Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8v9h9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T02:29:11.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ontogenetic analysis of Anisian (Middle Triassic) ptychitid ammonoids from Nevada, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2020

Eva A. Bischof*
Affiliation:
Geowissenschaftliche Sammlung, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universität Bremen, Leobener Strasse 8, 28357 Bremen, Germany ,
Jens Lehmann
Affiliation:
Geowissenschaftliche Sammlung, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universität Bremen, Leobener Strasse 8, 28357 Bremen, Germany ,
*
*Corresponding author

Abstract

Ptychites is among the most widely distributed ammonoid genera of the Triassic and is namesake of a family and superfamily. However, representatives of the genus mostly show low-level phenotypic disparity. Furthermore, a large number of taxa are based on only a few poorly preserved specimens, creating challenges to determine ptychitid taxonomy. Consequently, a novel approach is needed to improve ptychitid diversity studies. Here, we investigate Ptychites spp. from the middle and late Anisian of Nevada. The species recorded include Ptychites embreei n. sp., which is distinguished by an average conch diameter that is much smaller and shows a more evolute coiling than most of its relatives. The new species ranges from the Gymnotoceras mimetus to the Gymnotoceras rotelliformis zones, which makes it the longest-ranging species of the genus. For the first time, the ontogenetic development of Ptychites was obtained from cross sections where possible. Cross-sectioning highlights unique ontogenetic trajectories in ptychitids. This demonstrates that, despite showing little phenotypic disparity, Ptychites was highly ontogenetically differentiated, and thus the high taxonomic diversity at the species level is justified for the species investigated.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/5abe2487-8a00-4b48-adc7-ec7db7a097f7

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2020, The Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. (1) Middle Triassic paleogeographical setting. Nevada as well as other important localities of Ptychites spp. are marked. Redrawn from Péron et al. (2005), Brayard et al. (2006), and Skrzycki et al. (2018). (2, 3) Location of the study area in NW Nevada, USA. The most important localities of Fossil Hill Member outcrops are marked.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Measured lithostratigraphic sections in the Muller and Favret canyons of the Augusta Mountains, Pershing County, NW Nevada, USA from where our specimens were collected. Black dots: Beds within our measured sections; Gray dots: JJ-localities documented by J. Jenks, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Gray triangle: HB-locality, documented by H. Bucher, Zurich, Switzerland (Monnet and Bucher, 2005).

Figure 2

Figure 3. (1–4)Ptychites wrighti, from north side of Favret Canyon, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County; (3) cast of deeply incised and funnel-shaped umbilicus, NMMNH 80882. (5–7) Ptychites guloensis, Favret Canyon, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County, GSUB C13194. (8–10) Ptychites gradinarui, Favret Canyon, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County, GSUB C13196.

Figure 3

Table 1. Measurements in mm of one specimen of Ptychites guloensis Tozer, 1994 collected in the Fossil Hill Member of the Favret Formation at the Muller Canyon locality in the Augusta Mountains, Pershing County, Nevada, USA. For further details on the bed number, see Figure 2 (“Bed No.”). uw: maximum umbilical width; ww: maximum whorl width; dm: maximum diameter of shell.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Suture line of Ptychites guloensis, (1) GSUB C13194 compared to (2) Tozer (1994, p. 444, fig. 35e). Bracketed letters indicate traditional suture nomenclature.

Figure 5

Table 2. Measurements in mm of one specimen of Ptychites wrighti McLearn, 1946 collected by J. Jenks in the Fossil Hill Member of the Favret Formation, Pershing County, Nevada, USA. For further details on the bed number, see Figure 2 (“Bed No.”). uw: maximum umbilical width; ww: maximum whorl width; dm: maximum diameter of shell.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Ptychites gradinarui (1–6) from Rieber Gulch, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County, (1–3) NMMNH 80878, (4–6) NMMNH 80879; (7–14) from the Wildhorse-McCoy mine area, Churchill County, (7–10) GSUB C11443, (9) cast of deeply incised and funnel-shaped umbilicus; (11–14) NMMNH 80880, (12, 14) casts of deeply incised and funnel-shaped umbilicus.

Figure 7

Table 3. Measurements in mm of selected specimens of Ptychites gradinarui Bucher, 1992 collected by J. Jenks and us in the Fossil Hill Member of the Favret Formation, Churchill and Pershing counties, Nevada, USA. For further details on the bed number, see Figure 2 (“Bed No.”). uw: maximum umbilical width; ww: maximum whorl width; dm: maximum diameter of shell; (): Fragmented specimens, estimated values; *: specimen used for ontogenetic analysis, cast present.

Figure 8

Figure 6. (1–11) Ptychites gradinarui (1–5) from Rieber Gulch, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County, (1–3) GSUB C11442, (4, 5) GSUB C11441; (6–11) from the Wildhorse-McCoy Mine area, Churchill County, (6, 7) GSUB C11440, (8–11) NMMNH 80877, (10) cast of deeply incised and funnel-shaped umbilicus. (12–14) Ptychites densistriatus from the south side of Favret Canyon, Augusta Mountain, Pershing County, NMMNH 80881.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Adult suture of Ptychites gradinarui. Bracketed letters indicate traditional suture nomenclature. (1, 2) Suture lines drawn from specimen GSUB C13196, of which (2) is reversed. (3) Reversed suture line redrawn from Bucher, 1992, text-figure 22a.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Ontogenetic analysis of Ptychites gradinarui. (1) Cross section of the largest discoidal specimen GSUB C11443, scale bar units 5 mm. (2–4) Ontogenetic development of the whorl expansion rate (WERn = (dmn/dmn-0.5)2), whorl width index (WWIn = wwn/whn), umbilical width index (UWIn = uwn/dmn), and the conch width index (CWIn = wwn/dmn) plotted against number of half whorls (ontogenetic stages). (5) Ratio between UWI and CWI of the available specimens. Bubble size refers to number of half whorl; the picture in the background shows the shape of the last complete whorl (developed by Korn, 2010). Roman numbers refer to interpretation of different life phases; I: Hatchling, II: Juvenile; III: Subadult–adult; for more detailed explanations see Walton and Korn (2017, p. 713).

Figure 11

Figure 9. (1–3) Ptychites densistriatus from Favret Canyon, Pershing County, Nevada, GSUB C11439. (4–10) Ptychites embreei n. sp. from Muller Canyon, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County, (4) GSUB C8273 (paratype), (5–7) GSUB C8254, (8–10) GSUB C8287 (paratype).

Figure 12

Table 4. Measurements in mm of selected specimens of Ptychites densistriatus Bucher, 1992 collected by J. Jenks in the Fossil Hill Member of the Favret Formation. Pershing County, Nevada, USA. For further details on the bed number, see Figure 2 (“Bed No.”). uw: maximum umbilical width; ww: maximum whorl width; dm: maximum diameter of shell; (): fragmented specimen, estimated value;**: specimen used for ontogenetic analysis, preservation not sufficient, cast present.

Figure 13

Figure 10. Ptychites embreei n. sp. from Muller Canyon, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County. (1–3) GSUB C8272, (4–6) GSUB C10313, (7–9) GSUB C8289 (paratype).

Figure 14

Figure 11. Ptychites embreei n. sp. from Muller Canyon, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County. (1–3) GSUB C8280 (paratype), (4–6) GSUB C9458 (paratype), (7–9) GSUB C9455, (10–12) GSUB C9642.

Figure 15

Figure 12. (1, 2) Holotype GSUB C9453 of Ptychites embreei n. sp. from Muller Canyon, Augusta Mountains, Pershing County.

Figure 16

Figure 13. Ontogenetic analysis of Ptychites embreei n. sp. (1) Cross section of specimen GSUB C9642, scale bar units 5 mm. (2–4): Ontogenetic development of the whorl expansion rate (WERn = (dmn/dmn-0.5)2), whorl width index (WWIn = wwn/whn), umbilical width index (UWIn = uwn/dmn) and the conch width index (CWIn = wwn/dmn) plotted against number of half whorls (ontogenetic stages). (5) Ratio between UWI and CWI of the available specimens. Bubble size refers to number of half whorl; the picture in the background shows the shape of the last complete whorl (developed by Korn, 2010). Roman numbers refer to interpretation of different life phases; I: Hatchling, II: Juvenile; III: Subadult–adult; for more detailed explanations see Walton and Korn (2017).

Figure 17

Table 5. Measurements in mm of selected specimen of Ptychites embreei n. sp. collected in the Fossil Hill Member of the Favret Formation at the Muller Canyon locality in the Augusta Mountains. Pershing County. Nevada. USA. Further details on the bed number see Figure 2 (“Bed No.”). uw: maximum umbilical width; ww: Maximum whorl width; dm: maximum diameter of shell; (): fragmented specimen, estimated value; *: specimens used for ontogenetic analysis, cast present; **: specimen used for ontogenetic analysis, preservation not sufficient, cast present; H: holotype.

Figure 18

Table 6. Morphologic comparison of different species of Ptychites of the P. opulentus group to the newly introduced species P. embreei n. sp. For biostratigraphic and geographic distribution, see Figure 15. U and uw: maximum umbilical width; D and dm: maximum diameter of conch; S.s.: Small specimens; L.s.: Large specimens.

Figure 19

Figure 14. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of combined ontogenetic stages of all available specimens of Ptychites gradinarui and Ptychites embreei n. sp. The parameters whorl expansion rate (WER), umbilical width index (UWI), and conch width index (CWI) were used. Every individual is defined by the sum of all parameters of all ontogenetic stages. Black dots P. gradinarui, gray dots P. embreei n. sp.

Figure 20

Figure 15. Biostratigraphic distribution of Ptychites spp. The biostratigraphic framework and correlation of Nevada, British Columbia, and the Tethyan realm follows Jenks et al. (2015). For the correlation of Spitsbergen, Harland and Geddes (1997) and Weitschat and Lehmann (1983) were used. Only representatives of Ptychites discussed in this publication are listed in this table. Therefore, empty boxes do not necessarily indicate the absence of all Ptychites spp. * Indicates location of the “Ptychiten Kalke—Ptychites layers” (e.g., Mojsisovics, 1886; Spath, 1921; Gugenberger, 1927; Rosenberg, 1952; Harland and Geddes, 1997). Paleogeographic locations of the localities are provided in Figure 1. ** According to Weitschat (1986, p. 253), the preservation of middle Anisian ammonoids of Spitsbergen is not sufficient for a successful zonation of the area. Crosses mark gaps in the ammonoid biostratigraphic framework.