Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T15:09:09.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

What is wrong with rerandomization in randomized field experiments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2026

Mariusz Maziarz*
Affiliation:
Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Accessibility of Accepted Manuscripts

Accepted Manuscripts are early, peer-reviewed versions that have not yet been copyedited, typeset, or formally published and may not meet all accessibility standards. A fully formatted accessible version will follow.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Rerandomization is a new technique employed in randomized field experiments (RFEs) to enhance the balance of covariates across experimental groups. Rerandomization is recommended because it reduces imbalances in known covariates, thereby enhancing the precision of the average treatment effect estimates. However, employing rerandomization necessitates adjusting observed p-values, using regression-based inference, and selecting predictive covariates. All these amendments increase the number of researcher degrees of freedom, i.e., methodological decisions involved in designing and analyzing experiments. I argue that this increased analytical flexibility may be misused to p-hack for statistically significant or preferred results, thereby reducing the credibility of the results.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Philosophy of Science Association