Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T12:24:30.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of satellite-derived sea-ice motion with drifting-buoy data in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Sandra Schwegmann
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bussestrasse 24, D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany E-mail: Sandra.Schwegmann@awi.de
Christian Haas
Affiliation:
Departments of Earth and Atmospheric Science and Geophysics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta TG6 2E3, Canada
Charles Fowler
Affiliation:
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research, University of Colorado at Boulder, CO 80309-0431, USA
Rüdiger Gerdes
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bussestrasse 24, D-27570 Bremerhaven, Germany E-mail: Sandra.Schwegmann@awi.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compare a satellite-derived sea-ice motion dataset obtained from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center with daily ice drift by drifting buoys between 1989 and 2005. the satellite data were derived from daily composites of passive-microwave satellite measurements by means of a cross-correlation method and were supplemented with data from visible and thermal channels of the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer. Seasonal and interannual variations of the agreement between the two datasets are discussed. In addition, regional differences in the agreement and correlation coefficients of buoy- and satellite-derived drift components are analyzed. Results show that the overall drift regime can be well described by satellite-derived drift data but 71% of the retrieved drift velocities are lower than those observed by buoys. Nevertheless, correlation coefficients, r, between the two datasets are 0.587 for the zonal and 0.613 for the meridional drift component. the correlation coefficients between monthly averages of buoy- and satellite-derived zonal and meridional drift components are on average 25.7% and 16.4% lower in summer (October–February) than in winter (March–September), with the exception of January. In January, correlation coefficients are about 62.6% (zonal) and 66.5% (meridional) lower than in winter. Furthermore, deviations between zonal buoy- and satellite-derived drift are 80% larger in the second half than in the first half of the year. the observed yearly and regional averaged agreement between the two datasets depends strongly on the season when buoy data were collected and on the number of coincident buoy and satellite data, which was often very low.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © the Author(s) [year] 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution of buoy start positions between 1989 and 2005 (symbols) and their drift tracks (gray lines). See Table 1 for region abbreviations.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. 5 day running mean of buoy- (black) and satellite-derived (gray) zonal (a, c) and meridional (b, d) ice drift. Examples for a buoy in 1996 (a, b) and one in 1999 (c, d) are shown.

Figure 2

Table 1. Definition of different regions for local comparisons

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Differences between buoy- and satellite-derived drift for (a) the zonal (u) and (b) the meridional (v) drift component. Bin size is 0.005 ms–1. Pairs of buoy and satellite drift vectors: 11 928. Time period: 1989–2005. the two datasets and the number of data points, n, that contribute to the mean values. Furthermore, the 95% confidence interval for the differences is added and indicates where mean differences are not significantly different from zero. the magnitude of both drift components shown in Figure 5 is generally too low for the satellite-derived sea-ice drift.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Correlation between buoy data and satellite-derived drift for (a) the zonal (u) and (b) the meridional (v) component. Pairs of buoy and satellite drift vectors: 11 928. Time period: 1989–2005.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Mean values for (a, c) zonal and (b, d) meridional components of buoy- (black) and satellite-derived (gray dotted line) drift, mean differences (gray, dashed line) with attached 95% confidence interval and number of corresponding drift vector pairs (n, light gray, only in (b) and (d)). (a, b) Yearly and (c, d) monthly distribution.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Correlation, r, between zonal (black) and meridional (dark gray, dashed) components of buoy- and satellite-derived ice drift. (a) Yearly and (b) monthly distribution. Gray bars show the region of <95% confidence for the correlation coefficients being nonzero.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Percentages of mean differences between buoy- and satellite-derived drift components (zonal: black, meridional: gray, dashed) for monthly distribution. Circles indicate that the confidence for differences being nonzero is <95% for each drift component.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Correlation between zonal (black) and meridional (dark gray, dashed) components of buoy- and satellite-derived ice drift for monthly separated data and number of corresponding drift vector pairs, n (light gray), for different regions. Gray bars show the region of <95% confidence for the correlation coefficients being nonzero.