Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bkrcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T18:59:51.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Which Identity Frames Boost Support for and Mobilization in the #BlackLivesMatter Movement? An Experimental Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2020

TABITHA BONILLA*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
ALVIN B. TILLERY JR.*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
Tabitha Bonilla, Assistant Professor, Human Development and Social Policy and Political Science (by courtesy) and Faculty Fellow Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, tabitha.bonilla@northwestern.edu.
Alvin B. Tillery, Jr., Associate Professor of Political Science and African American Studies (by courtesy), alvin.tillery@northwestern.edu.

Abstract

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has organized hundreds of disruptive protests in American cities since 2013 (Garza 2014; Harris 2015; Taylor 2016). The movement has garnered considerable attention from the U.S. media and is well recognized by the U.S. public (Horowitz and Livingston 2016; Neal 2017). Social movement scholars suggest that such robust mobilizations are typically predicated on clear social movement frames (Benford and Snow 2000; Snow et al. 1986). Tillery (2019b) has identified several distinct message frames within the social media communications of BLM activists. In this paper, we use a survey experiment to test the effect of three of these frames—Black Nationalist, Feminist, and LGBTQ+ Rights—on the mobilization of African Americans. We find that exposure to these frames generates differential effects on respondents’ willingness to support, trust, canvass, and write representatives about the Black Lives Matter movement. These findings raise new questions about the deployment of intersectional messaging strategies within movements for racial justice.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: Link

Bonilla and Tillery Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: File

Bonilla and Tillery supplementary material

Bonilla and Tillery supplementary material

Download Bonilla and Tillery supplementary material(File)
File 159.5 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.