Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-rxg44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T20:04:36.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fatty acid composition of milk from mothers giving birth at extremely low gestation in Sweden

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Ulrika Sjöbom
Affiliation:
Section for Opthalmology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Osman Cismaan
Affiliation:
Section for Opthalmology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Ingrid Hansen-Pupp
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Pediatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Dirk Wackernagel
Affiliation:
Department of Neonatology, Karolinska University Hospital and Institute, Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Karin Sävman
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Region Västra Götaland, Department of Neonatology, The Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
Ann Hellström
Affiliation:
Section for Opthalmology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Anders K. Nilsson*
Affiliation:
Section for Opthalmology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author. Email: anders.k.nilsson@gu.se

Abstract

Preterm infants show postnatal deficits of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) which are essential for adequate growth and neurodevelopment. Human milk is a primary source of fatty acids (FAs) for the preterm infant, and therefore, knowledge about milk FA levels is required to design appropriate supplementation strategies. Here, we expanded on our previous study (Nilsson et al., 2018, Acta Paediatrica, 107, 1020–1027) determining FA composition in milk obtained from mothers of extremely low gestational age (<28 weeks) infants on three occasions during lactation. There was a clear difference in FA composition in milk collected at Day 7 and milk collected at postmenstrual weeks (PMW) 32 or PMW 40. Notably, the proportion of LCPUFAs was low and declined significantly during milk maturation. These results strengthen previous data that the content of FAs required by the preterm infant is not supplied in sufficient amounts when the mother’s own milk is the sole source of these essential nutrients.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the fatty acid profiles of milk samples collected at Day 7, at postmenstrual week 32 (PMW 32), and PMW 40 (total n = 288). (a) PCA scatter plot colored according to sampling occasion and (b) the corresponding loading plot. The ellipse in (a) shows Hotelling’s T2 (95% confidence limit). PCA model: six components, R2X = 0.76 and Q2 = 0.49.

Figure 1

Table 1. Proportions of fatty acids (FAs) in milk samples collected on three occasions during lactation

Supplementary material: PDF

Sjöbom et al. supplementary material

Sjöbom et al. supplementary material

Download Sjöbom et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 139.5 KB
Reviewing editor:  Francisco Javier Alarcón López Universidad de Almeria, Almeria, Spain, 04120
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and has been sent for additional statistical evaluation and met required revisions.

Review 1: Fatty acid composition of milk from mothers giving birth at extremely low gestation in Sweden

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: The authors report the extension of data from a previous study on the importance of the presence of polyunsaturated fatty acids in breast milk for infant development.

Although the study is interesting, it does not contribute anything new or innovative to the previously published study. This study only provides more data than the previously published study.

Furthermore, the authors base their results on exploratory data analysis (PCA), but the graph shown in figure 2 does not show clear trends in the grouping of the three types of samples analysed according to fatty acid composition. In fact, there is only a slight tendency to group the samples classified as “day 7” with negative scores for component 1 and the remaining two with positive scores, as the authors state in the results section.

For this reason, I recommend not to publish this study, as a more complete study is needed to correlate the authors’ hypothesis.

Presentation

Overall score 2.9 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
2 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
3 out of 5

Context

Overall score 3.5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
3 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
3 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 2 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
2 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
2 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
2 out of 5

Review 2: Fatty acid composition of milk from mothers giving birth at extremely low gestation in Sweden

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: In this piece of research, the authors broached a short note about the quality in term of fatty acids profile of milk from mothers giving birth at extremely low gestation in Sweden. This is hot topic because every year around 15 million babies are born before reaching term, that is, more than one in ten births.

However, there are some general concerns listed below that should be addressed in order to improve it.

-Why have these sampling points been taken? It would have been interesting to take samples at intermediate points between 7 days and 32 weeks (8 months). In my opinion, the measurement at 8 and 16 weeks would give us interesting data.

-It would have been interesting to include a control of breast milk from mothers who gave birth at term, to see these variations that are discussed.

-Figure 1 does not provide much information. The measurement parameters can be incorporated in the material and methods section.

-Perhaps it would have been interesting to include a table showing the differences in the percentage of fatty acids at the different sampling points. Although this is a suggestion only.

-In pag 4, as for linoleic acid, specify the nomenclature of the fatty acids DHA and AA.

Presentation

Overall score 3.6 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
3 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.2 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
4 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
3 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
3 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5