Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T15:33:55.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geology of the Souter Head subvolcanic complex, Aberdeenshire, Scotland: an Ordovician granite-related Mo–(Bi–As–Au) system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2020

Clive M. RICE*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland AB24 3UE, UK. Email: c.rice@abdn.ac.uk
Darren F. MARK
Affiliation:
Isotope Geoscience Unit, Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, East Kilbride, Scotland G75 0QF, UK.
*
*Corresponding author
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An Ordovician subvolcanic intrusive complex hosted by Neoproterozoic metasediments crops out at Souter Head about 6km S of Aberdeen, Scotland. The complex is composed mainly of two-mica red granite and breccia with minor dykes of pegmatite, quartz porphyry, felsite and dolerite, and widespread quartz veining, hydrothermal alteration and minor molybdenite mineralisation. Anomalous levels of bismuth (Bi), arsenic (As) and gold (Au) occur in quartz–pyrite veins. The complex has been mapped and the major- and minor-element geochemistry, including rare-earth elements of intrusives and mineralisation, has been determined. These data reveal a complex tectonic, intrusive and hydrothermal history. The intrusives are peraluminous and magnetite-, muscovite- and garnet-bearing. The youngest member, a quartz porphyry, is highly fractionated. There are two stages of hydrothermal activity: the first is linked to the explosive release of volatiles from a granite cupola and breccia formation; and the second, widespread quartz veining. Mo is associated with both stages, and Bi–As–Au anomalies are found in late quartz–pyrite veins. The mineralisation is classified as a granite-related vein-type Mo system. The unique preservation, in the Grampian terrane, of an Ordovician subvolcanic complex may be attributed to pre-Devonian movements on the nearby Dee fault and possibly also the collapse of the magma chamber following the explosive release of volatiles. The combination of large size, poor exposure and abundant multi-stage hydrothermal activity suggests that there is potential for further Mo and possibly Au mineralisation in this complex. Further mineralisation of this style may be present in the NE Grampian terrane.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1 Geological map of the Souter Head subvolcanic complex. Inset: regional location of Souter Head.

Figure 1

Figure 3 Distribution of hydrothermal alteration and main quartz veins in the SHSC.

Figure 2

Figure 4 Orientation of group 2 quartz veins. Most fall into two sets: N–S vertical and N–S dipping E.

Figure 3

Table 1 Souter Head major elements, rare-earth elements (REEs) and trace elements (all ppm except Au ppb and S %). Abbreviations: NXG = non-xenolithic granite; XG = xenolithic granite; Peg = pegmatite; QP = quartz porphyry; Dol = dolerite; S vein = sulphide lens in Group 2 quartz vein; Mo vein = main molybdenite vein; AltNXG = granite from linear alteration zone; Bx matrix = igneous matrix from intrusion breccia (analysed for trace elements only); N/A = not analysed. Selected bulk crust values from Rudnick & Gao (2003) in ppm for As (2.5), Bi (0.18), Mo (0.8), Pb (11) and in ppb for Au (1.3). Analyses by ALS Minerals, Loughrea, Co. Galway.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Multi-element variation diagrams for the SHSC. (a, b) Normalised against primitive mantle values from Lyubetskaya & Korenaga (2007). Elements are arranged in order of increasing incompatibility (right to left) with respect to the mantle source (Sun & McDonough 1989). The figures represent the integrated effects of all the processes that have contributed to the formation of the granites and, generally, these cannot be individually identified. (c) Normalised against chondrite values from Korotev et al. 2009. (d) Comparison of the non-xenolithic granite from Souter Head with the Aberdeen granite (Ordovician) and Late Caledonian granites (Tarney & Jones, 1994, fig. 8).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Relationship of the SHSC to the Aberdeen granite, nearest Late Caledonian granites and the Dee and Highland Boundary Faults.

Figure 6

Figure 7 Cross-section of the SHSC. Quartz veins omitted for clarity.

Figure 7

Figure 8 Evolution of the SHSC. (a) Emplacement of a peraluminous granite magma in the upper crust. Volatiles collect in the roof. (b) Magma chamber explodes with formation of breccia bodies. (c) Chamber roof and breccias collapse into chamber. Magma invades blocks of breccia. Superstructure omitted for clarity. (d) System cools and new chamber forms at depth. Further movements fracture the roof. Fractures filled by volatile-rich fluid to form pegmatites and linear alteration zones and minor molybdenite mineralisation. (e) Further cooling and new chamber forms. Fractionation generates the quartz porphyry magma. (f) Cooling continues, N–S fracturing, hydrothermal activity and formation of group 2 quartz veins and Mo–Bi–As–Au mineralisation. Hydrothermal activity possibly linked to deeper chamber.