2 Theoretical analysis of etalon effect in transmission plate

When a beam passes through a transmission plate, with thickness $d$ and residual reflectivity $R$ , as shown in Figure 1, the number of reflections approaches infinite: in one cycle, the forward beam in the plate is split into two beams at the output interface and the reflected part will be reflected again at the input interface. As a result, it goes forward as the initial forward beam in the plate in the next cycle.

According to the reflection process, the delay time of the $m$ -order output is obtained by

(1) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle t_{m}=\frac{nd}{c}(2m+1). & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

In the calculation, the change of the refractive index with the optical wavelength of SSD beam is ignored due to the beam’s small bandwidth. The output optical field contains amplitude attenuation and a phase delay. Considering these two aspects, the $m$ -order optical field transmission is given by

(2) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle T_{m}=(1-R)R^{m}e^{i(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}nd/\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})(2m+1)}. & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

The total output is a summation of the infinite series that comes from the multi-times reflection in the plate and given by

(3) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle A_{\text{out}}(t)=\mathop{\sum }_{m=0}^{\infty }T_{m}A_{\text{in}}(t-t_{m}), & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

where $A_{\text{in}}(t)$ and $A_{\text{out}}(t)$ are the input and output amplitudes of the optical field, respectively. When the steady-state approximation, which is a traditional method used in the Fabry–Perot (F–P) etalon, is applied to solve Equation (3), the output optical amplitude can be derived as

(4) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle A_{\text{out}}=A_{\text{in}}\mathop{\sum }_{m=0}^{\infty }T_{m}=A_{\text{in}}\frac{(1-R)e^{i(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}nd/\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})}}{1-Re^{i(4\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}nd/\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})}}. & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

And the intensity is calculated as

(5) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle I_{\text{out}}=I_{\text{in}}\frac{1}{1+\frac{4R\sin ^{2}(2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}nd/\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})}{(1-R)^{2}}}. & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

Equation (5) is the standard spectral transmission function of the F–P etalon. Generally, steady-state approximation is not satisfied in high-power laser facility due to the sharply shaped pulse which would cause inaccurate solutions. Since $R$ is a small quantity in high-power laser facility thus the $|T_{m+1}|/|T_{m}|\ll 1$ , one can use the low-order approximation to solve Equation (3). We get the first two terms of Equation (3) and calculate the output optical amplitude

(6) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle E_{\text{out}}(t)=T_{0}A_{\text{in}}(t-t_{0})+T_{1}A_{\text{in}}(t-t_{1}). & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

Let us consider a typical SSD beam that the dispersion direction is along $x$ -axis. Then the time–space optical field distribution can be written as

(7) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle E_{\text{in}}(t,x)=A_{0}(t,x)e^{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}t}e^{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\sin (\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}t+kx)}, & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

where $A_{0}(t,x)$ is the pulse amplitude, and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}$ are the central and modulation angular frequency, respectively. $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}$ is the modulation depth, $k$ is the dispersion parameter and the value is $2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}N_{c}/D$ , $N_{c}$ is the number of color cycles and $D$ is the beam aperture. Substituting Equation (7) into Equation (6), we can obtain the output optical field as

(8) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle E_{\text{out}}(t,x) & = & \displaystyle (1-R)A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,e^{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}(t-nd/c)}e^{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\sin \left[\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\left(t-nd/c\right)+kx\right]}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,(1-R)RA_{0}\left(t-\frac{3nd}{c}\right)e^{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}(t-3nd/c)}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,e^{i\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\sin [\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}(t-3nd/c)+kx]}.\end{eqnarray}$$

In Equation (8), the time–space optical field has theoretical expression; therefore, AM can be calculated directly in time domain instead of using optical spectrum transfer function to describe FM-to-AM conversion of etalon effect.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the beam mixing process in transmission plate.

3 AM of SSD beam induced by etalon effect in near field

For single sinusoidal phase modulation, the temporal intensity of output optical field is calculated from Equation (8) as

(9) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle I(t,x)=(1-R)^{2}\left|A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)\right|^{2}[1+2R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\cos \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(t,x)]. & & \displaystyle \nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

In Equation (9), the parameters $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(t,x)$ are extracted by

(10) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D702}=\frac{A_{0}(t-\frac{3nd}{c})}{A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)}\approx 1-\frac{\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}A_{0}}{\unicode[STIX]{x2202}t}\frac{2nd}{c}}{A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)}, & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

and

(11) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(t,x)=a\cos \left[\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\left(t-\frac{2nd}{c}\right)+kx\right]+\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}, & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

where $a=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\sin (\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}nd/c)$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=2n\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}d/c$ . The output pulse intensity as shown in Equation (9) has a cosine function term that accounts for the AM of SSD beam; the modulus and the phase of the cosine function determine the amplitude and patterns of AM.

With the definition of the FM-to-AM conversion factor^{[Reference Hocquet, Penninckx, Bordenave, Gouedard and Jaouen10]}, the distortion criterion $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$ is calculated as

(12) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=4R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}. & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

It indicates that the distortion criterion is proportional to $R$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$ . $R$ is a constant parameter related to the plate property, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$ is impacted by the pulse temporal shape expressed by Equation (10). We can easily obtain that the distortion criterion is reduced at the position where pulse has a sharp rise.

Equation (9) obviously shows that the time-varying AM patterns have the same period as FM. In order to obtain the detailed AM patterns, we performed a modulo- $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$ operation on the phase function and quantized the results into discrete phase levels with the name equivalent phase. $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(t,x)$ is accordingly converted into equivalent phases to analyze the AM patterns, and it indicates that the values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ and $a$ (the half variation range of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(t,x)$ ) are key points to impact AM patterns. Figures 2 shows some examples of the equivalent phases (Figures 2(a), 2(c) and 2(e)) and the corresponding AM patterns (Figures 2(b), 2(d) and 2(f)). For clear comparisons, we classify our discussion into two cases as follows.

1. (1) When $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ satisfies the condition $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}$ ( $n_{0}$ is an integer, the same below), the term $\cos \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(t,x)$ from Equation (9) can be simplified as $\cos \{a\cos [\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}(t-2nd/c)+kx]\}$ , which has two uniform types in a period and the AM period is reduced to half, which is shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b). Supposing the FM period is $T$ , the actual period $T_{1}$ can be easily obtained as $T_{1}=T/2$ .

2. (2) When $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ is not $2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}$ , AM patterns may have multiple ripples with different amplitudes and widths in a period. As shown in Figures 2(c) and 2(d), there are three different ripples. Additionally, if the value of $a$ is bigger, the number of ripples in one period is larger. This phenomenon can be easily mistaken for random noise in high-power laser facility.

We analyzed the values of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ and $a$ with typical SSD parameters. That is, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}=2$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}f=30\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}~\text{GHz}$ , $n=1.5$ , and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}=1.8\times 10^{15}(1053~\text{nm})$ . The results are $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=1.8\times 10^{7}d$ and $a=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\sin (\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}nd/c)$ . $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ changes linearly with the plate thickness, while the large slope coefficient indicates that the plate thickness is very sensitive. Generally, in high-power laser facility, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ around $2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}$ has low probability to occur, $a$ is periodically varied with the plate thickness and it indicates that the plate thickness can be precisely designed to reduce the ripples’ number and amplitude.

For multiple sinusoidal phase modulations, the temporal shape is calculated as

(13) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle I(t,x) & = & \displaystyle (1-R)^{2}\left|A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)\right|^{2}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,\left\{\vphantom{\frac{2n\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}d}{c}}1+2R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\cos \left[\vphantom{\frac{2n\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}d}{c}}a_{1}\cos \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}_{1}(t,x)\right.\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\left.\left.a_{2}\cos \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}_{2}(t,x)+\frac{2n\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{0}d}{c}\right]\right\}.\end{eqnarray}$$

The distortion criterion of AM has the same value as one sinusoidal phase modulation, but AM patterns are more complex, as shown in Figures 2(e) and 2(f). The traditional periodical pattern disappeared and the amplitude and the width of ripples varied over entire pulse.

Figure 2.

Samples of equivalent phases and the corresponding AM patterns of SSD beam induced by etalon effect. In the left three figures, red curves and blue curves denote the equivalent phase and the original phase, respectively. The parameters are (a) one sinusoidal phase modulation with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}$ , $a=2$ , (c) one sinusoidal phase modulation with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/3$ , $a=3.5$ and (e) two sinusoidal phase modulations with $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/3$ , $a_{1}=3$ , $a_{2}=2$ . The corresponding temporal ripples are shown in (b), (d) and (f) and the intensity scale is normalized to mean intensity.

Figure 3.

Schematic representations of the focusing process for an SSD beam (single sinusoidal phase modulation). Integration of intensity on focal plane can reduce the distortion criterion of SSD beam. The colors represent the isointensity surface in near field, and the horizontal dashed line corresponds to AM patterns in near field as shown in Figure 2.

When multi-plates are applied in series in system, ignoring the high order of AM terms, the temporal intensity is calculated as

(14) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle I(t,x) & = & \displaystyle \mathop{\prod }_{i=1}^{N}I_{i}(t,x)=\mathop{\prod }_{i=1}^{N}(1-R)^{2}\left|A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)\right|^{2}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,\mathop{\sum }_{i=1}^{N}[1+2R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\cos \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}(t,x)]\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & {\approx} & \displaystyle \left\{1+2\mathop{\sum }_{i=1}^{N}[R_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{i}\cos \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}_{i}(t,x)]\right\}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,\mathop{\prod }_{i=1}^{N}(1-R_{i})^{2}\left|A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd_{i}}{c}\right)\right|^{2}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Equation (14) indicates that AM with multi-plates has similar patterns and increased distortion criterion compared to the one plate scenario. When multi-plates have equal thickness (in high-power laser facility, only the beam passing through one plate by multi-times can satisfy this condition), the distortion criterion is superposed with linearity as $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=4\sum _{i=1}^{N}R_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{i}$ . Otherwise, the distortion criterion is superposed with quadratic sum as $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=4\sqrt{\sum _{i=1}^{N}(R_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{i})^{2}}$ because of the random equivalent phase $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F7}_{i}(t,x)$ . Supposing $n_{i}$ is the passing number for the $i$ th plate, the integral distortion criterion of multi-plates can be obtained as $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=4\sqrt{\sum _{i=1}^{N}(n_{i}R_{i}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{i})^{2}}$ .

4 AM of SSD beam induced by etalon effect in far field

For an SSD beam expressed as Equation (10), $kx$ is the phase factor associated with space, which represents that the grating generates a time delay proportional to $x$ . In the focusing process, the lens simply acts as an integrator on the focal plane, as presented in Figure 3. Therefore, the far-field intensity is temporally averaged due to the time delay.

For a spatially flat-top beam, the far-field intensity is linked to near-field intensity by the following expression:

(15) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle I_{f\!\!f}(t) & = & \displaystyle \int _{-D/2}^{D/2}I_{0}(t,x)\,\text{d}x=\int _{-D/2}^{D/2}(1-R)^{2}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \left|A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)\right|^{2}\left\{\vphantom{\frac{2nd}{c}}1+2R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \left.\cos \left\{a\cos \left[\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\left(t-\frac{2nd}{c}\right)+kx\right]+\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}\right\}\right\}\text{d}x\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle (1-R)^{2}\left|A_{0}\left(t-\frac{nd}{c}\right)\right|^{2}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \left\{\vphantom{\int _{-D/2}^{D/2}}D+2R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \left.\int _{-D/2}^{D/2}\cos \left\{a\cos \left[kx+\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\left(t-\frac{2nd}{c}\right)\right]\right.\right.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \left.\left.\vphantom{\int _{-D/2}^{D/2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}\right\}\text{d}x\right\}=I_{M}(t)+I_{AM}(t),\end{eqnarray}$$

where $I_{M}(t)$ and $I_{AM}(t)$ are the mean intensity and modulation intensity, respectively. The relative modulation $I_{AM}(t)/I_{M}(t)$ is calculated as

(16) $$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \frac{I_{AM}(t)}{I_{M}(t)}=2R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \quad \times \,\int _{-1/2}^{1/2}\cos \!\left\{a\cos \!\left[2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}N_{c}x_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}\left(t-\frac{2nd}{c}\right)\right]\!+\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}\right\}\text{d}x_{0}.\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$

Figure 4.

(a) Dependence of the far-field distortion criterion on the number of color cycle for an SSD beam, where the equivalent phase of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ is 0, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/6$ , $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/3$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/2$ , respectively. (b) The comparison of AM patterns in near field and far field for an SSD beam with the parameters $N_{c}=1.3$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/3$ .

Here the transform $x_{0}=x/D$ is applied. From Equation (16) it can be indicated that, AM in the far field has similar patterns and reduced distortion criterion to the near field. Equation (16) clearly shows the dependence of distortion criterion on the number of color cycle. When $N_{c}\rightarrow 0$ , the distortion criterion of the far field has the maximum value $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=4R\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$ , which is the same as the near field. When $N_{c}$ is an integer, the distortion criterion becomes 0 at any time slice, and AM on the far field disappears. Generally, the distortion criterion has a decreasing trend with $N_{c}$ increasing, and the constant phase $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ has an influence on the distortion criterion especially when $N_{c}$ is small.

We then investigate the number of color cycle dependence of the distortion criterion by numerical illustrations as follows. During the calculation, the temporal pulse profile was flat-in-time and 3 ns wide, SSD parameters are the same as in Figure 2(c) and the distortion criterion induced by the etalon effect is $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}=20\%$ in the near field. The distortion criterion trend is shown in Figure 4(a). It shows that with increasing $N_{c}$ , the distortion criterion in far field decreases integrally and it has an inflection point at the position where $N_{c}$ is an integer; the constant phase $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}$ does not change the characteristic of the curve but can modify the details. For clear comparisons, in Figure 4(b), we give an example of AM patterns in the near field and the far field, and the corresponding parameters are $N_{c}=1.3$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{0}=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}n_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}/3$ , respectively. We can see that AM in the far field and near field has similar patterns, but the distortion criterion in the far field is obviously smaller. The analytical results are in good agreement with the simulation ones.