Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T01:02:52.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On competing indexicalities in southern Peninsular Spanish. A sociophonetic and perceptual analysis of affricate [ts] through time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Matilde Vida-Castro*
Affiliation:
Malaga University, Spain
*
Corresponding author. Email: mvida@uma.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines linguistic, cognitive, and social factors in the development of an ongoing sound change in Andalusian Spanish related to the crosslinguistically well-known process of syllable coda lenition. The resyllabification of word internal /-s/ when followed by dental plosive /t/, in words such as lingüística [liŋ⋅ˈgujs⋅ti⋅ka] ‘linguistics’ realized as [liŋ⋅ˈguj⋅tsi⋅ka], results in an affricate sound [ts] that may be indexed in different ways within the speech community. Findings are reported from a trend study of two sample surveys separated by a twenty-year time gap, acoustic analysis, and two perception experiments. Acoustic phonetics, historical linguistics, theoretical phonology, and sociolinguistic studies provide the theoretical background to help explain the development of this sound change and its connection with other phonological features of Andalusian Spanish. Development of the affricate allophone is a natural outcome consistent with universal constraints boosted by the recent emergence of a regional koine, where its indexicality is undetermined.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Tableau of parameters for the two Malaga sample surveys (1995 = 72: 4 speakers per cell; 2015 = 54: 3 speakers per cell)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Effect of time in the allophonic variation of /-s⋅t/. Pearson's Chi-squared: 371.94 (4). Sig.: <.001. Cramer's V: .276. (1995 Corpus n = 2750; 2015 Corpus n = 2144).

Figure 2

Figure 2. By-speaker probability of affrication [ts] in apparent time.

Figure 3

Table 2. Mean probability of affrication [ts] in every group of speakers in 1995 and in 2015

Figure 4

Table 3. Summary of mixed effects logistic regression for [ts] realizations (versus [0+h+th+s]), speaker as random factor. Signif. codes: ‘***’ < .001 ‘**’ < .01 ‘*’< .05 ‘⋅’ < 0.1

Figure 5

Figure 3. Relevant acoustic features related to basic stages in the word-medial /-s + t/ resyllabification process.

Figure 6

Table 4. Effect of style on the allophonic variation of /-s⋅t/. Absolute and relative frequencies and statistical significance. Source: 2015 sample

Figure 7

Table 5. Acoustic correlates of coda fricative noise. Means, standard deviation and statistical significance (see Online Appendix 1 for values separated by gender)

Figure 8

Table 6. Acoustic correlates of onset fricative noise in /-s⋅t/ variants. Means, standard deviation and statistical significance (Online Appendix 2 for values separated by gender)

Figure 9

Table 7. List of stimuli for perception experiment 1: target stimuli, distractors and order of presentation to listeners

Figure 10

Table 8. Answers to perception experiment 1. Total n of responses per word = 54. The accurate answers are shadowed

Figure 11

Table 9. Acoustic correlates of affricate sounds. Means, standard deviation, and statistical significance. Source: 2015 sample (see Trend Study section)

Figure 12

Table 10. Groups of stimuli generated for the perception test

Figure 13

Table 11. Effect of noise duration and spectral values on the phoneme discrimination. Absolute and relative frequencies and statistical significance

Figure 14

Table 12. Summary of multinomial regression for /-st/ (left) and /t/ (right) responses versus /ʧ/ responses (reference level: /ʧ/ responses)

Supplementary material: File

Vida-Castro supplementary material

Appendix

Download Vida-Castro supplementary material(File)
File 149.3 KB