Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T21:49:48.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of milk and milk constituents on postprandial lipid and glucose metabolism in overweight and obese men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2013

Leonie E. C. van Meijl
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
Ronald P. Mensink*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MDMaastricht, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: R. P. Mensink, fax +31 43 367 09 76, email r.mensink@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies have suggested that two major milk constituents, casein and Ca, favourably affect postprandial responses. However, effects of milk on postprandial metabolism are unknown. We therefore investigated effects of using milk with a fat-containing meal on lipid and glucose responses in overweight men. To identify the constituent responsible for possible effects, we also studied responses to Ca and protein. A total of sixteen men (BMI >27 kg/m2) participated in four postprandial tests. They consumed a breakfast (44 g of fat) plus a drink: a control drink, low-fat milk or a protein and Ca drink (500 ml). Blood samples were taken before the meals and at regular time points during 6 h thereafter. Compared with control, the incremental AUC (iAUC) for serum TAG was increased by 44 % after the protein meal (P= 0·015). Although the iAUC were not different (P= 0·051), peak glucose concentrations were reduced by 24 % after protein intake, as compared with control (P= 0·021). The decrease of 18 % after milk intake did not reach statistical significance. Compared with the milk meal, the iAUC for insulin was 52 % lower after the control meal (P= 0·035) and 51 % after the protein meal (P= 0·005). The present results indicate that the intake of milk with a fat-containing meal enhances postprandial TAG and insulin responses and may blunt glucose increases. The protein fraction of milk seems to be the main determinant for the effects on TAG and glucose. Ca did not change any of the postprandial responses.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012 
Figure 0

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the sixteen men (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 1

Table 2 Composition of the test meals

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Mean changes in serum TAG concentrations after consumption of the control, milk, protein, and calcium meals in a randomised crossover study with overweight and obese men (n 16). Values are means with their standard errors and were analysed using linear mixed models. There were no significant meal × time interactions. Time effects were P< 0·001 and meal effects P= 0·186. After Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparisons, all time points significantly differed from zero: P< 0·001. , Control; , milk; , protein; , calcium.

Figure 3

Table 3 Incremental AUC (iAUC) and maximal changes from fasting concentrations (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Mean changes in apoB-48 concentrations after the control, milk, protein, and calcium meals in a randomised crossover study with overweight and obese men (n 16). Values are means with their standard errors and were analysed using linear mixed models. There were no significant meal × time interactions. Time effects were P< 0·001 and meal effects P= 0·016. After Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparisons, all time points significantly differed from zero: P< 0·001. In addition, differences between the milk and calcium meals (P= 0·030) and between the protein and calcium meals (P= 0·042) reached statistical significance. , Control;, milk; , protein; , calcium.

Figure 5

Table 4 Fasting plasma amino acid concentrations and their changes after the test meals (Mean values and standard deviations)

Supplementary material: File

Mensink Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Mensink Supplementary Material(File)
File 471.4 KB