Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-92wsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T02:27:25.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying environmental drivers of fungal non-pollen palynomorphs in the montane forest of the eastern Andean flank, Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2017

Nicholas J.D. Loughlin*
Affiliation:
School of Environment, Earth & Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom Palaeoecology & Landscape Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity & Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, the Netherlands
William D. Gosling
Affiliation:
School of Environment, Earth & Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom Palaeoecology & Landscape Ecology, Institute for Biodiversity & Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94248, 1090 GE Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Encarni Montoya
Affiliation:
School of Environment, Earth & Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author at: School of Environment, Earth & Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, United Kingdom. E-mail address: nicholas.loughlin@open.ac.uk (N.J.D. Loughlin).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Samples taken from sedimentary archives indicate that fungal non-pollen palynomorphs (NPPs) can be used to provide information on forest cover, fire regime, and depositional environment in the eastern Andean flank montane forest of Ecuador. Within the 52 samples examined, 54 fungal NPP morphotypes are reported, of which 25 were found to be previously undescribed. Examination of fungal NPPs over a gradient of forest cover (2–64%) revealed three distinct assemblages: (1) low (<8%) forest cover Neurospora, IBB-16, HdV-201, OU-102, and OU-110 indicative of an open degraded landscape; (2) medium (8–32%) forest cover Cercophora-type 1, Xylariaceae, Rosellinia-type, Kretzschmaria deusta, Amphirosellinia, Sporormiella, and Glomus suggestive of a forested landscape disturbed by herbivores and soil erosion; and (3) high (32–63%) forest cover Anthostomella fuegiana, OU-5, OU-101, OU-108, and OU-120. Environmental variables for forest cover (forest pollen), available moisture (aquatic remains), regional fire regime (microcharcoal), and sediment composition (organic carbon) were found to explain ~40% of the variance in the fungal NPP data set. Fire was found to be the primary control on fungal NPP assemblage composition, with available moisture and sediment composition the next most important factors.

Information

Type
Tribute to Daniel Livingstone and Paul Colinvaux
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2017
Figure 0

Figure 1 Map showing position of study site and sample locations. (A) Map of Ecuador. Regions coloured black indicate an altitude of between 1300 and 3600 metres above sea level (m asl) corresponding to Andean montane forest vegetation. (B) Map of study location with altitudinal gradient related to vegetation zones as described in the “Introduction” and corresponding to Sierra (1999). Circles indicate sample locations; squares, local population centres; and triangles, volcanic centres.

Figure 1

Table 1 Radiocarbon (accelerator mass spectrometry) ages obtained from palynomorph residues from Huila and Vinillos. The dated sample from Huila is from the base of the sediment analysed (i.e., all the samples presented here are younger than the age of this sample). The dated sample from Vinillos is from the upper part of the sedimentary section (i.e.,, all the samples presented here are older than the age indicated). Original dates calibrated in OxCal 4.2.4 (Bronk Ramsey et al., 2013) using IntCal13 atmospheric curve (Reimer et al., 2013).

Figure 2

Figure 2 Palaeoenvironmental proxies from which environmental variables have been inferred. Samples are ordered based on increasing percentage of forest pollen. Forest pollen is based on the combined percentage of Alnus, Weinmannia, Hedyosmum, and Melastomataceae in the sample relative to the total terrestrial pollen sum. Aquatic remains relate to the percentage abundance of total aquatic remains relative to the terrestrial pollen sum. Microcharcoal plotted as fragments per cubic centimetre of sediment. Organic carbon refers to the percent organic carbon loss during loss on ignition at 550°C.

Figure 3

Figure 3 (A, B) Fungal non-pollen palynomorph (NPP) assemblage data for all taxa occurring at >2% abundance in >1 sample. Fungal NPP percentages are calculated relative to the total terrestrial pollen sum. Samples are ordered based on an increasing percentage of forest pollen. Asterisk (*) in panel A indicates that HdV-123 in sample V5 occurs at 698.3%. See Table 2 for definitions of abbreviations.

Figure 4

Table 2 Abbreviations of taxa used in non-pollen palynomorph diagram (Fig. 3) and canonical correspondence analysis diagram (Fig. 4).

Figure 5

Figure 4 Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of non-pollen palynomorph (NPP) morphotypes and environmental variables. NPP morphotypes (black dots) and samples (grey dots) are plotted against palaeoenvironmental proxies of environmental variables (black arrows): forest pollen (forest cover), aquatic remains (available moisture), microcharcoal (regional fire regime), and organic carbon (sediment composition). See Table 2 for definitions of abbreviations.

Figure 6

Figure 5 (colour online) New fungal morphotypes described from the eastern Andean flank of Ecuador. Conidia positioned with proximal cell at bottom. 1, OU-5; 2, OU-18; 3, OU-28 (a–c); 4, OU-35; 5, OU-100; 6, OU-101; 7, OU-102; 8, OU-103; 9, OU-104; 10, OU-105; 11, OU-106; 12, OU-107; 13, OU-108; 14, OU-109; 15, OU-110; 16, OU-111; 17, OU-112; 18, OU-113; 19, OU-114; 20, OU-115; 21, OU-116; 22, OU-117; 23, OU-118; 24, OU-119; 25, OU-120.

Supplementary material: File

Loughlin et al supplementary material

Appendix A and B

Download Loughlin et al supplementary material(File)
File 24.5 KB