Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T13:37:05.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mantle cloak design using cylindrical metasurface with a novel unit cell for scattering suppression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2026

Hande Bodur*
Affiliation:
Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
Sibel Çimen
Affiliation:
Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Hande Bodur; Email: hande.bodur@kocaeli.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A mantle cloak with a novel unit cell design is proposed for the scattering suppression of cylindrical metasurfaces. The proposed cloak is designed for an electrically small cylindrical object. The Mie Theory is employed to calculate the surface impedance of the mantle cloak, which plays a critical role in determining the optimal design parameters. The unit cell parameters necessary for the design are obtained by analyzing the surface impedance. Bistatic Radar Cross-Section (RCS) analyses have been conducted for the cloaked and uncloaked cases of cylinders. The designed cylinder demonstrated remarkable scattering suppression at the operating frequency. Furthermore, the results obtained from the novel unit cell design are compared with findings in the literature, underscoring the improved cloaking performance achieved with the new design. As a demonstration, a single-layer novel unit cell cloaked cylinder is constructed with a total radius equal to 13 percent of the free-space wavelength, a total length corresponding to 1.94 times the free-space wavelength, and a dielectric spacer thickness of 1.27 percent of the free-space wavelength. This single-layer novel unit cell mantle cloak achieves a 16.65 dB total RCS reduction at 3.1 GHz, with a notable decrease in scattering at the operational frequency in all directions.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Cross-sectional and (b) comprehensive view of structure.

Figure 1

Figure 2. $S$W of both uncloaked and cloaked conducting cylinder with dimensions of $a = 12.5$ mm, ${{{\varepsilon }}_r} = 10.2$ and $h = 1.27$ mm.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The surface impedance of the proposed unit cell according to frequency.

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Layout of the proposed unit cell; (b) periodic settlement of unit cells.

Figure 4

Table 1. The geometrical measurements of the proposed unit cell

Figure 5

Figure 5. Exposure of (a) cloaked and (b) uncloaked cylinders to a TM-polarized incident plane wave.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Validation of analytical and full-wave simulation results: (a) SCS versus frequency for cloaked and uncloaked cylinders, obtained from Mie theory and CST simulations for finite and infinite (PBC) cylindrical models; (b) corresponding SW comparison.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Bi-static radar cross section of cloaked and uncloaked cylinders for finite length and infinite length (PBC) simulation models.

Figure 8

Table 2. Comparison between the proposed mantle cloak and other works

Figure 9

Figure 8. 3D RCS patterns at $f = 3.1$ GHz for (a) the cloaked and (b) the uncloaked scenarios.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Simulated scattering polar pattern of the cloaked and uncloaked for (a) $\varphi = {90^\circ }$ and (b) $\theta = {90^\circ }$.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Bi-static RCS for (a) normal incidence, (b) oblique incidence.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Simulated E-field patterns in the azimuth plane under TM-polarized plane wave excitation at normal incidence for (a) the cloaked and (b) the uncloaked case.

Figure 13

Figure 12. The experimental setup for the measurement.

Figure 14

Figure 13. RCS plots for the cloaked design, both simulated and measured.