Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T20:51:10.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gut microbiota composition is associated with body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

A. Santacruz
Affiliation:
Microbial Ecophysiology and Nutrition Group, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Valencia, Spain
M. C. Collado
Affiliation:
Microbial Ecophysiology and Nutrition Group, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Valencia, Spain
L. García-Valdés
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
M. T. Segura
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
J. A. Martín-Lagos
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
T. Anjos
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
M. Martí-Romero
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
R. M. Lopez
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
J. Florido
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
C. Campoy
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Y. Sanz*
Affiliation:
Microbial Ecophysiology and Nutrition Group, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology (IATA), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Valencia, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Yolanda Sanz, fax +34 963636301, email yolsanz@iata.csic.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obesity is associated with complications during pregnancy and increased health risks in the newborn. The objective of the present study was to establish possible relationships between gut microbiota, body weight, weight gain and biochemical parameters in pregnant women. Fifty pregnant women were classified according to their BMI in normal-weight (n 34) and overweight (n 16) groups. Gut microbiota composition was analysed by quantitative real-time PCR in faeces and biochemical parameters in plasma at 24 weeks of pregnancy. Reduced numbers of Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides and increased numbers of Staphylococcus, Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia coli were detected in overweight compared with normal-weight pregnant women. E. coli numbers were higher in women with excessive weight gain than in women with normal weight gain during pregnancy, while Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia muciniphila showed an opposite trend. In the whole population, increased total bacteria and Staphylococcus numbers were related to increased plasma cholesterol levels. Increased Bacteroides numbers were related to increased HDL-cholesterol and folic acid levels, and reduced TAG levels. Increased Bifidobacterium numbers were related to increased folic acid levels. Increased Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli numbers were related to increased ferritin and reduced transferrin, while Bifidobacterium levels showed the opposite trend. Therefore, gut microbiota composition is related to body weight, weight gain and metabolic biomarkers during pregnancy, which might be of relevance to the management of the health of women and infants.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010
Figure 0

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the studied subjects(Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 1

Table 2 Daily energy and nutrient intake in normal-weight and overweight women at 24 weeks of pregnancy(Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 2

Table 3 Biochemical parameters recorded at 24 weeks of pregnancy of normal-weight (BMI<25 kg/m2) and overweight women (BMI>25 kg/m2)(Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 3

Table 4 Bacterial numbers in faecal samples (cell equivalents (genome equivalents) per g faeces) analysed by quantitative real-time PCR at 24 weeks of pregnancy(Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Relationships between numbers of faecal bacterial groups and weight. Data represent the positive samples. The line in the box is the median (50 % percentile), with the lower line being the lower 25 % border (25 % percentile) and the upper line the 75 % (75 % percentile) border. The end of the upper vertical line is the maximum data value, outliers not considered. The end of the lower vertical line is the lowest value, outliers not considered. The separate dots or asterisks indicate outliers. Lines show the Spearman correlation (linear adjustment). (a) Staphylococcus (R 0·67; P = 0·003); (b) Enterobacteriaceae (R 0·46; P < 0·001); (c) Escherichia coli (R 0·40; P = 0·004); (d) Bifidobacterium (R − 0·56; P < 0·001); (e) Bacteroides (R − 0·34; P = 0·020).

Figure 5

Table 5 Bacterial numbers in faecal samples (cell equivalents (genome equivalents) per g faeces) analysed by quantitative real-time PCR according to recommended weight gain over pregnancy(Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 6

Fig. 2 Relationships between numbers of faecal bacterial groups and weight gain over pregnancy. Data represent the positive samples. The line in the box is the median (50 % percentile), with the lower line being the lower 25 % border (25 % percentile) and the upper line the 75 % (75 % percentile) border. The end of the upper vertical line is the maximum data value, outliers not considered. The end of the lower vertical line is the lowest value, outliers not considered. The separate dots or asterisks indicate outliers. Lines show the Spearman correlation (linear adjustment). (a) Akkermansia muciniphila (R − 0·34; P = 0·017); (b) Bifidobacterium (R − 0·31; P = 0·029); (c) Enterobacteriaceae (R 0·28; P = 0·050); (d) Escherichia coli (R 0·42; P = 0·002).