Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T23:49:08.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A period of 10 weeks of increased protein consumption does not alter faecal microbiota or volatile metabolites in healthy older men: a randomised controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2020

S. M. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
E. J. McKenzie
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
C. J. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
A. M. Milan
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Food Nutrition & Health Team, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand The High-Value Nutrition National Science Challenge, Auckland, New Zealand
N. Zeng
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
R. F. D'Souza
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Discipline of Nutrition, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
F. Ramzan
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
P. Sharma
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
E. Rettedal
Affiliation:
Food Nutrition & Health Team, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand
S. O. Knowles
Affiliation:
Food Nutrition & Health Team, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand
N. C. Roy
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Food Nutrition & Health Team, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand The High-Value Nutrition National Science Challenge, Auckland, New Zealand
A. Sjödin
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
K.-H. Wagner
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Sciences and Research Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
J. M. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
D. Cameron-Smith*
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology, and Research, Singapore
*
*Corresponding author: D. Cameron-Smith, email d.cameron-smith@auckland.ac.nz

Abstract

Diet has a major influence on the composition and metabolic output of the gut microbiome. Higher-protein diets are often recommended for older consumers; however, the effect of high-protein diets on the gut microbiota and faecal volatile organic compounds (VOC) of elderly participants is unknown. The purpose of the study was to establish if the faecal microbiota composition and VOC in older men are different after a diet containing the recommended dietary intake (RDA) of protein compared with a diet containing twice the RDA (2RDA). Healthy males (74⋅2 (sd 3⋅6) years; n 28) were randomised to consume the RDA of protein (0⋅8 g protein/kg body weight per d) or 2RDA, for 10 weeks. Dietary protein was provided via whole foods rather than supplementation or fortification. The diets were matched for dietary fibre from fruit and vegetables. Faecal samples were collected pre- and post-intervention for microbiota profiling by 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing and VOC analysis by head space/solid-phase microextraction/GC-MS. After correcting for multiple comparisons, no significant differences in the abundance of faecal microbiota or VOC associated with protein fermentation were evident between the RDA and 2RDA diets. Therefore, in the present study, a twofold difference in dietary protein intake did not alter gut microbiota or VOC indicative of altered protein fermentation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Participant characteristics pre-intervention(Mean values, standard deviations and ranges; numbers of participants)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.

Figure 2

Table 2. Estimated composition of baseline (pre) and experimental diets (post) for the RDA and 2RDA groups(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Microbiota composition. Relative abundance at the genus level post-intervention in the RDA and 2RDA groups. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Genera boxplots: the most abundant genera in the RDA and 2RDA groups. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein. For the box plots: middle line is the median, boxes represent 25th and 75th percentiles, whiskers are within 1⋅5 interquartile ranges of the lower and upper percentiles, and dots represent outliers.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. α-Diversity. (a) Shannon's diversity; (b) Simpson's diversity. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein. For the box plots: middle line is the median, boxes represent 25th and 75th percentiles, whiskers are within 1⋅5 interquartile ranges of the lower and upper percentiles, and dots represent outliers.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. β-Diversity. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Principal component (PC) analysis of volatile organic compounds. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Volatile organic compound boxplots. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein. For the box plots: middle line is the median, boxes represent 25th and 75th percentiles, whiskers are within 1⋅5 interquartile ranges of the lower and upper percentiles, and dots represent outliers.

Figure 9

Table 3. Important features identified by ANOVA simultaneous component analysis (ASCA) related to microbial fermentation*

Supplementary material: File

Mitchell et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Mitchell et al. supplementary material(File)
File 53.6 KB