Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T05:43:00.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Value of Marriage to Family Firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Pramuan Bunkanwanicha ,
Joseph P. H. Fan  and
Yupana Wiwattanakantang
Pramuan Bunkanwanicha
Affiliation:
pbunkanwanicha@escpeurope.eu, ESCP Europe, 79 Avenue de la République 75011 Paris, France
Joseph P. H. Fan
Affiliation:
pjfan@cuhk.edu.hk, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Business Administration, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
Yupana Wiwattanakantang
Affiliation:
yupana@nus.edu.sg, National University of Singapore, Business School, Mochtar Riady Building, BIZ 1 2-7, 15 Kent Ridge Drive, Singapore 119245, Singapore.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the first empirical evidence showing that the marriage of a member of the controlling family adds value to public corporations. The results, based on a uniquely comprehensive data set from Thailand, show that the family firm’s stock price increases when the partner is from either a prominent business or a political family. Abnormal returns tend to be higher for firms whose operation depends on extensive networks. In contrast, marriages to ordinary citizens are not associated with any abnormal returns. These findings are generally supportive of the value of networks in general and marriage in particular.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , April 2013 , pp. 611 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, R. C., and Reeb, D. M.. “Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from S&P 500.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 1301–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, J. J. The Winding Road from the Late Teens through the Twenties. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2004).Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. “The Value of and Demand for Information.” In Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, McGuire, C. B., and Radner, R., eds. Chicago, IL: Markham (1971).Google Scholar
Balmori, D.; Voss, S. F.; and Wortman, M.. Notable Family Networks in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1984).Google Scholar
Becker, G. S.; Landes, E.; and Michael, R.. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability.” Journal of Political Economy, 85 (1977), 1141–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennedsen, M.; Nielsen, K. M.; Perez-Gonzales, F.; and Wolfenzon, D.. “Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (2007), 647–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennedsen, M.; Perez-Gonzales, F.; and Wolfenzon, D.. “Do CEOs Matter?” Working Paper, Stanford University (2010).Google Scholar
Berkowitz, D.; Pistor, K.; and Richard, J.-F.. “Economic Development, Legality, and the Transplant Effect.” European Economic Review, 47 (2003), 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M.; Johnson, S.; Samphantharak, K.; and Schoar, A.. “Mixing Family with Business: A Study of Thai Business Groups and the Families behind Them.” Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (2008), 466–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Schoar, A.. “The Role of Family in Family Firms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2006), 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker Group. Thai Business Groups 2001: A Unique Guide to Who Owns What. Bangkok, Thailand: Brooker Group (2001).Google Scholar
Brown, S. J., and Warner, J. B.. “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (1985), 205–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunkanwanicha, P., and Wiwattanakantang, Y.. “Big Business Owners in Politics.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 2133–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkart, M.; Panunzi, F.; and Shleifer, A.. “Family Firms.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 2167–2202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B., and Buchholtz, A. K.. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing (2000).Google Scholar
Chernow, R. The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance. New York, NY: Grove Press (1990).Google Scholar
Claessens, S.; Djankov, S.; and Lang, L. H. P.. “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (2000), 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, 4 (1937), 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAngelo, H., and DeAngelo, L.. “Controlling Stockholders and the Disciplinary Role of Corporate Payout Policy: A Study of the Times Mirror Company.” Journal of Financial Economics,56 (2000), 153–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M., and Thaler, R. H.. “Does the Stock Market Overreact?” Journal of Finance,40 (1985), 793–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M., and Thaler, R. H.. “Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellul, A.; Pagano, M.; and Panunzi, F.. “Inheritance Law and Investment in Family Firms.” American Economic Review, 100 (2010), 2414–2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, M. “Politically Connected Firms.” American Economic Review, 96 (2006), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccio, M., and Lang, L. H. P.. “The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 65 (2002), 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J. P. H., and Lang, L. H. P.. “The Measurement of Relatedness: An Application to Corporate Diversification.” Journal of Business, 73 (2000), 629–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology, 91 (1985), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. “Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders Coalition.” American Economic Review, 83 (1993), 525–548.Google Scholar
Grossman, S. J., and Hart, O. D.. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (1986), 691–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holderness, C. “The Myth of Diffuse Ownership in the United States.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 1377–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, P., and Lifschitz, A.. “Kinship in the Shadow of the Corporation: The Interbuilder Network in Clyde River Shipbuilding, 1711–1990.” American Sociological Review, 71 (2006), 334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, P., and Simons, T.. “The Transfer of Experience in Groups of Organizations: Implications for Performance and Competition.” Management Science, 48 (2002), 1517–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, H. Family Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. T. “Korean Elites: Social Networks and Power.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37 (2007), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, B.; Crawford, R. G.; and Alchian, A. A.. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.” Journal of Law and Economics, 21 (1978), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, B., and Leffler, K. B.. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance.” Journal of Political Economy, 89 (1981), 615–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, D. S. Dynasties. New York, NY: Viking Penguin (2006).Google Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; and Shleifer, A.. “Corporate Ownership around the World.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 471–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Legal Determinants of External Finance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 1131–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, R.; Lopez-de-Silanes, F.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R. W.. “Law and Finance.” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, J., and Woodruff, C.. “Interfirm Relationships and Informal Credit in Vietnam.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1999), 1285–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrotra, V.; Morck, R.; Shim, J.; and Wiwattanakantang, Y.. “Adoptive Expectations: Rising Son Tournaments in Japanese Family Firms.” NBER Working Paper No. 16874 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molho, A. Marriage Alliance in Late Medieval Florence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1994).Google Scholar
Morck, R.; Wolfenzon, D.; and Yeung, B.. “Corporate Governance, Economic Entrenchment, and Growth.” Journal of Economic Literature, 43 (2005), 655–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, J. F., and Ansell, C. K.. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1993), 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, R. A. “A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households.” Journal of Economic Literature, 23 (1985), 581–608.Google Scholar
Polsiri, P., and Wiwattanakantang, Y.. “Thai Business Groups: Crisis and Restructuring.” In Business Groups in East Asia: Financial Crisis, Restructuring, and New Growth, Chang, S.-J., ed. London, UK: Oxford University Press (2006).Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L.. “The Influence of the Financial Revolution on the Nature of Firms.” American Economic Review, 91 (2001), 206–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sappaiboon, T. The Fifty-Five Most Well-Known Families: Version 1. Bangkok, Thailand: Nation Multimedia Group (2000).Google Scholar
Sappaiboon, T. The Fifty-Five Most Well-Known Families: Version 2. Bangkok, Thailand: Nation Multimedia Group, Bangkok (2001).Google Scholar
Villalonga, B., and Amit, R.. “How Do Family Ownership, Control, and Management Affect Firm Value?” Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2006), 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Consideration.” American Economic Review, 61 (1971), 112–123.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange.” American Economic Review, 73 (1983), 519–540.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. “Transaction Cost Economics: The Comparative Contracting Perspective.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8 (1987), 617–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar