Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- 1 Images of discourse: interpretive, functional, critical, and structurational
- 2 Interpretive approaches to organizational discourse
- 3 Functional approaches: metaphor in organization change and development
- 4 Critical approaches: Michel Foucault's conceptions of discourse
- 5 A structurational approach to discourse
- 6 Analyzing discourse I: discourse as situated symbolic action
- 7 Analyzing discourse II: a tale of three discourses
- Index
- References
4 - Critical approaches: Michel Foucault's conceptions of discourse
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- Preface
- 1 Images of discourse: interpretive, functional, critical, and structurational
- 2 Interpretive approaches to organizational discourse
- 3 Functional approaches: metaphor in organization change and development
- 4 Critical approaches: Michel Foucault's conceptions of discourse
- 5 A structurational approach to discourse
- 6 Analyzing discourse I: discourse as situated symbolic action
- 7 Analyzing discourse II: a tale of three discourses
- Index
- References
Summary
As discussed in chapter 1, critical approaches view discursive social reality construction as imbued with power and interest considerations, where dominant groups attempt to shape reality, social practices, and even subjects' identities in ways that perpetuate these groups' own interests. Far from being neutral, language-based constructs, discourses are seen as the sites of polyphonic struggles as domains of power–knowledge relations that can dominate subjectivity in favor of the already powerful. The politically motivated task of critical discourse analysis is thus to demystify and expose the processes involved and ideally weaken their grip.
Michel Foucault has been a key figure providing inspiration, concepts, and analytical frameworks for critical discourse scholars. This chapter traces the development of Foucault's concept(s) of discourse from the Archaeological to the Genealogical periods, significantly drawing from Foucault's own texts. Second, it offers a critique of Archaeological conceptions of discourse, focusing on the discourse–subject relationship, and on Foucault's related conceptions of change, choice, and rules of discursive formations. Third, it traces Foucault's conceptual shifts and concerns in his Genealogical period, in particular his views on power, discourse as a manifestation of the will to power, and a tacit acceptance of the importance of agency. Finally, implications for organizational discourse analysis are discussed.
Critiques of Foucault's discussions of discourse have received much attention in philosophy (Frank, 1992; Habermas, 1987), literature (Kermode, 1973; Said, 1974), sociology (Brown and Cousins, 1994; Freundlieb, 1994), and organization studies (Newton, 1994, 1998; Reed, 1998).
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Discourse, Interpretation, Organization , pp. 79 - 107Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
and 1966. The social construction of reality. London: Penguin.
1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
1992. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Brown, B. and Cousins, M. 1994. The linguistic fault: The case of Foucault's Archaeology. In (ed.), Michel Foucault: Critical assessments: 186–208. London: Routledge.
1988. Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9 (2): 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000. Redirecting critique in postmodern organization studies: The perspective of Foucault. Organization Studies, 21 (6): 1059–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1981. Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure. Discourse Processes, 3: 101–131.Google Scholar
and 1983. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis'. Discourse & Society, 3: 193–217.Google Scholar
1972. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. 1977a. History of systems of thought [1970]. In (ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault: 199–204. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Foucault, M. 1977b. Intellectuals and power [1972]. In (ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault: 205–217. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
1977c. Discipline and punish. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. 1980a. Two lectures [1977]. In (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977: 78–108. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Foucault, M, 1980b. Truth and power [1977]. In (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977: 109–133. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. 1980c. The confession of the flesh [1977]. In (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977: 194–228. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. 1983. The subject and power [1982]. In and (eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics: 208–226. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. 1991a. Politics and the study of discourse [1968]. In , , and (eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: 53–72. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. 1991b. Questions of method [1980]. In , , and (eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: 73–86. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. 1991c. Governmentality [1978]. In , , and (eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality: 87–104. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Frank, M.1992. On Foucault's concept of discourse. Michel Foucault: Philosopher. (trans.): 99–116. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Freundlieb, D. 1994. Foucault's theory of discourse and human agency. In and (eds.), Reassessing Foucault: Power, medicine and the body: 152–180. London: Routledge.
1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
1987. Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
1987. The philosophical discourse of modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heracleous, L. 2000. Reflections on Foucault's conceptions of discourse. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Organizational Discourse, King's College London, July 26–28.
Heracleous, L. and Chan, A. 2005. Foucault's conceptions of discourse in the Archaeological and Genealogical periods. An interpretation, critique, and analytical implications. Working paper.
and 2000. Discourse and the study of organization: Toward a structurational perspective. Human Relations, 53: 1251–1286.Google Scholar
1987. The archaeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12 (3): 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1986. Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11 (2): 105–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2001. Seeing without being seen: Towards an archaeology of controlling science. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31 (3): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973. Crisis critic: Review of the archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York Review of Books, 17 (May): 36–39.Google Scholar
and 1991. Corporate strategy, organizations and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12 (2): 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1995. Strategy under the microscope: Strategic management and IT in financial services. Journal of Management Studies, 32 (2): 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1989. Power and subjectivity at work: From degradation to subjugation in social relations. Sociology, 23 (4): 535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.), 1998. Foucault, management and organization theory: From panopticon to technologies of self. London: Sage.
and 1991. Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control. Discourse and Society, 2 (3): 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994. Discourse and agency: The example of personnel psychology and assessment centres. Organization Studies, 15 (6): 879–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of Foucauldian studies? Organization Studies, 19 (3): 415–447.Google Scholar
1969. Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
and 1997. Managing multiple identities: Discourse, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4: 159–186.Google Scholar
and 2002. Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. London: Sage.
Reed, M. 1998. Organizational analysis as discourse analysis: A critique. In , , and (eds.), Discourse and organization: 193–213. London: Sage.
1991. From text to action. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
and 1995. Strategy and organization theories: Common forms of discourse. Journal of Management Studies, 32: 101–117.Google Scholar
1974. An ethics of language: Review of Michel Foucault's the archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Diacritics, 4: 28–37.Google Scholar
1983. Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth.
1993a. Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18 (3): 518–545.Google Scholar
1993b. Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies, 30 (2): 221–238.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 1
- Cited by