Introduction
Silky windgrass is a winter annual grass occurring as a weed in cereal production systems in several parts of the world (Warwick et al. Reference Warwick, Black and Zilkey1985; USDA-NRCS 2016). In particular, silky windgrass is a common grass weed infesting arable crops in central and eastern Europe (e.g., Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Switzerland, Slovakia, and Hungary), but it also grows in Asia and North America (Krysiak et al. Reference Krysiak, Gawronski, Adamczewski and Kierzek2011). This grass is a problematic weed in winter cereals in the Czech Republic, often found in 80% of the fields in the west and central parts of the country (Soukup et al. Reference Soukup, Novakova, Hamouz and Namestek2006). Recently, this species has become a major weed in Scandinavia (Melander et al. Reference Melander, Holst, Jensen, Hansen and Olesen2008; Babineau et al. Reference Babineau, Mathiassen, Kristensen, Holst, Beffa and Kudsk2017). It infests mainly winter cereals, but it is also found in oilseed rape, forage crops, and spring cereals (Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011). Silky windgrass represents a growing threat to arable crops in extended areas of northwestern Greece, given that the dominant sterile oat (Avena sterilis L.) is replaced by other grasses, such as spring milletgrass (Milium vernale M. Bieb.) (Grevena and Ptolemaida Counties), brome (Bromus spp.) (Florina County), or silky windgrass (infesting large areas of Ptolemaida County).
Abandonment of herbicide rotation and repeated application of herbicides with same modes of action (MOAs) exerted greater levels of selection pressure to silky windgrass populations, resulting in field-evolved resistance in many agricultural areas (Balgheim et al. Reference Balgheim, Wagner and Gerhards2007; Delabays et al. Reference Delabays, Mermillod and Bohren2006; Novakowa et al. Reference Novakowa, Soukup, Wagner, Hamouz and Namestek2006; Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011). The first case of herbicide resistance in silky windgrass was documented for the substituted urea isoproturon (Mayor and Mallard Reference Mayor and Mallard1997; Niemann Reference Niemann2000). Since then, numerous populations of silky windgrass from central and eastern Europe have evolved resistance to several acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors (e.g., chlorsulfuron, flupyrsulfuron, sulfosulfuron, and a commercial mixture of mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron) (Hamouzova et al. Reference Hamouzova, Soukup, Jursik, Hamouz, Venclova and Tumova2011; Krysiak et al. Reference Krysiak, Gawronski, Adamczewski and Kierzek2011; Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011). Herbicide resistance to ALS inhibitors in silky windgrass is likely to spread rapidly, causing significant economic losses (Gerhards and Massa Reference Gerhards and Massa2011). Recent research confirmed resistant populations of silky windgrass to iodosulfuron and fenoxaprop ethyl ester in Denmark (Babineau et al. Reference Babineau, Mathiassen, Kristensen, Holst, Beffa and Kudsk2017). In Lithuania, several silky windgrass populations were found resistant to sulfosulfuron (Auskalniene et al. Reference Auskalniene, Kadziene, Stefanoviciene and Jomantaite2020). In Czech Republic, silky windgrass populations with varying levels of resistance to herbicides inhibiting ALS, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase), and photosystem-II (PSII) were confirmed (Kosnarova et al. Reference Kosnarova, Hamouz, Hamouzova, Linn, Sen, Mikulka, Suk and Soukup2021). However, cases of silky windgrass resistance in Greece have not previously been reported.
Field-selected resistance to ALS- or ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in most weed populations of silky windgrass involved mostly target-site (Krysiak et al. Reference Krysiak, Gawronski, Adamczewski and Kierzek2011; Massa et al. Reference Massa, Krenz and Gerhards2011; Hamouzova et al. Reference Hamouzova, Kosnarova, Salava, Soukup and Hamouz2014) and probably non-target-site resistance (NTSR) mechanisms (Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011; Babineau et al. Reference Babineau, Mathiassen, Kristensen, Holst, Beffa and Kudsk2017). More specifically, Babineau et al. (Reference Babineau, Mathiassen, Kristensen, Holst, Beffa and Kudsk2017) reported NTSR due to detoxification in silky windgrass populations at different levels of herbicides and underlined that NTSR mechanisms do not always confer broad resistance to different herbicide subclasses, hence suggesting complex relationships to resistant phenotypes. Target-site resistance typically occurs after a single nucleotide change in the gene encoding the ALS enzyme, which affects the strength of herbicide binding to the target protein and thus renders the enzyme insensitive to ALS-inhibiting herbicides (Tranel and Wright Reference Tranel and Wright2002; Yu and Powles Reference Yu and Powles2014b). Six amino acid substitutions of the ALS gene (Trp-574-Leu, Arg-377-His, Pro-197-Thr, Pro-197-Asn, Pro-197-Ser, and Ala-122-Val) have been so far identified in ALS-resistant silky windgrass populations (Krysiak et al. Reference Krysiak, Gawronski, Adamczewski and Kierzek2011; Massa et al. Reference Massa, Krenz and Gerhards2011). By contrast, although it is not currently known for silky windgrass, NTSR is related to different factors than the gene encoding the ALS enzyme, such as reduced herbicide penetration to the foliage, reduced translocation into the target site, or enhanced metabolism mainly by cytochrome P450 mixed-function oxidases, Family 1 UDP-glucose-dependent glycosyltransferases, and glutathione transferases (Cummins et al. Reference Cummins, Wortley, Sabbadin, He, Coxona, Straker, Sellars, Knight, Edwards, Hughes, Kaundund, Hutchings, Steel and Edwards2013; Yu and Powles Reference Yu and Powles2014a). NTSR mechanisms in grasses usually cause multiple resistance to ALS inhibitors and other herbicides with different MOAs (Délye et al. Reference Délye, Jasieniuk and Le Corre2013).
Unsatisfactory control of silky windgrass populations has lately occurred in winter cereal–growing areas of northwestern Greece with continuous and exclusive use of chlorsulfuron and clodinafop-propargyl without integration with nonchemical methods, thus causing an alarming situation among farmers and field practitioners. However, there is no information whether the cause of this situation is due to evolution of resistance. The objective of this research was (1) to investigate whether the reported unsatisfactory control of silky windgrass claimed by some cereal farmers in northwestern Greece was due to the occurrence of resistance to either ALS and/or ACCase inhibitors, (2) to determine the molecular mechanism of silky windgrass cross-resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides, and (3) to evaluate other postemergence herbicides for silky windgrass control in winter cereals (or broadleaf crops).
Materials and Methods
Seed Source
Seeds were collected in early summer 2013 and 2014 from wheat fields located in northwestern Greece, in the West Macedonia region, where failure of silky windgrass control with chlorsulfuron, clodinafop-propargyl, and other ALS- or ACCase-inhibiting herbicides had been reported. Seeds were collected from the locations Olympiada (40o34′N, 21o36′E), Galateia (40o33′N, 21o35′E), Anarahi (40o29′N, 21o34′E), and Tripotamos (40o49′N, 21o30′E). All sampling locations were rural areas devoted to continuous wheat monoculture for more than 10 yr, accompanied by repeated use of herbicides with the same MOAs, especially chlorsulfuron and clodinafop-propargyl. Mature seeds were collected from different patches and from several plants across representative fields before winter wheat harvest. Seeds from each field were pooled together and regarded as a distinct population. A susceptible population originated from the margins of a field that had never been treated with any herbicide was included in the study. The seeds were initially collected in plastic bags and then transported to the laboratory. After air-drying, seeds were stored for 4 mo in paper bags at 5 to 7 C for use in the whole-plant response experiments. No dormancy was observed after the cool storage of seeds.
Whole-Plant Response Experiments (Amaliada)
Two identical pot trials at different times were conducted outdoors at the farm of the Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece in Amaliada during winter 2013 to spring 2014, where one susceptible (S) population never treated with herbicides and 16 putative resistant (A1 to A16) silky windgrass populations were evaluated. Experiments were conducted in 0.9-L plastic pots filled with a 1:1:1 (v/v/v) mixture of clay loam soil with peat and sand. Each pot was surface seeded with approximately 35 seeds of silky windgrass seeds and covered by a thin layer of sand. At the 2-leaf growth stage, seedlings were carefully thinned to six per pot. All pots were moved outdoors, irrigated, and fertilized with a liquid fertilizer (Bayfolan® 11:8:6, Bayer Crop Science, Athens, Greece) as and when required for optimum plant growth. Mean air temperature during the experimental period in Amaliada ranged from 9.2 to 19.7 C in 2013 and from 9.9 to 20.4 C in 2014.
The silky windgrass plants of the putative resistant populations were sprayed at the 4- to 5-leaf growth stage with the recommended (X), 4X, 8X, and 16X field rates of the following herbicides: chlorsulfuron (Glean® 75 WG, Dupont Hellas, Athens, Greece; 15, 60, 120, 240 g ai ha−1), mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron (Atlantis® WG, Bayer Crop Science Hellas, Athens, Greece; 15 + 3, 60 + 12, 120 + 24, 240 + 48 g ai ha−1), pyroxsulam (Senior® 75 WG, Dow Elanco Hellas, Acharnes, Greece; 18.75, 75, 150, 300 g ai ha−1), pinoxaden (Axial® 100 EC, Syngenta Hellas, Oinofyta, Greece; 45, 180, 360, 720 g ai ha−1), clodinafop-propargyl (Topik® 240 EC, Syngenta Hellas; 41, 164, 328, 656 g ai ha−1), and clethodim (Clethodim Arysta® 24 EC, Arysta LifeScience, Athens, Greece; 240, 960, 1,920, 3,840 g ai ha−1). The recommended rates of these herbicides were also co-applied with the recommended field rate (1,000 g ai ha−1) of the systemic organophosphate (OP) insecticide chlorpyrifos (Aspida® 480 EC, Bayer Crop Science Hellas), applied 1 h before the application of herbicides. This application was made to examine the possible existence of NTSR mechanisms involved in resistance in silky windgrass populations. Chlorpyrifos is a cytochrome P450 inhibitor that has been used previously to detect indirect evidence of enhanced metabolism resistance (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Hulting and Mallory-Smith2016). Because only cytochrome P450s and not glutathione transferases are inhibited by chlorpyrifos, a lack of suppression of weed control in response to chlorpyrifos does not indicate the potential presence of a different metabolic resistance mechanism, such as from glutathione transferases. An untreated control for each putative resistant and the susceptible populations was included in the experiments. A field plot sprayer (AZO Sprayer, Ede-Konstrukties, Ede, the Netherlands) with a 2.4-m-wide boom was used for herbicide applications. The sprayer carried six 8002 flat-fan nozzles and delivered 300 L ha−1 of water at 280 kPa. The application of herbicides was performed when silky windgrass plants were at GS21 to GS22 (3 to 4 leaves, 1 to 2 tillers) of the Zadoks scale (Zadoks et al. Reference Zadoks, Chang and Konzak1974).
Each of the two identical pot experiments was established in a completely randomized design with treatments replicated three times. Pot randomization within each population was made weekly to ensure uniform growth conditions for all plants. Silky windgrass control was evaluated by determining the fresh weight of surviving plants at 35 days after treatment (DAT). Then, fresh weight data were turned to a percent reduction of the nontreated control (fresh weight suppression over the nontreated control) and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA).
A combined over-the-two-experiments ANOVA was conducted for each evaluated silky windgrass population, using a 6 (herbicides) × 5 (herbicide rates, X-recommended rate, X+OP, 4X, 8X, and 16X) factorial approach. Differences between herbicide × rate means presented within each population were tested using the Bonferroni adjusted least significant difference (LSD) value at P < 0.05 (Steel et al. Reference Steel, Torrie and Dickey1997). In addition, a combined over-the-two-experiments ANOVA was conducted for each herbicide, using a 17 silky windgrass population × 5 herbicide rate factorial approach, while the differences between population means within each herbicide rate were tested using the Bonferroni adjusted LSD value at P < 0.05.
Whole-Plant Response Experiments (Florina)
Two identical pot experiments at different times were conducted outdoors at the farm of the Technological Educational Institute of West Macedonia (Florina County), Greece, during winter 2013 to spring 2014, where one susceptible population never treated with herbicides and eight putative resistant (A17 to A24) populations were evaluated. In these experiments, clethodim was replaced with cycloxydim (Focus® 10 EC, BASF Hellas, Athens, Greece) applied at the recommended (X), 2X, 4X, 8X, and 16X field rates (200, 400, 800, 1,600, 3,200 g ai ha−1). Also, the same proportions of the recommended rates (X, 2X, 4X, 8X, and 16X) were used for the other five herbicides. The silky windgrass plants of the putative resistant populations were sprayed at the 4- to 5-leaf growth stage. Each of the two identical pot experiments was established in a completely randomized design with treatments replicated three times, as described previously for the experiments carried out in Amaliada. Mean air temperature during the experimental period in Florina ranged from 6.3 to 16.8 C in 2013 and from 4.2 to 20.4 C in 2014.
A combined over-the-two-experiments ANOVA was conducted for each evaluated silky windgrass population using a 6 (herbicides) × 5 (herbicide rates, X-recommended rate, X+OP, 4X, 8X, and 16X) factorial approach. Differences between herbicide × rate means presented within each population were tested using the Bonferroni adjusted LSD value at P < 0.05 (Steel et al. Reference Steel, Torrie and Dickey1997). In addition, a combined over-the-two-experiments ANOVA was conducted for each herbicide, using a 9 silky windgrass population × 5 herbicide rate factorial approach, while the differences between population means within each herbicide rate were tested using the Bonferroni adjusted LSD value at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software.
Amplification and Sequencing of the ALS Gene Fragment from Silky Windgrass Plants
The S and the eight R silky windgrass populations A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A23, and A24, with cross-resistance to chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron, and pyroxsulam, were the only ones selected for sequencing of the ALS gene due to limited resources. Sequencing of the ACC gene for R populations to ACCase inhibitors was not conducted. The plant material for the amplification of the ALS gene was taken from plants grown in separate pots for this purpose, as described earlier. Three pots with six plants per pot from each of the S and eight R populations, at the 3- to 4-leaf stage (1 to 2 tillers), were sprayed with the recommended rate of chlorsulfuron (15 g ai ha−1), whereas three pots with six plants per pot of the S population were left untreated. This procedure was followed to eliminate possible individual susceptible plants from the R populations and to confirm the susceptibility of the S population. Leaf samples of individual surviving plants from the eight R populations were harvested, stored at −28 C, and subsequently used for DNA extraction. Also, leaf samples of individual plants from the untreated S population were harvested. Six leaf samples from plants of the R and the S populations were sequenced. DNA was extracted from 100-mg leaf tissue using a NucleoSpin® Plant II kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The amplification of the ALS gene fragment (375 bp) from genomic DNA of the S and R populations, which includes the Pro-197 codon, was performed using the primers ALS375for 5′-CGAGCCCCGCAAGGGCGCCGACAT-3′ (forward) and ALS375rev 5′-GTGATGGAG CGGGTGACCTCTA-3′ (reverse), following Massa et al. (Reference Massa, Krenz and Gerhards2011). The amplification focused on the Pro-197 codon, following the response of the populations in the whole-plant response experiments and also because mutations at Pro-197 are by far the most commonly reported in the literature, with 11 amino acid substitutions endowing resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides (Powles and Yu Reference Powles and Yu2010). These primers were designed on the basis of the nucleotide and amino acid sequence of the ALS gene reported by Massa et al. (Reference Massa, Krenz and Gerhards2011) for silky windgrass. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test consisted of 0.2 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 μM of each forward and reverse primer, 2 μL of the supplied 10X thermophilic buffer, 1 μL of genomic DNA diluted at 20 ng/uL, and 1 enzyme unit (U) of standard Thermus aquaticus (Taq) polymerase in 20 μL mixture. Amplification was conducted in a Veriti™ thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the following cycles: DNA denaturation for 5 min at 95 C, 40 cycles of 30-s denaturation at 95 C, 30 s annealing at 50 C, and 1 min elongation at 72 C. The samples were submitted in a final step of elongation at 72 C for 5 min, and the PCR products were separated in 1% agarose gel. The purified product was sent immediately for sequencing to the School of Medicine, Department of Immunology and Histocompability, University of Thessaly. Each PCR product was sequenced once. The sequencing chromatograms were edited with ChromasPro software, and the nucleotide sequences were aligned using Blast® (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The EMBOSS suite of bioinformatics tools (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/emboss_transeq/) was used to translate the nucleotide to peptide sequence.
Ploidy levels of silky windgrass were not considered in this study, following a common practice of previous studies concerning resistance of certain weed species with known ploidy level, such as shepherd’s purse [Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.] (Jin et al. Reference Jin, Liu, Huan, Wu, Bi and Wang2011; Cui et al. Reference Cui, Li, Wang, Wang, Wei and Gao2012) and littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.) (Gherekhloo et al. Reference Gherekhloo, Osuna and De Prado2012). Ploidy levels may influence the isolation of target genes of interest due to existence of more than one copy of the ALS gene in the genome (Scarabel et al. Reference Scarabel, Locascio, Furini, Sattin and Varotto2010); thus, in the case of a polyploid, one ancestral genome could have a mutation and not the other. This point should be considered in future research, but the most important objective of the present study was to explain the reported unsatisfactory control of grasses claimed by some cereal farmers in northwestern Greece and not to explore the ploidy levels of silky windgrass.
Wheat Field Experiments
Two field experiments were conducted during 2013 and 2014 in Florina County, a main winter cereal–growing area of northwestern Greece, to evaluate the response of the A6 silky windgrass (cross-resistant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides) population to a range of postemergence herbicides. The efficacy evaluation was performed in a natural silky windgrass population of relatively uniform density that was previously evaluated in the pot experiments (A6 population). The field trials were established in Tripotamos District of Florina County (40o49′N, 21o30′E) on a grower’s farm where common agronomic practices (e.g., soil tillage, selection of wheat cultivar, sowing date, sowing density) were implemented. The two trials were established in heavily and uniformly infested fields, with high silky windgrass densities ranging between 60 and 90 plants m−2. The following commercial herbicide formulations were used at the recommended and two times the recommended field rate: clodinafop-propargyl (Topik® 240 EC) applied at 41 and 82 g ai ha−1, fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Puma® S 6.9 EW, Bayer Crop Science Hellas) applied at 82.5 and 165 g ai ha−1, pinoxaden (Axial® 60 EC, Syngenta Hellas) applied at 45 and 90 g ai ha−1, pyroxsulam (Senior® 75 WG) applied at 18.75 and 37.5 g ai ha−1, and mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron (Atlantis® WG) applied at 15 + 3 and 30 + 6 g ai ha−1. Chlorsulfuron was not included in the field experiments because it imposes serious restrictions on crop rotation, while clethodim also was not included because it is not registered for use in wheat. A field plot sprayer (AZO Sprayer) with a 2.4-m-wide boom was used for herbicide applications. The sprayer carried six 8002 flat-fan nozzles and delivered 300 L ha−1 of water at 280 kPa. Herbicides were applied as previously noted, when silky windgrass plants were at GS22 to GS23 (4 to 5 leaves, 2 to 3 tillers) of the Zadoks scale. Treatments were applied in plots laid out in a randomized complete block design, with four replicates for each treatment. Plot size was 6 × 3 m. An untreated control (four replicate plots) was used for the necessary comparisons. Mean air temperature during the experimental period ranged between 6.9 C and 19.6 C in 2013 and between 4.1 C and 16.1 C in 2014. Visual phytotoxicity assessments by three scientists were done 15, 30, and 45 d following herbicide treatments by comparison with plots that received no herbicide treatment (controls). Herbicide efficacy was assessed on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 corresponding to no plant injury (as compared with the nontreated control) and 100 corresponding to no plant survival (dead plants). To confirm visual assessments, aboveground biomass data of the silky windgrass were collected from 1 m2 in the center of each plot. Only visual assessments were reported, reflecting weed control levels more accurately.
The homogeneity of variances of the two field trials was checked using Bartlett’s test (Snedecor and Cochran Reference Snedecor and Cochran1989), and therefore silky windgrass control data were combined from the two experiments prior to conducting ANOVA, using a 5 × 2 factorial approach (five herbicides × two rates). Differences of treatment means were compared at P < 0.05 using Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Results and Discussion
Whole-Plant Response Experiments
The S population of silky windgrass was completely controlled with all rates of postemergence-applied chlorsulfuron examined (Tables 1 and 2). None of the suspected R populations were adequately controlled at the chlorsulfuron labeled rate. The recommended (X) rate of postemergence-applied chlorsulfuron, 15 g ha−1, provided only 0% to 10% control of 16 putative R populations (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A9, A10, A11, A12, A13, A15, A16, A17, A18, A19) and 14% to 30% control of seven silky windgrass populations (A7, A8, A14, A20, A21, A22, A23) (Tables 1 and 2). Co-application of the OP insecticide chlorpyrifos only slightly increased the overall poor level of control (Table 1). The increase in fresh weight reduction from 0% to 33% (population A5) was statistically significant yet offered practically poor control of this population. Similar control was documented with the application of 4X (60 g ha−1) and 8X (120 g ha−1) chlorsulfuron rate, whereas the application of 16X (240 g ha−1) rate reduced fresh weight by 0% to 58% in 21 putative R populations (Tables 1 and 2).
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A1 to A16) with chlorsulfuron (Amaliada trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; OP, organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (1,000 g ai ha−1); NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A17 to A24) with chlorsulfuron (Florina trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Acceptable to excellent control (73% to 100%) of 13 putative R populations (A8, A10, A12, A13, A14, A15, A16, A17, A18, A19, A20, A21, A22) was achieved with the X rate (15 + 3 g ha−1) of mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron, whereas the remaining populations were insufficiently controlled (5% to 71%) (Tables 3 and 4). The overall control level was not significantly increased with co-application of chlorpyrifos, although a 12% to 19% control increase was documented against some silky windgrass populations (A3, A4, A9, A10, A11) when mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron was co-applied with chlorpyrifos (Table 3). It is also noteworthy that the OP treatment had a major effect on the control of some populations with mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron; for example, the control of population A10 increased from 73% to 94% after the OP treatment, bringing its level from just unacceptable to excellent, and the control of population A13 increased from 75% (acceptable) to 86% (good). Mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron at the 4X rate (60 + 12 g ha−1) resulted in excellent control (94% to 100%) of 15 populations, while its efficacy against seven populations (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6, A23, A24) ranged from 31% to 78% (Tables 3 and 4). In addition, application of the 16X rate (240 + 48 g ha−1) provided 44% to 77% control of four silky windgrass populations (A1, A2, A6, A23).
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A1 to A16) with mesosulfuron-methyl plus iodosulfuron (Amaliada trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; OP, organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (1,000 g ai ha−1); NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A17 to A24) with mesosulfuron-methyl plus iodosulfuron (Florina trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Nine putative (A12, A13, A14, A15, A16, A17, A18, A20, A21) R silky windgrass populations were controlled 86% to 100% after application of the X rate (18.75 g ha−1) of pyroxsulam, whereas the remaining populations were less controlled (Tables 5 and 6). A slight increase of control was documented for most populations with co-application of chlorpyrifos (Table 5). Pyroxsulam applied at the 4X rate (75 g ha−1) caused 80% to 100% reduction of fresh weight in 13 populations (A7, A10, A11, A12, A13, A14, A15, A16, A17, A18, A19, A20, A21) and 13% to 68% reduction in 10 populations (A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6, A9, A22, A23, A24) (Tables 5 and 6). The 8X rate (150 g ha−1) controlled populations A1, A2, A3, A4, A6, A22, A23, and A24 15% to 72%, whereas populations A1, A2, A3, A6, A22, and A23 were controlled 33% to 70% with pyroxsulam at the 16X rate (300 g ha−1).
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A1 to A16) with pyroxsulam (Amaliada trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; OP, organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (1,000 g ai ha−1); NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A17 to A24) with pyroxsulam (Florina trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Pinoxaden at the X rate (45 g ha−1) controlled 14 putative R populations 91% to 100%, whereas populations A7 and A11 were controlled 87% (Table 7). In addition, pinoxaden applied at the 4X rate (180 g ha−1) controlled 13 populations 100%, whereas its co-application with chlorpyrifos did not increase the level of control, except for population A9, for which control increased from 91% to 97% (Table 7). Finally, excellent control (100%) of all populations was observed with pinoxaden in the Florina trials (data not shown).
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A1 to A16) with pinoxaden (Amaliada trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; OP, organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (1,000 g ai ha−1); NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Clodinafop-propargyl efficacy was reduced against some putative R silky windgrass populations as compared with the other ACCase inhibitors, clethodim and pinoxaden (Tables 8 and 9). However, excellent control (93% to 100%) was obtained with clodinafop-propargyl at the X rate (41 g ha−1) against seven populations (A4, A6, A12, A15, A16, A23, A24), whereas moderate (60% to 77%) to good (83% to 90%) control was evident against five (A7, A8, A10, A18, A20) and nine populations (A1, A2, A3, A9, A11, A13, A14, A17, A22), respectively. By contrast, control with the X rate (41 g ha−1) of clodinafop-propargyl was 10% and 26% against population A19 and A5, respectively (Tables 8 and 9). The control level increased by 9% to 29% in certain silky windgrass populations when clodinafop-propargyl was co-applied with chlorpyrifos (Table 8). Significant increases in control with clodinafop-propargyl were noted in populations A3 (85% to 90%), A5 (26% to 49%), A7 (72% to 89%), A8 (77% to 96%), A9 (84% to 98%), and A13 (89% to 100%) (Table 8) and also in populations A17 (83% to 91%), A18 (68% to 76%), A19 (10% to 32%), and A20 (62% to 78%) (Table 9). Overall, control increase following OP treatment was the highest for clodinafop-propargyl. For these populations, NTSR cannot be ruled out. Application of the 4X rate (164 g ha−1) of clodinafop-propargyl provided excellent control (90% to 100%) of 19 populations; moderate control (79% and 88%) of the A10 and A21 populations, respectively; and poor control (56% and 42%) of the A5 and A19 populations, respectively (Tables 8 and 9). The 8X (328 g ha−1) and 16X (656 g ha−1) rates of clodinafop-propargyl controlled silky windgrass plants of all putative R populations, with the exception of two populations (A5 and A19), whose fresh weight was reduced by 74% to 91%.
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A1 to A16) with clodinafop-propargyl (Amaliada trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; OP, organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (1,000 g ai ha−1); NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A17 to A24) with clodinafop-propargyl (Florina trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Excellent control (90% to 100%) of 13 out of 16 putative R silky windgrass populations studied in Amaliada pot experiments was achieved with the clethodim X (240 g ai ha−1) rate, whereas three populations (A1, A2, A7) were effectively controlled by 84% to 87% (Table 10). No significant differences in the level of control were documented when clethodim was applied together with chlorpyrifos, except in population A1 (87% to 95%) (Table 10). All other clethodim rates (4X, 8X, and 16X) killed all plants of each silky windgrass population (Table 10). Finally, all cycloxydim rates controlled all silky windgrass populations 100% (data not shown).
Fresh weight reduction over the nontreated control of silky windgrass populations (A1 to A16) with clethodim (Amaliada trials). a,b
a Values are means of two experiments (3 + 3 replicates per treatment).
b Abbreviations: S, susceptible population; OP, organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos (1,000 g ai ha−1); NA, not applicable; LSD, least significant difference.
c Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the herbicide rate means presented within each population.
d Common Bonferroni LSD (at P < 0.05) value that allows performing all interesting pairwise comparisons between the populations means within each herbicide rate.
Amplification and Sequencing of the ALS Gene Fragment from Silky Windgrass Plants
The 352 bp fragment of the sequenced ALS gene from all silky windgrass plant samples was aligned with the ALS gene from an Arabidospis thaliana sequence obtained from GenBank (accession number X51514). The DNA sequence of eight of the R populations revealed a single point mutation at the first base of the codon Pro-197 (Table 11). More specifically, substitution of the first cytosine (C) of the codon 197 (CCT) by thymine (T) resulted in substitution of Pro-197 by Ser (TCC) in 42 individual plants belonging to 7 R populations, whereas substitution of the first C by adenine (A) resulted in substitution of Pro-197 by Thr (ACC) in 6 plants of one R (R2) population. All R plants were heterozygous (RS), as they had the point mutation in only one allele.
Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence alignment of ALS gene fragments, originating from one susceptible and eight resistant silky windgrass populations indicating different point mutations at the first nucleotide of codon Pro-197. a
a Abbreviations: S, susceptible; R, resistant.
b The codon positions refer to the standard Arabidopsis thaliana ALS gene (GenBank: X 51514).
c IUPAC-IUB nucleotide codes (YCC, Y = C + T, CCC + TCC = Pro-197/Ser-197; MCC, M = A + T, CCC + ACC = Pro-197/Thr-197).
Wheat Field Experiments
The A6 silky windgrass population evaluated in the two field experiments was controlled 15% and 36% with the X and 2X field rate of pyroxsulam (18.75 and 37.7 g ha−1), respectively, whereas the respective rates of the prepackaged mixture mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron (15 + 3 and 30 + 6 g ha−1) controlled the A6 silky windgrass population 55% and 71%, respectively (Table 12). However, application of the X and 2X rates of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl (82.5 and 165 g ha−1) controlled silky windgrass 98% and 100%, respectively, which was similar (99% and 100% control) with percentages obtained by the application of the X and 2X rates (45 and 90 g ai ha−1) of pinoxaden, respectively (Table 12). Finally, the X and 2X rates of clodinafop-propargyl (41 and 82 g ai ha−1) controlled silky windgrass 88% and 95%, respectively. Regarding herbicide selectivity, none of the herbicides caused any wheat phytotoxicity. There was a correlation between the control values at the X rate in the field study versus the pot study (88% vs. 93%, 99% vs. 99%, 15% vs. 16%, and 55% vs. 54% for clodinafop, pinoxaden, pyroxsulam, and mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron, respectively).
Implications for Field Management
The present study indicated that the unsatisfactory control of both silky windgrass populations claimed by some cereal growers in northwestern Greece was due to the occurrence of resistance to ALS and/or ACCase inhibitors. In particular, the current study confirmed a high level of field-evolved resistance to chlorsulfuron in terms of biomass reduction in all silky windgrass populations studied. However, despite the high resistance levels to chlorsulfuron, other ALS inhibitors (i.e., the prepackaged mixture of mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron, pyroxsulam) provided excellent control of 10 out of 24 populations, with major differences between the two in populations A13 and A22. Some populations were moderately susceptible, and a few were highly resistant and cross-resistant to chlorsulfuron. These findings are in line with those of previous studies in other countries (Novakowa et al. Reference Novakowa, Soukup, Wagner, Hamouz and Namestek2006; Krysiak et al. Reference Krysiak, Gawronski, Adamczewski and Kierzek2011; Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011), which showed a widespread high level of silky windgrass resistance mainly to chlorsulfuron and less pronounced resistance to other sulfonylureas (e.g., sulfosulfuron, flupyrsulfuron, mesosulfuron-methyl + iodosulfuron).
On the other hand, most silky windgrass populations were effectively controlled with the ACCase inhibitors cycloxydim, clethodim, and pinoxaden at the recommended field rates, except for five populations (A5, A10, A18, A19, A20) with resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides that were also resistant to ACCase-inhibiting herbicide clodinafop-propargyl. This trend could be attributed to the less frequent use of clodinafop-propargyl as compared with the frequent and repeated applications of chlorsulfuron and other ALS inhibitors. By looking at the complete cross-resistance pattern, it is confirmed that the later-introduced products showed less resistance. In fields with a long-term monoculture of winter wheat together with the use of chlorsulfuron, resistance of silky windgrass biotypes to this active ingredient was ascertained (Marczewska Reference Marczewska2006). In addition, the considerable plasticity of silky windgrass as well as its genetic diversity, coupled with high fecundity, may account for the selection of multiple and cross-resistant populations bearing mutations, impairing or reducing effectiveness of both ALS- and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides (Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011). In agreement with our multiple resistance findings, Dicke et al. (Reference Dicke, Henschke, Petersen and Gerhards2016) reported that a silky windgrass population, originating from spring/winter-sown cereals in Germany, evolved multiple resistance across ACCase-, ALS-, and PSII-inhibiting herbicides.
Apart from the repeated and widespread use of herbicides with same MOAs, some other factors, such as monoculture and reduced tillage practices applied in winter cereals grown in Greece, may influence selection pressure. In addition, the good adaptation of this weed to current agricultural production systems, along with its similarity to the wheat crop in terms of phenology and physiology, could account for this prevalence (Barberi Reference Barberi2003). Adoption of long-term reduced or no tillage practices allows increased weed seedbank in the top layers of the soil (Murphy and Lemerle Reference Murphy and Lemerle2006), which eventually may lead to higher weed seed germination, seedling establishment, and higher weed competition compared to conventional tillage systems (Massa et al. Reference Massa, Kaiser, Andújar-Sánchez, Carmona-Alférez, Mehrtens and Roland2013). Moreover, as silky windgrass has a short seed dormancy period and early seedling emergence (Rola Reference Rola1990), early winter crop sowing enhances infestations and increases the risk of field-evolved herbicide resistance (Massa et al. Reference Massa, Kaiser, Andújar-Sánchez, Carmona-Alférez, Mehrtens and Roland2013). Also, high silky windgrass densities (>40 plants m−2) significantly increase the risk of selection and spread of herbicide resistance (Murphy and Lemerle Reference Murphy and Lemerle2006; Massa et al. Reference Massa, Kaiser, Andújar-Sánchez, Carmona-Alférez, Mehrtens and Roland2013).
The presence of Pro-197-Ser or Pro-197-Thr mutation in the analyzed ALS sequences from the eight R silky windgrass populations suggests that the cross-resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides detected in the whole-plant response experiments was due to mutant als alleles encoding an amino acid replacement at codon 197. Similar results were reported by other researchers (Krysiak et al. Reference Krysiak, Gawronski, Adamczewski and Kierzek2011; Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011; Hamouzova et al. Reference Hamouzova, Kosnarova, Salava, Soukup and Hamouz2014), who also found resistant target-site enzyme to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in most of their studied silky windgrass populations. Nevertheless, because the populations were not tested for ACCase mutations, the presence of TSR due to this mechanism cannot be ruled out. In addition, the change in fresh weight reduction was relatively large (>25%) for both chlorsulfuron and clodinafop-propargyl with OP application, which suggests the presence of a metabolic pathway capable of degrading both compounds or the presence of two separate metabolic pathways, in addition to the ALS mutation. The Pro-197 mutation that was detected in one of the two alleles provides evidence that all plants of the R sequenced populations were heterozygous (RS). The lack of point mutations at codon 197 of the sequenced ALS gene from the S silky windgrass population supports our findings in the whole-plant response experiments. Concerning the metabolic degradation of ALS-inhibiting herbicides in silky windgrass, this process has not thus far been thoroughly studied (Massa et al. Reference Massa, Krenz and Gerhards2011). Our findings show that co-application of the OP insecticide chlorpyrifos only slightly increased the overall poor level of control, except for some populations in which a significant increase in fresh weight reduction was noted with both chlorsulfuron and clodinafop-propargyl. Thus a NTSR mechanism based on increased metabolic degradation cannot be ruled out in some of the studied silky windgrass populations. Nevertheless, additional studies may shed more light on this aspect.
It is worth mentioning that in some winter cereal–producing areas of northwestern Greece, sterile oat is replaced by spring milletgrass (Grevena and Ptolemaida Counties), brome (Florina County), or silky windgrass (infesting large areas of Ptolemaida County). Therefore silky windgrass represents a growing threat to arable crop production in extended areas of northwestern Greece. In these specific production systems, mostly dryland arable crops (predominantly winter wheat) are cultivated repeatedly, because limited water availability does not allow for cultivation of more profitable row crops. Only recently, growers have started to adopt crop rotation, principally with winter legumes, attempting to mitigate problems closely associated with monoculture, such as evolution of herbicide resistance.
The results of this study suggest that chlorsulfuron and clodinafop-propargyl were the selecting agents of field-evolved multiple resistance to ALS- and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in five silky windgrass populations. Although cases of herbicide-resistant silky windgrass populations to several ALS inhibitors have been reported in northwestern, central, and eastern Europe (Hamouzova et al. Reference Hamouzova, Soukup, Jursik, Hamouz, Venclova and Tumova2011; Krysiak et al. Reference Krysiak, Gawronski, Adamczewski and Kierzek2011; Massa and Gerhards Reference Massa and Gerhards2011; Babineau et al. Reference Babineau, Mathiassen, Kristensen, Holst, Beffa and Kudsk2017), no cases of silky windgrass resistance have been reported in Greece so far. Moreover, our findings confirm multiple resistance of silky windgrass to ALS- and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in some of the tested populations. As the available postemergence-applied chemistries/MOAs registered for grass weed control in cereals are rather limited, the risk for field-evolved resistance in grass weeds is inevitably aggregated in the absence of crop and herbicide MOA rotation. Sustainable wheat production is threatened by the expanding occurrence of herbicide-resistant weed populations, with limited efforts to discover new herbicide molecules (Nakka et al. Reference Nakka, Jugulam, Peterson and Asif2019). Therefore it is important to adopt integrated management practices, implementing proactive and reactive measures to delay the evolution of herbicide-resistant populations and manage their established presence. More specifically, systematic crop and herbicide rotation, reduced reliance on herbicides as the exclusive mean of weed management, adoption of diversified production systems, and implementation of alternative or complementary measures for effective weed control should be systematically practiced.
Acknowledgments
No conflicts of interest have been declared. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Open access
