1. Introduction

Plans to drill in the central Antarctic ice sheet are being formulated by various national and international groups (e.g. Gamburtsev subglacial drilling project; US intermediate drilling at South Pole; Rapid Access Ice Drilling) for diverse purposes such as the study of changing climate, glacier dynamics, ancient life and the subglacial environment. In deep boreholes, the main functions of the drilling fluid are the exertion of balancing hydrostatic pressure to maintain the stability of the borehole, and the transportation of cuttings (or melted water) from the advancing face. Typically, the cuttings or meltwater are temporarily stored in a chamber within the drill, which is periodically withdrawn to the surface and emptied.

A number of special, low-temperature drilling fluids (kerosene-based fluids with density-increasing additives, ethanol and n-butyl acetate) have been proposed for ice coring, but not all of them are intelligent choices from safety, environmental and some technological standpoints (Reference Talalay and GundestrupTalalay and Gundestrup, 2002; Reference GerasimoffGerasimoff, 2003). We contend that the probable next wave of ice-drilling-fluid evolution will arise through the introduction of ESTISOL™ esters, compounds that are classified as non-hazardous substances (Reference TalalayTalalay and others, 2014a).

Danish specialists from the Centre for Ice and Climate, University of Copenhagen, recently chose a mixture of ESTISOL™ 240 ester and COASOL™ for laboratory and field testing (Reference Sheldon, Steffensen, Hansen, Popp and JohnsenSheldon and others, 2014). Both liquids are characterized by low vapor pressure, almost no odor, low toxicity and good biodegradability. The main disadvantage of this mixture is its very high viscosity (∼30 cSt at −35°C) which increases the travel time of the drill and, therefore, the total drilling time.

Another promising product of this type is the aliphatic synthetic ester ESTISOL™ 140, a clear fluid with fruit-like odor that is immiscible with water (Reference TalalayTalalay and others, 2014a). ESTISOL™ 140 mixtures with ESTISOL™ 165 and ESTISOL™ F2887 have suitable density and viscosity at low temperatures, and field tests have proved ESTISOL™ 140 applicable to deep drilling of ice sheets. The viscosity of ESTISOL™ 140-based fluids can be considered reasonable at borehole temperatures down to −50°C, but the viscosity at lower temperatures is excessive (>25 cSt).

Sometime ago it was also proposed to use the low-molecular-weight dimethylsiloxane oils as drilling fluid (Reference TalalayTalalay, 2007). The density of these oils is suitable for compensation of ice overburden pressure, and their viscosity allows ‘normal’ performance of the drill’s lowering/hoisting operations, even in very cold ice. They are inert to ice, metals, most plastics and elastomers, and have satisfactory volatility. They have no unpleasant odor, and low toxicity. Grades and price vary significantly depending on suppliers, and they cost more than some alternatives (minimum price currently ∼US$7.5 kg⁻¹).

The search for one or more new, environmentally friendly, relatively cheap drilling fluids for coring in central Antarctica remains one of the most pressing challenges for future drilling projects. This paper presents our investigation of a small selection of low-molecular-weight, fatty-acid esters that meet the requirements for low-temperature drilling fluids.

2. Desirable Properties

The ideal low-temperature drilling fluid would simultaneously have several desirable and somewhat conflicting properties.

Density is perhaps the most important fluid property, as pressure throughout the fluid column should be sufficient to prevent plastic deformation and borehole closure. On the other hand, excess density and pressure is undesirable because the borehole will then expand. As a first approximation, the desirable, average fluid density in the borehole can be estimated as (Reference TalalayTalalay and others, 2014b)

where is the average ice density (kgm⁻³), z is borehole depth (m), H ₁ is the ‘firn correction’ factor which accounts for the reduced density of snow and firn at the top of the ice sheet (its value depends on the ice accumulation conditions (e.g. Reference Tchistyakov, Kratilev, Lipenkov, Balestrieri, Rado and PetitTchistyakov and others (1994) suggested H ₁ = 34 m at Vostok station, East Antarctica)), k _c is the empirical coefficient accounting for the fluid compressibility (k _c ∼ 1.01 for depths of 2000–3000 m in cold ice sheets) and H ₀ is the fluid level in the borehole (m)

Taking the average density of ice 920–923 kg m⁻³ and fluid level in the borehole 80–100 m below the present-day snow surface, we assume that the average fluid density should be in the range 925–935 kg m⁻³ if the final borehole depth is 3000 m. This value must be maintained as the average fluid density at the average borehole temperature (in central Antarctica, T = −30 ± 5°C).

Viscosity of the fluid influences the winching power requirements, travel time of the drill string and the total drilling time. There are two alternative ways to achieve the desired drill lowering rate: either a low-viscosity fluid must be used, or boreholes with a larger clearance between drill and borehole walls must be drilled to decrease viscous drag. Lower viscosities are preferred because a larger-diameter borehole has the disadvantages of increased cuttings and higher power input.

The drill is lowered to the bottom of the borehole, driven by gravity alone. This method is very simple and energy-efficient, but the falling velocity depends on the viscous drag exerted on the drill as it sinks. It is generally recognized that low viscosity (less than 5–10 mPa s; Reference Talalay and GundestrupTalalay and Gundestrup, 1999) is one of the essential requirements for ice-drilling fluids. These values are probably conservative, as experience in the NEEM (North Greenland Eemian Ice Drilling) borehole showed a free lowering rate of at least 1.0 m s⁻¹ at clearance 7 mm using a mixture of ESTISOL™ 240 and COASOL™ with viscosity of 20–25 mPa s (personal communication from S. Hansen, 2011). Thus, the acceptable viscosity of the drilling fluid may prove to be as high as 20–25 mPa s, subject to future study.

Freezing point of the fluid must, of course, be higher than the minimal temperature in the borehole. The annual average temperatures in central Antarctica (and thus the minimal borehole temperatures) at 10 m depth are in the range −50 to −58°C (Reference King and TurnerKing and Turner, 1997); this can be taken as the minimum operating temperature for low-temperature drilling fluids.

Stability of the drilling fluid should be sufficiently great that the fundamental properties remain unchanged during storage, transportation and use in the borehole.

Reactivity of the drilling fluid should be low, i.e. essentially inert. Drilling fluid should be non-aggressive to drill and cable components, stable to water, air, oxygen, metals and wood, compatible with most plastics and elastomers, and completely un-reactive with ice.

The matter of volatility is not simple. On the one hand, the high volatility of drilling fluid raises human-health and fire-safety questions. For liquids with a high rate of vaporization it is necessary to organize careful control of air contamination so as to ensure that exposure-threshold limits and minimal inflammable concentration are observed. From this point of view, it is preferable to use fluid with a low rate of vaporization. On the other hand, there are benefits to high volatility: workplace and clothes become clear of liquid contamination after a short time, and ice-core processing is easier.

Cost of the fluid should be relatively low, and fluid should be readily available from commercial sources near the site of drilling operations; the effective cost results not so much from the initial purchase of the drilling fluid, but from its transportation to Antarctica. Using the drilling fluid also requires a costly processing system including mixing devices, pumps, chip recovery system, ventilation, etc. Most of the processing equipment is the same for different types of fluid, but distinctions exist. For example, mixing devices are not needed for single-component drilling fluids such as n-butyl acetate.

Toxicological and environmental properties of the drilling fluids have become the key point for the forthcoming drilling projects in Antarctica because recently used fluids are toxic and environmentally hazardous substances (Reference TalalayTalalay and others, 2014a). The ideal drilling fluid would be non-toxic to humans and biodegradable.

3. Low-Molecular-Weight Fatty Acid Esters

Esters consist of an organic or inorganic acid in which at least one −OH (hydroxyl) group is replaced by an −O−(alkoxy) group. Fatty-acid esters (FAEs) result from the bonding of a fatty acid with an alcohol. They are widely distributed in nature. FAEs are typically fragrant, and those with low enough molecular weight have sufficient volatility for common use in fragrances; they are often found in ‘essential oils’ and pheromones. Some FAEs find application as solvents in the nitrocellulose and cellulose industry.

Low-molecular-weight FAEs can have hazardous properties (e.g. n-butyl acetate that was used to complete two deep drilling projects at Summit, Greenland (GISP2 Project, 3053 m), and Dome F, Antarctica (3035 m), presenting an ongoing liability from a fire safety and acute- and chronic-health-hazard standpoint. The main risk posed by n-butyl acetate as a drilling fluid is to the physical and mental health of the people working at the drilling site.

Not all low-molecular-weight FAEs are harmful to human beings and the environment. Many of them occur naturally in plants and fruits. Chemically synthesized, they find commercial application in artificial flavoring because they resemble, for example, orange or pineapple juice and within certain limitations cause no harm to the human body (Reference Surburg and PantenSurburg and Panten, 2006). Thus, we selected five non-HAP (i.e. not listed as hazardous air pollutants), low-molecular-weight FAEs and studied their applicability as low-temperature drilling fluids for ice-coring in central Antarctica, namely (Table 1): (1) ethyl butyrate, (2) n-propyl propionate, (3) n-butyl butyrate, (4) n-amyl butyrate and (5) hexyl acetate.

Table 1.

Typical physical properties of selected low-molecular-weight FAEs

Ethyl butyrate (also known as ethyl butanoate or butyric ether) has a fruity odor, similar to pineapple. It is one of the most commonly used chemicals in flavors and fragrances.It is used to enhance orange juice and the flavoring of alcoholic beverages (e.g. Martinis, daiquiris). It is also used as a solvent in perfumery products and as a plasticizer for cellulose. In industrial applications, it is one of the cheapest chemicals, a fact which contributes to its popularity.

n-Propyl propionate, like most FAEs, has a distinctly fruity odor, which may be described as chemically tinged pineapple. In industry, it is used mainly as a polymerization solvent in automotive finishes and coatings, and in printing inks.

n-Butyl butyrate (also known as butyl butanoate) is a liquid with a sweet-fruity odor. It is a naturally occurring volatile constituent of many fruits including apples, bananas, berries, pears, plums and strawberries and is also found in honey. It is used in the flavor industry to create sweet-fruity flavors.

n-Amyl butyrate (also known as pentyl butyrate or pentyl-butanoate) is reminiscent of pear or apricot, and is used in flavorings, as a solvent and plasticizer, and in perfumes.

Hexyl acetate is a liquid with a sweet-fruity, pear-like odor. It is naturally present in a number of fruits and alcoholic beverages. It finds use in fruit-aroma compositions and as a solvent for resins, polymers, fats and oils.

4. Density–Viscosity Testing

The density of these selected low-molecular-weight FAEs was measured by direct-reading hydrometer with an accuracy of 1 kg m⁻³. Tests showed that the density–temperature relationship is linear (Fig. 1; Table 2). At a temperature of −30°C, the density of the tested liquids lies in the range 911–933.5 kg m⁻³. Of the selected low-molecular-weight FAEs, n-propyl propionate has the highest density and n-amyl butyrate the lowest. The density–temperature relationship for ethyl butyrate is similar to that for n-butyl acetate, previously used as a low-temperature drilling fluid. n-Propyl propionate and ethyl butyrate best meet the density requirements for deep ice coring in central Antarctica. The density of other tested FAEs is slightly less than required, and these compounds may find application as drilling fluids in cold or very cold ice (i.e. where plastic creep is slow), or for rapid-access drilling projects (i.e. when the project schedule limits closure time).

Fig. 1.

Density of selected low-molecular-weight FAEs vs temperature.

Table 2.

Experimental density–temperature equations of selected low-molecular-weight FAEs in temperature range −60 to +10°C (R ² > 0.999)

The viscosity of low-molecular-weight FAEs was measured using a rotational viscometer of DC-6506 type (Fangrui Instrument Co Ltd) with an imbedded thermostat that can maintain temperature in the range −65 to 100°C. The viscosities of tested FAEs are similar at room temperature, but increase at different rates with decreasing temperature (Fig. 2). All tested FAEs meet the viscosity requirements and do not exceed 16 mPa s. n-Amyl butyrate and hexyl acetate are the most viscous, while ethyl butyrate has essentially the same viscosity as n-butyl acetate.

Fig. 2.

Viscosity of selected low-molecular-weight FAEs vs temperature.

The viscosity–temperature functional connection of the most organic liquids can be linearized by the double-logarithmic equation (Reference Talalay and GundestrupTalalay and Gundestrup, 1999)

where η is the dynamic viscosity (mPa s), t _K is the temperature (K) and A and B are empirical coefficients.

This assumption was again confirmed by experiment, with the viscosity of FAEs fitting the double-logarithmic function with a high coefficient of determination. Applying the equations presented in Table 3, the dynamic viscosity of FAEs can be predicted at any desired temperature. Tests showed that all FAEs are inter-miscible and the resulting density or viscosity can be adjusted within ranges of the end members by proportional mixing of the components.

Table 3.

Experimental viscosity-temperature equations of selected low-molecular-weight FAEs in temperature range −60 to +10°C (R ² > 0.99)

5. Other Technical Properties

Tested FAEs are clear, colorless liquids with high electrical resistivity (typically > 1000 MΩ). The freezing point of testing FAEs lies in the range −73.2 to −93.3°C, sufficient to ensure they remain liquid not only in the hole but also during storage outside the drilling shelter.

FAEs are strong solvents, so attention must be paid to the choice of materials for gaskets and electrical insulation (plastic jacket of wire, insulation of electrical sockets, etc.) so as to avoid swelling, softening or other symptoms of degradation. O-rings made from EPDM and Viton^® can be used in aggressive chemicals like FAEs with minor effect. Polypropylene, Teflon, polyethylene and nylon are recommended materials as they can withstand extended exposure to esters.

FAEs are soluble in non-polar solvents such as propylene glycol, paraffin oil, ethanol, diethyl ether, and kerosene. FAEs are generally hydrophobic. The tested FAEs are essentially insoluble in water (solubility <0.7%), with the exception of n-amyl butyrate. This chemical is most likely to be reactive with ice at subzero temperatures, and might dissolve cuttings and borehole walls.

The higher the vapor pressure of a liquid, the higher the volatility. Ethyl butyrate and n-propyl propionate are highly volatile substances with vapor pressure 1.2 times higher than that of n-butyl acetate. Other tested FAEs evaporate relatively slowly.

FAEs present a fire hazard at room temperature, but at temperatures below 0°C the fire hazard is quite low. Ethyl butyrate and n-propyl propionate are flammable and therefore present on the Special Health Hazard Substance List. Even so, the flash points of these chemicals are higher than that of n-butyl acetate (22°C) and ethanol (12°C).

None of the tested low-molecular-weight FAEs presents a significant health hazard; no occupational exposure limits have been established. All these materials can irritate the skin, and their vapors can irritate the eyes, nose and throat Standard industrial hygiene (e.g. the use of chemical-resistant gloves) is indicated when handling FAEs, and prolonged skin contact should be avoided. Low-molecular-weight FAEs have a strong aroma and their odor-perception thresholds are quite low (>0.015 ppm), so the working area should be well ventilated to prevent workers from being overcome by the odor

The price of low-molecular-weight FAEs depends, of course, on the type, the customer’s ability to negotiate the price, and the volume purchased. The retail price is typically US$3 to US$6 kg⁻¹

Conclusions

Preliminary tests indicate that low-molecular-weight FAEs are applicable as drilling fluids in central Antarctica. According to the published data, they are not hazardous to man or animals, and, for this reason, permissible exposure levels in indoor air of work areas are not specified. Most of them are commonly used as fragrance and flavor additives and, when consumed in those concentrations, are harmless to human health.

From the desired-density point of view, ethyl butyrate and n-propyl propionate best meet cold-ice drilling requirements. The viscosities of these two chemicals are the lowest among studied FAEs, and do not exceed 4 mPa s at temperatures down to −60°C. Both are highly volatile substances and essentially insoluble in water. The final disposition regarding the applicability of FAEs to deep, cold-ice drilling can be made only after field experiments in one or more test boreholes.