Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T06:52:27.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of breakfast cereal type on portion size and nutritional implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2021

Isabelle M Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK
Lucy Boote
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK
Tom Butler*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email butlert@edgehill.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The present study aimed to assess the effect of different types of breakfast cereal (BC) on portion size and the nutritional implications of potential under or overserving.

Design:

A cross-sectional analysis was performed using one BC from the seven established BC manufacturing methods (flaking (F), gun puffed (GP), oven puffed (OP), extruded gun puffed (EGP), shredded wholegrain (SW), biscuit formed (BF) and granola). Participants were asked to pour cereal as if they were serving themselves (freepour). Difference between the freepour and recommended serving size (RSS) was calculated (DFR). The Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test was used to test for a significant differences between cereal categories.

Setting:

City of Chester, North West of the UK.

Participants:

Adults (n 169; n 110 female, 32 (sd 18) years).

Results:

Freepour values were greater than RSS for all categories of BC. Median values for denser cereals such as SW, granola and oats were significantly (P < 0·001) greater than all other categories with granola having the highest median freepour value of 95 g. Median (and range of) DFR weight values for granola were significantly higher than other BC (50·0 g (−24·0 to 267·0 g), P < 0·001). BC with the lowest median DFR were F1 (7·0 g (−20 to 63·0 g)), GP (6·0 g (−26·0 to 69·0 g)), EGP (6·0 g (−26·0 to 56·0 g)), OP (5·0 g (−27·0 to 53·0 g)) and BF (0·0 g (−28·2 to 56·4 g)).

Conclusions:

The degree of overserving may be related to the type of BC with denser cereals more readily overserved. Encouraging manufacturers to reformulate cereals and improving their nutritional properties may have benefit in reducing excess energy intake.

Information

Type
Research paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1 BC products with corresponding brand, manufacturing method and RSS*

Figure 1

Table 2 Nutritional information for the BC*

Figure 2

Table 3 Participant characteristics*,†

Figure 3

Fig. 1 Paricipant flow through study

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Freepour and difference between freepour and RSS. Freepour (a) and difference between freepour and RSS (b). Data shown as median ± range. n 169 for 10 BC. The dashed line in Fig. 1a represents median portion size of 30 g (based on our cereal sample). Categories with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·001). F1, flaked 1; F2, flaked 2; GP, gun puffed; EGP, extruded gun puffed; SW, shredded wholegrain; OPC, oven-puffed coloured; OP, oven puffed; BF, biscuit formation

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Differences in potential nutritional intake based on participants freepour. Data shown as median ± range. n 169 for 10 BC. Energy (a), total carbohydrate (b), sugar (c), fat (d), saturated fat (e), protein (f), fibre (g), and salt (h). F1, flaked 1; F2, flaked 2; GP, gun puffed; EGP, extruded gun puffed; SW, shredded Wholegrain; OPC, oven-puffed coloured; OP, oven puffed; BF, biscuit formation. Categories with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·001)

Supplementary material: File

Lewis et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Lewis et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.8 KB