Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-grvzd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T01:36:09.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A geochemical and biostratigraphic approach to investigating regional changes in sandstone composition through time; an example from Paleocene–Eocene strata, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2020

Karen E. Higgs*
Affiliation:
GNS Science, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Stuart Munday
Affiliation:
Chemostrat Australia Pty. Ltd, 1131 Hay Street, West Perth, WA6005, Australia
Anne Forbes
Affiliation:
Chemostrat Australia Pty. Ltd, 1131 Hay Street, West Perth, WA6005, Australia
Erica M. Crouch
Affiliation:
GNS Science, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Matthew W. Sagar
Affiliation:
GNS Science, 1 Fairway Drive, Avalon, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
*
Author for correspondence: Karen E. Higgs, Email: k.higgs@gns.cri.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A geochemical and biostratigraphic approach has been applied to investigate the spatial and stratigraphic variability of Palaeogene sandstones from key wells in Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Chronostratigraphic control is predominantly based on miospore zonation, while differences in the composition of Paleocene and Eocene sandstones are supported by geochemical evidence. Stratigraphic changes are manifested by a significant decrease in Na2O across the New Zealand miospore PM3b/MH1 early Eocene zonal boundary, at approximately 53.5 Ma. The change in Na2O is associated with a decrease in baseline concentrations of many other major (MnO, CaO, TiO2) and trace elements, and is interpreted to reflect a significant change in sandstone maturity. Paleocene sandstones are characterized by abundant plagioclase (albite and locally Na–Ca plagioclase), significant biotite and a range of heavy minerals, while Eocene sandstones are typically quartzose, with K-feldspar dominant over plagioclase, low mica contents and rare heavy minerals comprising a resistant suite. This change could reflect a change in provenance from local plutonic basement during the Paleocene Epoch to relatively quartz- and K-feldspar-rich granitic sources during Eocene time. However, significant quartz enrichment of Eocene sediment was also likely due to transportation reworking/winnowing along the palaeoshoreface and enhanced chemical weathering, driven in part by long-term global warming associated with the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. The broad-ranging changes in major-element composition overprint local variations in sediment provenance, which are only detectable from the immobile trace-element geochemistry.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Taranaki Basin map showing study wells. Palaeogeography at 54 Ma shows the orientation of the middle Eocene palaeoshoreline and general position of facies belts for lower Eocene strata (after Strogen 2011). The present-day shoreline of the Taranaki Peninsula and latitude and longitude are also shown; see inset for location of the study area.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Cretaceous and Palaeogene stratigraphic framework for the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand, plotted against the geological timescale and correlative miospore zones. The stratigraphic framework is modified from King & Thrasher (1996), international timescale from Gradstein et al. (2012) and miospore zones from Raine (1984, 2004). Dt – Teurian; Dw – Waipawan; Dm – Mangaorapan; Dh – Heretaungan; Dp – Porangan; Ab – Bortonian; Ak – Kaiatan; Ar – Runangan; Lwh – Whaingaroan.

Figure 2

Table 1. Bulk-rock geochemistry samples from six wells, Taranaki Basin

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Cross-section showing chronostratigraphic framework for the study wells; location of the transect is shown on the inset map, with legends on Figures 1 and 2 for facies belts and biostratigraphic data, respectively. Intervals sampled for geochemical analyses are indicated; mudstone/siltstone intervals are indicated by brown shading on the neutron-density (N-D) log crossover.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Geochemical plots for basement samples from Maui-4 and MB-P(8) showing: (a) La/Sc v. Zr/Sc; (b) SiO2 v. TiO2; (c) Rb v. Sr/Y; and (d) Y v. Nb. (c, d) Plotted with published geochemical data from selected igneous suites; references provided in online Supplementary Material S3. These trace elements and ratios are some of the best discriminators (e.g. Tulloch & Kimbrough, 2003) but still illustrate the wide variability in suite composition. (e, f) Chondrite-normalized rare Earth element (REE) patterns comparing (e) basement samples from Maui-4 and MB-P(8), and (f) selected published data from McCulloch et al. (1987), Muir et al. (1996), Waight et al. (1998), Price et al. (2011) and Sagar et al. (2016).

Figure 5

Table 2. Key bulk-rock elemental data, ratios and alteration indices

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Comparison of x-ray powder diffraction (XRD) data from core samples (Clews & Soo, 1994) with bulk-rock elemental data from cuttings (this study) plotted against gamma-ray (GR), neutron-density (N-D) and biostratigraphy (Bio) data for well Maui B-P(8). Whole-rock XRD data are plotted as bar charts (dark colour) joined by a bar edge line (pale colour). Elemental data are represented by coloured disks. Mudstone/siltstone intervals are indicated by brown shading on the N-D log crossover. Alteration indices after Harnois (1988), Fedo et al. (1995) and Buggle et al. (2011).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Comparison of point-count data from core samples (Martin et al.1994) with bulk-rock elemental data from cuttings (this study) plotted against gamma-ray (GR), neutron-density (N-D) and biostratigraphy (Bio) data for well Kupe South-4. Petrographic data are plotted as bar charts (dark colour) joined by a bar edge line (pale colour). Mudstone/siltstone intervals are indicated by brown shading on the N-D log crossover. Alteration indices after Harnois (1988), Fedo et al. (1995) and Buggle et al. (2011).

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Bulk-rock elemental data for key elements and ratios plotted against gamma-ray (GR), neutron-density (N-D) and biostratigraphy (Bio) data for well Maui B-P(8). Mudstone/siltstone intervals are indicated by high GR and brown shading on the N-D log crossover, while mudstone/siltstone cuttings are indicated by low SiO2 and K2O/Rb together with high Cs/Rb (shown by brown shading on Cs/Rb and K2O/Rb profiles). Note that locally the geochemical data are not representative of the drilled interval (shown by red box and demonstrated by an elevated chem-GR in online Supplementary Material S2).

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Cross-section through study wells showing vertical changes in SiO2, K2O/Rb, K2O and Na2O plotted against gamma-ray (GR), biostratigraphy (Bio) and QEMSCAN data. Mudstone/siltstone cuttings are indicated by brown shading on K2O/Rb data.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Cross-section through study wells showing vertical changes in SiO2, Na2O, MnO and CaO plotted against gamma-ray (GR), biostratigraphy (Bio) and QEMSCAN data.

Figure 11

Table 3. Average abundance of selected oxides and trace elements by stratigraphy. All – all analysed cuttings; sand – sandstone cuttings based on lithology indicator cut-offs defined in Table 2. Eocene strata (representing MH1, MH2, MH3 zones) contain the lowest abundances of most elements, with the exception of Hf and Zr (zircon affinity), Cr and Ta.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Relative proportions of feldspars from QEMSCAN data (Higgs et al.2012b) with bulk-rock elemental data (this study) plotted against gamma-ray (GR) and biostratigraphy (Bio) data for wells Kapuni-13 and Kupe South-4. Fdsp refers to total feldspar abundance (vol%) to nearest percent; relative proportion of feldspar types are illustrated by pie charts.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Cross-section through study wells showing vertical changes in Cs/Rb, Al2O3/Alkali (Al/Ak = Al2O3/(CaO+MgO+K2O+Na2O)), alteration indices (Alt In) and Na2O plotted against gamma-ray (GR) and biostratigraphy data (Bio). Molecular proportions have been used in the calculation of alteration indices, where CaO* is the estimated silicate Ca. CIW – chemical index of weathering ((Al2O3/(Al2O3+CaO*+Na2O))×100; Harnois, 1988); PIA – plagioclase index of alteration (((Al2O3–K2O)/(Al2O3+CaO*+Na2O-K2O))×100; Fedo et al.1995); and CPA – chemical proxy of alteration ((Al2O3/(Al2O3+Na2O))×100; Buggle et al.2011). Mudstone/siltstone cuttings are indicated by brown shading on Cs/Rb data.

Figure 14

Table 4. Heavy mineral abundance (vol%) from wells Kupe South-4 and Kupe South-6. Other – sum of abundance of amphibole, anatase, andalusite, clinozoisite, clinopyroxene, diaspore, sillimanite and topaz; co – core; cu – cuttings

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Selected cross-plots showing the distinct major-element composition of basement samples at Maui-4 and Maui B-P(8) and a comparison between basement and Paleocene sandstone composition in wells (a) Maui-4, (b) Maui B-P(8) and (c) Kapuni-13, where sandstone lithology has been based on a cut-off for SiO2/Al2O3 and K2O/Rb. Plots illustrate the higher Na2O content of Cretaceous to lowermost Eocene sandstones (PM3a, PM3b) and uppermost Eocene sandstones (MH3) compared with the main Eocene reservoir sandstones (MH1 and MH2).

Figure 16

Fig. 13. Geochemical plots for basement and sandstone samples from all study wells showing (a) Y v. Nb; and (b) La/Sc v. Hf/Sc. Sandstone lithology has been based on a cut-off for SiO2/Al2O3 and K2O/Rb. (a) > 90% data fields based on published geochemical data from selected igneous suites (references provided in online Supplementary Material S3).

Figure 17

Fig. 14. Summary figure showing the interpretations for the observed stratigraphic changes in major-element geochemistry and quartz–feldspar composition. The stratigraphic framework is modified from King & Thrasher (1996), international timescale from Gradstein et al. (2012) and miospore zones from Raine (1984, 2004). The Taranaki basement map is modified from Tulloch & Mortimer (2017) and palaeogeography maps modified from Strogen (2011). The Palaeogene palaeoclimate estimate is based on TEX86H records for New Zealand (red dashed line being the 3-point moving average), which is a proxy for sea surface temperature, from Hollis et al. (2019).

Supplementary material: PDF

Higgs et al. supplementary material

Higgs et al. supplementary material 1

Download Higgs et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 468.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Higgs et al. supplementary material

Higgs et al. supplementary material 2

Download Higgs et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.2 MB