Introduction
The Government of Jordan recognized the importance of regulating hunting as early as 1934, when the first hunting law was issued by the Ministry of Agriculture. Since then, this law has been revised and amended to meet changing needs, and several institutions have been established to manage and regulate hunting. In 1956 the concept of game species was first introduced and in 1966 regulations on guns used for hunting were issued. In the same year, the Royal Jordanian Hunting Club was reborn as the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature (Fitter, Reference Fitter1967) and given a de facto role in hunting control. At the time, all hunting and shooting was forbidden without a license (which cost JOD 5 per year) and hunting seasons and bag limits for all game species were set by the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature committee (Fitter, Reference Fitter1967). In addition, the use of automatic weapons, nets and traps, and mechanical vehicles and spotlights for hunting were prohibited. In 1973 the government amended the Agricultural Law to incorporate a Wildlife Conservation Law and delegated the Royal Society to implement this (Amr et al., Reference Amr, Hamidan and Quatrameez2004). Under this Law the Royal Society's previous de facto role in hunting control became official and it was given authority to issue and administer hunting licences and impose fines for non-compliance with the hunting laws.
The Royal Department for Environmental Protection was established in 2006 to improve the quality of Jordan's environment through proper and effective enforcement of environmental legislation, enhancing cooperation with and between relevant authorities, and increasing national support and advocacy for environmental issues. Since its establishment, the agency has worked cooperatively with the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature and has had some success in preventing violations against wildlife, with a total of 354 hunting violations registered and handled during 2009–2014 (Ministry of Environment, 2016). In 2014 the Jordan Outdoor Sport Association was created as a non-profit hunters’ association, to spread awareness amongst hunters and other stakeholders about sustainable hunting in Jordan. Since its establishment the Association has carried out release programmes in wilderness areas for two popular game species, chukar partridge Alectoris chukar and sand partridge Ammoperdix heyi. These are intended to supplement existing wild populations and meet hunters’ needs more sustainably (R. Handal, pers. obs.).
Currently, hunting is covered by three laws: Agricultural Law No. 13 (2015), the Aqaba Region Authority Law No. 32 (2000), and the Law of Environmental Protection No. 1 (2003) (Amr et al., Reference Amr, Hamidan and Quatrameez2004). These laws have a wide range of clauses for protecting wild animals, including hunting regulations, for ensuring cooperation between non-governmental and governmental agencies, and for assigning responsibilities for enforcement and the distribution of available funds among agencies. There are also articles defining the level of penalties for violations of these laws, based on detailed appendices in regulation No. 34 (2003) of the Agriculture Law. Hunting of species on Appendix I is punishable by imprisonment for 4 months and a fine of JOD 1,000, on Appendix II by imprisonment for 3 months and a fine of JOD 1,000, and on Appendix III by imprisonment for 1 month and a fine of JOD 100 (FAOLEX, 2015).
Although hunting is a socially acceptable practice in Jordan (at least for the majority), there is concern about increasing illegal hunting and its impact on individual species. Prominent hunters have estimated the number of unlicensed hunters to be 5,000–10,000 (RSCN, 2005; R. Handal, pers. obs., 2015) but the number could be up to c. 16,000 (i.e. four times the number of licensed hunters; RSCN, 2005). There are, however, few data on the scale of illegal hunting and its effect on game and other species. We therefore attempt here to establish the extent of the problem and to discuss the conservation implications for globally threatened species and species protected by Jordanian law. Illegal hunting in Jordan is poorly documented by the responsible authorities because of problems with species identification, and we therefore used the visibility of hunting on social media to obtain data on the number and species hunted.
Methods
Daily investigations of seven hunting groups active on Facebook were carried out during January 2015–January 2016 (13 months). These groups were accessible to anybody following a join request. We did not visit the personal pages of hunters, collect any personal information or interact with the people posting photographs. Only photographs uploaded to the groups’ pages were collected, and stored on an encrypted drive. All posts with photographs of hunted species were downloaded within a day of being posted. A total of 1,251 photographs were downloaded and screened to remove duplicates and any in which there was uncertainty about the source and/or the species killed. Such uncertainties became evident from an examination of vehicle numbers present in the photographs, from comments that appeared with each photograph, and/or from images of the hunters. After duplicates and photographs with other anomalies (such as a low resolution) were omitted, a total of 606 photographs remained. These were examined in detail to determine the species hunted and the number of each species killed.
Results
In the 606 photographs a total of 4,707 individuals of 59 species were hunted in the wild over the study period. The majority were birds (n = 3,920, 84%), followed by mammals (785, 16%) and reptiles (2, < 1%; Table 1). Five species of mammals categorized as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2016) were recorded (Nubian ibex Capra nubiana, goitered gazelle Gazella subgutturosa, dorcas gazelle Gazella dorcas, mountain gazelle Gazella gazella, marbled polecat Vormela peregusna), along with two Vulnerable bird species (Asian houbara Chlamydotis macqueenii, turtle dove Streptopelia turtur), two Endangered bird species (saker falcon Falco cherrug, steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis), and a Vulnerable reptile species (Egyptian spiny-tailed lizard Uromastyx aegyptia).
Animal species and numbers hunted in Jordan during January 2015–January 2016, as recorded from photographs posted on Facebook by hunters' groups, with their protected status in Jordan (according to the Ministry of Agriculture), category on the IUCN Red List (2016), range of hunting bag size in photographs, total number killed, and whether species can be legally hunted.
*LC, Least Concern; NT, Near Threatened; VU, Vulnerable, EN, Endangered
The chukar partridge was the most hunted species, with a total of 1,503 kills recorded, followed by the common quail Coturnix coturnix (849) and the rock dove Columba livia (632). The cape hare Lepus capensis was the most commonly hunted species of mammal, with a total of 438 kills, followed by the Nubian ibex (115) and wild boar Sus scrofa (40).
Of the 59 species killed by hunters, 36 are protected under Jordanian law and were therefore hunted illegally. These include nine species listed in Appendix I of Agriculture Law No. 13 (7 mammals and 2 birds), 15 species on Appendix II (7 mammals and 8 birds) and 12 species on Appendix III (1 mammal, 1 reptile and 10 birds).
Many hunters also appear to be flouting the regulations on bag limits. These limits specify the number of kills allowed for a given species in a single day or period by a single hunter; these are announced annually by the Ministry of Agriculture following recommendations provided by the Wildlife Committee. Table 2 provides a comparison of the legal bag limits over the study period for four bird species that can be legally hunted with the maximum number of kills revealed in single photographs posted by hunters on Facebook. Assuming that the number of hunters that appear in each photograph (including the photographer) represent all the hunters involved in the display of kills, and that all the birds in each photograph were killed on the same day, then bag limits for these species were considerably exceeded. In the case of the chukar and sand partridges, for example, the bag limits on the days the photographs were taken were exceeded by > 3,000 and > 1,000%, respectively.
Comparison of the legal bag limits for four bird species that can be legally hunted and the maximum bag sizes recorded on Facebook during January 2015–January 2016.
Discussion
High species diversity in Jordan is a result of its location at the junction of the African, Oriental and Palaearctic faunal regions (Amr et al., Reference Amr, Hamidan and Quatrameez2004). The Kingdom is known to support 83 species of mammals (Amr, Reference Amr2012), 406 species of birds (Eid & Qaneer, Reference Eid and Qaneer2013), and 103 species of reptiles and amphibians (Disi et al., Reference Disi, Amr and Hamidan2014). Threats to species in Jordan have increased since the beginning of the 20th century, when machine guns and vehicles for hunting were first introduced (Qumsiyeh et al., Reference Qumsiyeh, Amr and Budairi1996). This, together with growth of the human population, habitat loss and the growing popularity of hunting amongst urban populations, has caused the extinction of the Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx (Nelson, Reference Nelson1973; Fitter, Reference Fitter1984; Lamb, Reference Lamb1984; Hatough & Al-Eisawi, Reference Hatough and Al-Eisawi1987; Qumsiyeh, Reference Qumsiyeh1996), roe deer Capreolus capreolus (Eid & Ananbeh, Reference Eid and Ananbeh2009), and the Arabian leopard Panthera pardus nimr (Amr, Reference Amr2012), and several others are seriously threatened, including the Nubian ibex, gazelle species (Amr, Reference Amr2012) and the Asian houbara (Eid & Qaneer, Reference Eid and Qaneer2013). The species that have declined in Jordan during the past 3 centuries have been mainly of the orders Artiodactyla and Carnivora (Qumsiyeh et al., Reference Qumsiyeh, Amr and Shafei1994, Reference Qumsiyeh, Amr and Budairi1996).
Much of the existing academic research on Facebook has focused on identity presentation and privacy concerns (Gross & Acquisti, Reference Gross and Acquisti2005; Stutzman, Reference Stutzman2006) and there has been limited research using Facebook groups as a tool to assess the magnitude of illegal hunting. Hunters join Facebook to create and support virtual groups based on their common interests and to maintain connections with fellow hunters, presenting their hunting achievements and expressing their satisfaction with the sport. Braden (Reference Braden2015) studied illegal recreational hunting in Russia, using the media, government reports, environmental organizations and social media. Essen (Reference Essen2016) followed informal conversations on Facebook to examine illegal hunting in Sweden.
It is clear from the level of Facebook activity monitored during the survey period that hunting is thriving in Jordan. Most of the seven groups studied were posting photographs and information on kills on a regular basis and with increasing frequency through the year. The 4,707 individual animals killed in the 13 months of study is worryingly high, especially as the seven groups are only a small proportion of licensed hunters (4,000 registered by the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature in 2005) and of the estimated 5,000–10,000 unlicensed hunters. The overall number of animals killed annually, therefore, is likely to be much higher than the number we recorded in Facebook posts. There is therefore little doubt that hunting is a major factor influencing the decline of wildlife species and undermining the success of conservation efforts in the Kingdom.
Our survey also revealed that hunters are killing species protected under Jordanian law and species categorized as threatened on the IUCN Red List (most of which are also protected under Jordanian law). In total we recorded 34 protected species killed illegally, including two migratory birds of prey, the steppe eagle and saker falcon. The saker was apparently captured for trade with visitors from the Arabian Gulf, as evident from the posted photograph, and the eagle was shot. Both of these species are in serious decline (BirdLife International, 2016a,b). The saker falcon is listed on Appendix II of CITES, which highlights the need to improve the control of border trade. The striped hyaena Hyaena hyaena, categorized as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List (AbiSaid & Dloniak, Reference AbiSaid and Dloniak2015), was also killed in significant numbers, with a total of 27 individuals documented in photographs. It is listed on Schedule II of the Jordanian wildlife protection law (MOA, 2015) and is often hunted for traditional medicinal uses and as a sexual tonic (Aloufi & Eid, Reference Aloufi and Eid2016). The high number of ungulates killed is of particular concern. We recorded 115 Nubian ibex, 23 goitered gazelles, two dorcas gazelles and one mountain gazelle in photographs on Facebook. There has been a marked decline of gazelles in Jordan, with an estimated goitered gazelle population of < 100 individuals (Kiwan et al., Reference Kiwan, Boef, Boudari, Mallon and Kingswood2001). Gazelles remain at risk of extinction in Jordan (Amr, Reference Amr2012) and will not be able to sustain such high hunting pressure.
Despite the efforts of the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature and the Royal Department for Environmental Protection, it is evident from our findings that the enforcement of Jordan's hunting laws is no longer effective. We suggest that there are a number of key issues that need to be addressed: (1) the increasing number of licensed and unlicensed hunters in Jordan and the lack of sufficient enforcement officers, especially outside protected areas; (2) poor coordination between the parties involved in the management of hunting (including the hunters themselves); (3) a lack of awareness within local communities of the importance of wildlife and conservation; (4) inconsistent support from government and judicial bodies in upholding the law; and (5) inadequate funding to support the expansion of ranger services and effective patrolling. It is also important to note that some of the hunters operating in Jordan are from the Arabian Gulf, most of whom are probably unlicensed. Of the 23 goitered gazelle carcasses recorded, 10 (43%) were apparently killed by hunters from the Gulf, with the support of Jordanian guides. In 2013 13 dorcas gazelles were killed in Wadi Araba by hunters from the Gulf (E. Eid, pers. obs.).
Our findings indicate that the management of hunting in Jordan needs to be reviewed, to develop a much more effective licensing and enforcement system that engages all parties, including hunters' groups and the recently formed Outdoor Sport Association. This needs to be linked to a nationwide awareness campaign highlighting the importance and benefits of managing wildlife in a sustainable way. Under Jordanian law photographs of hunting bags, such as those we documented on Facebook, are not sufficient to convict hunters. Enforcement of laws needs to be enhanced to halt the excessive hunting of both protected and unprotected species in Jordan. As a member of the National Wildlife Committee in Jordan, Outdoor Sport Association will ensure our results are used as a basis for future decisions on permits and bag limits for hunted species.
Acknowledgements
We thank Chris Johnson for reviewing this article, David Mallon for identifying gazelle species, and Laith Elmoghrabi and Feras Rahahleh for identifying and confirming bird species.
Author contributions
EE collected data and identified species, analysed the data and wrote the article. RH collected and analysed data.
Biographical sketches
Ehab Eid has worked in biodiversity conservation for more than 15 years. He is currently the programme director at the Royal Marine Conservation Society of Jordan, and has previously worked as the head of research and survey at the Royal Society for the Conservation of Nature. His major interests are in mammals, reptiles and amphibians. Ramzi Handal is the head and founder of Jordan's Outdoor Sport Association, and his main interests are to conserve Jordan's biodiversity from illegal hunting and to contribute to reintroduction programmes for threatened species.
