Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-xnzfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T09:03:32.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two- and three-dimensional wake transitions of a circular cylinder with a rear-attached splitter plate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2025

Hongyi Jiang*
Affiliation:
Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Hongyi Jiang, hongyi.jiang@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

This study investigates the strong influence of a splitter plate on two- and three-dimensional wake transitions of a circular cylinder. Direct numerical simulations and Floquet analyses are conducted over a parameter space including Reynolds numbers (Re) of 10–480 and non-dimensional plate lengths (L/D) of 0–6. With the increase in L/D, the critical Re for the onset of vortex shedding (Recr2D) increases monotonically. The delayed onset of vortex shedding with elongation of the body is physically explained. The critical Re for the onset of three-dimensionality (Recr3D) and the three-dimensional wake instability modes and structures are also significantly altered by the splitter plate. Compared with an isolated cylinder, the Recr3D for L/D = 1 is significantly reduced via a long wavelength mode, whereas the Recr3D for L/D = 2–6 is significantly increased via other modes. For each L/D, with increasing Re over the wake transition process, the spanwise wavelength of the wake structure gradually decreases, and the wake structure becomes increasingly chaotic. The strong influence of the splitter plate on the formation of the primary vortices and three-dimensional wake structures alter the hydrodynamic characteristics strongly. In particular, optimal lift reduction is achieved at L/D ∼ 1. In addition, the existence/absence of a hysteresis effect at the onset of three-dimensionality is identified by three methods. Among which, the method involving the Landau equation may be contaminated by initial transients induced by stable Floquet modes and may thus lead to a false conclusion on the existence/absence of hysteresis.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Experimental studies for flow past a circular cylinder with a rear-attached splitter plate.

Figure 1

Table 2. Two- and three-dimensional numerical studies for flow past a circular cylinder with a rear-attached splitter plate.

Figure 2

Figure 1. Computational domain and mesh for the case of flow past a circular cylinder with a splitter plate attached: (a) schematic model of the computational domain (not to scale), and (b) close-up view of the macro-element mesh near the cylinder–plate system for the case L/D = 3. The splitter plate is highlighted in blue.

Figure 3

Table 3. Results of the 2-D mesh dependence study for the case L/D = 4 and Re = 480.

Figure 4

Table 4. Results of the 3-D mesh dependence study for the case L/D = 4 and Re = 480.

Figure 5

Table 5. Results of the Lz dependence study for the case L/D = 1 and Re = 180.

Figure 6

Figure 2. Critical Re for the onset of vortex shedding for a circular cylinder with a rear-attached splitter plate of either no-slip or slip boundary condition.

Figure 7

Figure 3. Instantaneous spanwise vorticity fields at Re slightly above Recr2D: (a) (L/D, Re) = (0.5, 60), (b) (L/D, Re) = (1, 70), (c) (L/D, Re) = (3, 110), (d) (L/D, Re) = (6, 180), (e) (L/D, Re) = (5, 120) with a slip splitter plate and (f) (L/D, Re) = (5, 130) with a slip splitter plate.

Figure 8

Figure 4. Floquet analysis results for various L/D conditions: (a) critical Re for the 3-D wake instability modes, and (b) critical λ/D for these modes.

Figure 9

Figure 5. Floquet analysis results for L/D = 0.5: (a) the $| \mu |$$ \beta $ relationships for several Re values, and (b) the neutral instability curves for the 3-D wake instability modes.

Figure 10

Figure 6. Streamwise perturbation vorticity fields for the case (L/D, Re) = (0.5, 280): (a) mode A predicted at $ \beta $D = 1.4, (b) mode QP1 predicted at $ \beta $D = 2.7, (c) mode QP2 predicted at $ \beta $D = 3.9 and (d) mode B predicted at $ \beta $D = 6.5. Red and blue denote positive and negative vorticity values, respectively.

Figure 11

Figure 7. Instantaneous vorticity fields for the 3-D wake instability modes observed for L/D = 0.5: (a) mode A structure at (Re, Lz/D) = (220, 4.0), (b) mode QP1 structure at (Re, Lz/D) = (263, 2.3), (c) mode QP2 structure at (Re, Lz/D) = (270, 1.62) and (d) mode B structure at (Re, Lz/D) = (269, 0.94). The translucent iso-surfaces represent spanwise vortices with |$\omega_z$| = 0.5, while the opaque iso-surfaces represent streamwise vortices with |$\omega_x$| = 0.5, 0.1, 0.1 and 0.2 for panels (ad), respectively. Dark grey and light yellow denote positive and negative vorticity values, respectively. The flow is from left to right past the cylinder on the left.

Figure 12

Figure 8. Instantaneous vorticity fields for L/D = 0.5: (a) Re = 220 (ordered mode A structure before evolution to dislocations), (b) Re = 220 (disordered mode A structure in the fully developed flow), (c) Re = 260 (disordered finer-scale structure) and (d) Re = 400 (increasingly disordered finer-scale structure). The translucent iso-surfaces represent spanwise vortices with |$\omega_z$| = 0.5, while the opaque iso-surfaces represent streamwise vortices with |$\omega_x$| = 0.07, 0.7, 0.7 and 1.0 for panels (ad), respectively. Dark grey and light yellow denote positive and negative vorticity values, respectively. The flow is from left to right past the cylinder on the left.

Figure 13

Figure 9. Floquet analysis results for L/D = 1: (a) the $| \mu |$$ \beta $ relationships for several Re values, and (b) the neutral instability curve for mode AL.

Figure 14

Figure 10. Streamwise perturbation vorticity fields for the case (L/D, Re) = (1, 180): (a) mode AL predicted at $ \beta $D = 0.3, (b) mode A predicted at $ \beta $D = 1.44 and (c) a synchronous mode of mode B type symmetry pattern predicted at $ \beta $D = 1.68. Red and blue denote positive and negative vorticity values, respectively.

Figure 15

Figure 11. Instantaneous vorticity fields for L/D = 1: (a) Re = 180 (one spanwise period of mode AL), (b) Re = 190 (a mixture of modes AL and A), (c) Re = 200 (disappearance of mode AL) and (d) Re = 280 (chaotic fine-scale structures). The translucent iso-surfaces represent spanwise vortices with |$\omega_z$| = 0.5, while the opaque iso-surfaces represent streamwise vortices with |$\omega_x$| = 0.15, 0.35, 0.4 and 0.7 for panels (a–d), respectively.

Figure 16

Figure 12. Floquet analysis results for L/D = 2 and 3: (a) the $| \mu |$$ \beta $ relationships for L/D = 2, and (b) the neutral instability curves for the 3-D wake instability mode, i.e. mode BL.

Figure 17

Figure 13. Streamwise perturbation vorticity fields for the case (L/D, Re) = (2, 330): (a) mode BL predicted at $ \beta $D = 0.4, and (b) mode A predicted at $ \beta $D = 2.0. Red and blue denote positive and negative vorticity values, respectively.

Figure 18

Figure 14. Instantaneous vorticity fields for L/D = 2: (a) Re = 330 (stable mode A structure before evolution to mode BL), (b) Re = 330 (ordered mode BL structure in the fully developed flow), (c) Re = 400 (disordered mode BL structure) and (d) Re = 480 (chaotic fine-scale structures). The translucent iso-surfaces represent spanwise vortices with |$\omega_z$| = 0.5, while the opaque iso-surfaces represent streamwise vortices with |$\omega_x$| = 0.08, 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 for panels (a–d), respectively.

Figure 19

Figure 15. Floquet analysis results for L/D = 4–6: (a) the $| \mu |$$ \beta $ relationships for L/D = 4, and (b) the neutral instability curves for the 3-D wake instability mode, i.e. mode QP3.

Figure 20

Figure 16. Instantaneous vorticity fields for L/D = 4: (a) Re = 360, (b) Re = 380, (c) Re = 420 and (d) Re = 480. The translucent iso-surfaces represent spanwise vortices with |$\omega_z$| = 0.5, while the opaque iso-surfaces represent streamwise vortices with |$\omega_x$| = 0.3, 0.6, 1.0 and 1.0 for panels (ad), respectively.

Figure 21

Figure 17. Hydrodynamic coefficients computed by the 2-D and 3-D DNSs, including the (a) $\overline{C_{D,cyl}}-Re$, (b) $C'_{L,cyl}-Re$ and (c) $C'_{L,\textit{plate}}-Re$ relationships. For each L/D condition (apart from L/D = 1), the Recr3D value is indicated by a red vertical bar.

Figure 22

Figure 18. Hydrodynamic coefficients computed by the 3-D DNS at Re = 400: (a) the mean drag coefficient, and (b) the root-mean-square lift coefficient.

Figure 23

Table 6. Hysteresis effect at the onset of three-dimensionality identified by different methods.

Figure 24

Figure 19. Identification of the hysteresis effect using the Landau equation: (a) time evolution of the mode amplitude |A| for the case (L/D, Re, Lz) = (0.5, 220, 4), (b) time evolution of |A| for the case (L/D, Re, Lz) = (2, 327, 13.67), (c) time evolution of |A| for the case (L/D, Re, Lz) = (4, 355, 2.91) and (df) the [d(log|A|)/dt] –|A|2 relationships for the corresponding cases shown in panels (ac), respectively.

Figure 25

Figure 20. Time history of CL for L/D = 0.5 and (a) Re = 52, and (b) Re = 53. The black curves show exponential fitting of the upper and lower envelopes.

Figure 26

Figure 21. Relationship between the growth/decay rate and the Reynolds number.