Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-qmkzp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T21:18:52.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tangut verbal template from a cross-West Gyalrongic perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2025

Mathieu Beaudouin Open the ORCID record for Mathieu Beaudouin [Opens in a new window]
Mathieu Beaudouin*
Affiliation:
INALCO-CRLAO, Paris, France / Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
*
Email: mathieu.beaudouin@inalco.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The past decade has seen an increase in attention to Tangut, an extinct Sino-Tibetan language spoken by the rulers of the Western Xia xīxià 西夏 empire. The question of its classification has become a subject of discussion especially since the documentation of its closest relatives came to light recently. The present paper builds on the study of the Tangut verb template by Jacques (2011) to question the place of Tangut with regard to the Horpa languages (Beaudouin 2023b). By doing so, it identifies a phenomenon of attraction encompassing synchronic and diachronic analysis and proposes that verbal templatic morphology in West Gyalrongic is nuclear.

Keywords

TangutWest GyalrongicTemplatic morphologyHead attractionStem selectionAmphicrony

Information

Type
Article
Information
Bulletin of SOAS , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , June 2025 , pp. 347 - 357
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Babiniotis, Georges. 2009. “Diachronie et synchronie dynamique”, La Linguistique 45/1, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudouin, Mathieu. 2021. “Tangut directional preverbs: a new system”, in Rencontres internationales de tangoutologie 2. Arras: Université d'Artois and Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Beaudouin, Mathieu. 2023a. “Grammaire du tangoute. Phonologie et morphologie”. Paris: Inalco, doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Beaudouin, Mathieu. 2023b. “Tangut and Horpa languages: some shared morphosyntactic features”, Language and Linguistics 24/4, 611–74.Google Scholar
Beaudouin, Mathieu. 2024. “Non-past and past verb stems in Tangut”, Language and Linguistics, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00177.beaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudouin, Mathieu and Honkasalo, Sami. 2023. “Proto-horpa and the classification of Tangut”, in The International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics 56. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna. 2007. “Inflectional morphology”, in Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gates, Jesse. 2021. “A grammar of Mazur Stau”. Doctoral dissertation. Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Gates, Jesse, Honkasalo, Sami and Lai, Yunfan. 2022. “From transitive to intransitive and voiceless to voiced in Proto-Sino-Tibetan”, Language and Linguistics 23/2, 212–39.Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 1999. 〈西夏語的緊母音及其起源〉 Xīxiàyŭ de jǐn mŭyīn jí qí qǐyuán [The tense vowels of Tangut and their origin], Journal of the Institute of History and Philology of the Academia Sinica 70/2, 531–58.Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 2002. 西夏語文研究論文集 Xīxià yŭwén lùnwénjí [Collected papers on the Tangut language]. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics of the Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2017. “Verb stems in Tangut and their orthography”, Scripta 9.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2020. “Uvulars and uvularization in Tangut phonology”, Language and Linguistics 21/2, 175–212.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2022. “Nasal preinitials in Tangut phonology”, Archiv orientální 89/3, 443–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. “A grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored description”. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Arts.Google Scholar
Honkasalo, Sami and Gates, Jesse. 2023. “When /ʁjə/ becomes [a̯jə] and /sni/ becomes [ini]: preinitial vocalization in horpa consonant clusters”, paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Athens: National and Kapodistrian University.Google Scholar
Honkasalo, Sami, Gates, Jesse and Beaudouin, Mathieu. Forthcoming. “Preinitials and their development in Horpa and Tangut”, Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2011. “The structure of the Tangut verb”, Journal of Chinese Linguistics 39/2, 419–41.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2017. “Rgyalrong”, in Sybesma, Rint, Huang, James, Behr, Wolfgang and Handel, Zev (eds), Encyclopedia of Chinese Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, 583–9. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2017. “Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi”. Doctoral dissertation. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan. 2021. “Betrayal through obedience: on the history of the unusual inflectional chain in Siyuewu Khroskyabs”, Linguistic Typology 25/1, 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Yunfan, Gates, Jesse, Gong, Xun and Jacques, Guillaume. 2020. “Tangut as a West Gyalrongic language”, Folia Linguistica Historica 41/1, 171–203.Google Scholar
Li, Fanwen 李範文. 2008. 夏漢字典 Xià Hàn zìdiǎn [A Tangut-Chinese Dictionary]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1984. “De la synchronie dynamique à la diachronie”, Diachronica 1/1, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Marc. 2012. “Complexity from compression: a sketch of pre-Tangut”, in Popova, Irina (ed.), Тангуты в Центральной Азии: сборник статей в честь 80-летия проф. Е.И.Кычанова [Tanguts in Central Asia: a collection of articles marking the 80th anniversary of Prof. E. I. Kychanov], 244–61. Moscow: Oriental Literature.Google Scholar
Nishida, Tatsuo. 1964–66. 西夏語の研究―西夏語の再構成と西夏文字の解読 Seikago no kenkyū – Seikago no saikōsei to seika moji no kaidoku [Tangut Studies – Decipherment of the Tangut Script and Reconstruction of the Tangut Language]. Tokyo: Zauhō Kankōkai [2 volumes].Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1995 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius. 2014. “Cognitive processing, language typology, and variation”, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Cognitive Science 5/4, 477–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Shuya. 2020. “Le rgyalrong situ de Brag-bar et sa contribution à la typologie de l'expression des relations spatiales: l'orientation et le mouvement associé”. Doctoral dissertation. Paris: Inalco.Google Scholar