Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T20:26:13.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glutamine modulates acute dextran sulphate sodium-induced changes in small-intestinal intraepithelial γδ-T-lymphocyte expression in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

Man-Hui Pai
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Jun-Jen Liu
Affiliation:
School of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Sung-Ling Yeh
Affiliation:
School of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Wei-Jao Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Chiu-Li Yeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Chinese Culture University, 55, Hwa-Kang Road, Yang-Ming-Shan, Taipei 11114, Taiwan, ROC
*
* Corresponding author: C.-L. Yeh, email m8707008@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of glutamine (Gln) on dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-induced changes in the expression of small-intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) γδ-T cells in mice. Mice were randomly assigned to a normal control (NC) group and two DSS-treated groups. The NC group and one of the DSS-treated groups (DSS-C) were fed a common semi-purified diet, while the other DSS-treated group (DSS-G) was fed an identical diet, except that part of casein was replaced by Gln, which provided 25 % of total amino acid nitrogen. After being fed the diets for 10 d, mice in the NC group were given distilled water, while the DSS-treated groups were given distilled water containing 2·5 % DSS for 5 d. At the end of the experiment, the mice were killed. The small-intestinal IEL γδ-T-cell subset was isolated for further analysis. The results indicated that DSS treatment resulted in a lower percentage of small-intestinal IEL γδ-T cells and higher mRNA expressions of interferon-γ, TNF-α, IL-17, complement 5a receptor and keratinocyte growth factor in IEL γδ-T cells. Gln administration increased the proportion of small-intestinal IEL γδ-T cells, and the expression levels of immunomodulatory mediator genes in IEL γδ-T cells were lower in the DSS-treated mice. The histological findings indicated that the immunoreactive intensity of the tight junction protein ZO-1 in the small-intestinal mucosa was higher in the DSS-G group than in the DSS-C group. These results indicate that pretreatment with Gln increases the proportion of small-intestinal IEL γδ-T cells and down-regulates γδ-T-cell-expressed inflammatory mediators, which may consequently ameliorate the severity of DSS-induced small-intestinal epithelial injury.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets (g/kg)

Figure 1

Table 2 Sequences of primers used for inflammatory mediator quantitative real-time PCR assays

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Distributions of γδ-T cells in small-intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes in the normal control (NC) group, dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-treated group fed the control diet (DSS-C) and DSS-treated group fed the glutamine diet (DSS-G) for 10 d and given DSS water for 5 d. All the data are representative of duplicate measurements (n 6). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. Differences among the groups were analysed by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple-comparison test. * Mean value was significantly different from those of the other two groups (P <0·05). † Mean value was significantly different from that of the DSS-G group (P <0·05).

Figure 3

Table 3 IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) concentrations in peritoneal lavage fluid† (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Expressions of C5a receptor (C5aR), IL-17, TNF-α, interferon-γ (IFNγ) and IL-4 mRNA in small-intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte γδ-T cells. All the data are representative of duplicate measurements (n 6). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. Differences among the groups were analysed by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple-comparison test. □, Normal control group; ■, dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-treated group fed the control diet; , DSS-treated group fed the glutamine diet. *Mean values were significantly different from those of the other two groups (P <0·05).

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Expressions of regenerating islet-derived protein III-γ (RegIIIγ) and keratinocyte growth factor-1 (KGF-1) mRNA in small-intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte γδ-T cells. All the data are representative of duplicate measurements (n 6). Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. Differences among the groups were analysed by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple-comparison test. □, Normal control group; ■, dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-treated group fed the control diet; , DSS-treated group fed the glutamine diet. * Mean value was significantly different from those of the other two groups (P <0·05).

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Distribution of tight junction protein ZO-1-immunoreactive areas in the small-intestinal mucosa of mice in the normal control (NC) group, dextran sulphate sodium (DSS)-treated group fed the control diet group (DSS-C) and DSS-treated group fed the glutamine diet (DSS-G). (a) Representative histological images of mice in the normal control and DSS-treated groups at 100 ×  (left column) and 200 ×  (right column) magnifications. Cell nuclei were contrast-stained with haematoxylin. Arrows indicate ZO-1-positive areas. The normal small intestine exhibited intact epithelium with marked dark-brown ZO-1 expression. In contrast, mucosal structural degeneration and less extensive ZO-1 distribution were observed in the DSS-C group. It is obvious that changes in the DSS-C group were more severe than those in the DSS-G group. (b) Quantification of ZO-1-immunoreactive areas among the groups. The immunoreactive areas of the DSS-G and NC groups were significantly larger than those of the DSS-C group. *Value was significantly different from those of the other two groups (P <0·05). (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org/bjn).