Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pztms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T07:04:11.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Do Citizens Respond Politically to the Local Economy? Evidence from Registry Data on Local Housing Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

MARTIN VINÆS LARSEN ,
FREDERIK HJORTH Open the ORCID record for FREDERIK HJORTH [Opens in a new window] ,
PETER THISTED DINESEN Open the ORCID record for PETER THISTED DINESEN [Opens in a new window]  and
KIM MANNEMAR SØNDERSKOV Open the ORCID record for KIM MANNEMAR SØNDERSKOV [Opens in a new window]
MARTIN VINÆS LARSEN*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University
FREDERIK HJORTH*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
PETER THISTED DINESEN*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
KIM MANNEMAR SØNDERSKOV*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University
*
*Martin Vinæs Larsen, Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, mvl@ps.au.dk.
†Frederik Hjorth, Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, fh@ifs.ku.dk.
‡Peter Thisted Dinesen, Professor at the Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen, ptd@ifs.ku.dk.
**Kim Mannemar Sønderskov, Professor at the Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, ks@ps.au.dk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent studies of economic voting have focused on the role of the local economy, but with inconclusive results. We argue that while local economic conditions affect incumbent support on average, the importance of the local economy varies by citizens’ interactions with it. More recent and frequent encounters with aspects of the local economy make those aspects more salient and, in turn, feature more prominently in evaluations of the incumbent government. We label this process “context priming.” We provide evidence for these propositions by studying local housing markets. Linking granularly detailed data on housing prices from Danish public registries to both precinct-level election returns and an individual-level panel survey, we find that when individuals interact with the housing market, their support for the incumbent government is more responsive to changes in local housing prices. The study thus provides a framework for understanding when citizens respond politically to the local economy.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 113 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 499 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We would like to thank Kraks Fond—Institute for Urban Economic Research, the Carlsberg foundation, and the Danish Council for Independent Research (Social Sciences) for financial support. We also want to acknowledge Amalie Sofie Jensen and Statistics Denmark for help in acquiring and understanding the data on housing prices. Furthermore, we thank the APSR editors and reviewers, Ben Ansell, Martin Bisgaard, Gabriel Lenz, Mikael Persson, and seminar participants at the 2016 APSA Annual Meeting, the 2017 MPSA Annual Meeting, Kraks Fond—Institute for Urban Economic Research Seminar 2017, and Université Laval 2018 for helpful comments. All remaining errors are our own. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EKZQSZ.

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Cameron D., and Roy, Jason. 2011. “Local Economies and National Economic Evaluations.” Electoral Studies 30 (4): 795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, Ben. 2014. “The Political Economy of Ownership: Housing Markets and the Welfare State.” American Political Science Review 108 (02): 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Meredith, Marc, and Snowberg, Erik. 2012. “Asking about Numbers: Why and How.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Meredith, Marc, and Snowberg, Erik. 2014. “Mecro-Economic Voting: Local Information and Micro-Perceptions of the Macro-Economy.” Economics & Politics 26 (3): 380–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott. 2012. “Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Jonah, Meredith, Marc, and Wheeler, S. Christian. 2008. “Contextual Priming: Where People Vote Affects How They Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (26): 8846–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, Robert, Chadha, Anita, and Montjoy, Robert. 2001. “Overreporting Voting: Why It Happens and Why It Matters.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (1): 22–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisgaard, Martin, Dinesen, Peter T., and Sønderskov, Kim M.. 2016. “Reconsidering the Neighborhood Effect: Does Exposure to Residential Unemployment Influence Voters’ Perceptions of the National Economy?” The Journal of Politics 78 (3): 719–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Howard S., and Price, H. Douglas. 1975. “Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession.” American Political Science Review 69 (04): 1240–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Books, John, and Prysby, Charles. 1999. “Contextual Effects on Retrospective Economic Evaluations the Impact of the State and Local Economy.” Political Behavior 21 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Craig M., and Kogan, Vladimir. 2017. “The Politics of Potholes: Service Quality and Retrospective Voting in Local Elections.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 302–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, Raj, Hendren, Nathaniel, and Katz, Lawrence F.. 2016. “The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.” The American Economic Review 106 (4): 855–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dam, Niels Arne, Hvolbøl, Tina Saaby, Pedersen, Erik Haller, and Birch, Peter. 2011. “The Housing Bubble that Burst: Can House Prices be Explained? And Can Their Fluctuations be Dampened?” Danmarks Nationalbank Monetary Review 1st Quarter Part 1.Google Scholar
Davenport, Tiffany C. 2015. “Policy-Induced Risk and Responsive Participation: The Effect of a Son’s Conscription Risk on the Voting Behavior of His Parents.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 225–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debus, Marc, Stegmaier, Mary, and Tosun, Jale. 2014. “Economic Voting Under Coalition Governments: Evidence from Germany.” Political Science Research and Methods 2 (1): 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, Bradley T., and Ondercin, Heather L.. 2017. “Conditional Motivated Reasoning: How the Local Economy Moderates Partisan Motivations in Economic Perceptions.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (1): 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinesen, Peter Thisted, and Sønderskov, Kim Mannemar. 2015. “Ethnic Diversity and Social Trust: Evidence from the Micro-Context.” American Sociological Review 80 (3): 550–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Falcó-Gimeno, Albert. 2014. Decision-Making in Coalitions and the Economic Vote. Presented at 4th EPSA Conference, Edinburgh, June, 19–21.Google Scholar
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Daniel, and Ketcham, Jonathan. 2004. “Economic Voting in US Presidential Elections: Who Blames Whom for What.” Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy 4 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elinder, Mikael. 2010. “Local Economies and General Elections: The Influence of Municipal and Regional Economic Conditions on Voting in Sweden 1985–2002.” European Journal of Political Economy 26 (2): 279–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enos, Ryan D. 2016. “What the Demolition of Public Housing Teaches Us about the Impact of Racial Threat on Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and Pickup, Mark. 2010. “Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 US Presidential Election Cycle.” The Journal of Politics 72 (4): 1236–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Stephen D., and Hobolt, Sara B.. 2010. “Coalition Government and Electoral Accountability.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 358–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossati, Diego. 2014. “Economic Vulnerability and Economic Voting in 14 OECD Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (1): 116–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Xu, Yiqing. Forthcoming. “How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice.” Political Analysis.Google Scholar
Hall, Andrew B., Yoder, Jesse, and Karandikar, Nishant. 2017. “Economic Distress and Voting: Evidence from the Subprime Mortgage Crisis.” SocArXiv. April 13. doi:10.31235/osf.io/9ptqc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., and Gomez, Brad T.. 2015. “Reevaluating the Sociotropic Economic Voting Hypothesis.” Electoral Studies 39: 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Austin. 2013. “Can Candidates Activate or Deactivate the Economic Vote? Evidence from Two Mexican Elections.” The Journal of Politics 75 (4): 1051–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, Barbara, and Lanoue, David J.. 1991. “Attention, Asymmetry, and Government Popularity in Britain.” The Western Political Quarterly 44 (1): 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2014. “Substituting the End for the Whole: Why Voters Respond Primarily to the Election-Year Economy.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (1): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2017. “Presidential Voting and the Local Economy: Evidence from Two Population-Based Data Sets.” The Journal of Politics 79 (4): 1419–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew J., Persson, Mikael, and Snowberg, Erik. 2017. “Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting from Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey.” American Political Science Review 111 (4): 771–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2009. “Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy.” American Political Science Review 103 (03): 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neil. 2013. “Retrospective Voting Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Seth J., Herron, Michael C., and Lewis, Jeffrey B.. 2010. “Economic Crisis, Iraq, and Race: A Study of the 2008 Presidential Election.” Election Law Journal 9 (1): 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjermitslev, Ida B. Forthcoming. “The Electoral Cost of Coalition Participation: Can Anyone Escape?” Party Politics.Google Scholar
Hjorth, Frederik. Forthcoming. “The Influence of Local Ethnic Diversity on Group-Centric Crime Attitudes.” British Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J., and Pettingill, Lindsay M.. 2018. “Retrospective Voting in Big-City US Mayoral Elections.” Political Science Research and Methods 6 (4): 697–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Peters, Mark D., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1982. “Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-so-Minimal” Consequences of Television News Programs.” American Political Science Review 76 (4): 848–58.Google Scholar
Jerzak, Connor T., and Libgober, Brian D.. 2016. “Property Values & Political Preferences: Evidence from the Adoption of E-ZPass.” Available at SSRN 2780539.Google Scholar
Johnston, Ron J., and Pattie, Charles J.. 2001. “‘It’s the Economy, Stupid’-But Which Economy? Geographical Scales, Retrospective Economic Evaluations and Voting at the 1997 British General Election.” Regional Studies 35 (4): 309–19.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1979. “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (3): 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. “Short-Term Fluctuations in US Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.” American Political Science Review 65 (01): 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate-Versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12 (1): 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, Dean, and Christenson, Dino P.. 2017. “Who Votes for the Future? Information, Expectations, and Endogeneity in Economic Voting.” Political Behavior 39 (2): 347–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Martin Vinæs. 2016. “Economic Conditions Affect Support for Prime Minister Parties in Scandinavia.” Scandinavian Political Studies 39 (3): 226–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Martin Vinæs. Forthcoming. “Is the Relationship between Political Responsibility and Electoral Accountability Causal, Adaptive and Policy-Specific?” Political Behavior.Google Scholar
Legewie, Joscha. 2013. “Terrorist Events and Attitudes toward Immigrants: A Natural experiment.” American Journal of Sociology 118 (5): 1199–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lettau, Martin, and Ludvigson, Sydney C.. 2004. “Understanding Trend and Cycle in Asset Values: Reevaluating the Wealth Effect on Consumption.” The American Economic Review 94 (1): 276–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Stegmaier, Mary. 2013. “The VP-Function Revisited: A Survey of the Literature on Vote and Popularity Functions after over 40 Years.” Public Choice 157 (3–4): 367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Nadeau, Richard, and Foucault, Martial. 2013. “The Compleat Economic Voter: New Theory and British Evidence.” British Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Stubager, Rune, and Nadeau, Richard. 2013. “The Kramer Problem: Micro-Macro Resolution with a Danish Pool.” Electoral Studies 32 (3): 500–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Adrienne, and Martínez-García, Enrique. 2011. “A Cross-Country Quarterly Database of Real House Prices: A Methodological Note.” Working Paper No. 99, Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Miller, Norman, Peng, Liang, and Sklarz, Michael. 2011. “House Prices and Economic Growth.” The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 42 (4): 522–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Ryan T., and Reeves, Andrew. Forthcoming. “Defining Racial and Ethnic Context with Geolocation Data.” Political Science Research and Methods.Google Scholar
Nannestad, Peter, and Paldam, Martin. 1997. “From the Pocketbook of the Welfare Man: A Pooled Cross-Section Study of Economic Voting in Denmark, 1986–92.” British Journal of Political Science 27 (1): 111–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Harvey D., and Whitten, Guy D.. 1999. “The Electoral Impact of Unexpected Inflation and Economic Growth.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (4): 623–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham Jr, and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, Andrew, and Gimpel, James G.. 2012. “Ecologies of Unease: Geographic Context and National Economic Evaluations.” Political Behavior 34 (3): 507–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonovits, Gabor, Kates, Sean, and Szeitl, Blanka. Forthcoming. “Local Economic Shocks and National Election Outcomes: Evidence from Hungarian Administrative Data.” Political Behavior.Google Scholar
Singer, Matthew M. 2011. “Who Says ‘It’s the Economy’? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (3): 284–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Matthew M. 2013. “What Goes Around Comes Around: Perceived Vulnerable Employment and Economic Voting in Developing Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 52 (2): 143–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N. 2006. “Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information.” The Journal of Politics 68 (2): 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., Stecula, Dominik A., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2015. “It’s (Change in) the (Future) Economy, Stupid: Economic Indicators, the media, and Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (2): 457–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubager, Rune, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Nadeau, Richard. 2013. “Reaching for Profit in the Welfare State: Patrimonial Economic Voting in Denmark.” Electoral Studies 32 (3): 438–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubager, Rune, Botterill, Niels W., Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Nadeau, Richard. 2014. “Scope Conditions of Economic Voting: The Danish Exception?” Electoral Studies 34: 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thygesen, Lau Caspar, Daasnes, Camilla, Thaulow, Ivan, and Brønnum-Hansen, Henrik. 2011. “Introduction to Danish (Nationwide) Registers on Health and Social Issues: Structure, Access, Legislation, and Archiving.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 39 (Suppl. 7): 12–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilley, James, Neundorf, Anja, and Hobolt, Sara B.. 2018. “When the Pound in People’s Pocket Matters: How Changes to Personal Financial Circumstances Affect Party Choice.” The Journal of Politics 80 (2): 555–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, James, and Hobolt, Sara B.. 2011. “Is the Government to Blame? An Experimental Test of How Partisanship Shapes Perceptions of Performance and Responsibility.” The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 316–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, Catherine E., and Giger, Nathalie. 2014. “Holding Governments Accountable? Individual Heterogeneity in Performance Voting.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (2): 345–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with ‘most Important Problem’.” Electoral Studies 24 (4): 555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. 2012. “Unemployment and the Democratic Electoral Advantage.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Larsen et al. supplementary material

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EKZQSZ
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Larsen et al. supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Larsen et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 404.7 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.