Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T16:51:38.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SOME NEW RESULTS ON ORDERING OF SIMPLE SPACINGS OF GENERALIZED ORDER STATISTICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2010

Hongmei Xie  and
Weiwei Zhuang
Hongmei Xie
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang 832003, People's Republic of China
Weiwei Zhuang
Affiliation:
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, People's Republic of China E-mail: weizh@ustc.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of generalized order statistics was introduced as a unified approach to a variety of models of ordered random variables. The purpose of this article is to establish several stochastic comparisons of simple spacings in the mean residual life and the excess wealth orders under the more general assumptions on the parameters of the models.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 71 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Barlow, R.E. & Proschan, F. (1981). Statistical Theory of reliability and life testing. Silver Spring, MD: To Begin with.Google Scholar
2.Brown, M. (1981). Further monotonicity properties for specialized renewal processes. Annals of Probability 9: 891–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Brown, M. & Proschan, F. (1983). Imperfect repair. Journal of Applied Probability 20: 851–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., & Meilijson, I. (2004). Four notions of mean-preserving increase in risk, risk attitudes and applications to the rank-dependent expected utility model. Journal of Mathematical Economics 40: 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cramer, E. & Kamps, U. (2001). Sequential k-out-of-n systems. In Balakrishnan, N. & Rao, C.R., (eds.)., Handbook of statistics: Advances in reliability, Vol. 20, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 301–372.Google Scholar
6.Fernández-Ponce, J.M., Kochar, S.C., & Muñoz-Pérez, J. (1998). Partial orderings of distributions based on right spread functions. Journal of Applied Probability 35: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hu, T. & Zhuang, W. (2005). A note on stochastic comparisons of generalized order statistics. Statistics and Probability Letters 72: 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kamps, U. (1995). A concept of generalized order statistics. Stuttgard: Teubner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kamps, U. (1995). A concept of generalized order statistics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 48: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kamps, U. & Cramer, E. (2001). On distribution of generalized order statistics. Statistics 35: 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Müller, A. & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
12.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (1998). Two variability orders. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 12: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Shaked, M. & Shanthikumar, J.G. (2007). Stochastic orders. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
14.Xie, H. & Hu, T. (2009). Ordering p-spacings of generalized order statistics revisited. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 23: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Yan, R.F. & Luo, T.Q. (2009). Some properties of sample spacings. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science) 45: 19–22.Google Scholar