Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8v9h9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T11:14:05.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxic effects of dietary hydrolysed lipids: an in vivo study on fish larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2012

Øystein Sæle*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research, PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Andreas Nordgreen
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research, PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Pål A. Olsvik
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research, PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Jan I. Hjelle
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research, PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
Torstein Harboe
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Research, Austevoll, 5392Storebø, Norway
Kristin Hamre
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research, PO Box 2029, Nordnes, 5817Bergen, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: Ø. Sæle, fax +47 55 90 52 99, email Oyse@nifes.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have previously described that fish larvae absorb a larger fraction of dietary monoacylglycerol than TAG. To investigate how dietary hydrolysed lipids affect a vertebrate at early life stages over time, we fed Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) larvae six diets with different degrees of hydrolysed lipids for 30 d. The different diets had no effect on growth, but there was a positive correlation between the level of hydrolysed lipids in the diets and mortality. Important genes in lipid metabolism, such as PPAR, farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), were regulated by the different diets. Genes involved in the oxidative stress response did not respond to the increased lipid hydrolysation in the diets. However, enterocyte damage was observed in animals fed diets with 2·7 % NEFA (diet 3) or more. It is thus possible that mortality was due to infections and/or osmotic stress due to the exposure of the subepithelial tissue. In contrast to earlier experiments showing a positive effect of dietary hydrolysed lipids, we have demonstrated a toxic effect of dietary NEFA on Atlantic cod larvae. Toxicity is not acute but needs time to accumulate.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012
Figure 0

Table 1 Diet composition of all diets

Figure 1

Table 2 Lipid class composition in diets 1–6*

Figure 2

Table 3 Gene names, symbols, accession number, primer sequences for SYBR Green assays, SYBR Green assay product size and PCR assay efficiency for all the genes analysed

Figure 3

Table 4 Growth of fish larvae fed diets 1–6, after 15 d (45 d post-hatch (dph)) and 30 d (60 dph) (Mean values and standard deviations, n 20)

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Correlation between NEFA in the diets and cumulative mortality per experimental unit (P< 0·000; R2 0·8, n 18).

Figure 5

Fig. 2 Lipid class levels (mg/g wet weight) in fish larvae at mid-trial. The inserts show the lipid class level in the diets. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; ANOVA). Fish given diet 6 were not included in the statistical analysis since only one unit could be analysed. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PS, phosphatidylserine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; CL, cardiolipin.

Figure 6

Table 5 Overview of the genes analysed, their function and the P value of quantitative PCR analysis (one way-ANOVA)

Figure 7

Fig. 3 Mean normalised expression (MNE) of the genes that responded to the trial diets after 30 d. (A) Glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPx3), (B) farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and (C) stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; ANOVA).

Figure 8

Fig. 4 Histology of the intestinal mucosa at mid-trial (45 d post-hatch (dph)) and at the end of the trial (60 dph). 1, Intestinal lumen; 2, mucosal goblet cells; 3, food particles in the lumen; 4, lipid droplets in enterocytes; 5, lysed epithelium. Scale bar, 50 μm (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn).

Figure 9

Fig. 5 Proposed cause of membrane disruption and subsequent exfoliation of enterocytes. (A) Transbilayer diffusion (flip-flop): 1, NEFA enters the outer leaflet of the cell membrane; 2, NEFA is transferred to the inner leaflet; 3, NEFA enters the cytosol bound to fatty acid-binding protein. (B) Overload of NEFA in the bilayer: 1, a large number of NEFA enter the cell membrane; 2, the membrane is destabilised and the cell lyses (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn).