Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T02:38:09.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characteristics and sources of dissolved organic matter in a glacier in the northern Tibetan Plateau: differences between different snow categories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2018

Lin Feng
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou 730000, China. E-mail: jzxu@lzb.ac.cn University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Yanqing An
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou 730000, China. E-mail: jzxu@lzb.ac.cn
Jianzhong Xu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou 730000, China. E-mail: jzxu@lzb.ac.cn
Shichang Kang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou 730000, China. E-mail: jzxu@lzb.ac.cn CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) in mountain glaciers is an important source of carbon for downstream aquatic systems, and its impact is expected to increase due to the increased melting rate of glaciers. We present a comprehensive study of Laohugou glacier no. 12 (LHG) at the northern edge of the Tibetan Plateau to characterize the DOM composition and sources by analyzing surface fresh snow, granular ice samples, and snow pit samples which covered a whole year cycle of 2014/15. Excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy analysis of the DOM with parallel factor analysis (EEM-PARAFAC) identified four components, including a microbially humic-like component (C1), two protein-like components (C2 and C3) and a terrestrial humic-like component (C4). The use of Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) showed that DOM from all these samples was dominated by CHO and CHON molecular formulas, mainly corresponding to lipids and aliphatic/proteins compounds, reflecting the presence of significant amounts of microbially derived and/or deposited biogenic DOM. The molecular compositions of DOM showed more CHON compounds in granular ice than in fresh snow, likely suggesting newly formed DOM from microbes during snowmelting.

Information

Type
Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location of the LHG and the sampling sites in this glacier.

Figure 1

Table 1. Sampling information for snow, ice and snow pit in this study

Figure 2

Fig. 2. The δ18O record and δD record at different depths of the snow pit.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Average mass concentrations of DOC in fresh snow, granular ice (a) and snow pit samples (b). The data of DOC concentration of snow pit samples are adopted from Yan and others (2016). The error bars indicate the Std dev. (1σ).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. UV-Vis absorbance spectra of DOM in fresh snow, granular ice samples (a) and snow pit samples (b).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. EEMs for the four-component PARAFAC model.

Figure 6

Table 2. The four components identified by the PARAFAC model, with maximum excitation/emission wavelengths and description (Coble, 1996; Coble and others, 1998; And and Mcknight, 2005; Fellman and others, 2010)

Figure 7

Table 3. HIX and BIX for DOM extracted from the samples in this study, and the average relative contributions of the four components identified by the PARAFAC model

Figure 8

Fig. 6. van Krevelen diagrams for the mass spectra of samples of (a) fresh snow 1, (b) fresh snow 2, (c) granular ice 1, (d) granular ice 2, (e) warm period snow 1, (f) warm period snow 2, (g) cold period snow 1 and (h) cold period snow 2. The black lines in the van Krevelen diagram correspond to major classes of compounds that can be expected in DOM.

Figure 9

Table 4. The number of molecular formulas identified, and % of molecular formulas assigned to each defined compound class as revealed by FT-ICR MS for DOM samples isolated from the fresh snow, granular ice and snow pit samples in LHG

Figure 10

Table 5. The average molecular weight, the average of DBE, and the number and % containing of CHO, CHON, CHN classes as revealed by FT-ICR MS for DOM samples isolated from the fresh snow, granular ice and snow pit samples in LHG

Figure 11

Fig. 7. (a) Two-way Venn diagram for molecular formulas between fresh snow and granular ice. The numbers in the diagram are the percentage of the common and unique formulas to each type of sample. (b) and (c) Mean contributions of different molecules identified from the FT-ICR mass spectra for the unique components in fresh snow and granular ice.