Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:39:04.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Which is the most preventive measure against tail damage in finisher pigs: tail docking, straw provision or lowered stocking density? – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2017

M. L. V. Larsen ,
H. M.-L. Andersen  and
L. J. Pedersen

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , June 2018 , pp. 1268
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

doi:10.1017/S175173111700249X, published by Cambridge University Press, 2 November 2017.

The original publication of Model 1 within the Results Section contained an error within the last sentence. The sentence should have read as follows;

However, the effect of tail docking tended to be higher than the effect of straw provision (P=0.092).

The authors apologise for the error.

References

Larsen, MLV, Andersen, H M.-L and Pedersen, LJ 2017. Which is the most preventive measure against tail damage in finisher pigs: tail docking, straw provision or lowered stocking density? Animal, first published online 2 November 2017, doi: 10.1017/S175173111700249X.Google Scholar