Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T12:40:52.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glucagon-like peptide-1 response to whey protein is less diminished by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 in comparison with responses to dextrin, a lipid and casein in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2020

Yuki Shimizu
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
Hiroshi Hara
Affiliation:
Faculty of Human Life Science, Fuji Women’s University, Ishikari 061-3204, Japan
Tohru Hira*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Tohru Hira, fax +81 11 706 2504, email hira@chem.agr.hokudai.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although glucose is the best-known nutrient to stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion, dietary peptides also potently stimulate GLP-1 secretion. Certain peptide fragments derived from dietary proteins possess dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitory activity in vitro. Hence, we hypothesised that dietary peptides protect GLP-1 from degradation through attenuating DPP-4 activity in vivo. Here, we compared GLP-1 responses with dietary proteins, a carbohydrate and a lipid (Intralipos) in rats having or not having plasma DPP-4 activity. Plasma GLP-1 concentrations clearly increased by oral administration of whey protein (2–4 g/kg), but not by that of dextrin (2–4 g/kg), in control rats (untreated Sprague–Dawley rats and F344/Jcl rats), having DPP-4 activity. In contrast, dextrin administration increased the plasma GLP-1 concentrations as the whey protein administration did, in rats having reduced or no DPP-4 activity (a DPP-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin-treated Sprague–Dawley rats or DPP-4-deficient F344/DuCrl/Crlj rats). DPP-4 inhibition by sitagliptin treatment also enhanced GLP-1 response to Intralipos, and casein, but the treatment did not further enhance GLP-1 response to whey protein. Intestinal GLP-1 content and gastric emptying rate were not associated with differences in GLP-1 responses to test nutrients. The luminal contents from rats administered whey protein decreased DPP-4 activity in vitro. These results suggest that GLP-1 released by dextrin, Intralipos and casein was immediately degraded by DPP-4, while GLP-1 released by whey protein was less degraded. Our study provides novel in vivo evidence supporting the hypothesis that dietary peptides not only stimulate GLP-1 secretion but also inhibit DPP-4 activity to potentiate GLP-1 response.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) responses and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity after oral administration of dextrin or whey protein in rats with or without sitagliptin treatment. (A and C) Changes in plasma GLP-1 concentrations after oral administration of water (control, 10 ml/kg, ), 2 g/kg dextrin (), 2 g/kg whey protein () with or without 50 mg/kg sitagliptin treatment. (B and D) The AUC of changes (ΔAUC) in GLP-1 concentrations from 0 min. (E) Changes in plasma DPP-4 activity after sitagliptin treatment in conscious rats. Blood samples were collected at –120, –60, 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min. Values are means with their standard errors (n 5–6). Significant difference compared with basal (0 min) values within each treatment: † P < 0·05, †† P < 0·01 (Dunnett’s test). a,b Plots that do not share the same letter differ significantly between the treatments (P < 0·05, Tukey–Kramer’s test). In (E), significant differences compared with –120 min values within each treatment were evaluated using Dunnett’s test (P < 0·01). The P values of two-way repeated ANOVA for time (TI), treatment (TR) and interactions of time and treatment (TI × TR) are shown in each panel (A, C, E).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) responses after oral administration of dextrin or whey protein and plasma dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity in DPP-4 (+) and DPP-4 (–) rats. (A and C) Changes in plasma GLP-1 concentrations after oral administration of water (control, ), 4 g/kg dextrin (), 4 g/kg whey protein () in conscious DPP-4 (+) and DPP-4 (–) rats. (B and D) The AUC of changes (ΔAUC) in GLP-1 concentrations from 0 min. Blood samples were collected before (0 min) and after the oral administration of test solutions (10 ml/kg). Values are means with their standard errors (n 7–9). Significant difference compared with basal (0 min) values within each treatment: † P < 0·05, †† P < 0·01 (Dunnett’s test). a,b Plots that do not share the same letter differ significantly between the treatments (P < 0·05, Tukey-Kramer’s test). (E) Plasma DPP-4 activity after overnight fasting in anesthetised DPP-4 (+) and DPP-4 (–) rats. Blood samples were collected from the vena cava. Values are means with their standard errors (n 12–13). N.D., not detected. The P values of two-way repeated ANOVA for time (TI), treatment (TR) and interactions of time and treatment (TI × TR) are shown in each panel (A, C).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Changes in plasma acetaminophen concentrations after oral administration of dextrin whey protein. Values are expressed as changes from basal (0 min) values and as mean values with their standard errors (n 5–6) (A, B). Values are expressed as changes from basal (0 min) values and as means with their standard errors (n 7–9) (C, D). a,b,c Plots that do not share the same letter differ significantly between the treatments (P < 0·05, Tukey–Kramer’s test). The P values of two-way repeated ANOVA for time (TI), treatment (TR), and interactions of time and treatment (TI × TR) are shown in each panel. , Control; , dextrin; , whey protein.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity in the presence of luminal contents from rats treated with whey protein. Luminal contents were collected 15 min after oral administration of water or whey protein. DPP-4 activity was measured in the presence of extracts from the luminal contents and Diprotin A (final concentration in the reaction 10 µm, as a positive control). The luminal extracts (× 1) were diluted as indicated (× 1/5, × 1/25). The value of control treatment indicates DPP-4 activity without luminal extracts. Values are presented as means with their standard errors (control, Diprotin A: n 3, water, whey protein: n 4–5). Significant difference compared with the control group: * P < 0·05, ** P < 0·01 (Dunnett’s test).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) responses after oral administration of casein or Intralipos in rats with or without sitagliptin treatment. (A and B) Changes in plasma GLP-1 concentrations from the basal (0 min) value. Rats were orally given casein (2 g/15 ml/kg; A), Intralipos (0·89 g/10 ml/kg; B) with () or without () 50 mg/kg sitagliptin treatment. Blood samples were collected at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min. Values are means with their standard errors (n 5–6). Significant difference compared with basal (0 min) values within each treatment: † P < 0·05, †† P < 0·01 (Dunnett’s test). Significant differences between the treatments: * P < 0·05, ** P < 0·01 (Student’s t test). The P values of two-way repeated ANOVA for time (TI), treatment (TR) and interactions of time and treatment (TI × TR) are shown in each panel.

Supplementary material: PDF

Shimizu et al. supplementary material

Shimizu et al. supplementary material 1

Download Shimizu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 471.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Shimizu et al. supplementary material

Shimizu et al. supplementary material 2

Download Shimizu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 35.4 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Shimizu et al. supplementary material

Shimizu et al. supplementary material 3

Download Shimizu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 74.3 KB