2. Numerical setup

The objective of the present simulation setup is to obtain a TBL developing under a moderate APG over a long region of near-equilibrium flow from low to high Reynolds numbers. To achieve a high-Reynolds-number simulation starting from a laminar flow we have taken as a reference the ZPG LES simulation by Eitel-Amor et al. (Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014) based on Schlatter et al. (Reference Schlatter, Li, Brethouwer, Johansson and Henningson2010), which on itself was validated using DNS by Schlatter & Örlü (Reference Schlatter and Örlü2010). The box size in the streamwise direction ($L_x$) was chosen to be identical to that of the ZPG simulation. The effect of an APG will increase the growth rate of the BL together with the size of the energetic scales, and in order to account for this we increased the box size in the wall-normal ($L_y$) and spanwise directions ($L_z$) with respect to the values used by Eitel-Amor et al. (Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014), as can be observed in table 1. As the code used for the simulation, SIMSON (Chevalier et al. Reference Chevalier, Schlatter, Lundbladh and Henningson2007), uses Fourier modes in the streamwise direction, all the flow that has exited the domain through the top boundary due to the growth of the BL, needs to enter again into the domain at the end of the box through a fringe region. The fringe length in the APG case will have to be longer than in the ZPG configuration, because a larger amount of flow leaves the domain in the former case and it will need to return through a negative wall-normal velocity component $V$, which will increase the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) number. The time step of the simulation was kept constant in order to perform Fourier analysis of the temporal series of the velocity components. Therefore, in order to have a constant time step that would not be too low and maintain a stable CFL, the fringe length had to be increased so the maximum $V$ was reduced in that region. It is important to mention that the CFL also depends on the spatial discretisation, and because SIMSON uses Chebyshev polynomials in the wall-normal direction $y$, the wall-normal grid spacing ($\Delta y$) at the top boundary is too fine, if this spacing could be increased, then the CFL number would be reduced and it would be possible to use a shorter fringe with a higher $V$.

Table 1.

Parameters of the simulations used in this paper. The inlet displacement thickness $\delta _0^*$ corresponds to the displacement thickness of a laminar flow for a Reynolds number $Re_{\delta _0^*}=450$. The box size is $(L_x/\delta _0^*, L_y/\delta _0^* , L_z/\delta _0^*)$ and $(m_x, m_y, m_z)$ are the number of collocation points including the $3/2$ factor for de-aliasing in the Fourier directions ($x$ and $z$). The spatial resolution in viscous units $(^+)$ of the streamwise and spanwise directions $\Delta x^{+}, \Delta z^{+}$, has been calculated using $(m_x, m_z)$ at the position $x/\delta _0^*=250$, which corresponds to a friction Reynolds number $Re_{\tau }\approx 210$ for all the simulations. The maximum viscous distance between grid points in the wall-normal direction inside the BL is observed close to the BL edge and for the highest Reynolds number of each simulation.

2.1. Parameters of the simulation

The streamwise, wall-normal and spanwise coordinates $(x,y,z)$ and other lengths or distances are non-dimensionalised with the reference length $\delta ^*_0$ (which is the displacement thickness of the inflow laminar BL). In some parts of the text $\delta ^*_0$ is not written for the sake of simplicity. That is also the case for the velocities, which are non-dimensionalised with the inflow free stream velocity $U_{ref}$. For all of the simulations in table 1 the same code (SIMSON) was employed, and the well-resolved LES is based on the same SGS model, ADM-RT, which stands for approximate deconvolution relaxation-term (Schlatter, Stolz & Kleiser Reference Schlatter, Stolz and Kleiser2004), as discussed in more detail in Appendix B. In the present simulation, denoted by b1.4, we have used a new feature in the code: the implementation of message-passing interface (MPI) communication in single precision. In this version of the code, all the computations continue to be in double precision, but the time spent in communication between processors has been reduced by casting the data into single precision and reducing by half the amount of data to communicate.

After selecting the box size we proceed to run the simulation with ZPG boundary conditions (BCs) at a low resolution. The initial conditions and inflow profile are given by a laminar Blasius BL with a displacement thickness $\delta ^*_0$ such that $Re_{\delta _0^*}=450$. The flow is tripped to turbulence close to the inlet at $x/\delta ^*_0=10$ using a volume forcing (Schlatter & Örlü Reference Schlatter and Örlü2012), which is the same method as in the other databases, and with this configuration we expect the transition to turbulence to be over at $Re_{\theta }\approx 600$ (Schlatter & Örlü Reference Schlatter and Örlü2012; Eitel-Amor et al. Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014). The TBL will develop to high Reynolds numbers over a long computational domain in a similar way as it is done in a wind-tunnel experiment. This is different from setting up an auxiliary ZPG simulation and using a recycle plane for the inflow as used in Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016, Reference Kitsios, Sekimoto, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2017) and Gungor et al. (Reference Gungor, Maciel, Simens and Gungor2017), because the APG BCs downstream would affect the initial ZPG, as can be seen in figure 1. At the end of the domain a fringe region (Nordström, Nordin & Henningson Reference Nordström, Nordin and Henningson1999) reduces the turbulence and yields the same laminar flow as the inflow in order to obtain the periodicity required by the Fourier discretisation. One flow-through is defined as the time required by the flow to pass through the domain once; here the mean streamwise velocity is of the order of the unity, so we approximate the time required by the flow to cover a distance $L_x$ to be equal to that distance. When the flow is fully turbulent after $\sim$3 flow-through times we proceeded to progressively change the APG BC to the desired distribution. In the final APG configuration, a fringe length of $1500 \delta ^*_0$ is needed to keep the simulation stable. The simulation was run for enough time for the statistics to converge (Vinuesa et al. Reference Vinuesa, Prus, Schlatter and Nagib2016b) after excluding the initial transients due to the change of resolution. The statistics were averaged for over eight and four eddy-turnover times (ETTs) at the middle and the end of the region of interest (ROI), respectively (note that the ROI ends before the fringe). In APG TBLs the ETT varies significantly with $x$, and it is calculated as ${\rm ETT}(x) = \Delta T u_{\tau }(x) / \delta _{99}(x)$, with $\Delta T$ being the period of time used for averaging and $u_{\tau }(x)=\sqrt {(\tau _w / \rho )}$ the friction velocity. We also collected time series containing 36,000 samples over the same period. The time step of the simulation is held constant at $\Delta t_{step}=0.25$, which ensures that in viscous units the time step along the domain is $\Delta t_{step}^+ \leq 0.35$. The statistics were sampled every 4 time steps in the ROI, which corresponds to $\Delta t_{stat}^+ \leq 0.5$. The viscous scaling (denoted by the superscript ‘$+$’) for velocity, length and time scales is $u_{\tau }$, $l_{\tau }=\nu /u_{\tau }$ and $t_{\tau }=l_{\tau }/u_{\tau }$.

Figure 1.

Streamwise evolution of (dashed) velocity at the top of the domain $U_{top}(x)$ and (solid) velocity at the BL edge $U_e(x)$: (orange) b1.4; (red) b1; (green) b2; (blue) m16.

In table 1 we list the box size, the collocation points using the 3/2 factor for de-aliasing ($m_x, m_y, m_z$) and the resolution of the various simulations. With the previous parameters we obtain the streamwise and spanwise resolution in viscous units ($\Delta x^+ , \Delta z^+$). The maximum separation of grid points in the wall-normal direction inside the BL is shown in viscous units as $\Delta y_{max}^+$, and it occurs close to the BL edge at the highest Reynolds numbers. In the new simulation b1.4, for $Re_{\tau }=500$, the number of grid points below $y^+=10$ is 6, below $y^+=1$ we have 2 and the distance of the first grid point from the wall is $\Delta y_w^+=0.3$. As the viscous length scale $l_{\tau }$ increases with the streamwise position, the resolution in viscous units close to the wall will be better at higher Reynolds numbers: for $Re_{\tau }=800$ we have 7 grid points below $y^+=10$, 3 grid points below $y^+=1$ and $\Delta y_w^+=0.2$. The colour code that is used throughout this work is also shown in table 1.

The Reynolds-number and PG ranges are listed in table 2, together with the ROI for each simulation. The ROI in the APG cases starts at the point where the maximum $\beta$ is achieved, whereas in the ZPG TBL, the starting point is taken at $Re_{\tau }=500$, which approximately corresponds to $Re_{\theta }\approx 1500$, where according to Eitel-Amor et al. (Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014) and Schlatter & Örlü (Reference Schlatter and Örlü2012) the flow is independent of the inflow conditions and the tripping. The last point of the ROI was chosen as the position where the skin-friction coefficient exhibits a clear tendency upwards due to the effects of the fringe; note that the large scales have not been affected yet. In the ROI we observe a slowly decaying positive $\beta$, where $\bar {\beta }$ is the average $\beta$ along the ROI. Note that this is not the accumulated $\bar {\beta }$ defined by Vinuesa et al. (Reference Vinuesa, Örlü, Sanmiguel Vila, Ianiro, Discetti and Schlatter2017), but a simple average instead. The standard deviation is $\sigma ({\beta })$ and these quantities, together with the defect shape factor $G=(H_{12}-1)/(H_{12}\sqrt {c_f/2})$, are given in table 2. Note that $H_{12}$ and $c_f$ are the shape factor and the skin-friction coefficient, respectively. In the ROI of the b1.4 case, $G$ lies between 10.5 and 11.6, which is in agreement with the results reported by Bobke et al. (Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017): 9.8 and 12.1 for the b1 and b2 cases, respectively.

Table 2.

Flow characteristics in the ROI for the various cases.

2.2. Boundary conditions

These simulations are statistically homogeneous in the spanwise direction $z$, therefore, they are statistically 2D in the streamwise and wall-normal directions, and have periodic BCs in the streamwise and spanwise directions. As no cross-flow is present in the spanwise direction the only BC is imposed by the periodicity. In the streamwise direction, the periodicity forces the outflow to be the same as the inflow, and this is achieved through a fringe region as mentioned previously. The inflow is given by a Blasius BL at $Re_{\delta ^*_0}=450$. At the bottom boundary of the computational domain there is a flat plate, the BCs of which are no-slip and no transpiration. The PG will be imposed at the top boundary of the domain with the free-stream BCs discussed next.

2.2.1. Free-stream BCs

Three conditions have to be imposed at the top of the domain:

(2.1)$$\begin{gather} \frac{\partial W}{\partial y}=0, \end{gather}$$

(2.2)$$\begin{gather}\varOmega_z = \frac{\partial V}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial U}{\partial y}=0, \end{gather}$$

(2.3)$$\begin{gather}U_{top}(x)= \left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll} U_{ref}, & x \leq x_z ,\\ U_{ref}\left( 1 + \dfrac{x - x_{z}}{x_{b}} \right)^{{-}m}, & x > x_z. \end{array}\right. \end{gather}$$

The first relates to the statistical homogeneity in $z$, through the derivative in the wall-normal direction of the spanwise mean velocity as shown in (2.1). Homogeneity in $z$ implies that $W$ is statistically zero, therefore its wall-normal derivative should also be zero. Homogeneity also implies that the mean derivatives in $z$ are statistically zero, a fact that has an implication in the mean streamwise vorticity, i.e. $\varOmega _x = \partial W/ \partial y - \partial V / \partial z = 0$. This could be implemented in the simulation in multiple ways, but because the perturbations in the farfield are negligible in our case, the easiest way is to set $\partial \tilde {w} / \partial y = 0$ for each time step, where ($\widetilde { ~~ }$) denotes instantaneous quantities. The second BC is zero spanwise vorticity, given by (2.2) as in Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016) and Hiroyuki (Reference Hiroyuki2019); finally, the third BC will introduce the APG through a decaying mean streamwise velocity $U_{top}(x)$ using a power-law distribution. First, a constant velocity is used to provide an initial ZPG development and at $x=x_z=350$ the power law is applied as indicated in (2.3). At the end of the domain the fringe raises the velocity to the initial $U_{ref}$ values. The power law was also used as in Bobke et al. (Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2016), based on the theoretical studies by Townsend (Reference Townsend1956b) and Mellor & Gibson (Reference Mellor and Gibson1966) in order to obtain a near-equilibrium TBL. The use of (2.3) together with a fringe region may produce instabilities in the code where the fringe region starts, which were damped by the LES filter. The parameters of the power law were chosen as in the m16 simulation (Bobke et al. Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2016), i.e. $x_z=350$, $x_b=60$ and $m=0.16$.

In figure 1 we show the streamwise evolution of $U_{top}$ for the various cases under study, and it can be observed that this quantity is constant up to $x=350$, while it decays following a power law with different exponents $m$ for each APG (Bobke et al. Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017). Note that the later rise of $U_{top}$ is produced by the fringe. As the BC is applied at the top of the domain and not at the edge of the BL, the velocity at the BL edge $U_e$ is not the same as $U_{top}$, a fact that has been observed in multiple experiments and simulations of PG TBL and is still discussed in the scientific community as part of the problem of determining the edge of the TBL (Vinuesa et al. Reference Vinuesa, Bobke, Örlü and Schlatter2016a; Griffin, Fu & Moin Reference Griffin, Fu and Moin2021). The top BC is far from the BL edge where the TBL starts to develop, however, when the TBL starts to grow, this distance is reduced and the curves for $U_{top}$ and $U_{e}$ come close to each other. This effect can be seen for the APGs by Bobke because the height of the domain was lower than in the larger b1.4 simulation. The fact that the mean streamwise velocity $U$ exhibits a gradient ${\partial U}/{\partial y} \neq 0$ (which is a consequence of the streamwise PG) makes it harder to impose a specific velocity distribution at the edge of the BL, especially for the larger high-Reynolds-number simulations that require a taller computational domain for the TBL to grow. This effect could be reduced if the simulation could be performed in a domain with a variable height and not in a box of constant height. As a result of this effect, the imposed ZPG at $y=L_y$ is not perceived as a pure ZPG at the BL edge, where the velocity instead of being constant, is slightly decaying as in an APG. As stated previously, in the case where an auxiliary ZPG simulation gives the inflow, this effect of upstream influence of the APG will not be seen. The parameters for $U_{top}$ are the same in the b1.4 and m16 cases, as can be observed in figure 1, but the resulting $U_{e}$ is higher in the b1.4 than in the m16 case, which means that the decay of the velocity is not as steep in the former as in the latter and it will result in a smaller $\beta$. This shows that it is important to take into account the value of $L_y$ when setting the $U_{top}(x)$ distribution to achieve a certain $U_{e}(x)$.

As we use a zero-spanwise vorticity as a BC, it is possible to rewrite the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations for the momentum in $x$ and $y$ in terms of the mean spanwise vorticity and its derivatives. Being outside of the TBL means that the RSs can be neglected if the turbulence is confined in the BL. The first derivatives in $x$ and $y$ of $U$ and $V$ are present in the continuity equation and the mean spanwise vorticity $\varOmega _z$. If those two equations are derived in $x$ and $y$, then it is possible to obtain relationships between the first derivatives of $\varOmega _z$ with the second derivatives of $U$ and $V$ (present in the viscous terms of the RANS equations). Substituting the spanwise vorticity and its first derivatives in the convective and viscous terms we obtain

(2.4)$$\begin{gather} U \frac {\partial U} {\partial x} + V \frac {\partial V} {\partial x} + \frac {1} {\rho} \frac {\partial P} {\partial x} = \nu \left( \frac {\partial \varOmega_z} {\partial y} \right) + V \varOmega_z, \end{gather}$$

(2.5)$$\begin{gather}U \frac {\partial U} {\partial y} + V \frac {\partial V} {\partial y} + \frac {1} {\rho} \frac {\partial P} {\partial y} = \nu \left( \frac {\partial \varOmega_z} {\partial x} \right) + U \varOmega_z, \end{gather}$$

where $P$ is the pressure. In these equations we can see the effects of using a zero-spanwise vorticity or also making its derivatives zero. The convective terms on the left-hand side can be written as the gradient of a total pressure $P_T / \rho = P/\rho + (U^2+V^2)/2$ caused by the effects of non-zero spanwise vorticity. Even if the spanwise vorticity is set to zero at the top of the domain, this does not guarantee that it will remain zero in all the domain outside of the TBL. The spanwise vorticity outside of the BL is related to the curvature of $P_T$ outside of the BL due to the growth of the BL.

3. Turbulence statistics at moderately high Reynolds numbers

The streamwise development of the different simulations as well as statistics in different wall-normal profiles are given in Appendix A, where similar conclusions as the ones observed in Bobke et al. (Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017) for near-equilibrium flows at lower Reynolds numbers are observed and extended to higher ${\textit {Re}}$ numbers.

In this section, we present the RSs obtained at different streamwise positions because later in § 5 they are decomposed into their spectral components.

In figure 2 the Clauser PG parameter $\beta =(\delta ^*/\tau _w) (\partial P/\partial x)_{e}$ is shown for the nearly-constant-$\beta$ simulations by Bobke et al. (Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017), the current simulation and data obtained in experiments (Sanmiguel Vila et al. Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020b) for a similar range of ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }-\beta$. Here, ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=u_{\tau }\delta _{99}/\nu$ is the Reynolds number based on friction velocity and $\delta _{99}$ is the $99\,\%$ BL thickness, which was calculated by means of the method proposed by Vinuesa et al. (Reference Vinuesa, Bobke, Örlü and Schlatter2016a).

Figure 2.

Evolution of the Clauser PG parameter $\beta$ as a function of the friction Reynolds number $Re_{\tau }$ for three of the simulations: (orange) b1.4; (red) b1; (green) b2; ($\circ$) experiments by Sanmiguel Vila et al. (Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020b).

For the following figures, the $Re_{\tau }=500$ profiles (outside the ROI) are considered to observe effects of different $\beta$, comparing b1.4 with the other near-equilibrium APG simulations at lower ${\textit {Re}}$. Three additional profiles within the ROI, at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=\{500, 1000, 1500\}$, are used to determine the effects of moderate APG at higher ${\textit {Re}}$ through a comparison with the high-${\textit {Re}}$ ZPG. The mean velocity profiles of these cases are shown in figure 21 from Appendix A.

The inner-scaled RSs are shown in figure 3, and the corresponding profiles in outer scaling can be observed in Appendix A, figure 22. The most noticeable characteristic of these TBLs is that the wall affects each component of the RS tensor differently. The streamwise component has, in general, a larger value than the other terms, making it the leading term of the TKE. As at the wall the no-slip condition makes the velocities zero, the RSs also start from a zero level. In the viscous sub-layer the mean velocity gradually increases, together with the velocity fluctuations. In the near-wall region, i.e. at around $y^+\simeq 15$, the streamwise RS exhibits the well-known inner peak, while the other fluctuating components are moderately affected by the strong TKE production in this region.

Figure 3.

Inner-scaled RSs scaled with the friction velocity $u_{\tau }$ at various matched $Re_{\tau }$: (a) $Re_{\tau }=500$ where $\beta (Re_{\tau })$ intersects for the simulations b1 and b1.4; (b) $Re_{\tau }=1000$; (c) $Re_{\tau }=1500$; (d) $Re_{\tau }=2000$; (——) $\overline {u^2}^+$; ($\cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot \cdot$) $\overline {v^2}^+$; (– – –) $\overline {w^2}^+$; (–$\cdot$–$\cdot$) $\overline {uv}^+$. Colors and symbols: (black) ZPG; (red) b1; (orange) b1.4; (green) b2 as in table 1.

The APG significantly affects the inner peak of $\overline {u^2}^+$, and when this peak is scaled in outer units its magnitude decreases with APG magnitude (see figure 22a). Interestingly, the near-wall fluctuations increase slightly with $\beta$ in the other velocity components when scaling in outer units (figure 22), a result which is more prominent in the case of $\overline {w^2}$.

In the inner-scaled RSs shown in figure 3, the influence of the APG can be observed in both $\overline {u^2}^+$ and $\overline {w^2}^+$, especially on the latter, from $y^+ \approx 2$ onward. However, the components containing the wall-normal velocity fluctuation are affected farther from the wall, starting at $y^+ \approx 10$ for ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500$ or even $y^+ \approx 20$ for higher ${\textit {Re}}$. This behaviour supports the attached-eddy hypothesis on the differing contributions to the RSs close to the wall (Townsend Reference Townsend1976; Deshpande, Monty & Marusic Reference Deshpande, Monty and Marusic2021), however, the trends are modified by the APG farther from the wall. The viscous scaling is appropriate for regions close to the wall, because it properly scales the mean streamwise velocity and the viscous length locates the inner peak of $\overline {u^2}^+$ at $y^+\approx 15$ (see figure 4a). Furthermore, the friction velocity $u_{\tau }$ leads to more similar inner-peak magnitudes from different $\beta$ values than what is obtained using the outer velocity scale $U_{e}$. It is important to recall that the friction velocity is computed from ${\rm d}U / {\rm d}y$, which is the largest term of the near-wall TKE production also in APGs, closely connected with the formation of the inner peak in $\overline {u^2}^+$. The other components of the RSs exhibit a better scaling using outer units even close to the wall, as shown in figure 22 from Appendix A.

Figure 4.

Streamwise evolution of the wall-normal location of the inner and outer peaks of the streamwise RS profiles: (a) inner-scaled position of the inner peak $y_{IP}^+$; (b), (c) outer-peak location ($y_{OP}$) scaled with $\delta _{99}$ and $\delta ^*$, respectively; (d) inner-scaled outer-peak location $y^{+}_{OP}$; (black) ZPG; (orange) b1.4; (red) b1; (green) b2; (blue) m16; ($\Diamond$) $\beta =1$ DNS data from Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016); ($\circ$) experiments by Sanmiguel Vila et al. (Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020b); ($\blacksquare$) experiments by Skåre & Krogstad (Reference Skåre and Krogstad1994).

To further study the impact of APG and ${\textit {Re}}$ on the near-wall and outer peaks, it is important to have fine resolutions around $y^+=15$ and well-converged statistics in the outer region.

As the experimental database exhibits some noise, a curve-fit approach was considered around the inner and outer peaks of the streamwise RS to determine their locations, whereas a simple spline interpolation was employed for the numerical data.

In figure 4 we show the streamwise evolution of the peak locations, where a clear influence of the APG is observed. Based on our results, an increasing APG magnitude leads to a larger wall-normal location of the inner peak $y^+_{IP}$, a phenomenon which is also observed for higher ${\textit {Re}}$ at a given constant $\beta$. Although for the ZPG case the near-wall-peak location reaches an asymptotic value of around $y^+ \simeq 15$ for $Re_{\tau } >2000$, the trend in the b1.4 case is currently inconclusive.

Figure 4(b) shows the outer-peak location $y_{OP}$ of $\overline {u^2}$, scaled with the $99\,\%$ BL thickness, and our results indicate that the curve reaches a slightly decaying trend with ${\textit {Re}}$ in the b1.4 case. Furthermore, comparison with the other cases indicates that the values of $y_{OP}/\delta _{99}$ are clearly affected by $\beta$, with stronger APGs leading to larger values of the outer-peak location. Note that although the value of $\beta$ is approximately the same in the b1 simulation and in the experiment, the former is at a much lower Reynolds number, and therefore this case is expected to perceive a more intense effect of the APG. This would explain that the outer-peak location is slightly farther away from the wall in the b1 case than in the experiment. Figure 4(c) shows the outer-peak location of $\overline {u^2}$ scaled with the displacement thickness $\delta ^*$. The low-${\textit {Re}}$ simulations exhibit a similar slowly growing trend for the various $\beta$ cases, with an average value of around $y_{OP}/\delta ^* = 1.4$. The b1.4 case appears to reach an approximately constant state at higher ${\textit {Re}}$, also around 1.4, a result consistent with that reported by Sanmiguel Vila et al. (Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020a) for the experimental data (despite the noise present in the measurements).

The inner-scaled location of the outer peak present in the DNS by Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016) and the experiments by Skåre & Krogstad (Reference Skåre and Krogstad1994) are also shown in figure 4(d). The outer-peak location of the $\beta =1$ DNS by Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016) continues the trend defined by the b1 LES at lower ${\textit {Re}}$ and lies below the line of the b1.4 LES. The values of the near-equilibrium experimental data by Skåre & Krogstad (Reference Skåre and Krogstad1994) at a much higher ${\textit {Re}}$ and $\beta \approx 20$ appear to be consistent with the linear trend of $y_{OP}^+$ established by the lower-${\textit {Re}}$ data.

The magnitudes of the inner ($\overline {u^2}_{IP}$) and outer ($\overline {u^2}_{OP}$) peaks of the streamwise RS are shown in the different panels of figure 5. In (a) it is possible to see the Reynolds-number evolution of the inner-scaled inner peak ($\overline {u^2}_{IP}^+$) for the various APGs, as well as that of the ZPG TBL, which is well documented in the literature (Marusic, Uddin & Perry Reference Marusic, Uddin and Perry1997; Eitel-Amor et al. Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014). Although it is unclear what the behaviour will be for the APG cases at higher ${\textit {Re}}$, our data indicates that the inner-scaled near-wall peak increases with APG magnitude. The trend from the experiment exhibits more scatter, but it appears to be in qualitative agreement with that of the b1.4 case. Note that, although the inner peak in inner scaling increases with $\beta$, it actually decreases in outer scaling for stronger APGs, as can be observed in figure 22. The outer-peak value increases with $\beta$ using inner scaling, as shown in figure 5(b), and also in outer scaling with $U_e$, as illustrated in figure 5(c). In both panels, the trends are approximately constant with ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$, where $U_{e}$ yields a reasonably flat curve even at lower Reynolds numbers.

Figure 5.

Streamwise evolution of the magnitude of the inner and outer peaks of the streamwise RS profiles: (a) inner-scaled magnitude of the inner peak $\overline {u^2}^+_{IP}$; (b), (c) outer-peak magnitude ($\overline {u^2}_{OP}$) scaled in inner and outer units, respectively; (black) ZPG; (orange) b1.4; (red) b1; (green) b2; (blue) m16; ($\Diamond$) $\beta =1$ DNS data from Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016); ($\circ$) experiments by Sanmiguel Vila et al. (Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020b); ($\blacksquare$) experiments by Skåre & Krogstad (Reference Skåre and Krogstad1994).

In figure 5(b) the location of $\overline {u^2}^+$ for the $\beta =1$ DNS by Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Sekimoto, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2017) and the b1 LES exhibit small differences probably associated with the different flow histories at low Reynolds numbers. The experimental data by Skåre & Krogstad (Reference Skåre and Krogstad1994) exhibits a larger uncertainty and dispersion of the values, but an approximately constant trend in $\overline {u^2}^+$ can be observed.

An unexpected trend is observed in figure 5(c) for the b1 simulation, a fact that could be attributed to the relatively low outer-peak values in this simulation.

3.1. Comparison with experiments

The range of Reynolds numbers achieved in the b1.4 case allows for a direct comparison of the statistics with the experimental results by Sanmiguel Vila et al. (Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020b), where we selected two cases with matching $\beta$ and ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ conditions. As shown in figure 2, the flow history of this database differs from that of the b1.4 case, a fact that will be taken into account when comparing the data.

Three different profiles have been chosen in figure 6 to show the mean streamwise velocity and the streamwise RS from the simulation and the experiment at matching ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$. In the first row (${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=1004$) the experimental TBL has a very low $\beta =0.3$, and it is very close to the ZPG, with small differences in the near-wall peak of $\overline {u^2}^+$ and a growing energy in the outer region of the TBL. Here the simulation has a larger value of $\beta =1.6$, and it exhibits the most relevant features of APGs, including a prominent outer peak in $\overline {u^2}^+$. In the middle row (${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=1586$) the experimental data and the numerical simulation b1.4 exhibit the same $\beta \simeq 1.4$. Although the mean velocity profiles and the near-wall region of $\overline {u^2}^+$ are in good agreement in both cases, the simulation exhibits a larger fluctuation peak. This is due to the effect of flow history (Bobke et al. Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017; Tanarro, Vinuesa & Schlatter Reference Tanarro, Vinuesa and Schlatter2020), but it is interesting to note that although the simulation is subjected to a mildly decaying $\beta (x)$ curve, the APG is rapidly increasing in the experiment. This implies that the smaller scales adapt more quickly to the local PG, whereas the larger scales require a longer streamwise distance. Finally, the higher-Reynolds-number profile (${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=2049$), where both TBLs have a value of $\beta \simeq 1.1$, exhibits a better collapse in both inner and outer peaks of $\overline {u^2}^+$, as well as in the mean velocity $U^+$. This implies that, despite the different flow histories upstream, the two TBLs have been exposed to a similar PG magnitude for a sufficiently long streamwise distance such that their local turbulence features converge. Several profiles have been compared for ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }>1586$, and the best agreement between simulation and experiment is obtained for ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=2049$. Upstream of this position the outer-peak value of the experimental data is still developing towards the value of the b1.4 case. The streamwise distance between the profiles at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=1586$ and 2049, which are subjected to a similar $\beta$ history, is around $11 \overline {\delta _{99}}$ for both simulation and experiment, where $\overline {\delta _{99}}$ is the average BL thickness between those profiles. A similar albeit lower of around $7\overline {\delta _{99}}$ was reported by Bobke et al. (Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017) for m16 simulation to converge towards b2 simulation at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=786$. One possible explanation for the longer distance reported here may be the higher Reynolds number, in which the large scales may require longer streamwise lengths to adapt to a particular PG condition.

Figure 6.

Mean velocity (a,c,e) and streamwise RS (b,d, f) scaled in viscous units as a function of the inner scaled wall-normal distance. The Reynolds numbers from top to bottom are $Re_{\tau }=\{1004, 1586, 2049\}$. The black solid line represents the ZPG by Eitel-Amor et al. (Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014), the orange line is the present b1.4 simulation and the red circles represent the experimental data by Sanmiguel Vila et al. (Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020b).

The APG in the simulation is achieved through a free-flow BC, the turbulence is achieved through a tripping, therefore, the turbulence is confined inside the BL with the RSs being negligible outside of it. The experiments are performed inside a wind tunnel, the APG is imposed through changes in the geometry of the upper wall where another TBL develops. Even though the methods to establish the two APG TBLs are different, the results are remarkably similar. Although the region outside of the BL in the wind tunnel can be seen as the flow in the core of a channel where the mean $U$ does not exhibit a significant change, the free-flow APG condition has a negative $\partial {U}/\partial {y}$. This gradient, even if small, is present over a large distance in $y$, and when the mean profile is represented in a logarithmic scale it gives the impression of a drastic reduction of the mean velocity for $y>\delta _{99}$. This comparison between numerical simulation and experiments shows a satisfactory collapse and, thus, validates the high-Reynolds-number region of this numerical simulation.

4. Scaling considerations

One important question of wall-bounded turbulence research is to find a scaling that produces a collapse of statistical quantities such as the mean velocity or the RSs in different parts of the TBL. Ideally, the scaling parameters should include the information of the forces/BCs that could affect the flow, i.e. PGs, temperature gradients, friction forces, flow history, etc. Here we have an incompressible simulation of a flat-plate TBL where outside of the BL there is an initial ZPG condition, which after a certain streamwise distance evolves into an APG condition. The scaling parameters should include the effects of the friction at the wall ($\tau _w$), the PG, the Reynolds number and the flow history. In the literature there are many studies of self-similarity (or self-preservation) focused on the equation of momentum conservation in $x$ under some ansatz and simplifications (Rotta Reference Rotta1950; Townsend Reference Townsend1956b; Castillo, Wang & George Reference Castillo, Wang and George2004; Kitsios et al. Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016; Gibis et al. Reference Gibis, Wenzel, Kloker and Rist2019). Most of those studies find parameters that should be kept constant to achieve self-similarity. Another question regarding self-similarity is whether it can be achieved across the whole BL or whether the BL can only be self-similar in different regions, with various scales.

Following the considerations about self-similarity in Gibis et al. (Reference Gibis, Wenzel, Kloker and Rist2019), two sets of scalings will be considered in the outer region for the b1.4 and ZPG databases: the edge and the Zagarola–Smits (ZS) scalings as discussed later. The equilibrium character of the BL will be assessed using the Rotta–Clauser PG parameter $\beta$ together with the PG BL growth parameter $\varLambda _{inc}$ for the chosen outer scalings:

(4.1)\begin{equation} \varLambda_{inc}=\frac{L_s}{\rho U_s^2 (\mathrm{d}L_s/\mathrm{d}x)} \frac{\mathrm{d}p}{\mathrm{d}x}. \end{equation}

In the parameter $\varLambda _{inc}$, $L_s$ represents the chosen length scale and $U_s$ the velocity length scale. If $L_s=\delta ^*$ and $U_s=u_{\tau }$, then the difference with respect to the parameter $\beta$ will be given by the streamwise derivative of the length scale $\textrm {d} L_s/\textrm {d}x$, which contains some information of the flow history linking the local profile with the surrounding flow. The different scalings with their respective velocity and length scales are summarised in table 3. In figure 7 the PG parameter $\varLambda _{inc}$ is shown for simulation b1.4 in the first row. While the edge scaling (figure 7a and 7c) shows a monotonically rising $\varLambda _{inc}$ from the beginning, the ZS scaling (figure 7b and 7d) exhibits an initial peak, then a plateau and, finally, a slowly increasing region. On the other hand, $\beta$ (figure 2) exhibits a maximum and a slow monotonic decrease throughout the domain. Recalling that the ROI starts at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=800$, the range of variation of the PG parameter within the ROI is $[0.2, 0.25]$ for the edge scaling, $[3.2, 4]$ for the ZS scaling and $[1.65, 1.2]$ for $\beta$. The rates of variation of the PG parameters and $\textrm {d} L_s/\textrm {d}x$ over the ROI, although not constant, are relatively small, which is a requirement for similarity according to the various studies.

Figure 7.

Different PG parameters based on the self-similarity analysis for the outer layer performed in Gibis et al. (Reference Gibis, Wenzel, Kloker and Rist2019): (a), (c) the edge scaling, where $L_s=\delta ^*$ and $U_s=U_e$; (b), (d) the ZS scaling with $L_s=\delta _{99}$ and $U_s=U_{e}\delta ^*/\delta _{99}$. A Savitzky–Golay filter has been applied to $\textrm {d} L_s/\textrm {d}x$ as in Gibis et al. (Reference Gibis, Wenzel, Kloker and Rist2019). The black solid line represents the ZPG by Eitel-Amor et al. (Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014) and the orange line is the present b1.4 simulation.

Table 3.

Parameters for different scalings, where $L_s$ and $U_s$ correspond to the length and velocity scales, respectively.

In figure 8 we use the edge and ZS scalings for the streamwise mean velocity defect and the streamwise RS for the profiles within the ROI. The first observation is the common good agreement of both scalings from the logarithmic region all the way to the edge of the TBL in the ZPG.

Figure 8.

(a), (b) Mean velocity defect and (c), (d) streamwise RS scaled with (a), (c) edgeand (b), (d) ZS scalings. Profiles from $Re_{\tau }=800$ to $Re_{\tau }=2000$. Lines in gray scale represent ZPG data (Eitel-Amor et al. Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014), increasing the Reynolds number from white to black. APG data from the b1.4 simulation increases Reynolds number from yellow to red.

The definition of $\delta ^*$ is

(4.2)\begin{equation} \int_{0}^{\delta_{99}} (U_e-U)\,\textrm{d}y = U_e \delta^* \Rightarrow \int_{0}^{\delta_{99}/L_s} \frac{U_e-U}{U_s} \,\textrm{d}(y/L_s)=1. \end{equation}

For the ZS and edge scalings, the velocity and length scales are just a combination of the parameters present in (4.2) ($U_e$, $\delta ^*$, $\delta _{99}$), therefore we can divide both sides by the term $U_e \delta ^*$ and using the length and velocity scales in table 3 it is possible to rewrite the integral in a common form (right-hand side of (4.2)) for both ZS and edge scalings.

Using this form we can directly relate the integral with the mean defect velocity curves in figure 8. The value of the normalised integral of the mean velocity defect is the same for both scalings, where the integrands are the various curves and the only difference would be the upper limit of the integration. That upper limit in the ZS scaling does not change with the Reynolds number: it is 1 because $L_s=\delta _{99}$. The upper limit for the edge scaling is variable with Reynolds number because $L_s=\delta ^*$. The functional form in the edge scaling fixes all the profiles to start from the same point, thus the differences between profiles increase from the wall. The functional form of the ZS scaling makes the profiles start from different values for each Reynolds number, and because the value of the integral is the same and the upper limit is also the same for all profiles, the differences are concentrated close to the wall, allowing for a better collapse in the outer region of the TBL. This can be observed in figure 8(b), where the ZS scaling exhibits a better collapse even in the overlap region. The edge scaling, figure 8(a), exhibits a good collapse in the wake region, with differences in the overlap region.

We have previously discussed that the inner peak of $\overline {u^2}$ has a location $y^+ \simeq 15$. As shown in figures 8(c) and 8(d), and also in figures 4(b) and 8(c), the outer-peak location for the edge scaling is at $y/\delta ^*=1.4$ and around $y/\delta _{99}=0.35$ for the ZS scaling. Although there is a better collapse in the outer region of the mean defect profiles using the ZS scaling, the $\overline {u^2}$ profiles collapse in the outer region when using the edge scaling. Our results suggests that it is not possible to collapse the wall-normal profiles at all positions with a single length scale. In the mean flow, the inner region collapses in inner scaling and the outer region using the ZS scaling. Regarding the streamwise RS, the location of the near-wall peak slightly varies around $y^+\simeq 15$, it slowly grows with the Reynolds number and the slope is larger with higher $\beta$, whereas both the magnitude and location of the outer peak are fixed using the edge scaling. As the inner and outer scales are related by ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$, to achieve self-similarity throughout the whole profile would require that ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ remains constant in $x$, which is not the case even in the ZPG.

In the next similarity analysis we consider the Reynolds shear stress, where in figures 9(a) and 9(b) we consider $U_s^2$, and in figure 9(c) and 9(d) we use $U_s^2 \textrm {d} L_s/\textrm {d}x$ as in Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016) and Gibis et al. (Reference Gibis, Wenzel, Kloker and Rist2019). The edge scaling leads to a moderate collapse of the $\overline {uv}$ profiles in the outer region, although the collapse is not as good as that observed for $\overline {u^2}$. The additional term $\textrm {d} L_s/\textrm {d}x$ applied to the Reynolds shear stress, worsens the collapse for the APG in both scalings, whereas it improves the collapse for the ZPG in the edge scaling.

Figure 9.

Reynolds shear stress $\overline {uv}$ scaled with: (a), (c) edge and (b), (d) ZS scalings. The second row shows the effect of the evolution of the characteristic length scale $\textrm {d} L_s/\textrm {d}x$. Profiles from $Re_{\tau }=800$ to $Re_{\tau }=2000$. Lines in gray scale represent ZPG data (Eitel-Amor et al. Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014), increasing the Reynolds number from white to black. APG data from the b1.4 simulation increases Reynolds number from yellow to red.

To summarise, the edge scaling yields a good scaling of the APG profiles in the outer region, and given the good collapse with viscous units close to the wall, it can be stated that the APG TBL is in near-equilibrium (Marusic et al. Reference Marusic, McKeon, Monkewitz, Nagib, Smits and Sreenivasan2010; Bobke et al. Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017) conditions in the ROI. The ZS scaling leads to a better collapse in the outer region of the mean defect profiles.

As observed in figure 10, comparing the first three profiles for both the ZPG and b1.4 cases a clear lack of collapse can be observed, and as discussed in figure 8 the profiles only collapse in the inner or outer regions using the adequate scaling. We argue that any claims of self-similarity throughout the complete BL may be based on limited regions of near-equilibrium conditions, which may hide the existing Reynolds-number trends. With these considerations we remark the importance of considering long regions of near equilibrium, where it is possible to clearly observe the trends in the inner and outer layers and to assess how the scales separate as the TBL develops.

Figure 10.

Mean streamwise velocity defect and RS tensor components $\overline {u^2}$, $\overline {v^2}$, $\overline {w^2}$, $\overline {uv}$ scaled using the edge scaling as in Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016), and using the streamwise derivative of the length scale $\partial _x \delta ^*$ in the case of $\overline {uv}$. The purple asterisks are used for the collapsed data by Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016). The profiles have been taken at ${\textit {Re}}_{\theta }=\{3500, 4150, 4800, 8200\}$, where the first three are in the same range as Kitsios et al. (Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016) and the last is the highest ${\textit {Re}}_{\theta }$ available in ZPG and b1.4 cases. Gray lines show the ZPG data growing in ${\textit {Re}}$ from light to dark. The b1.4 lines show increase in Reynolds number from yellow to red.

5. Spectral analysis

The turbulent fluctuations are due to the interactions of a wide range of coherent structures of different sizes. Each of these structures will have a characteristic length and energy content. Depending on the approach used to decompose the energy content of the RS components in space/time we can have different types of representations. The spectral analysis used here is based on a Fourier decomposition of the spanwise two-point correlations. The velocity correlation between two points along the spanwise direction provides an idea of lengths at which the fluctuations are highly correlated, and this gives an indication of the presence of a certain structure or pattern. In a multi-scale phenomenon such as turbulence at high Reynolds numbers, the two-point correlations will contain a mix of all the different scales and it will be difficult to obtain meaningful information from it. As the spanwise direction is periodic, a Fourier decomposition of the two-point correlation is possible, and the result is a spectral decomposition of the energy content in different wavenumbers $k_z$ associated with their corresponding wavelengths $\lambda _z=2{\rm \pi} /k_z$. In the next sections we show the premultiplied power-spectral density of the different RS components at matched values of ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500, 1000,1500,2000$. For reference, an additional contour has been added in gray for the maximum ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=2386$ in the ZPG simulation.

5.1. One-dimensional power-spectral density in $z$

The premultiplied power-spectral energy density of the streamwise velocity fluctuations is shown in figure 11; note that this corresponds to the highest energetic components of the TKE. This figure shows that the low-Reynolds-number case $Re_{\tau }=500$ exhibits similarities between the b1.4 and the ZPG TBLs. The APG starts to show its effects by lifting small scales with $\lambda _z^+ \approx 100$ from the wall to the outer region, and increasing the energy of the scales with $\lambda _z^+ \approx 400$ in the outer region. The near-wall spectral peak located at $y^+\approx 15$ and $\lambda _z^+ \approx 100$ remains similar in the APG and ZPG cases. For increasing Reynolds number, the near-wall peak magnitude does not exhibit significant changes in the APG, but the maximum value shifts to the outer region at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau } \approx 700$, and is associated with scales of wavelength $\lambda _z=\delta _{99}$. The inner and outer peaks are separated by a region of lower energy content, and the lowest-energy contour shows the characteristic rising of small scales by the APG in the outer region (Vinuesa et al. Reference Vinuesa, Negi, Atzori, Hanifi, Henningson and Schlatter2018; Tanarro et al. Reference Tanarro, Vinuesa and Schlatter2020). The rest of the spectra exhibit similar features between the ZPG and the APG, except for a wider range of $\lambda _z^+$ across the BL at the same ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$, which is an effect of the footprint of large scales residing in the logarithmic region, similar to what was reported by Hoyas & Jiménez (Reference Hoyas and Jiménez2006) for channel flows. Note that at these Reynolds numbers the outer spectral peak of the APG has a magnitude similar to that of the near-wall peak in the ZPG.

Figure 11.

Premultiplied spanwise power-spectral density $k_z |\phi _{uu}|$ scaled with the local maximum for the b1.4 and ZPG cases at matched ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$: (a) $Re_{\tau }=500$, (b) $Re_{\tau }=1000$, (c) $Re_{\tau }=1500$ and (d) $Re_{\tau }=2000$. Contours taken at $10\,\%$, $50\,\%$ and $90\,\%$ of the maximum value. Reference contour in gray colour: ZPG at $Re_{\tau }=2386$. Contours with (black) for ZPG and (orange) for b1.4.

In figure 12 we show the premultiplied cospectra $k_z |\phi _{uv}|$ at the same matched ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ as in figure 11. At the lowest ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ the contours in the APG and the ZPG are similar, with the difference that the maximum value is in the outer region in the former ($y^+=120$ and $\lambda _z^+=307$) and closer to the wall ($y^+=26$ and $\lambda _z^+=109$) in the latter. In the $10\,\%$ and $50\,\%$ contours, it is possible to see a small contribution of the small scales in the outer region compared with the ZPG contours. At higher Reynolds numbers, the ZPG develops a plateau of energy with contour levels following a straight line of slope $C$, which in a logarithmic plot corresponds to a power law of the form: $y^+=(\lambda _z^+)^C$. This line connects the near-wall peak with the outer region. Furthermore, the plateau indicates a progressive growth of the region containing this level of energy following the previous power law, which at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=1000$ develops an outer peak with a magnitude similar to that of the near-wall peak. Note that at higher Reynolds numbers the outer peak progressively rises over the magnitude of the near-wall peak. The effect of the APG is to displace the near-wall energy to the outer region, which becomes dominant in the premultiplied cospectra of the Reynolds shear stress. At higher Reynolds numbers, the premultiplied cospectra exhibit a peak at $\lambda _z \simeq \delta _{99}$, which implies that this peak scales in outer units. The constant $C$ which defines the slope of the black dashed lines in figure 12 was reported to be approximately one by de Giovanetti et al. (Reference de Giovanetti, Hwang and Choi2016). The APG exhibits $10\,\%$ contours similar to those of the ZPG, indicating the presence of some energy in the near-wall region. If a line from the inner peak of the ZPG is drawn towards the APG peak in the outer region (orange dashed lines in figure 12), its slope is larger than that of the ZPG. If a self-similar hierarchy of motions in the log-layer is suggested by the black dashed line, in connection with the attached-eddy hypothesis (Townsend Reference Townsend1976; Deshpande et al. Reference Deshpande, Monty and Marusic2021), then the APG either rises the slope of that hierarchy of scales or follows the same hierarchy of motions as in the ZPG with an additional contribution in the outer region by small scales risen from the wall by the wall-normal convection of the APG and by the more energetic large scales.

Figure 12.

Premultiplied cospectra $k_z |\phi _{uv}|$ scaled with the local maximum for the b1.4 and ZPG cases at matched ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$: (a) $Re_{\tau }=500$, (b) $Re_{\tau }=1000$, (c) $Re_{\tau }=1500$ and (d) $Re_{\tau }=2000$. Contours taken at $10\,\%$, $50\,\%$ and $90\,\%$ of the maximum value. Reference contour in gray colour: ZPG at $Re_{\tau }=2386$. Dashed black lines show the curve $y^+=0.27 \lambda _z^+$ as in de Giovanetti, Hwang & Choi (Reference de Giovanetti, Hwang and Choi2016), whereas the orange dashed lines represent $y^+=0.1 (\lambda _z^+)^{1.2}$, which is the ridge for the b1.4 case: (black) ZPG; (orange) b1.4.

The premultiplied spectra for the wall-normal fluctuations is shown in the first row of figure 13. It exhibits features similar to those of the cospectra of the Reynolds shear stress: small-scale energy in the outer region due to the APG and a different location of the maximum power-spectral density in the ZPG and the APG. Although the ZPG exhibits an elongated $90\,\%$ contour around $\lambda _z^+ \approx 150$ at $y^+\approx 90$ for the different Reynolds numbers, the APG starts to stretch the peak at the lowest ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500$, and at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=1000$ the peak is located in the outer region with scales of the order of $\lambda _z \simeq \delta _{99}$. In the ZPG the $10\,\%$ contours in the wall-normal spectra exhibit a shape similar to that of the $50\,\%$ contours in the cospectra. Approximating the $10\,\%$ contour by an ellipse, the major axis also follows a trend $y^+=(\lambda _z^+)^C$ with $C=1$, as in the cospectra. The $50\,\%$ contours also exhibit linear regions, but in the wall-normal spectra the slopes are different. This could still be related to a hierarchy of motions in the logarithmic layer, just indicating that the range of wall-normal scales grows with the wall-normal location and, as before, the APG adds an extra contribution from the small and highly energetic large scales in the outer part of the logarithmic layer. The $10\,\%$ contours of the APG follow the trend dictated by ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ and far from the trend marked by $y^+=(\lambda _z^+)^C$; for this reason, we have not included those linear trends. As can be observed in the second row of figure 13, the spectra of the spanwise fluctuations exhibit effects similar to those shown in the wall-normal spectra in the first row for the ZPG and the APG. In particular, we identify the small-scale contribution to the outer region and a stable $90\,\%$ contour for the ZPG expanding a long range of scales from $\lambda _z^+\approx 15$ to $\lambda _z^+\approx 70$ in a region between $y^+=15$ and $y^+=100$, which is inside the overlap region. This $90\,\%$ contour is displaced by the APG towards regions farther than $y^+=300$, already in the wake region. The $\lambda _z^+$ of this peak also scales with the Reynolds number.

Figure 13.

Premultiplied spanwise power-spectral density of (a)–(d) $k_z |\phi _{vv}|$ and (e)–(h) $k_z |\phi _{ww}|$ (scaled with the local maximum for the b1.4 and ZPG cases at matched ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$. Contours taken at $10\,\%$, $50\,\%$ and $90\,\%$ of the maximum value. Reference contour in gray colour: ZPG at $Re_{\tau }=2386$. Contours with (black) for ZPG and (orange) for b1.4. From left to right: $Re_{\tau }=500$, $Re_{\tau }=1000$, $Re_{\tau }=1500$ and $Re_{\tau }=2000$.

5.2. Two-dimensional power-spectral density

The 2D power-spectral energy $E_{u_iu_j}(k_z,k_t,y)$ is obtained using temporal series of the velocities in all the spanwise grid points at selected streamwise and wall-normal positions. Once the mean in time and spanwise direction is substracted, the turbulent components are transformed to Fourier space in the spanwise wavenumbers. To obtain the power spectra in time, Welch's method is used with 8 independent subdivisions in time overlapped with 7 subdivisions for a total of 15 bins. The window function is a Hamming window. The spectral energy is then divided by $\Delta k_z \Delta k_t$ to obtain the 2D power-spectral density $\phi (k_z,k_t,y)$. As previously, the figures used to illustrate the effects of the Reynolds number and the APG in the spectral density content will be premultiplied, in this case, with the factor $k_z k_t$. It has been verified that the addition of the spectral energy for all the wavenumbers in time yields the one-dimensional power-spectral energy in the spanwise direction $E_{u_i u_j}(k_z,y)$.

5.2.1. Two-dimensional power-spectral density in the near-wall region

The premultiplied power-spectral density in time and the spanwise direction $k_zk_t\phi (\lambda _z, \lambda _t)$ is first analysed at $y^+=15$, a wall-normal location which shows the characteristics of the near-wall peak of the streamwise RS and the production of TKE. For all the Reynolds numbers shown in figure 14 there is a near-wall spectral peak with $\lambda _z^+ \approx 100$ and $\lambda _t^+$ of the order of 100. The blue dashed line represents $\lambda _z^+ = 1.5\lambda _t^+$, which describes the evolution with ${\textit {Re}}$ of the ridge in the upper-right part of the spectrum. This ridge was documented by Hoyas & Jiménez (Reference Hoyas and Jiménez2006) for channels, Sillero et al. (Reference Sillero, Jiménez, Moser and Malaya2011), for ZPG TBLs and Tanarro et al. (Reference Tanarro, Vinuesa and Schlatter2020) for APG TBLs. The APG does not significantly modify the spectrum around the near-wall peak and the local viscous length and time scales $l_{\tau }$ and $t_{\tau }$ lead to the collapse of the inner region for the three displayed contour levels. Some extra energy is seen in the APG with the $50\,\%$ contours in the region with larger $\lambda _z^+$ and $\lambda _t^+$. The biggest difference in the inner region is seen for the lowest Reynolds number, which is upstream of the ROI where near-equilibrium is achieved. At higher ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ values of 1000, 1500 and 2000, the spectra around the near-wall peak are identical for each simulation and grow closer to the ZPG contours. In figure 15, only the contours at ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500$ and 2000 are represented to show the differences in the region around the near-wall peak due to ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500$ being outside of the near-equilibrium region and to show the growth of the largest spatiotemporal scales.

Figure 14.

Two-dimensional premultiplied power-spectral density $k_z k_t |\phi _{uu}|$ at $y^+=15$ scaled with the local maximum. Contours taken at $10\,\%$, $50\,\%$ and $90\,\%$ of the maximum value: (a) $Re_{\tau }=500$, (b) $Re_{\tau }=1000$, (c) $Re_{\tau }=1500$ and (d) $Re_{\tau }=2000$. The dashed blue line represents $\lambda _z^+ = 1.5\lambda _t^+$. Contours with (black) for ZPG and (orange) for b1.4.

Figure 15.

Evolution with the Reynolds number of the 2D premultiplied power-spectral density in time and $z$ for the various RS components $k_z k_t |\phi _{u_iu_j}|$ at $y^+=15$ scaled with the local maximum. Spectra of: (a) $uu$, (b) $vv$, (c) $uv$ and (d) $ww$. Contours taken at $10\,\%$, $50\,\%$ and $90\,\%$ of the maximum value. Solid lines for $Re_{\tau }=500$ and dotted lines for $Re_{\tau }=2000$: (black) for ZPG and (orange) for b1.4.

Surprisingly, the cospectra of the Reynolds shear stress shown in figure 15(c) at $y^+=15$ does not exhibit significant differences between APG and ZPG nor with increasing ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$. The behaviour of the streamwise and spanwise components is similar, because at higher Reynolds numbers the ZPG and the APG contours grow closer, both developing a region with larger values of $\lambda _z^+$, $\lambda _t^+$ with a higher energy content. The wall-normal RS does not develop a region with larger scales, and the lowest-density contour grows in the direction of smaller $\lambda _z^+$, $\lambda _t^+$. The effect of ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500$ not being in near-equilibrium, as opposed to the higher-${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ profiles at 1000, 1500 and 2000 is reflected in a different slope of the $10\,\%$ contour in the lower region of the premultiplied spectra for the normal RSs.

5.2.2. Two-dimensional power-spectral density in the overlap region

The analysis for the overlap region will be done at $y^+=150$ as in Tanarro et al. (Reference Tanarro, Vinuesa and Schlatter2020) to compare the trends of $\lambda _{z}^+=f(\lambda _{t}^+)$ previously reported for channel flows in del Álamo et al. (Reference del Álamo, Jiménez, Zandonade and Moser2004) and for BLs in Chandran et al. (Reference Chandran, Baidya, Monty and Marusic2017). In figure 16 we show for $y^+=150$ the contour levels of energy 0.05 and 0.15 for the ZPG and for b1.4. At this wall-normal location and for the energy level 0.15, it was reported in Tanarro et al. (Reference Tanarro, Vinuesa and Schlatter2020) a lower bound for small time and spanwise scales following $\lambda _z^+ \propto (\lambda _t ^{+})^{0.5}$ (blue-dashed line) and an upper bound composed by the red-dashed line ($\lambda _z^+ \propto \lambda _t^+$) for shorter time scales, as well as the cyan-dashed line for longer time scales (same slope as the blue-dashed line). For the ZPG it is possible to see that for short scales there is a good collapse for different Reynolds numbers, and the lower limit (blue line) serves as a good approximation in spite of a small tendency with higher Reynolds numbers (at higher $\lambda _t^+$) to go towards wider scales for the same time scale. The lower energetic level 0.05 also presents a good collapse for the different Reynolds numbers, however, the slope of the trend (0.4) is slightly smaller than that for energy level 0.15 (0.5). The upper part of the contours are more curved than the lower part, therefore it is harder to come up with a linear trend in a logarithmic plot (potential law). The red line approximates a short region, $\lambda _t^+ \in (20, 60)$, whereas the cyan line seems to be a good approximation for the larger scales at higher Reynolds numbers. The tangent lines to the energetic contour 0.15 of the ZPG are presented also in figure 16(b) as a way to compare with the same energetic contour in b1.4. It is clear that in inner-scaling, the same energy contour is bigger in the APG than in the ZPG, expanding over shorter and larger scales. There is also a bigger dispersion of the contours due to the increasing Reynolds numbers. The lower limits exhibit a slightly different slope than the blue line, however, with an increasing Reynolds number (dotted orange line) the trend is closer to the blue-dashed line. As this is a fixed location at $y^+=150$ (see figure 11) at higher Reynolds numbers the differences between APG and ZPG are shifted towards higher wall-normal positions and larger $\lambda _z^+$ scales. The red line ($\lambda _z^+ \propto \lambda _t^+$) appears to be a better approximation for the upper limit that will expand over a longer region, i.e. $\lambda _t^+ \in (10, 200)$ for ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=2000$ compared with the case of the ZPG. The cyan line also seems to be a good approximation for the larger scales. For ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=2000$ the location of the local maximum for APG and ZPG is very similar. If the power-spectral density is non-dimensionalised by the local maximum as in figure 16(c) the $10\,\%$ and $50\,\%$ contours of the ZPG and APG cases appears to collapse, except for some extra energy in the APG in the largest $\lambda _z^+$ and $\lambda _t^+$. The trends marked by the blue, red and cyan dashed lines are a better approximation at the higher ${\textit {Re}}$.

Figure 16.

Two-dimensional premultiplied power-spectral density $k_z k_t |\phi _{uu}|$ at $y^+=150$. The line styles solid, dashed, dash-dotted and dotted correspond to $Re_{\tau }=500, 1000, 1500$ and 2000, respectively. (a), (b) are scaled with inner units, $u_{\tau }^2$, and show the contour levels 0.05 and 0.15 of the ZPG and b1.4 respectively. In (a), (b) the red, blue and cyan lines are tangent to the contour level 0.15 of the ZPG. (c) Representation of both ZPG and b1.4 scaled with the local maximum marked as a black dot for ZPG and as a red dot for b1.4. The contours are taken at $10\,\%$ and $50\,\%$ of the maximum value. In (c) the red, blue and cyan lines are moved to be tangent to the $10\,\%$ contour. Blue and cyan lines follow $\lambda _z^+ \propto (\lambda _t^{+})^{0.5}$, whereas the red line represents $\lambda _z^+ \propto \lambda _t^+$: (black) for ZPG and (orange) for b1.4.

For the lowest ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$ in figure 17 there is not a clear separation of scales. For each wall-normal plane, the local maximum of $k_z k_t |\phi _{uu}|$ evolves from the characteristic inner-peak wavelengths of $\lambda _z^+=100$ at $y^+=15$ towards wider scales $\lambda _z$ of the order of $\delta _{99}$ in the outer region. At a higher Reynolds number as ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=1000$ the location of the maxima in these premultiplied plots changes radically from scales $\lambda _z^+ \approx {O} (100)$ and $\lambda _t^+ \approx {O} (\lambda _z^+/2)$ to scales $\lambda _z \approx {O}(\delta _{99})$. This change appears at $y^+\approx 23$ for b1.4 and $y^+\approx 40$ for the ZPG.

Figure 17.

Two-dimensional premultiplied power-spectral density $k_z k_t |\phi _{uu}|$ at $y^+=150$ scaled with the local maximum. Contours taken at $10\,\%$, $50\,\%$ and $90\,\%$ of the maximum value: (a) $Re_{\tau }=500$, (b) $Re_{\tau }=1000$, (c) $Re_{\tau }=1500$ and (d) $Re_{\tau }=2000$. The dashed blue and cyan lines represent $\lambda _z^+ \approx (\lambda _t^+)^{1/2}$, the dashed red line represents $\lambda _z^+ \approx \lambda _t^+$. The red and black dots mark the position of the local maximum for b1.4 and ZPG, respectively; (black) for ZPG and (orange) for b1.4.

At the position $y^+=150$ the peak of $k_z k_t |\phi _{uu}(k_z,k_t)|$ is already in scales $\lambda _z \approx \delta _{99}$ as it can be seen in figure 17(c). The other components of the RS tensor are shown in figure 18. As it was seen near the wall, at the lowest ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500$ (solid lines), the $10\,\%$ contour shows an additional content of energy for b1.4 in the smaller $\lambda _z^+$ scales with lower $\lambda _t^+$. The APG effects are manifested as a deviation of the local peak position and as it was seen near the wall, in the presence of small scales with shorter $\lambda _t^+$ in the wall-normal component, see figure 18(b). Previously, near the wall, the spectra containing wall-normal velocities in figures 18(b) and 18(c) was practically unaffected by an increase in the Reynolds number. On the other hand, in the outer region, both components develop larger spatiotemporal scales when the Reynolds number is increased. As observed in figure 17(d) (and also in figure 16c), the red dashed line which approximates the contours for scales up to $\lambda _t^+ =100$ in the ZPG, reaches scales up to $\lambda _t^+ =200$ in the APG (Chandran et al. Reference Chandran, Baidya, Monty and Marusic2017). The extra energy in the small scales with lower $\lambda _t^+$ is only seen in the lower ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=500$ profiles of b1.4; for ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=1000$, 1500 and 2000 that region is exhibits collapse. In the 2D spectra shown in Tanarro et al. (Reference Tanarro, Vinuesa and Schlatter2020), the profiles were taken at different levels of the premultiplied spectral density scaled either in viscous or outer units. They reported that at the same contour level the APG effects extend over a wider range of scales compared with the ZPG contours at the same low ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=305$. However, note that in their case the Reynolds number was low, the APG very strong and their BLs were not in near-equilibrium, exhibiting a rapid change in the $\beta (x)$ curve. Even if they achieved a value of $\beta$ larger than in the b1.4 simulation and an increase of the energy in the outer regions of the $\overline {u^2}^+$ TKE production profiles, the separation of scales in their study was not sufficient to observe the effects exhibited by the b1.4 simulation.

Figure 18.

Evolution with the Reynolds number of the 2D premultiplied power-spectral density of the RS components $k_z k_t |\phi _{u_iu_j}|$ at $y^+=150$ scaled with the local maximum. The panels show spectra of: (a) $uu$, (b) $vv$, (c) $uv$ and (d) $ww$. Contours taken at $10\,\%$, $50\,\%$ and $90\,\%$ of the maximum value. Solid lines for $Re_{\tau }=500$ and dotted lines for $Re_{\tau }=2000$: (black) for ZPG and (orange) for b1.4.

6. Summary and conclusions

A new well-resolved LES of a TBL developing on a flat plate subjected to an APG has been presented. The relevance of this simulation lies in the high Reynolds number we achieve starting from a laminar flow under similar conditions to those in experiments, and obtaining a long region where the TBL is in near-equilibrium. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first TBL under approximately constant APG magnitude ($\beta \approx 1.4$) over a long near-equilibrium region up to ${\textit {Re}}_{\theta }=8700$. The characteristics of this simulation have enabled a direct comparison with experimental data in a similar range of $\beta$ and ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }$, as well as the comparison with other near-equilibrium databases at lower Reynolds number as discussed in the following. The data obtained from the simulation consists of 2D turbulence statistics for all the grid points in the $xy$ plane, together with time series and two-point correlations at 20 streamwise locations (containing all the spanwise grid points), with 10 of those profiles in the near-equilibrium ROI.

The turbulence statistics were compared with lower-Reynolds-number simulations of different APGs (Bobke et al. Reference Bobke, Vinuesa, Örlü and Schlatter2017), with another high-Reynolds-number well-resolved LES of a ZPG (Eitel-Amor et al. Reference Eitel-Amor, Örlü and Schlatter2014) and also with high-Reynolds-number experiments (Sanmiguel Vila et al. Reference Sanmiguel Vila, Vinuesa, Discetti, Ianiro, Schlatter and Örlü2020b) with a similar $\beta (x)$ development. These comparisons highlight the need of more simulations with long near-equilibrium regions to be able to distinguish the effects of the APG and the effects of the Reynolds number. The near-equilibrium features have been analysed with the Rotta–Clauser PG parameter $\beta$ and the parameter $\varLambda _{inc}$ for different sets of velocity and length scales, i.e. the edge and the ZS scalings. Near-equilibrium conditions were obtained in the region from ${\textit {Re}}_{\tau }=800$ to around 2000. The results were also compared with another constant-$\beta$ database (Kitsios et al. Reference Kitsios, Atkinson, Sillero, Borrell, Gungor, Jiménez and Soria2016), and we showed that any self-similarity analysis has to be performed along regions of near-equilibrium at high Reynolds numbers to be able to study the collapse of the different regions in the TBL. For the APGs under study here, the viscous scaling collapses the near-wall region for the streamwise mean velocity and although the magnitude of the near-wall peak of the streamwise RS increases in inner scaling, its location remains close to $y^+ \simeq 15$. Furthermore, the outer scaling shows a good collapse of the outer region.

The large scales associated with the APG have an effect in the inner and outer regions, similarly to the large scales present in the flow at high Reynolds numbers in simpler geometries, such as channel flow (Hoyas & Jiménez Reference Hoyas and Jiménez2006). This was assessed for the various terms of the RS tensor using the spanwise one-dimensional power-spectral density and the 2D power-spectral density in spanwise spatial scales and the temporal scales. This study shows that the displacement of small scales with $\lambda _z^+ \simeq 100$ from the inner to the outer region, documented in APGs at low Reynolds numbers by Tanarro et al. (Reference Tanarro, Vinuesa and Schlatter2020) and Vinuesa et al. (Reference Vinuesa, Negi, Atzori, Hanifi, Henningson and Schlatter2018), is also observed in high-${\textit {Re}}$ APGs. The present analysis at higher Reynolds numbers shows that there is an energisation associated not only with the small scales but also with longer spatial and temporal scales in the streamwise and spanwise RSs near the wall and in the overlap region. The current database enables spatiotemporal analysis over a wide range of Reynolds numbers in near-equilibrium conditions due to the long near-equilibrium region at high ${\textit {Re}}$. This type of high-quality APG TBL in near equilibrium is necessary to deepen our insight into the similar but different effects of Reynolds number and APG, and to further understand the role of flow history on the local features of wall-bounded turbulence