Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-x9v92 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-14T08:14:23.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Influence of saflufenacil encapsulation on corn phytotoxicity and residual broadleaf weed control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2026

Jada N. Davis*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA;
Thomas R. Butts
Affiliation:
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA;
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Jada N. Davis; Email: jndavis0504@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Saflufenacil, a protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO)-inhibiting herbicide, has been reformulated as a microencapsulation for preemergence and postemergence applications in corn, with the primary purpose of the encapsulation to reduce the risk of corn injury from foliar applications. Field experiments on corn were conducted in 2023, 2024, and 2025 to evaluate the efficacy of encapsulated saflufenacil alone and in the formulated premixture with pyroxasulfone for residual broadleaf weed control and crop injury. Applications of encapsulated saflufenacil across a dose range resulted in incomplete control (less than 60%) of giant ragweed. Combinations of the encapsulated saflufenacil + pyroxasulfone premixture with atrazine were efficacious in controlling giant ragweed up to 28 days after planting (DAP), but efficacy declined sharply by 42 DAP. The reduced efficacy on giant ragweed was attributed to a lack of activating rainfall for the encapsulated saflufenacil. Conversely, encapsulated saflufenacil applications, with or without pyroxasulfone, were highly efficacious (83 to 99% control) on the small-seeded broadleaf species waterhemp and common lambsquarters. Furthermore, the most extensive weed control with encapsulated saflufenacil resulted from sequential applications (PRE/POST) of residual herbicide. Overall, encapsulated saflufenacil was effective in controlling small-seeded broadleaf weeds until a POST application was performed. However, additional herbicides in a mixture may be needed to manage large-seeded broadleaf species, such as giant ragweed. Regardless of the target species, management of problematic, herbicide-resistant weeds with encapsulated saflufenacil should focus on combinations with other effective herbicides in both PRE and POST applications, in addition to other weed control tactics.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America