Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T14:11:50.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applying the food multimix concept for sustainable and nutritious diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

F. B. Zotor*
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana
B. Ellahi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK
P. Amuna
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Greenwich, Medway, Kent ME4 4TB, UK Department of Clinical Affairs, Primary Health Care Corporation, PO Box 26555 Doha, Qatar
*
* Corresponding author: F. B. Zotor, email francisfirst@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite a rich and diverse ecosystem, and biodiversity, worldwide, more than 2 billion people suffer from micronutrient malnutrition or hidden hunger. Of major concern are a degradation of our ecosystems and agricultural systems which are thought to be unsustainable thereby posing a challenge for the future food and nutrition security. Despite these challenges, nutrition security and ensuring well balanced diets depend on sound knowledge and appropriate food choices in a complex world of plenty and want. We have previously reported on how the food multimix (FMM) concept, a food-based and dietary diversification approach can be applied to meet energy and micronutrient needs of vulnerable groups through an empirical process. Our objective in this paper is to examine how the concept can be applied to improve nutrition in a sustainable way in otherwise poor and hard-to-reach communities. We have reviewed over 100 FMM food recipes formulated from combinations of commonly consumed traditional candidate food ingredients; on average five per recipe, and packaged as per 100 g powders from different countries including Ghana, Kenya, Botswana, Zimbabawe and Southern Africa, India, Mexico, Malaysia and the UK; and for different age groups and conditions such as older infants and young children, pregnant women, HIV patients, diabetes and for nutrition rehabilitation. Candidate foods were examined for their nutrient strengths and nutrient content and nutrient density of recipes per 100 g were compared with reference nutrient intakes for the different population groups. We report on the nutrient profiles from our analysis of the pooled and age-matched data as well as sensory analysis and conclude that locally produced FMM foods can complement local diets and contribute significantly to meet nutrient needs among vulnerable groups in food-insecure environments.

Information

Type
Conference on ‘Food and nutrition security in Africa: new challenges and opportunities for sustainability’
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. A schematic diagram showing the stages and processes involved in the optimisation of food multimixes (FMM)(27).

Figure 1

Table 1. Nutrient compositions of original Super5® food product and food multimixes (FMM)-optimised Super5® per 300 g serving of product and Weanimix and fish-enriched Koko(25,37)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Energy, macronutrient, mineral and vitamin content of food multimixes (FMM) designed for human weanlings 9–12 months old in Malaysia. EAR, estimated average requirements; RNI, reference nutrient intake.

Figure 3

Table 2. Summary of the criteria for food multimixes (FMM) formulations for infants aged 9–12 months

Figure 4

Table 3. Key nutrients in 100 g food multimixes (FMM) per child serving compared with Ghanaian commercial products

Figure 5

Table 4. Daily nutrient intake of pregnant women consuming food multimixes (FMM; intervention) and placebo (control) in South Africa

Figure 6

Table 5. Selected haematological indices among 120 healthy pregnant women from the Vaal Triangle, Gauteng Province, South Africa, following intervention using food multimixes (FMM)

Figure 7

Table 6. Birth size and crown–heel length of babies born to intervention and control groups following food multimixes (FMM) feeding trial in South Africa

Figure 8

Fig. 3. Graphical representations of sensory responses to food multimix products.

Figure 9

Fig. 4. This is a graphical representation showing individual responses on a Likert Scale of 0–10 with respect to palatability, likeness and acceptability shown separately (blue bar = palatability; green bar = likeness and red bar = acceptability score) of food multimix (FMM) products A to J tasted by all female subjects across the age range. The numerical values on the left hand side of the vertical axis represent individual subject codes (based on sum total score for palatability, likeability and acceptance, product ID e.g. A4, subject group e.g. Junior Secondary School and age of subjects). The size of each colour-coded bar to the right i.e. horizontal scale represents the individual score (i.e. out of a total of 10 on the Likert scale) for palatability, likeness and acceptability. The Figure shows the overall distribution of tasting attractions of female subjects for the range of products provided. The tasters had freedom to try any of the products so that the number of tasters can be taken to indicate visual attractiveness.

Figure 10

Fig. 5. This is a graphical representation showing individual responses on a Likert Scale of 0–10 with respect to palatability, likeness and acceptability shown separately (blue bar = palatability; green bar = likeness and red bar = acceptability score) of food multimix (FMM) products A to J tasted by all male subjects across the age range. The numerical values on the left hand side of the vertical axis represent individual subject codes (based on sum total score for palatability, likeability and acceptance, product ID e.g. A4, subject group e.g. Junior Secondary School and age of subjects). The size of each colour-coded bar to the right i.e. horizontal scale represents the individual score (i.e. out of a total of 10 on the Likert scale) for palatability, likeness and acceptability. The figure shows the overall distribution of tasting attractions of male subjects for the range of products provided. The tasters had freedom to try any of the products so that the number of tasters can be taken to indicate visual attractiveness.