Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-25T22:21:52.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development of microstructure in the high-temperature deformation of ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher J. L. Wilson
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
Yanhua Zhang
Affiliation:
AGCRC, CSIRO Division of Exploration and Mining, Wembley, Western Australia 6014, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Microstructural changes in three sets of experiments involving crystallographic slip in anisotropic polycrystalline ice are described and interpreted with the aid of computer models. The development of microstructure was followed using time-lapse photography and transmitted light observations with deformation undertaken in plane strain and at a temperature of approximately –1°C. The deformation within a grain aggregate that accompanies axial shortening is always heterogeneous on a grainscale. The extent of inhomogeneity varies depending on the pre-existing grain structure and the way it can accommodate intragranular slip. Grain interactions are extremely important in determining the bulk deformation and the degree of grain-boundary migration. A consequence of shortening of the aggregate is the formation of high stresses between neighbouring grains and under the appropriate conditions there may be either grain-boundary migration or melting at these sites. Where a sample undergoes translation and shear during deformation, anisotropic grains in the appropriate orientation undergo bending. A buckle instability may then develop and much of the strain is accommodated by grains in easy-glide orientations. In such situations, the ice undergoes extensive recrystallization and grain growth that is concentrated in the areas of greatest buckling.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1996
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The microstructural evolution in typical polycrystalline ice aggregates with axial shortening from top to bottom (experiment BW 91). (a) Starting sample; (b) after 8% shortening; (c) after 23% shortening.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The microstructural evolution in an anisotropic ice aggregate with axial shortening from top to bottom (experiment BW 82). (a) After 13% shortening; (b) after 23% shortening; (c) after 33% shortening, the detailed grain structure observed in the boxed area is seen in Figure 4.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Microstructure and corresponding c-axis preferred orientations, related to the shortening axis Z and extension axis X. (a) Polygonal ice, experiment BW 91, after 23% shortening and (b) anisotropic ice after 33% shortening, experiment BW 82.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Recrystallized grains (a–f) overgrowing deformed anistropic grains in a zone of bending in experiment BW 82. For location see insert indicated in figure 2c. The trace of the slip bands in the anisotropic ice is preserved because of the silicon oil film that exists between the sample and the constraining glass plate.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The microstructural evolution in an anistotropic ice aggregate with non-axial shortening that involves a dextral shear of the sample (experiment BW 67). (a) Starting sample: (b–e) are 5%, 8%, 13% and 16% average longitudinal shortening strains, respectively.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Simulation of polygonal aggregate of ice. (a) Initial slip-plane traces in the numerical model; (b) the initial orientation distribution of slip-plane normals with respect to the specimen orientation; (c) final spatial distribution of slip-plane traces after 29% axial shortening; (d) final orientation distribution of slip-plane normals with respect to the orientation of the deformed specimen. The scale bar represents 2% frequency distribution of orientations.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Basic features of the axial shortening of the ice experiments, (a) Four undeformed polygonal grains (A, B, C and D) with basal planes (0001) and grain boundaries oriented at a high angle to the viewing plane (left), and possible c-axis orientations for each grain under the axial-shortening deformation frame. A has an orientation favourable for kinking, B and C have an easy-glide based-plane orientation and D has a stable orientation. (b) A pure-shear deformation with 20% bulk shortening and showing the relationship to the finite strain ellipse, (c) Stress distribution within a grain (see text for further explanation).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Simulation of deformation in anisotropic ice. The basic features are a direct copy of the microstructure in experiment F2 (see Wilson, 1994). The fixed platen is at the base of the sample, (a) Starting sample; (b) after 10% axial shortening; (c) after 20% axial shortening.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulation of shear-stress distribution in the ice-deformation experiment F2 at 20% shortening (cf. Fig. 8c). The contour intervals represent 1.50 × 10−1 steps in shear stress (MPa), increasing from unstippled, stippled to black.