Introduction
The co-existence of large carnivores with people remains challenging because of the common resources shared by humans, livestock, large carnivores and their wild prey (Woodroffe et al., Reference Woodroffe, Thirgood and Rabinowitz2005). Snow leopards Panthera uncia inhabit the mountainous areas of Central Asia and the Himalayas and play a crucial role in regulating ecosystem health and processes (Ripple et al., Reference Ripple, Estes, Beschta, Wilmers, Ritchie and Hebblewhite2014). However, the decline in their prey base (McCarthy & Chapron, Reference McCarthy and Chapron2014), habitat loss (Forrest et al., Reference Forrest, Wikramanayake, Shrestha, Areendran, Gyeltshen and Maheshwari2012), traditional herding practices involving minimal protection from predators (Tiwari et al., Reference Tiwari, Devkota, Jackson, Bahadur and Chhetri2020), and livestock-based livelihoods (Kusi et al., Reference Kusi, Sillero-Zubiri, Macdonald, Johnson and Werhahn2020) have escalated livestock depredation by snow leopards, causing human–snow leopard conflict (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994; Namgail et al., Reference Namgail, Fox and Bhatnagar2007; Mishra et al., Reference Mishra, Redpath, Suryawanshi, McCarthy and Mallon2016). Livestock depredation by snow leopards poses a serious threat to the livelihoods of agropastoral communities (Aryal et al., Reference Aryal, Brunton, Ji, Barraclough and Raubenheimer2014) as local herders suffer substantial economic losses from such depredation (Hussain, Reference Hussain2000; Namgail et al., Reference Namgail, Fox and Bhatnagar2007; Mishra et al., Reference Mishra, Redpath, Suryawanshi, McCarthy and Mallon2016; Kusi et al., Reference Kusi, Sillero-Zubiri, Macdonald, Johnson and Werhahn2020; Tiwari et al., Reference Tiwari, Devkota, Jackson, Bahadur and Chhetri2020), which sometimes leads to shifts in livelihood options (Vannelli et al., Reference Vannelli, Hampton, Namgail and Black2019). Consequently, livestock depredation can lead to retaliatory killing of snow leopards and often engenders negative attitudes towards the species (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994). Such conflict is expected to escalate because of stringent conservation laws and decreasing natural prey species for snow leopards (Namgail et al., Reference Namgail, Fox and Bhatnagar2007; Aryal et al., Reference Aryal, Brunton, Ji, Barraclough and Raubenheimer2014). Various approaches are being employed to mitigate this conflict, including compensation for livestock loss, livestock insurance schemes, predator-proof corrals and guarding of livestock by dogs. However, the success of these approaches depends largely upon the effective involvement of local communities in conservation (Jackson & Wangchuk, Reference Jackson and Wangchuk2004), which in turn requires an understanding of local community attitudes towards snow leopards (Bagchi & Mishra, Reference Bagchi and Mishra2006; Dickman, Reference Dickman2010).
Several studies have examined the factors driving agro-pastoral community attitudes towards snow leopards and their conservation (Bagchi & Mishra, Reference Bagchi and Mishra2006; Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Yin, Zhaxi, Jiagong and Schaller2014; Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014; Hanson et al., Reference Hanson, Schutgens and Leader-Williams2019; Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020; Kusi et al., Reference Kusi, Sillero-Zubiri, Macdonald, Johnson and Werhahn2020). These studies showed that source of livelihood, age, religion, education level (Hanson et al., Reference Hanson, Schutgens and Leader-Williams2019), livestock holdings and losses (Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014), and the presence of alternative sources of livelihood (Bagchi & Mishra, Reference Bagchi and Mishra2006) are significant predictors of these attitudes. Adherence to Buddhism (Li et al., Reference Li, Wang, Yin, Zhaxi, Jiagong and Schaller2014), higher education levels (Hanson et al., Reference Hanson, Schutgens and Leader-Williams2019) and diversified livelihoods (Bagchi & Mishra, Reference Bagchi and Mishra2006; Vannelli et al., Reference Vannelli, Hampton, Namgail and Black2019; Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020) have been found to influence these attitudes positively, whereas livestock-based livelihoods (Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014), lack of compensation mechanisms, higher livestock losses (Kusi et al., Reference Kusi, Sillero-Zubiri, Macdonald, Johnson and Werhahn2020), agropastoral occupation and households with illiterate and older family members (Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020) have a negative influence on these attitudes. One of the first studies of local community attitudes towards snow leopards, conducted in Manang District in central Nepal, found that the majority (> 60%) of respondents held a strongly negative attitude towards snow leopards and expressed extermination of snow leopards as the only solution for reducing this conflict (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994). Since then, the sustained implementation of conservation efforts (Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020) and changes in the socio-economic context (e.g. changes in pastoral practices, increases in mean annual income and tourism activities) have occurred in Manang (Chapagain, Reference Chapagain2016). Although livestock depredation by snow leopards in Manang remains a concern, little is known about current levels of livestock depredation and local community attitudes towards snow leopards.
Here we assess the extent of livestock loss and identify the factors influencing local community attitudes towards snow leopards in Manang District. We hypothesized that educated young men belonging to households that are less dependent on agropastoral livelihoods and respondents who had experienced no livestock losses in the last 2 years would hold positive attitudes towards snow leopards. Because of the plethora of conservation efforts initiated by Annapurna Conservation Area since the 1990s, we expected that the majority of local communities would hold positive attitudes towards snow leopards. Our findings will be useful for designing specific target-based conservation interventions, so that the long-term persistence of snow leopards is possible through the building of sustained pro-snow leopard local stewardship.
Study area
The study was undertaken in the Nyesyang valley, which lies in the north-east of Manang District, in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal (Fig. 1). The c. 700 km2 valley comprises nine clustered villages and settlements (Fig. 1). The vegetation of the area is characterized by coniferous and conifer–birch mixed forests at lower elevations and grasslands mixed with scrub at higher elevations (Lama et al., Reference Lama, Ghale, Regmi, Suwal and Lama2017). Wolves Canis lupus, red foxes Vulpes vulpes and Pallas's cats Otocolobus manul also occur in the area, and blue sheep Pseudois nayaur (the main prey of snow leopards) and Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster are the wild ungulates present (Lama et al., Reference Lama, Ghale, Regmi, Suwal and Lama2017).
Fig. 1 The study villages in Nyesyang Rural Municipality, Manang, Nepal.
The local economy depends mainly on animal husbandry and crop farming, with tourism becoming more important (Bhuju et al., Reference Bhuju, Shakya, Basnet and Shrestha2007; Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden and Wegge2017; Baral et al., Reference Baral, Subedi and Yadav2019). Domestic yaks Bos grunniens, jhopas (cattle–yak hybrids, Bos spp.), cattle Bos taurus, sheep Ovis aries, goats Capra hircus and horses Equus ferus caballus are the major livestock species reared. Herders mainly practice a traditional herding system in which accessible rangelands are used for livestock grazing, with seasonal rotation. Livestock are left to graze at remote and higher-altitude pastures during the summer months (June–August), and in winter (December–February) are brought to lower-altitude pastures near the settlements. All residents practice Buddhism and Gurung is the dominant caste.
Methods
Data collection
A total of 104 households were selected randomly from the pool of 593 households in seven villages (Khangsar, Bhraka, Tanki Manang, Manang, Ngawal, Ghyaru and Pisang), representing 17.6% of the total households. We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with the head of the household using a pre-tested questionnaire. In the absence of the household head we interviewed another household member > 18 years of age. The questionnaire contained sections pertaining to household demographic and socio-economic characteristics, livestock losses to snow leopards (including the reason for any loss and methods employed to mitigate human–snow leopard conflict), and attitudes of the respondent towards snow leopards (Supplementary Material 1). We asked respondents to report any livestock losses to snow leopards that had occurred over the previous 2 years only (February 2016–January 2018) as respondents may find it difficult to recall older cases of livestock depredation. We cross-checked this information with neighbouring respondents. We conducted the study during February–March 2018. We obtained verbal consent from all respondents before the interview. We tested the survey in five households to ensure questionnaire clarity, appropriate length and relevance to the study sites, following which we made some adjustments to the questionnaire prior to the full survey.
Data analyses
We summarized the household-level livestock loss over 2 years, segregated by species and village. We computed descriptive statistics for respondent socio-demographic characteristics, livestock depredation, monetary loss incurred and livestock holding. We evaluated the attitudes of respondents based on seven structured questions (Table 1) following Suryawanshi et al. (Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014). These questions were related to wider aspects concerning snow leopards and their conservation, providing a more holistic and detailed portrayal of community attitudes towards the species. Summing the scores of these questions produces a composite attitude score ranging from −8 to +8. An overall mean attitude score was calculated by adding the scores of the responses to all seven questions of all respondents and dividing by the total number of respondents. Following Suryawanshi et al. (Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014), we categorized composite scores of −8 to −2 as negative attitudes, −1 to +1 as neutral and +2 to +8 as positive. The negative, neutral and positive categories (coded as −1, 0 and 1, respectively) were used as the response variable in the regression analysis.
Table 1 The questions asked of respondents in the study area of the Nyesyang valley, Manang District, Nepal (Fig. 1) and the responses received, which were used to assess the attitudes of pastoralists towards the snow leopard Panthera uncia. Response indicates the per cent of the 104 respondents.
Because there were three categories (i.e. negative, neutral and positive) and an ordered response variable, we performed an ordered logit regression analysis to assess the influence of socio-demographic factors (Table 2) on attitudes towards snow leopards (the response variable). In the ordered logit model, the observed ordinal response variable (y; i.e. attitude) is a function of an unmeasured variable (yʹ). The continuous latent variable (yʹ) has various threshold points (ki) and the observed variable (y) depends on whether the latent variable (yʹ) has crossed a particular threshold or not. For example, in our case, the ordinal category (m) = 3:
$$y = \left\{{\matrix{ {-1} & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! {\;{\rm if} \hskip13pt \;y_i^{\rm^{\prime}} \;< k_1} \cr \ \ 0 & \ \ \ {{\rm if} \hskip1pc \;k_1 < y_i^{\rm^{\prime}} \;< k_2} \cr \ \ 1 & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! {\;{\rm if} \hskip16pt {y_i^{\rm^{\prime}} > \;k_2} \cr } } \right$$Table 2 Predictor variables selected to examine questionnaire respondent attitudes towards snow leopards via ordinal logistic regression.
Prior to running the ordered logistic regression analysis, we used a variance inflation factor to check for multicollinearity between the explanatory variables. We did not use highly correlated variables (variance inflation factor > 5) in the same model. Additionally, we ran a test to evaluate the proportional odds assumptions (Agresti, Reference Agresti2019) and the results confirmed proportional odds compliance and suitability of using an ordered logistic regression model. We developed 20 exploratory candidate models. We compared the relative support for these models using the Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes (AICc; Supplementary Table 1; Anderson & Burnham, Reference Anderson and Burnham2013). The predictor variables, their types and how they are coded in our analysis are presented in Table 2. We performed all of the data analyses using R 4.0.1 (R Core Team, 2017).
Results
Respondent characteristics
Of the 104 respondents most were men (78.8%). Literate respondents (73.0%) predominated over illiterate (27.0%). The age range of the respondents was 25–83 years, with a mean age of 50. Mean family size was 5.3 individuals (range 3–10). All of the respondents followed Buddhism. The majority of respondents (55.8%) depended on both tourism and the agropastoral system for their livelihood, 36.5% depended completely upon the agropastoral system, and only a few (7.7%) relied solely on tourism as their source of income.
Livestock holdings and losses
Goats, sheep, yaks, jhopas, horses and cattle were the commonly reared livestock. Overall, we recorded a total of 3,666 livestock owned by the respondents, with a mean of 35.3 livestock per household. Goats and yaks were the dominant species, with means of 14.9 and 13.9 per household, respectively. In 2016–2017 and 2017–2018, respectively, 56 and 34 households reported 145 and 134 livestock lost to snow leopards. On average, each household lost 1.4 and 1.3 livestock to snow leopards in 2016–2017 and 2017–2018, respectively, constituting 3.7% of total livestock holdings in 2017–2018. Yaks were the most highly predated livestock (mostly young yaks; 80.7% of livestock predated in 2016–2017 and 58.9% in 2017–2018), followed by goats (6.2% in 2016 and 30.6% in 2017), and horses and cattle were predated in smaller numbers (Table 3). Amongst the seven villages, Ngawal had the highest livestock loss (11.6% of total livestock holdings) in 2017–2018 and Khangsar had the highest loss (15.1%) in 2016–2017 (Supplementary Table 2). On average, the monetary loss for each household amounted to USD 318.8 per annum (Table 3). Livestock depredation by snow leopards showed a distinct seasonal pattern, with the highest losses during winter (32.7%), followed by spring (24.0%), summer (11.5%) and autumn (6.7%); c. one-quarter of respondents (25.1%) were unsure about the seasonal pattern of livestock depredation. The majority of livestock losses occurred at night (52.9%), followed by morning (11.5%), afternoon (9.6%) and at dusk (1.9%). The remainder of the respondents (24.1%) were unsure about the daily pattern of livestock depredation.
Table 3 Type, number and estimated economic cost of livestock depredation in seven villages in the Nyesyang valley, Manang District, Nepal, during February 2016–January 2018.
1 M, Mature; Y, Young.
Perceived causes and mitigation measures of depredation
The majority of respondents (87.5%) viewed the leading cause of depredation to be the ease with which snow leopards could kill livestock, followed by unsupervised grazing (5.8%), an increasing number of snow leopards (4.8%) and insufficient natural snow leopard prey (1.9%). Of the 67 households that had lost livestock to snow leopards during the 2 years of study, c. half (49.3%) received compensation from the Annapurna Conservation Area, although this was meagre (< 50 USD per livestock head). Nearly two-thirds (63.5%) of the respondents felt that adequate and rapid payment of compensation should be provided for losses incurred, followed by 18.3% of respondents who believed guarded grazing should be practised. Although 10.5% of respondents were unsure about appropriate mitigation measures, only a few (7.7%) thought exterminating snow leopards from the area was the only option for minimizing livestock depredation. Despite the availability of a livestock insurance scheme to help offset the costs of depredation, only 18.3% of the respondents were actively participating in it.
Attitudes towards snow leopards
The overall mean attitude score towards snow leopards was −0.05 (range = −8 to 8). Similar proportions of residents had positive (42%) and negative (41%) attitudes towards snow leopards, and only 17% of the respondents held neutral attitudes. The responses of the respondents to the seven questions are presented in Table 1. In response to the question on whether they would like snow leopards in the rangelands of Nyesyang (question 1), 17.4% of the respondents replied positively, 3.8% were not sure and 78.8% did not want snow leopards.
From the full sub-model set generated from the global model using the dredge function in the R package MuMIn (Barton, Reference Barton2022), we selected the top three models based on the criterion of ΔAICc < 2 (Supplementary Table 1). As no single model performed substantially better than other models, we performed model averaging (full averaging) across these top candidate models. The additive influences of the variables gender, occupation, education level, large-bodied and small-bodied livestock owned and total livestock loss received the most support (AICc weights = 0.317). Based on the averaging of the top models, the variables gender, occupation, education level of the respondents and number of large-bodied livestock owned were significant at the 5% level (Table 4). Gender was the most important variable and men held more positive attitudes towards snow leopards than women (Table 4). Respondents dependent primarily on non-agropastoral sources (e.g. owning trekking lodges) held more positive attitudes towards snow leopards than agropastoralists (Table 4). Educated men tended to hold the most positive attitudes towards snow leopards (Table 4). Owning larger numbers of large-bodied livestock had a negative effect on attitudes towards snow leopards, whereas the number of small-bodied livestock owned did not have a significant influence on attitudes. Similarly, the age of the respondents did not have any discernible influence on attitudes towards snow leopards, nor did the number of livestock lost in the previous 2 years.
Table 4 Model-averaged parameter estimates of the ordered logistic regression models and 95% CIs describing respondent attitudes towards snow leopards in the Nyesyang valley, Manang District, Nepal, during February–March 2018.
1 Described in Table 2.
2 Averaged across the top three models (ΔAIC < 2).
3 −1|0 represents the threshold between negative and neutral attitudes towards snow leopards and 0|1 represents the threshold between neutral and positive attitudes. Parameter estimates of −1|0 (negative|neutral) and 0|1 (neutral|positive) represent the thresholds such that attitude (y) is negative if yiʹ < 1.894, netural if 1.894 < yiʹ ≤ 3.874 and positive if yiʹ > 3.874. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Discussion
We estimated the extent of livestock depredation by snow leopards and examined the attitudes of local communities towards snow leopards. The proportion of livestock lost to snow leopards (3.7% of the total livestock holdings) was greater than a previous study in the same valley (2.6%; Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994) and in nearby Mustang District (c. 1.7%; Aryal et al., Reference Aryal, Brunton, Ji, Barraclough and Raubenheimer2014) but lower than in Nar-Phu region (3.0–4.0%; Wegge et al., Reference Wegge, Shrestha and Flagstad2012) and Shey Phoksundo National Park in the Upper Dolpo region (10.4%; Khanal et al., Reference Khanal, Mishra and Ramesh Suryawanshi2020). The larger livestock holdings compared to the previous study in this region (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994) could have contributed to the greater livestock losses observed, as livestock holding size and losses are positively correlated (Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau and Wegge2019; Tiwari et al., Reference Tiwari, Devkota, Jackson, Bahadur and Chhetri2020). Although previous studies reported that goats were the most predated livestock species (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994; Wegge et al., Reference Wegge, Shrestha and Flagstad2012; Aryal et al., Reference Aryal, Brunton, Ji, Barraclough and Raubenheimer2014), we found yaks (primarily young yaks) to be the most predated livestock species, followed by goats. This shift in the most predated livestock species is supported by recent studies in the same landscape (Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau and Wegge2019, Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020; Tiwari et al., Reference Tiwari, Devkota, Jackson, Bahadur and Chhetri2020). The increase in yak numbers, with a higher proportion of young yaks that are left unattended to graze remotely, probably explains this change.
The estimated annual monetary loss per household was USD 318.8, which is higher than that reported by Oli et al. (Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994; inflation-adjusted: c. USD 160; Nepal Rastra Bank, Reference Nepal Rastra Bank2022) and Aryal et al. (Reference Aryal, Brunton, Ji, Barraclough and Raubenheimer2014; USD 58) but within the range estimated by Tiwari et al. (Reference Tiwari, Devkota, Jackson, Bahadur and Chhetri2020). This higher economic loss can be attributed to the dominant predation of yaks, which are more expensive than goats. We found seasonal variation in the livestock depredation pattern, with higher depredation in winter, as has been noted in earlier studies (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994; Devkota et al., Reference Devkota, Silwal and Kolejka2013; Aryal et al., Reference Aryal, Brunton, Ji, Barraclough and Raubenheimer2014). Free roaming of livestock, unattended herding practices and hibernation of wild prey species, resulting in a reduced availability of wild prey in winter (Aryal et al., Reference Aryal, Brunton, Ji, Barraclough and Raubenheimer2014), could have contributed to this higher economic loss. Similarly, the majority of the predation incidents occurred during the night. Poorly constructed corrals and greater snow leopard activity during the night could have resulted in greater predation at that time. All of the predation incidents took place in remote pastures, which corroborates the findings of previous studies (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994; Tiwari et al., Reference Tiwari, Devkota, Jackson, Bahadur and Chhetri2020; Karki & Panthi, Reference Karki and Panthi2021). We noticed that few herders guard their dispersed grazing herds, rendering livestock vulnerable to predation (Bagchi & Mishra, Reference Bagchi and Mishra2006).
We found that an almost equal proportion of respondents held positive and negative attitudes towards snow leopards. The differences in the categorization of attitudes between the previous study in this region (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994) and ours hindered any quantitative comparison between the two studies. However, it is reasonable to infer that overall people held more positive attitudes towards snow leopards than in the previous study (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994). This improvement could be in part a result of conservation efforts to increase the awareness of the communities of the benefits of snow leopards, and the establishment of snow leopard conservation committees in the villages. In addition, increased tourism activities could have increased positive attitudes towards snow leopards by providing alternative livelihood opportunities (Vannelli et al., Reference Vannelli, Hampton, Namgail and Black2019).
People relying primarily on non-agropastoral sources for their livelihoods held more positive attitudes towards snow leopards. This has also been reported in several other studies (Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014; Hanson et al., Reference Hanson, Schutgens and Leader-Williams2019; Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020; Kusi et al., Reference Kusi, Sillero-Zubiri, Macdonald, Johnson and Werhahn2020) as these people have more economic opportunities in comparison to agropastoralists. However, people holding a greater number of large-bodied livestock held more negative attitudes towards snow leopards, which corroborates findings from Spiti Valley in the Indian Trans-Himalaya (Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014). The reason for this could be the higher losses incurred by the owners of such livestock if their animals are predated. However, households with a greater number of small-bodied livestock held marginally positive attitudes towards snow leopards, in contrast to an earlier study (Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014). A possible explanation is that people can bear the loss of relatively lower-priced livestock if they own a large number.
We found that having lost livestock in the recent past did not significantly influence the attitudes of respondents towards snow leopards (Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014; Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020). Consistent with previous research showing that education was strongly associated with positive attitudes towards snow leopards (Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014; Hacker et al., Reference Hacker, Dai, Cheng, Zhang, Zhang, Miller and Janecka2020), we found that literate respondents held positive attitudes. Greater knowledge of existing laws related to wildlife, greater awareness regarding the need for wildlife conservation and increased interaction with conservation agencies could have fostered a positive attitude in literate respondents. We did not find any significant difference in attitudes towards snow leopards with age, although earlier studies reported that older people held more negative attitudes towards snow leopards than younger generations (Røskaft et al., Reference Røskaft, Händel, Bjerke and Kaltenborn2007; Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014). The more positive attitudes of men towards snow leopards compared to women (Røskaft et al., Reference Røskaft, Händel, Bjerke and Kaltenborn2007; Suryawanshi et al., Reference Suryawanshi, Bhatia, Bhatnagar, Redpath and Mishra2014; Chetri et al., Reference Chetri, Odden, Devineau, McCarthy and Wegge2020) is possibly because of the greater involvement of men in conservation programmes and the fewer economic opportunities for women. The differences in the determinants of attitudes towards snow leopards that we found in comparison to multiple other studies reinforce the argument that such attitudes are multifaceted, complex and site-specific (Røskaft et al., Reference Røskaft, Händel, Bjerke and Kaltenborn2007).
A previous study in the same valley reported the killing of snow leopards by herders (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994), but we did not find any herders who knew of recent retaliatory killings. This was apparently because they were aware of the protected status of the species and the penalties for killing a snow leopard, and held the Buddhist belief that forbids killing of wildlife. The reported absence of retaliatory killing could have resulted in an increased snow leopard population, contributing to the higher livestock depredation rate observed in our study compared to that of Oli et al. (Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994). One of the respondents said candidly that ‘if there was no law protecting the animal and no penalty for the killing, local communities would certainly kill the animal because it is causing a lot of economic hardship to us’. As stated in the previous study in the valley, lack of willingness to provide information on the killing of snow leopards could be another reason for there being no record of the retaliatory killing of snow leopards (Oli et al., Reference Oli, Taylor and Rogers1994). These matters underscore the importance of specifically targeted conservation strategies that build pro-snow leopard conservation attitudes in local communities, as stringent laws prevent people from conducting retaliatory killings but do not necessarily improve attitudes towards snow leopards.
Constructing sufficient predator-proof corrals in all villages requires substantial human and financial resources, and making the compensation mechanism effective (i.e. a rapid and efficient process providing sufficient payment) will require significant regulatory changes. Targeting conservation education to illiterate people, engaging more women in conservation programmes and extending the community-based insurance scheme supported by the Annapurna Conservation Area to yaks in all villages, if not to all livestock, could mitigate livestock losses and improve attitudes towards snow leopards.
One concern regarding respondents reporting livestock depredation is that they could misattribute depredation by a wolf or red fox as that by a snow leopard. However, research has confirmed that wolves have only returned recently to the Nyesyang valley (Lama et al., Reference Lama, Ghale, Regmi, Suwal and Lama2017), and group discussions revealed that wolves and foxes have not caused significant problems so far. Therefore, it is plausible to conclude that most, if not all, livestock depredation we recorded was attributable to snow leopards. Although we deduced a few reasons for livestock depredation (e.g. large livestock holdings and the absence of retaliatory killing of snow leopards), we acknowledge there could be ecological factors (e.g. declines in snow leopard prey availability) that have contributed significantly to these livestock losses.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Trust for Nature Conservation and Annapurna Conservation Area Project for the research permit and partial funding; the staff of the Unit Conservation Office, Manang, of National Trust for Nature Conservation/Annapurna Conservation Area Project, especially Babulal Tiruwa and Netra Mahatara, for logistic support; the members of the conservation area management committees and the snow leopard conservation committees for their support; Tashi R. Ghale and his family for their help during the interview surveys; the people of the Nyesyang valley; Keshav Baral and Neeru Thapa for their guidance whilst conducting the study; and two reviewers for their comments.
Author contributions
Study design: KS, RKB, GK; interviews: KS, SA; survey response translation: KS, SA; data analysis: KS, SA, RKB; data interpretation; KS, SA, GK; writing: KS, SA, GK.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Ethical standards
The Institute of Forestry and the Annapurna Conservation Area Project approved the study, and we obtained verbal consent of the interviewees before administering the questionnaire. The research otherwise abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards.
Open access
