Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T00:39:04.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanostructure and compositional segregation of soft magnetic FeNi-based nanocomposites with multiple nanocrystalline phases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2020

P. Ohodnicki*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA
E.J. Kautz
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, USA
A. Devaraj
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99354, USA
Y. Yu
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
N. Aronhime
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
Y. Krimer
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
M.E. McHenry
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
A. Leary
Affiliation:
Materials and Structures Division, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: pro8@pitt.edu

Abstract

Soft magnetic metal amorphous nanocomposite alloys are produced through rapid solidification and thermal annealing yielding nanocrystals embedded within an amorphous precursor. Similar free energies in Co-rich and FeNi-based alloy systems result in multiple nanocrystalline phases being formed during devitrification. Studies of multi-phase crystallization processes have been reported for Co-rich alloys but relatively few have investigated FeNi-based systems. A detailed characterization of compositional partitioning and microstructure of an optimally annealed FeNi-based MANC (Fe70Ni30)80Nb4Si2B14 alloy is presented through complementary high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and atom probe tomography (APT). HRTEM demonstrates orientation relationships between FCC and BCC nanocrystals, suggesting heterogeneous nucleation of nanocrystals in the amorphous matrix or a cooperative mechanism of nucleation between BCC and FCC nanocrystallites. APT results show evidence for (i) the segregation of Fe and Ni between nanocrystals of different phases, (ii) B partitioning to the amorphous phase, and (iii) an Nb-enriched shell surrounding nanocrystals.

Information

Type
Invited Feature Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1: (a) Conventional bright-field TEM image and (b) selected area diffraction pattern confirming a nanocrystalline microstructure comprised of a mixture of BCC and FCC nanocrystals within the bulk of the annealed ribbon sample. HRTEM images are also presented for regions in which (c) BCC and (d) FCC nanocrystals are identified in zone axis orientation ([111]-type and [110]-type, respectively).

Figure 1

Figure 2: (a) HRTEM image and selected fast Fourier transforms showing a BCC and FCC grain on a zone axis orientation ([001] and [0-1-1], respectively) with a Nishiyama–Wassermann orientation relationship. (b) Corresponding HRTEM image and selected fast Fourier transforms showing a BCC and FCC grain on a zone axis orientation ([1-1-1] and [110], respectively) with a Kurdjumov–Sachs orientation relationship.

Figure 2

TABLE 1: Composition of as-cast and annealed (Fe70Ni30)80Nb4Si2B14 analyzed via APT.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Statistical analysis of element segregation in as-cast versus annealed (Fe70Ni30)80Nb4Si2B14. Frequency histograms are provided for all alloying elements for (a–e) as-cast, and (f–j) after 1 h annealing at 440 °C. A binomial distribution is plotted as a solid line, and given with frequency distribution measured for each element (shown in a dashed line). Corresponding Pearson correlation coefficients (μ) are reported in each sub-plot. A 200-ion bin size was used for frequency distribution analysis.

Figure 4

Figure 4: Compositional analysis of Fe–Ni–B–Si–Nb annealed at 1 h at 440 °C performed via APT. (a) Fe-enriched regions defined by a 54 at.% iso-concentration surface and (b) Ni-enriched region defined by a 32 at.% iso-concentration surface. Iso-concentration surfaces overlaid on a 2D contour plot with the stand-alone 2D contour plot shown in a larger view, for (c) Fe and (d) Ni. Proximity histograms across (e) 54 at.% Fe and (f) 32 at.% Ni iso-concentration surface. (g) Compositions of volumes encapsulated by 54 at.% Fe, 32 at.% Ni, and 12 at.% B iso-concentration surface with estimated volume percent of each region identified in parentheses. The total volume analyzed was 3.0295 × 104 nm3.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Elemental segregation in a sub-volume of the annealed alloy analyzed via APT. 2D contour plots for (a) Fe, (b) Ni, and (c) Nb are provided with Fe and Ni-rich regions outlined in pink and green, respectively. In (c), black arrows point toward regions of Nb enrichment at the surface of crystalline regions. Corresponding concentration profiles for Fe, Ni, and Nb are given in (d–f), respectively for a 1 at.% Nb iso-concentration surface. The vertical dashed lines in the concentration profiles indicate the location of the 1 at.% Nb iso-concentration surface. 2D contour plots were generated from a volume of 18 nm × 19 nm × 1 nm. Concentration of each element was analyzed in the thickness direction. Color scale bars provide the concentration of the selected element in at. %.

Figure 6

Figure 6: (a) Free energy versus composition curves for BCC, FCC, and liquid binary FeNi alloy at 440 °C (crystallization temperature) and (b) corresponding free energy versus composition curves for realistic liquid phase compositions. (Green arrows/line = parallel tangency condition to maximize driving force for nucleation, red circles/line = common tangency condition for equilibrium, following the methods described previously [14]).