Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T06:48:13.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measures of full dimension on affine-invariant sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

R. Kenyon  and
Y. Peres
R. Kenyon
Affiliation:
CNRS UMPA 128, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, 46, allée d'ltalie, 69364 Lyon, France
Y. Peres
Affiliation:
Statistics Department, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We determine the Hausdorff and Minkowski dimensions of some self-affine Sierpinski sponges, extending results of McMullen and Bedford. This result is used to show that every compact set invariant under an expanding toral endomorphism which is a direct sum of conformal endomorphisms supports an invariant measure of full dimension.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 307 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1]Algoet, P. H. and Cover, T. M.. A sandwich proof of the Shannon-McMillan-Breiman theorem. Ann. Probab. 16 (1988), 899–909Google Scholar
[2]Bedford, T.. Crinkly curves, Markov partitions and box dimension in self-similar sets. PhD Thesis, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
[3]Bedford, T.. Generating special Markov partitions for hyperbolic toral automorphisms using fractals. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 6 (1986), 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bedford, T.. The box dimension of self-affine graphs and repellers. Nonlinearity 2 (1989), 53–71.Google Scholar
[5]Bedford, T.. On Weierstrass-like functions and random recurrent sets. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 106 (1989), 325–342.Google Scholar
[6]Billingsley, P.. Ergodic Theory and Information. Wiley, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
[7]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 470. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1974.Google Scholar
[8]Dekking, F. M.. Recurrent sets. Adv. Math. 44 (1982), 78–104.Google Scholar
[9]Falconer, K. J.. Fractal Geometry-Mathematical foundations and applications. Wiley, New York, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Falconer, K. J.. The dimension of self-affine fractals II. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 111 (1992), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Furstenberg, H.. Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets and a problem in Diophantine approximation. Math. Sys. Theory 1 (1967), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Gatzouras, D. and Lalley, S.. Hausdorff and box dimensions of certain self-affine fractals. Indiana University Math. J. 41 (1992), 533–568.Google Scholar
[13]Kenyon, R.. Self similar tilings. Thesis, Princeton University, 1990.Google Scholar
[14]Kenyon, R.. Self replicating tilings in symbolic dynamics and its applications. P. Walters, ed. Amer. Math. Soc. Contemp. Math. 135 (1991), 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Kenyon, R. and Peres, Y.. Intersecting random translates of invariant Cantor sets. Invent. Math. 104 (1991), 601–629.Google Scholar
[16]Kenyon, R. and Peres, Y.. Hausdorff dimensions of sofic affine-invariant sets. Israel J. Math., to appear.Google Scholar
[17]Ledrappier, F.. On the dimension of some graphs. Symbolic dynamics and its applications. P. Walters, ed. Amer. Math. Soc. Contemp. Math. 135 (1991), 285–294.Google Scholar
[18]Ledrappier, F. and Young, L. S.. The metric entropy of diffeomorphisms II. Ann. Math. 122 (1985), 540–574.Google Scholar
[19]Mauldin, R. D. and Williams, S. C.. Hausdorff dimension in graph directed constructions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 309 (1988), 811–829.Google Scholar
[20]McMullen, C.. The Hausdorff dimension of general Sierpinski carpets. Nagoya Math. J. 96 (1984), 1–9.Google Scholar
[21]Propp, J.. A Shannon-McMillan theorem for motley names. Israel J. Math. 69 (1990), 225–234.Google Scholar
[22]Rokhlin, V. A.. Lectures on the entropy theory of measuring preserving transformations. Russian Math. Surveys 22 (1967), 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Vince, A.. Replicating Tesselations. Siam. J. Disc. Math. 6(3) (1993), 501–521.Google Scholar
[24]Walters, P.. An Introduction to Ergodic Theory. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1982.Google Scholar
[25]Young, L. S.. Dimension, entropy and Lyapunov exponents. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 2 (1982), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar