraph (Aug. 13, 2015), at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/11800088/Satellite-imagery-reveals-North-Korea-is-refurbishing-nuclear-facility.html; North Korea Shrouded in Darkness in Stunning New Photo from Space Station, CBS News (Feb. 25, 2014), at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/north-korea-shrouded-in-darkness-in-stunning-new-photo-from-space-station.

¹⁷⁰ Contra Shim, David, Remote Sensing Place: Satellite Images as Visual Spatial Imaginaries, 51 Geoforum 152, 159 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Sheila Jasanoff, Image and Imagination: The Formation of Global Environmental Consciousness, in Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance 309 (Clark A. Miller & Paul N. Edwards eds., 2001).

¹⁷¹ Susan Sontag, On Photography 2 (1977). Contra Perkins, Chris & Dodge, Martin, Satellite Imagery and the Spectacle of Secret Spaces, 40 Geoforum 546, 548 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (emphasizing the amenability of satellite image data to being “re-imagined and subverted” for “counter-hegemonic” purposes).

¹⁷² Jeffrey Richelson, Spying on the Bomb: American Nuclear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea 451 (2007).

¹⁷³ Irmgard Niemeyer, Clemens Listner & Prashanth Reddy Marpu, Treaty Monitoring from Space – Satellite Imagery Analysis for Verifying Treaty Compliance, in Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XII, 7474, Proc. of SPIE 74741U, 74741U-3 (Roland Meynart, Steven P. Neeck & Haruhisa Shimoda eds., 2009).

¹⁷⁴ See generally Lucy Suchman, Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2d ed. 2007).

¹⁷⁵ Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber & Jian Pei, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques 6 (3d ed. 2012).

¹⁷⁶ Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest & Clifford Stein, Introduction to Algorithms 5 (3d ed. 2009).

¹⁷⁷ Ian H. Witten, Eibe Frank & Mark A. Hall, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (3d ed. 2011).

¹⁷⁸ Niemeyer, Listner & Marpu, supra note 173, at 74741U-4.

¹⁷⁹ Hillol Kargupta & Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar, Existential Pleasures of Distributed Data Mining, in Data Mining: Next Generation Challenges and Future Directions (Hillol Kargupta, Anupam Joshi, Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar & Yelena Yesha eds., 2004); Jure Leskovec, Anand Rajaraman & Jeffrey D. Ullman, Mining of Massive Datasets (rev. ed. 2014).

¹⁸⁰ Garcia, Humberto et al. , Integration of Facility Modeling Capabilities for Nuclear Nonproliferation Analysis, 54 Progress in Nuclear Energy 96, 99 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁸¹ Tom Soukup & Ian Davidson, Visual Data Mining: Techniques and Tools for Data Visualization and Mining xxiii (2002); Adelchi Azzalini & Bruno Scarpa, Data Analysis and Data Mining: An Introduction 5 (2012).

¹⁸² Niemeyer, Listner & Nussbaum, supra note 162, at 100.

¹⁸³ INFCIRC/153, supra note 62, para. 7.

¹⁸⁴ See generally Abburu, Sunitha & Golla, Suresh Babu, Satellite Image Classification Techniques: A Review, 119 Int'l J. Comput. Applications 20 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁸⁵ See generally Leskovec, Rajaraman & Ullman, supra note 179, at 415–17.

¹⁸⁶ Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani & Jerome Friedman, Unsupervised Learning (2009).

¹⁸⁷ See generally Dahlman, Ola, How Can Science Support a Process Towards a World Free of Nuclear Weapons?, 21 Sci. & Glob. Sec'y 95 (2013)Google Scholar.

¹⁸⁸ Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, at http://www.fz-juelich.de/portal/EN/Home/home_node.html (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

¹⁸⁹ Louis Charbonneau & John Irish, Experts Urge Release of Details of IAEA Inspection at Iran Site, Reuters (Sept. 18, 2015), at http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/18/us-iran-nuclear-parchin-idUSKCN0RI05M20150918.

¹⁹⁰ Monitoring Nuclear Weapons, supra note 153.

¹⁹¹ See generally Jill Lepore, The Disruption Machine: What the Gospel of Innovation Gets Wrong, New Yorker (June 23, 2014), at http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/23/the-disruption-machine.

¹⁹² Amy F. Woolf, The Role of Technology in Monitoring and Verification, in Routledge Handbook of Nuclear Proliferation and Policy, supra note 90, at 349, 356.

¹⁹³ Frank Pabian, G. Renda, R. Jungwirth, L.K. Kim, E. Wolfart & G.G.M. Cojazzi, Open Source Analysis in Support to Nonproliferation Monitoring and Verification Activities: Using the New Media to Derive Unknown New Information, in IAEA Safeguards Symposium Proceedings, supra note 152, at 322; Cristina Versino, Pattern Recognition by Humans and Machines, in IAEA Safeguards Symposium Proceedings, supra note 152, at 330.

¹⁹⁴ Langdon Winner, Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought (1977).

¹⁹⁵ Burr, William, A Scheme of ‘Control’: The United States and the Origins of the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group, 1974–1976, 36 Int'l Hist. Rev. 252, 271 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁹⁶ Monica Dreicer, Clemens Listner, Cliff Chen, Gotthard Stein & Irmgard Niemeyer, Applying State-Level Approaches to Arms Control Verification (Presented at Ann. Mtg. of Inst. Nuclear Materials Mgt., July 17, 2014), available at https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/778138.pdf.

¹⁹⁷ Bleakly, Horak & McDaniel, supra note 161, at 15–16.

¹⁹⁸ Nikolai Khlebnikov, Davide Parise & Julian Whichello, Novel Technologies for the Detection of Undeclared Nuclear Activities, IAEA-CN-148/32 (2007), available at http://www.npolicy.org/books/Falling_Behind/Ch3_Khlebnikov-Parise-Whichello.pdf (discussing “techniques and instruments that will be used for the implementation of additional protocols, including the conduct of complementary access,” such as satellite image analysis).

¹⁹⁹ Yaron Ezrahi, The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy 275 (1990).

²⁰⁰ This is in contrast to many accounts of law's “privileging of the visual,” the prevalence of which is something on which Emily Grabham remarks. See Grabham, Emily, Shaking Mr. Jones: Law and Touch, 5 Int'l J. L. in Context 343, 344 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁰¹ Jacobsen, Katja Lindskov, Experimentation in Humanitarian Locations: UNHCR and Biometric Registration of Afghan Refugees, 46 Sec'y Dialogue 144, 149 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁰² Zieck, supra note 5, at 256–65.

²⁰³ Kronenfeld, Daniel, Afghan Refugees in Pakistan: Not All Refugees, Not Always in Pakistan, Not Necessarily Afghan?, 21 J. Refugee Stud. 43 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁰⁴ Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, supra note 3.

²⁰⁵ Id.; UNHCR Gears Up for 2003 Afghan Repatriation, UNHCR News Stories (Feb. 24, 2003), at http://www.unhcr.org/3e5a38924.html; Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, UNHCR Briefing Notes (Oct. 10, 2003), at http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/search?page=search&docid=3f86a3ac1&query=Return%20to%20Afghanistan. Barbara Harrell-Bond, Eftihia Voutira, and Mark Leopold suggest that disputes over numbers between the UNHCR and its donors may put pressure on the organization to improve its official statistics, and that enumeration practices often proceed on the “assumption that ‘refugees always lie.’” See Harrell-Bond, Voutira & Leopold, supra note 96, at 213.

²⁰⁶ BioID Technologies, UNHCR Refugee Identification System, at http://www.bioidtech.co.uk/BioID/UNHCR.html (last visited Mar. 28, 2017).

²⁰⁷ Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, supra note 205; UNHCR, Agreement Between the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Governing the Repatriation of Afghan Citizens Living in Pakistan (2007), at http://www.unhcr.org/46c98acd2.pdf [hereinafter Tripartite Agreement].

²⁰⁸ Zieck, supra note 5, at 264; Tripartite Agreement, supra note 207.

²⁰⁹ UNHCR, Agreement Between the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Governing the Repatriation of Afghan Citizens Living in Pakistan (2003), Art. 15, at http://www.unhcr.org/3f5d97524.html.

²¹⁰ Colonna, Liane, A Taxonomy and Classification of Data Mining, 16 SMU Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 309, 316 (2013)Google Scholar; Azzalini & Scarpa, supra note 181, at 8.

²¹¹ See generally Daugman, John, How Iris Recognition Works, 14 Circuits & Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions 21 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²¹² Liam Lye, Ali Chekima, Liau Chung Fan & Jamal Ahmad Dargham, Iris Recognition Using Self-Organizing Neural Network, Student Conference on Research and Development, SCOReD 2002 (July 2002), available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=1033084; Wenming Cao, Jianhui Hu, Gang Xiao & Shoujue Wang, Iris Recognition Algorithm Based on Point Covering of High-Dimensional Space and Neural Network, in Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (Petra Perner & Atsushi Imiya eds., 2005); Sibai, Fadi N., Hosani, Hafsa I., Naqbi, Raja M., Dhanhani, Salima & Shehhi, Shaikha, Iris Recognition Using Artificial Neural Networks, 38 Expert Systems with Applications: Int'l J. 5940 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bowyer, Kevin, Hollingsworth, Karen P. & Flynn, Patrick J., Image Understanding for Iris Biometrics: A Survey, 110 Comput. Vision & Image Understanding 281 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mark J. Burge & Kevin Bowyer, Handbook of Iris Recognition 79–80 (2013).

²¹³ Richard Roiger & Michael Geatz, Data Mining: A Tutorial-Based Primer 45–47, 245–64 (2003).

²¹⁴ Burge & Bowyer, supra note 212, at 300; Nathan D. Kalka, Jinyu Zuo, Natalia A. Schmid & Bojan Cukic, Image Quality Assessment for Iris Biometric, in SPIE 6202: Biometric Technology for Human Identification III Proceedings 6202:D1–D11 (2006).

²¹⁵ S. Sumathi & S.N. Sivanandam, Introduction to Data Mining and its Applications 402 (2006); Roiger & Geatz, supra note 213, at 9–11.

²¹⁶ Iris Testing of Returning Afghans Passes 200,000 Mark, UNHCR News Stories (Oct. 10, 2003), at http://www.unhcr.org/3f86b4784.html; Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, supra note 205.

²¹⁷ Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, supra note 3.

²¹⁸ Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, supra note 205. For discussion of error rates in iris recognition generally, see Vatsa, Mayank, Singh, Richa & Noore, Afzel, Improving Iris Recognition Performance Using Segmentation, Quality Enhancement, Match Score Fusion, and Indexing, 38 Systems, Man & Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions 1021 (2008)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Burge & Bowyer, supra note 212.

²¹⁹ Iris Testing of Returning Afghans Passes 200,000 Mark, supra note 216. Commentators have, however, been critical of the UNHCR’s failure to disclose the risk of false matches likely to arise in large-scale applications of biometric technology, or to put in place measures “to detect and correct for such false matches,” especially in view of the fact that data anonymization might hinder their detection. See Jacobsen, supra note 201, at 151–52.

²²⁰ BioID Technologies, supra note 206.

²²¹ Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, supra note 3.

²²² Iris Testing of Returning Afghans Passes 200,000 Mark, supra note 216.

²²³ Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, supra note 3.

²²⁴ Id.

²²⁵ Id.

²²⁶ See, e.g., BioID Technologies, supra note 206; Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, supra note 205.

²²⁷ Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, supra note 3.

²²⁸ Cf. Amoore, Louise, Lines of Sight: On the Visualization of Unknown Futures, 13 Citizenship Stud. 17, 18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (observing that “items of data” need not comprise “a picture or a snapshot of a person” in order be made actionable in counterterrorism operations, but rather “a projected line of sight” or a “digital alter ego … a projected person”).

²²⁹ Louis Althusser, Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation), in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays 121, 160–65 (Ben Brewster trans., 2d ed. 1977).

²³⁰ Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, supra note 3; Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, supra note 205.

²³¹ Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, supra note 205.

²³² Afghan “Recyclers” Under Scrutiny of New Technology, supra note 3.

²³³ Id.

²³⁴ David J. Hand, Heikki Mannila & Padhraic Smyth, Principles of Data Mining 163 (2001).

²³⁵ Loh, Stanley, de Oliviera, José Palazzo M. & Gameiro, Mauricio A., Knowledge Discovery in Texts for Constructing Decision Support Systems, 18 Applied Intelligence 357, 358 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²³⁶ Daugman, supra note 211, at 27–29 (discussing the “decision environment” for iris recognition).

²³⁷ Yanhong Li, A User-Guided Association Rules Mining Method and its Application, Fifth Int'l Conf. on Comput. & Info. Tech. (Sept. 21–23, 2005), available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1562643.

²³⁸ Jain, Anil K., Data Clustering: 50 Years Beyond K-means, 31 Pattern Recognition Letters 651, 656 (2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar).

²³⁹ Claudio Ciborra, The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems (2002).

²⁴⁰ Hand, Mannila & Smyth, supra note 234, at 295, 440–41 (2001).

²⁴¹ The Quiet Power of Indicators, supra note 25.

²⁴² Vatsa, Singh & Noore, supra note 218; Burge & Bowyer, supra note 212.

²⁴³ Afghanistan: Iris Testing Proves Successful, supra note 205.

²⁴⁴ Burge & Bowyer, supra note 212, at 6.

²⁴⁵ Iris Testing of Returning Afghans Passes 200,000 Mark, supra note 216.

²⁴⁶ E.g., Merritt Roe Smith & Leo Marx, Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (1994) (mapping the meanings associated historically with the concept of technological determinism, including recurrent challenges to it). But see Sally Wyatt, Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism, in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 165 (Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch & Judy Wajcman eds., 2007) (arguing that, despite relentless critique of technological determinism in science and technology studies, it remains pervasive in business and policy circles).

²⁴⁷ See, e.g., Winner, supra note 194, at 323.

²⁴⁸ See, e.g., Jean d'Aspremont, Epistemic Forces in International Law: Foundational Doctrines and Techniques of International Legal Argumentation (2015); Jack L. Goldsmith & Eric A. Posner, The Limits of International Law (2007); Weber, Max, The Three Types of Legitimate Rule, 4 Berkeley Pub. Soc'y & Inst. 1 (1958)Google Scholar; Ryan Goodman & Derek Jinks, Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights Through International Law (2013).

²⁴⁹ Rancière, Panagia & Bowlby, supra note 42.

²⁵⁰ Koskenniemi, Martti, The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later, 20 Eur. J. Int'l L. 7, 10 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.