Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-pjp64 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-01T15:01:37.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of high resolution XRF and downhole geophysical scanning of Nussloch loess records, Germany, with field observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2026

Denis-Didier Rousseau*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics-CSE, Division of Geochronology and Environmental Isotopes, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, 44-100, Poland Géosciences Montpellier, University Montpellier, 2 place Eugène Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier, France Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades NY 10964, USA
Pierre Antoine
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Environnements Quaternaires et Actuels, CNRS-University Paris 1-UPEC 2 rue Henri Dunant, F-94 320, Thiais, France
Philippe Adrien Pezard
Affiliation:
Géosciences Montpellier, University Montpellier, 2 place Eugène Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier, France
Gilles Henry
Affiliation:
Géosciences Montpellier, University Montpellier, 2 place Eugène Bataillon, F-34095 Montpellier, France
Laurent Augustin
Affiliation:
INSU Division Technique, CNRS, Zone portuaire de Brégaillon, CS 20330, F-83507 La Seyne-sur-Mer cedex, France
Alain De Moya
Affiliation:
INSU Division Technique, CNRS, Zone portuaire de Brégaillon, CS 20330, F-83507 La Seyne-sur-Mer cedex, France
Olivier Moine
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Environnements Quaternaires et Actuels, CNRS-University Paris 1-UPEC 2 rue Henri Dunant, F-94 320, Thiais, France
Luigi Ardito
Affiliation:
BRGM, 3 avenue Claude Guillemin, F-45100 Orléans, France
Manfred Löscher
Affiliation:
Max-Reger-Weg 3, D-69 181 Leimen-Sankt-Ilgen, Germany.
Frédéric Le Moal
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Géographie Physique, Environnements Quaternaires et Actuels, CNRS-University Paris 1-UPEC 2 rue Henri Dunant, F-94 320, Thiais, France
*
Corresponding author: Denis-Didier Rousseau; Email: denis-didier.rousseau@umontpellier.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nussloch (Germany) is a distinctive site of interest, particularly as a reference sequence for Late Pleistocene European loess, because it provides a comprehensive record of millennial climate variability. A notable feature of this site is its location within an active quarry. Consequently, the stratigraphic profiles documented constitute an ephemeral record, susceptible to rapid disappearance or brief accessibility, contingent on the operational status of the quarry. In order to guarantee the maintenance of a complete record of the sequence, three separate cores were collected and labelled S1, S2, and S3. The results of core S2, which is the most complete and thoroughly examined, are presented here. A comparison is drawn with the most recent P8 profile that is currently available. XRF measurements, conducted after the cores had been opened and described, are also presented. Borehole logging was carried out in the field after core retrieval, and the resulting measurements are also presented. The findings of this study demonstrate that a high degree of correlation can be established between the records from outcrop investigations and core studies, demonstrating the importance of preserving such archives for future research.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Quaternary Research Center.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of European loess and location of the Nussloch quarry near the Rhine valley (from Antoine et al., 2013) and aerial view of the drilling site (Google Earth view) at 49.31°N and 8.73°E, altitude 215 m.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Correlation between Nussloch pedo-stratigraphy of profile P8 (Prud’homme et al., 2019) and core S2. The same P8 units are identified in S2. Labels of different paleosols and gleys identified in P8.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Variations of pedogenic indices defined by Ca/Sr for decalcification processes, Rb/K and Fe/Al as weathering indices, and Fe/Mn as a redox index are plotted against the pedo-stratigraphy of S2. All ratios are expressed logarithmically. Red stars mark units that correspond to the different types of paleosols identified in P8. Double arrows mark the main weathering stages observed in S2. ET = Eltville Tuff. The three colored boxes represent three decreasing steps in decalcification.

Figure 3

Figure 4. The variations of grain size defined by the ratios of Si/Al, Ti/Al, and Ti/Zr as dust provenance indices, and Zr/Rb as a grain-size index, are shown against the pedo-stratigraphy of S2. All ratios are expressed logarithmically. The red stars in the Zr/Rb ratio indicate intervals with coarser material. The first (lowest) star indicates the initial eolian deposition. The red stars in the Ti/Zr ratio indicate a different provenance than that observed throughout the sequence. They correspond to coarser intervals identified by the grain-size index. The input of external material is more clearly seen in the Si/Al and Ti/Al ratios, which are marked by double arrows.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Comparison of P8 grain size index (GSI), (%26–52 µm)/(%< 26 µm) with S2 (Zr/Rb) versus their respective depth with indication of the main units identified when opening the cores. On the right-hand side, plot of S2 Zr/Rb ratio and P8 GSI on S2 re-scaled depth and P8 initial depth, respectively. For the purpose of comparing the two indices, on both panels Zr/Rb is not expressed logarithmically.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Comparisons of the S2 Ca/Sr and Vsh parameters with P8 clay percentages. The S2 indices are plotted on the re-scaled depth defined by pedo-stratigraphical correlations between P8 and S2. Arrows determine similar evolutions of the different sets of parameters, as expressed by boxes in Figure 3.

Supplementary material: File

Rousseau et al. supplementary material

Rousseau et al. supplementary material
Download Rousseau et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3 MB