Obesity is defined as a medical condition of abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that may impair health( 1 ). With the growing obesity epidemic, it is recommended that physicians assess and manage obesity through appropriate measurements in clinical practice for the assessment of health risk( 2 , 3 ). Anthropometric parameters for the diagnosis of obesity include BMI as an indicator of general obesity and waist circumference (WC) or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) as an indicator of abdominal adiposity( Reference Whitlock, Lewington and Sherliker 4 – Reference Reis, Araneta and Wingard 6 ). BMI reflects lean body mass as well as fat mass and does not consider fat distribution( Reference Rothman 7 ). Compared with BMI, indices of abdominal adiposity such as WC and WHR provide more information about the central distribution of body fat( Reference Vanltallie 5 ). There is some evidence from prospective cohort studies and meta-analyses that abdominal obesity measures such as WC or WHR are associated with obesity-related mortality in both men and women, regardless of general obesity( Reference Reis, Araneta and Wingard 6 , Reference Bigaard, Frederiksen and Tjonneland 8 , Reference Lee, Huxley and Wildman 9 ).
A recent large cohort study identified that normal-weight adults with central obesity (identified by WHR) had a higher rate of mortality compared with participants with normal fat distribution, regardless of BMI( Reference Sahakyan, Somers and Rodriguez-Escudero 10 ). Another study showed that individuals with a high body fat content were associated with a higher prevalence of insulin resistance, altered lipid profile, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk factors, despite a normal BMI( Reference Romero-Corral, Somers and Sierra-Johnson 11 ). One longitudinal study has revealed that the presence of abdominal obesity predicts insulin resistance, especially in normal-weight individuals, thereby increasing the risks of diabetes and CVD( Reference Karter, D’Agostino and Mayer-Davis 12 ).
Abdominal obesity occurs in the context of a variety of changes in dietary intake, physical activity, and socio-economic and lifestyle factors( Reference Koh-Banerjee, Chu and Spiegelman 13 ). Alcohol consumption appears to have become an important lifestyle element in both Western and Asian countries, and there is growing interest in better understanding its health risks( 14 ). Previous studies examining the association between alcohol consumption and abdominal obesity have shown inconsistent results( Reference Traversy and Chaput 15 ). Several studies have reported a positive association between alcohol drinking and abdominal obesity in heavy alcohol consumption( Reference Vadstrup, Petersen and Sørensen 16 ), and even moderate alcohol consumption( Reference Lourenço, Oliveira and Lopes 17 ); other studies have found that the amount or intensity of drinking is positively correlated with abdominal obesity, while the frequency of drinking is negatively correlated( Reference Tolstrup, Heitmann and Tjonneland 18 ). Binge drinking was associated with an increased likelihood of being obese in one study( Reference Chakraborty 19 ). A cohort study showed that alcohol intake was not associated with 5-year difference in WC in either women or men( Reference Halkjaer, Tjonneland and Thomsen 20 ).
To the best of our knowledge, data on the association between alcohol drinking pattern and abdominal obesity in normal-weight persons are limited. One study has reported that low to moderate alcohol consumption appears to be inversely associated with future weight and WC in middle-aged adults( Reference MacInnis, Hodge and Dixon 21 ). Likewise, middle-aged adults, a group at high risk for cardiovascular and other chronic conditions including obesity, are exposed to various potential health problems due to lifestyle factors such as physical activity, diet, alcohol drinking and smoking(22). The theoretical rationale for the present study is based on these considerations. We hypothesized that there exists a specific positive relationship between each of various measures of alcohol drinking pattern (alcohol drinking frequency, alcohol drinking amount, frequency of binge drinking, total alcohol intake) and abdominal obesity in normal-weight, middle-aged persons. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the relationship between three variables of alcohol drinking pattern (alcohol drinking frequency, alcohol drinking quantity, binge drinking) and abdominal obesity (as defined by WC) among the population of normal-weight individuals aged 40–69 years old in Korea.
Methods
Study population
The current cross-sectional study was conducted using data collected by the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), which has been conducted annually since 1998 by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. The survey was designed to assess the health and nutrition status of the non-institutionalized civilian population of South Korea and has three components: a health interview survey, a health examination survey and a nutrition survey. To increase the power of the analyses, we combined data from three separate waves of the survey (2008–2009, 2010–2012 and 2013)( Reference Kim 23 ). The 2008–2013 KNHANES investigated populations of approximately 10 000 individuals from twenty households in 200 enumeration districts per year based on a three-stage sampling method (household, enumeration districts and local districts). It is a complex, stratified, multistage, cluster-sampling method with proportional allocation based on geographic area, sex and age. Participants for the current study were normal-weight, middle-aged adults. Among 33 738 participants aged 20 years or older, we excluded participants aged less than 40 years or above 69 years (n 15 450) and those with missing data for BMI (n 63) or WC (n 30). The final study sample consisted of 18 195 participants, which included 403 participants with BMI lower than 18·5 kg/m2, 11 289 participants with BMI of 18·5 to 25·0 kg/m2, and 6503 participants with BMI of 25·0 kg/m2 or more. Therefore, for the present study, a total of 11 289 participants (4491 men; 6798 women) were included in the analysis of the association between alcohol consumption and abdominal obesity in normal-weight, middle-aged adults.
Definition of abdominal obesity and obesity
Anthropometric measurements of participants were performed by well-trained examiners. Body weight and height were measured while participants wore light clothing and were barefoot. BMI was calculated as weight divided by the square of height (kg/m2). According to the Asia-Pacific guidelines, BMI<18·5 kg/m2 was regarded as underweight and BMI≥25·0 kg/m2 was used to define obesity( Reference Weisell 24 ). WC was measured at the midline between the lowest costal rib and the uppermost iliac crest in the mid-axillary line, with the participant standing. The cut-off point for WC for abdominal obesity in Koreans was defined as 90 cm for men and 85 cm for women( Reference Lee, Park and Kim 25 ). Therefore, individuals with normal-weight abdominal obesity in our study were those with BMI of 18·5–25·0 kg/m2 and WC ≥90 cm for men or ≥85 cm for women.
Assessment of alcohol drinking patterns
Alcohol consumption patterns during the previous year were recorded using self-reported questionnaires, which included typical drinking quantity per drinking occasion (1–2 drinks, 3–4 drinks, 5–6 drinks, 7–9 drinks, ≥10 drinks), average drinking frequency (<1/month, 1/month, 2–4/month, 2–3/week, ≥4/week) and frequency of binge drinking (none, <1/month, 1/month, 1/week, every day). In these questions, a standard ‘drink’ was defined as a single glass of liquor, wine or the Korean traditional drink So-ju (Korean distilled liquor). One bottle of beer (355 ml) was counted as 1·6 standard drinks. Binge drinking was defined as consuming ≥7 standard drinks (≥5 drinks for women) consecutively on one occasion( Reference Lee 26 ). To yield an average measure of total alcohol intake, the categories of typical drinking quantity and average drinking frequency were converted into number, and the intake was categorized into four groups (<7 drinks/week, 7–13 drinks/week, 14–20 drinks/week, ≥21 drinks/week)( Reference Tolstrup, Heitmann and Tjonneland 18 ).
Measurement of covariates
Each participant was interviewed using a structured questionnaire to assess smoking status, physical activity, income, and educational and marital status. Smoking status was categorized into two groups: non-smokers or ex-smokers and current smokers. Regular physical activity was defined as exercising moderately for over 30 min per session more than 5 times per week or vigorously for over 20 min per session more than 3 times per week. Individuals with household incomes in the lowest quartile were designated as the low income group. Education level was classified as low if participants did not finish education higher than ninth grade. Daily energy intake was assessed using a single 24 h recall method.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS complex sample procedure by reflecting strata, clusters and weighted values applied to the KNHANES. Comparisons of participant characteristics according to abdominal obesity by sex were conducted using Student’s t test for continuous variables and the χ 2 test for categorical variables. We also used the χ 2 test to analyse the frequency of drinking, drinking quantity and binge drinking pattern depending on abdominal obesity. Potential confounders in the analyses of alcohol drinking pattern variables were sex, age, BMI, education level, income, physical activity, smoking status and total energy intake. Prior to inclusion of the confounders, variance inflation factors were calculated and all were lower than 3 (data not shown). In addition, alcohol drinking frequency was a confounder in the analysis of typical drinking quantity and typical drinking quantity was a confounder in the analysis of alcohol drinking frequency. A P value less than 0·05 was considered to be statistically significant. All analyses including calculation of weighted means, percentages, standard errors and odds ratios were conducted using the statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics version 21.0.
Results
A total of 11 289 normal-weight individuals were included in the present study and their general characteristics are presented in Table 1. Among the study participants, 7·9 % (n379) of men and 7·6 % (n609) of women had abdominal obesity. Compared with normal-weight individuals without abdominal obesity, normal-weight individuals with abdominal obesity were older (52·13 (se 0·15) v. 55·39 (se 0·48) years in males; 51·09 (se 0·12) v. 57·64 (se 0·38) years in females) and had higher BMI (22·46 (se 0·03) v. 24·09 (se 0·04) kg/m2 in males; 22·20 (se 0·02) v. 23·96 (se 0·04 kg/m2) in females). With respect to additional variables, normal-weight men with abdominal obesity were less likely to engage in regular physical activity, were less educated and had higher total energy intake. Normal-weight women with abdominal obesity were less likely to be educated or married living with spouse, had lower income and had lower total energy intake. The overall percentage of normal-weight subjects with abdominal obesity who consumed 10 drinks or more per typical occasion was higher compared with those without abdominal obesity in both sexes (19·2 v. 15·7 % in males; 5·1 v. 1·5 % in females; Table 1).
General characteristics of participants according to abdominal obesityFootnote * and sex; middle-aged adults (40–69 years), Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2013
WC, waist circumference.
* Abdominal obesity is defined as WC ≥90 cm for men and ≥85 cm for women in accordance with the Korean Society for the Study of Obesity( Reference Lee, Park and Kim 25 ).
† Regular physical activity is defined as exercising moderately for >30 min/session for >5 times/week or vigorously for >20 min /session for >3 times/week.
‡ Lowest level is defined as the lowest 25 percentile.
Multivariate logistic analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between drinking pattern and abdominal obesity in normal-weight persons (Table 2). Smoking status was included as a covariate because it has been found to be an important confounder of alcohol drinking pattern and abdominal fatness( Reference Travier, Agudo and May 27 ). Compared with normal-weight men who consumed fewer than 2 drinks per typical occasion, those who consumed more than 7 drinks were more prone to have abdominal obesity (OR=2·16; 95 % CI 1·23, 3·77 for 7–9 drinks/typical occasion; OR=2·07; 95 % CI 1·19, 3·59 for ≥10 drinks/typical occasion) when adjusting for age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, education, income and energy intake. These associations were still significant after controlling for drinking frequency (OR=2·00; 95 % CI 1·08, 3·66 for 7–9 drinks/typical occasion; OR=1·86; 95 % CI 1·01, 3·41 for ≥10 drinks/typical occasion). Normal-weight males who reported consuming ≥7 standard drinks consecutively on one occasion at a frequency of almost every day were found to have a higher odds for abdominal obesity compared with non-binge drinkers (OR=2·10; 95 % CI 1·21, 3·63; Table 3).
Associations between alcohol drinking pattern and normal-weight abdominal obesity; middle-aged adults (40–69 years), Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2013
Ref., reference category.
* Unadjusted.
† Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, education, income and energy intake.
‡ Adjusted for all variables in Model 2 and other alcohol drinking pattern (typical drinking quantity or alcohol drinking frequency).
§ Significance of P for trend by multiple logistic regression analysis.
║ Binge drinking is defined as consuming ≥7 drinks (men) or ≥5 drinks (women) consecutively on one occasion.
Associations between alcohol drinking pattern and abdominal obesity in normal-weight, middle-aged men (40–69 years); Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2013
Ref., reference category.
* Unadjusted.
† Adjusted for age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, education, income and energy intake.
‡ Adjusted for all variables in Model 2 and other alcohol drinking pattern (typical drinking quantity or alcohol drinking frequency).
§ Significance of P for trend by multiple logistic regression analysis.
║ Binge drinking is defined as consuming ≥7 drinks consecutively on one occasion.
Normal-weight women who consumed more than 10 drinks per typical occasion were more likely to have abdominal obesity compared with women who consumed fewer than 2 drinks per typical occasion (OR=3·26; 95 % CI 1·12, 9·47) after adjusting for age, BMI, education, smoking status, income, physical activity and energy intake. This result was still significant after adjusting for drinking frequency (OR=3·34; 95 % CI 1·21, 9·18). Binge drinking in normal-weight women, defined as consuming ≥5 standard drinks consecutively on one occasion at any frequency, was not a significant factor of abdominal obesity after adjusting for the variables listed above (Table 4).
Associations between alcohol drinking pattern and abdominal obesity in normal-weight, middle-aged women (40–69 years); Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2013
Ref., reference category.
* Unadjusted.
† Adjusted for age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, education, income and energy intake.
‡ Adjusted for all variables in Model 2 and other alcohol drinking pattern (typical drinking quantity or alcohol drinking frequency).
§ Significance of P for trend by multiple logistic regression analysis.
║ Binge drinking is defined as consuming ≥5 drinks consecutively on one occasion.
With respect to abdominal obesity and alcohol drinking frequency, there was no significant association in either normal-weight males or normal-weight females (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 5 shows the quantitative effect of alcohol on abdominal obesity in normal-weight persons. Among participants consuming 21 or more drinks weekly, the odds for normal-weight abdominal obesity were 1·47 (95 % CI 1·07, 2·04) compared with those consuming 1–6 drinks weekly. A dose–response relationship was found between total alcohol intake and normal-weight abdominal obesity in both genders, without clinical significance after adjustment for confounders.
Associations between total alcohol intake and normal-weight abdominal obesity according to sex; middle-aged adults (40–69 years), Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2013
Ref., reference category.
* Unadjusted.
† Adjusted for sex, age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, education, income and energy intake.
‡ Adjusted for all variables in Model 2 and alcohol drinking frequency.
§ Adjusted for age, BMI, physical activity, smoking status, education, income and energy intake.
║ Significance of P for trend by multiple logistic regression analysis.
Discussion
Results from the current study revealed that both normal-weight men and women who consumed a higher quantity of alcohol on each drinking occasion had higher odds for abdominal obesity compared with individuals who consumed fewer than 2 drinks, even after controlling for alcohol drinking pattern. Normal-weight men who consumed ≥7 standard drinks on one occasion were at significantly increased risk of abdominal obesity, while normal-weight women were at significantly increased risk with consumption of ≥10 standard drinks on one occasion. In normal-weight males, binge drinking (≥7 standard drinks consecutively) every day was associated with higher odds of abdominal obesity. However, this association was not significant in female, normal-weight, binge drinkers (defined as ≥5 standard drinks consecutively on one occasion). In contrast, alcohol drinking frequency was not significantly associated with abdominal obesity in both genders or overall.
Although it is widely recognized that alcohol intake contributes to the risk of obesity, previous studies on the relationship between alcohol intake and obesity have reported inconsistent findings( Reference MacInnis, Hodge and Dixon 21 , Reference Riserus and Ingelsson 28 , Reference Suter 29 ). An observational study using the same database of the general Korean population as the present study revealed that there were positive relationships between heavy drinking, binge drinking and abdominal obesity( Reference Kim and Song 30 ). In one study in Finland, women who did not drink alcohol had the highest risk of obesity( Reference Lahti-Koski, Pietinen and Heliovaara 31 ), while another study reported no relationship between BMI and alcohol intake in men( Reference Colditz, Giovannucci and Rimm 32 ). In contrast, Riserus et al. showed that high alcohol intake was associated with abdominal obesity rather than generalized obesity( Reference Riserus and Ingelsson 28 ), in accordance with abundant cross-sectional data from studies conducted in other countries among young, middle-aged and elderly men and women( Reference Dallongeville, Marecaux and Ducimetiere 33 – Reference Lapidus, Bengtsson and Bergfors 35 ). These studies reported an association between high alcohol intake and abdominal obesity only in individuals in the lowest tertile of BMI, which supports an effect of alcohol on abdominal fat accumulation per se ( Reference Riserus and Ingelsson 28 ), in agreement with our findings. Evidence from some previous studies showed that heavy drinkers have low BMI combined with high WC or WHR compared with healthy social drinkers( Reference Riserus and Ingelsson 28 , Reference Addolorato, Capristo and Greco 36 ).
One possible explanation for the effect of alcohol on abdominal obesity is an increased energy intake through high alcohol intake, resulting in fat accumulation( Reference Schroder, Morales-Molina and Bermejo 37 ). However, contrary to all other energy sources, alcohol cannot be stored in the body, with its absolute metabolic priority( Reference Suter, Hasler and Vetter 38 ). Thus a non-caloric mechanism must be taken into consideration for alcohol to contribute to abdominal obesity. Endocrine changes due to alcohol intake seem to be of importance. Alcohol alters steroid metabolism in the liver, which subsequently induces fat accumulation( Reference Bjorntorp 39 ). With activation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, alcohol consumption leads to the release of cortisol, resulting in suppression of fat oxidation with accumulation of mono-oxidized fat in the abdomen( Reference Suter, Schutz and Jequier 40 ). Also, alcohol has catabolic effects on muscle by affecting levels of anabolic sex hormones and growth hormone, which are necessary for preserving muscle mass( Reference Riserus and Ingelsson 28 ). Through these mechanisms, abdominal obesity increases fat deposition in the liver and muscles or around vessels and induces insulin resistance, leading to CVD such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia following atherosclerosis( Reference Sahakyan, Somers and Rodriguez-Escudero 10 ). Furthermore, abdominal adiposity in normal-weight individuals may imply excess fat in the trunk, representing relatively lower appendicular skeletal muscle mass, which is known as sarcopenic obesity. Both central obesity and sarcopenic obesity are known to be strongly associated with metabolic risk( Reference Despres 41 ). Therefore, normal-weight persons with increased abdominal fat deposition are at risk of developing an adverse metabolic profile.
In our study, alcohol drinking frequency had no significant association with abdominal obesity in normal-weight subjects. A few studies have suggested that drinking frequency was inversely associated with high BMI(18, Reference Dorn, Hovey and Muti 42 ). Another finding in a representative Korean population showed that drinking frequency was not associated with prevalence of metabolic syndrome( Reference Lee 26 ). There is a scarcity of evidence on the relationship between abdominal obesity and alcohol drinking frequency conducted in normal-weight subjects. Increased thermogenesis by alcohol consumption may be the biological mechanism behind the results in the present study. Alcohol metabolism uses three different pathways: the alcohol dehydrogenase pathway, the microsomal ethanol-oxidizing system and oxidation by catalase( Reference Suter, Hasler and Vetter 38 ). Although alcohol is mostly degraded by the alcohol dehydrogenase pathway, frequent alcohol drinking also activates the microsomal ethanol-oxidizing system, resulting in increased energy consumption through its thermogenic effect( Reference Tolstrup, Heitmann and Tjonneland 18 ). This effect may be in balance with various metabolic alterations induced by alcohol consumption and additional energy from alcohol intake( Reference Tolstrup, Heitmann and Tjonneland 18 ). Therefore, alcohol drinking frequency may not be causally related to body weight or fat accumulation; rather, high alcohol intake over the threshold based on sex may have an effect on abdominal obesity in normal-weight individuals.
There are several limitations in our study. First, due to the cross-sectional study design, it is difficult to infer causality. Also, the potential for reverse causality may be found. It is plausible that a person with abdominal obesity was affected by alcohol drinking habit, such as underestimating his/her alcohol consumption or stopping drinking alcohol in order to reduce energy intake. Second, because alcohol drinking pattern was measured by self-report on questionnaires, it is subject to reporting bias. As KNHANES does not have any procedure in the data collection to avoid this possibility except for initial validation of the study protocol, it may underestimate the effect size of the association in our study. In addition, we could not identify which alcoholic beverages specially promote abdominal fat deposition, because the types of alcoholic beverage were not classified. Third, a single day’s dietary recall method in our study limits day-to-day variability in intake. The availability of multiple 24 h recalls will provide a more accurate assessment of usual intake at the individual level. Fourth, as our study combined participants from three waves of KNHANES, there might be a chance to include overlapping of some study subjects. However, there is little possibility of this type of bias because the survey is cross-checking the repeated cluster sampling. Finally, due to lack of imaging data of adipose tissue, information on body fat distribution was based on anthropometric indicators, such as WC, alone. However, despite these limitations, the current study examined whether alcohol drinking patterns are associated with abdominal obesity in normal-weight adults using the largest representative database of the general Korean population. In addition, adjustment for several important confounders including other drinking pattern and energy intake is another strength of the present study.
Conclusion
Overall, the amount of alcohol drinking per occasion was significantly associated with abdominal obesity in normal-weight individuals aged 40–69 years in both sexes. Consumption of 7 or more standard drinks per occasion was positively associated with normal-weight abdominal obesity in middle-aged men; 10 or more standard drinks per occasion in middle-aged women. No significant relationship was found between alcohol drinking frequency and normal-weight abdominal obesity. Male every-day binge drinkers with normal weight had higher odds of abdominal obesity; there was no significant association in women. It has been suggested that normal-weight persons with abdominal obesity may represent an important target population for lifestyle modification and other preventive strategies( Reference MacInnis, Hodge and Dixon 21 ), and our results are consistent with data indicating increased risk of abdominal obesity in normal-weight drinkers with a certain alcohol drinking pattern. Given that BMI may not be an accurate measurement of obesity, especially in persons with higher body fat and normal BMI( Reference Okorodudu, Jumean and Montori 43 ), we recommend that clinicians utilize other measurements of central adiposity such as WHR or WC, in addition to BMI, to diagnose obesity and predict obesity-related cardiovascular risks. Lifestyle interventions including proper drinking guidelines and management of obesity-related health risks may be necessary in normal-weight individuals with abdominal obesity.
Acknowledgements
Financial support: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: All authors (K.-Y.P., H.-K.P. and H.-S.H.) contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of the results and development of the final manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Institutional Review Board on Human Subjects Research and the Ethics Committee of Hanyang University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
